Open Access e-Journal Cardiometry No.16 May 2020

We should mention that Cardiometry is a fine diagnostics tool to assess heart life expectancy. Our experts, using Cardiocode in “red zones” in intensive care units, have confirmed effectiveness of noninvasive measuring of the hemodynamics data on the cardiovascular system performance in critical patients with different severity degrees. The medical staff involved had a possibility not only to monitor the state in each critical patient, but also to predict and control the progression of a disease. We are going to publish some results of this pilot study in our next issues. We should mention that Cardiometry is a fine diagnostics tool to assess heart life expectancy. Our experts, using Cardiocode in “red zones” in intensive care units, have confirmed effectiveness of noninvasive measuring of the hemodynamics data on the cardiovascular system performance in critical patients with different severity degrees. The medical staff involved had a possibility not only to monitor the state in each critical patient, but also to predict and control the progression of a disease. We are going to publish some results of this pilot study in our next issues.

03.06.2020 Views

Table 4. AHD effects made on SHDAHD groupAHDEffect by AHD* onSHD (Code)Nitrendipine 312Calcium antagonistsNifedipine 313Diltiazem 112Amlodipine 212Perindopril, Enalapril 213ACE inhibitorsZofenopril, Kaptopril, Chinopril, Lizinopril, Ramipril,Fosinopril212Betaxolol 111Nevibilol 112Beta-blockersAtenolol, Bisoprolol, Metoprolol 141Losartan 113Angiotensin receptor blockers Valsartan, Candesartan, Eprosartan, Irbesartan, Telmisartan 212Selective imidazoline receptor agonist Moxonidin 212Diuretics Dichlotiazide, Indapamide 212Table 5. AHD selection priorityOrder ofpriority inCharacteristicAHD selection1 Normalizing improperly changed (increased or decreased) parameters, not affecting the normal levels2 Normalizing improperly increased parameters, but decreasing the normal parameter3 Normalizing improperly increased parameters, not affecting the decreased parameter4 Normalizing improperly decreased parameters; not affecting the normal parameter5 Normalizing improperly decreased parameters, decreasing the normal parameter6 Normalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other twoNormalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other one and decreasing the normal value of one7more parameterNormalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other one and increasing the normal value of one more8parameterTable 6. AHD rating corresponding to individual SHD profilesSHD* profileHR/SPVR/SIАP>140 АP>160 АP>170 Code and rating for AHD administration**112 17.6 3.6 0 112, 111, 141, 212, 113113 5.2 0 0 113, 112, 213, 212121 0.7 4.5 2 111, 141, 212, 112122 15.3 0 0 112, 141, 111, 212, 113, 213123 1.1 0 0 113, 112, 213, 212211 11.8 12.5 10.4 111, 212, 112212 4.5 32.1 37.6 212, 112, 111, 141, 213221 18.1 14.3 8.3 111, 212, 112222 7 0 0 212, 112, 111, 141, 213, 312311 7.1 18.7 22.9 212, 312321 11.2 14.3 18.8 312, 212*The SHD profile is ratio HR / SPVR/ SI, where 1 - increased value of the parameter; 2 - normal value of the parameter;3 - decreased value of the parameter.** AHD Code - effect produced by AHD on HR/SPVR/SI, where 1 - decreasing the parameter; 2 - not affecting the parameter;3 - increasing the parameter.40 | Cardiometry | Issue 16. May 2020

The mapping between the SHD profile and theAHD actions and effects on SHD is implemented byassigning a three-digit code (Code) to each drug; thefirst item of the Code exhibits the effect of AHD onHR (1- HR decrease, 2 - no effect, 3 – HR increase);the second item of the Code indicates the effect madeby AHD on TPVR (1- TPVR decrease, 2 - no effect,3 – TPVR increase 4 – increase of the parameter inthe first month, and decrease therein after a month,etc.); the third Code item marks the effect producedby AHD on SV (1- SV decrease, 2 - no effect, 3 – SVincrease) (see Table 4 herein).The priority in selection of AHD definitely dependson the degree of its modulating effect producedon an individual SHD profile. Selected should be sucha medical drug which is capable of normalizing improperlychanged (increased or decreased) parametersof HR, SV and TPVR, but not affecting the SHD valuesremaining within the normal range. Characteristicsof medical drugs of the second and next order ofthe priority are summarized by Table 5 herein.Having identified the correlation between the individualSHD profile and the respective AHD, we candetermine the rating modulating effect of the drugs oneach SHD profile (see Table 6 herein).Conclusions1. Hemodynamic disorders appear at the preclinicalstage of AH, well in advance (perhaps several decades)before the first recorded AH episodes.2. In patients with increased AP, 15 variations of theSHD profiles are identified.3. A hemodynamic effect of each AHD is determinedby its pharmacodynamics as well as the patient’s individualSHD profile.4. Taking into account of an individual SHD profileis an additional criterion for the AHD selection to increasethe efficacy of the treatment based on the abovementioned Guidelines. The given conclusion is basedon the evidence data, which have been obtained by usearlier and which have demonstrated the effectivenessof this technology in nine times out of ten cases [9].Statement on ethical issuesResearch involving people and/or animals is in fullcompliance with current national and internationalethical standards.Conflict of interestNone declared.Author contributionsThe authors read the ICMJE criteria for authorship andapproved the final manuscript.References1. The 2018 ESC / ESH Guidelines for the treatment ofpatients with hypertension.2. Zayko NN, Byts YV, Ataman AV, et al. PathologicalPhysiology [Textbook for med. universities]. K .: "Logos",1996. [in Russian]3. Intensive therapy. Guidelines for doctors. Ed. byMalyshev VD. Moscow: Medicine, 2002. [in Russian]4. Yakushin MA, Dasaev LA, Matyukhina EB. Algorithmof drug treatment of hypertension in middle and old age.Uspekhi Gerontologii. 2011;24(4):674-80. [in Russian]5. Gnedov DV. To a question on the status of systemichemodynamics in today's youth. Bulletin of MedicalInstitute Reaviz. 2018;6(36):36-7. [in Russian]6. Horoshinina LP. Geriatrics. Guidance for doctors-GEOTARMedia, 2019. 698 p. [in Russian]7. Zidek V. Hypertension. GEOTAR Media, 2009. 206с. [in Russian]8. Roitberg GE. Metabolic syndrome. Moscow: MEDpress-inform,2007. 224 p. [in Russian]9. Yakushin MA, Aleksandrova O, Yakushina TI,Vasilieva TP. Expert system for monitoring and correctionof hemodynamic system in solving the strategicproblems of public health. Practical medicine.2019;17(5):241-9. [in Russian]Issue 16. May 2020 | Cardiometry | 41

Table 4. AHD effects made on SHD

AHD group

AHD

Effect by AHD* on

SHD (Code)

Nitrendipine 312

Calcium antagonists

Nifedipine 313

Diltiazem 112

Amlodipine 212

Perindopril, Enalapril 213

ACE inhibitors

Zofenopril, Kaptopril, Chinopril, Lizinopril, Ramipril,

Fosinopril

212

Betaxolol 111

Nevibilol 112

Beta-blockers

Atenolol, Bisoprolol, Metoprolol 141

Losartan 113

Angiotensin receptor blockers Valsartan, Candesartan, Eprosartan, Irbesartan, Telmisartan 212

Selective imidazoline receptor agonist Moxonidin 212

Diuretics Dichlotiazide, Indapamide 212

Table 5. AHD selection priority

Order of

priority in

Characteristic

AHD selection

1 Normalizing improperly changed (increased or decreased) parameters, not affecting the normal levels

2 Normalizing improperly increased parameters, but decreasing the normal parameter

3 Normalizing improperly increased parameters, not affecting the decreased parameter

4 Normalizing improperly decreased parameters; not affecting the normal parameter

5 Normalizing improperly decreased parameters, decreasing the normal parameter

6 Normalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other two

Normalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other one and decreasing the normal value of one

7

more parameter

Normalizing one of the parameters, not affecting the other one and increasing the normal value of one more

8

parameter

Table 6. AHD rating corresponding to individual SHD profiles

SHD* profile

HR/SPVR/SI

АP>140 АP>160 АP>170 Code and rating for AHD administration**

112 17.6 3.6 0 112, 111, 141, 212, 113

113 5.2 0 0 113, 112, 213, 212

121 0.7 4.5 2 111, 141, 212, 112

122 15.3 0 0 112, 141, 111, 212, 113, 213

123 1.1 0 0 113, 112, 213, 212

211 11.8 12.5 10.4 111, 212, 112

212 4.5 32.1 37.6 212, 112, 111, 141, 213

221 18.1 14.3 8.3 111, 212, 112

222 7 0 0 212, 112, 111, 141, 213, 312

311 7.1 18.7 22.9 212, 312

321 11.2 14.3 18.8 312, 212

*The SHD profile is ratio HR / SPVR/ SI, where 1 - increased value of the parameter; 2 - normal value of the parameter;

3 - decreased value of the parameter.

** AHD Code - effect produced by AHD on HR/SPVR/SI, where 1 - decreasing the parameter; 2 - not affecting the parameter;

3 - increasing the parameter.

40 | Cardiometry | Issue 16. May 2020

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!