Open Access e-Journal Cardiometry No.16 May 2020
We should mention that Cardiometry is a fine diagnostics tool to assess heart life expectancy. Our experts, using Cardiocode in “red zones” in intensive care units, have confirmed effectiveness of noninvasive measuring of the hemodynamics data on the cardiovascular system performance in critical patients with different severity degrees. The medical staff involved had a possibility not only to monitor the state in each critical patient, but also to predict and control the progression of a disease. We are going to publish some results of this pilot study in our next issues. We should mention that Cardiometry is a fine diagnostics tool to assess heart life expectancy. Our experts, using Cardiocode in “red zones” in intensive care units, have confirmed effectiveness of noninvasive measuring of the hemodynamics data on the cardiovascular system performance in critical patients with different severity degrees. The medical staff involved had a possibility not only to monitor the state in each critical patient, but also to predict and control the progression of a disease. We are going to publish some results of this pilot study in our next issues.
the problem of the recommender system inability todistinguish similar items with different names. Thesame items having different names are called synonymous.Most modern systems are not able to discoverthe hidden connections between synonymous items.Interesting can also be the problem of “white raven"."White ravens" are users who have diverse tastes, theiropinions do not always coincide with the majority ofothers. Accordingly, it is impossible to recommendanything. But it should be noted that the problems ofthese people come from real life, so it would not beentirely correct to call it a problem of recommendersystems. The advantage of collaborative filtering is atheoretical accuracy.In content-based filtering the profiles of users anditems are created. User profiles may include demographicinformation or answers to a specific set ofquestions. [14] Profiles of items can include the namesof genres, actor names, artist names, etc., depending onthe type of item. Items similar to those that the user hasalready used, are recommended to the user. Similarityis estimated on the basis of the items’ content. Themain problems of these systems are the strong dependenceon the subject area, as well as the fact that theusefulness of recommendations is limited. Advantageof this approach is that it can recommend to even unfamiliarusers, thereby bringing them into service, it ispossible to recommend the items that have not yet beenevaluated by anyone. Disadvantage is a lower accuracy.Hybrid systems, as the name implies, combinesboth filterings, increasing the efficiency (and complexity)of recommender systems. Combining the resultsof the previous two types of filtering with a highprobability can improve prediction accuracy [15-20].In addition, hybrid systems can partially solve theproblem of the so-called "cold start" inherent in collaborativefiltering. The hybrid approach first weighsthe results according to the principles of the contentfiltering, and then, as soon as sufficient data on theanalyzed user obtained, shifts the weights toward thecollaborative filtering.Knowledge-based recommender systemsIn addition to the recommender systems, appearedat the dawn of the artificial intelligence development,i.e., content-basd and collaborative, currently there aremany systems that use in their work several differentprinciples. Example of such systems may be a so-called"recommendations based on knowledge”. The data inthem are not descriptive evaluations but deeper relationships.Knowledge-based, in some formal features,can be attributed to the content-based approach, butaccording to the existing classifications it is still referredto a separate class. In the knowledge-based recommendationsconsidered are only the common characteristicsof items, but deeper dependency are based on.Information processed by "recommendations basedon knowledge", can be divided into: (a) rules (metrics)of similarity and (b) the items of interest. The systemrecommends items based on the user desires. User formulateshis preferences in terms of the element properties,which, in turn, are presented in terms of rules(restrictions). A detailed review of decision-makingmechanisms that can be used in filters of this kind aredescribed in [21].Hybrid recommender systems, in turn, can be dividedinto mixed-type, cascade and context.Mixed-type strategyThe basis for a mixed-type hybrid model is a presentationof recommendations in a single integratedview. Data obtained as a result of other types of filtering,are assigned a certain weight. For example, anitem that was the highest rated in the collaborative filtering,obtains 100 points, an item best estimated inthe content-based filtering, obtains 50 points, etc.Cascade strategyAccording to the name, this method is characterizedby cyclical way of building recommendations.The initial iteration is the algorithm, that is a grossfilter, and all subsequent operations more and morerefine results.Context strategyThe main, characteristic of all existing recommendersystems, mechanism of work is to developrecommendations based solely on the previously recordedratings and user preferences. [22] This mechanismhas been used for a long time and therefore it isconsidered that it has developed all of its computingcapacity, i.e. it is impossible to increase the effectivenessof recommendations using only this mechanism.There appears a need to use new data to make recommendations.Context can play a role of these new data.Context is a data representing a characteristic ofthe situation in which the user is located and in which100 | Cardiometry | Issue 16. May 2020
the evaluation of the item occurs. In general, the contextcan be divided into 2 following types:- context in which the user preferences are fixed;- context in which the recommendation is formed;Context can also be divided into the followingtypes:- time, location, type of user activity, weather, light andthe like, i.e., physical context;- presence of others and their roles, social context;- specifications of the instrument, with the help ofwhich access to the information is supported, i.e. devicecontext;- nature of the user, his experience, cognitive abilities,i.e. modal context.Of course, all this makes sense only if the informationlisted above has a major impact on the selection ofan item, carried out by the user.Practical experience of the context recommendationsapplication shows that the most valuable is theinformation about the current user, behavior of usersin general, properties of recommended products andcontext of the current user interest [1-3].Based on the experience obtained by many developers,we can conclude that the context application inrecommendations is a promising direction.The application of context can get rid of the problemstypical to many recommender systems, especiallycollaborative ones: cold start (context allows tocharacterize a new user based on his psychologicaland national data, mood and professional affiliation),unusual user problems (taking into account individualcharacteristics makes it possible to personalize therecommendations in the best way), triviality of recommendations,"filter bubble" (the context allows us notto be limited by user's last points of view). However, inthe context systems, the problem of resource-intensivecomputations due to the large amount of data tobe processed remains, and even increases.Recommender systems in cardiologyOver the past few decades, number of medicaldata (test results, patient health records, treatmentplans, and others) has reached enormous volumes.Consequently, the amount of information availablefor decision-making on patient treatment, increasedsignificantly, but the problem is that this informationis presented on various websites and resources and togather it together is quite difficult. As a solution nowproposed is the creation of personal electronic healthcards (PEHC), which would be stored on a single resource,and would be available to both the patient andhealth care provider.Moreover, recommender systems start being usedin the medical field more often. These systems areused both by doctors and patients. The system allowsdoctors to speed up and simplify the process of diagnostics,the patient is able to get a preliminary consultation.Ricci et al. allocated the recommendationsystems used in medicine, in a separate group, andcalled it "medical recommender system (MRS)»[6].The MRS item is not confidential, scientifically proven,not tied to a particular patient medical information.MRS receives and processes data from PEHCof each particular user and on the basis of them buildsthe recommendations. Both the physician and patientget access to the MRS.MRS are designed to provide the user with highquality relevant content. To achieve a high level of relevancea broader context should be considered. MRStakes into account the complex relationship betweenhealth concepts, decipher acronyms and interpretcodes of medical classifications, adapts information tounderstand by an ordinary patient. Such systems areable to reduce the effect of information overload at theend user.MRS determines the information needs of a particularuser by analyzing PEHC records, user's searchqueries or by tracing the history of user views. To obtainhighly relevant recommendations many computingmethods are used. First of all, information retrieval(IR).Information retrieval is the process of searchingunstructured information, which satisfies informationneeds [23,24].Term "information retrieval" was first introducedby Kelvin Muersom in 1948 in his doctoral dissertation,published and used in the literature since 1950.Information retrieval is a process of identifying aset of documents in all those that satisfy a predeterminedsearch condition (query) or contain the necessarydata. In most cases, the information retrieval includeswording, determination of information sources,retrieval of information from these sources, and finalstage, acquaintance with information received andevaluation of the results.The retrieval methods are the following: address,semantic, documentary and factual.Issue 16. May 2020 | Cardiometry | 101
- Page 51 and 52: vascular system condition, using an
- Page 53 and 54: 4. Papers devoted to the AH treatme
- Page 55 and 56: 2019;2(12):18-23. https://doi.org/1
- Page 57 and 58: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Submitted: 17.01.
- Page 59 and 60: The statistical analysis of the obt
- Page 61 and 62: Table 7Eigenvalues and percentage o
- Page 63 and 64: but also as a means for active mode
- Page 65 and 66: values [6]. Both groups are homogen
- Page 67 and 68: Table 2No. of ind.BMIAge, yearsHb,
- Page 69 and 70: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Submitted: 18.03.
- Page 71 and 72: а) b)Figure 1. Fragments of the bl
- Page 73 and 74: а)b)cd)Figure 3. Fragments of seru
- Page 75 and 76: zation of the facias and add to the
- Page 77 and 78: PV5 - blood volume (part of SV), pu
- Page 79 and 80: Conflict of interestNone declared.A
- Page 81 and 82: Issue 16. May 2020 | Cardiometry |
- Page 83 and 84: the action of high level energy. Ac
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 5. Diagram of “a multipuls
- Page 87 and 88: REPORT Submitted: 25.02.2020; Accep
- Page 89 and 90: used to suppress this sort of noise
- Page 91 and 92: tion v[n] using HFF, then the final
- Page 93 and 94: jω jω jωZe ( ) = Xe ( ) H1( e )
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 4. Filtering of the ECG sign
- Page 97 and 98: Significant data have been obtained
- Page 99 and 100: REVIEW Submitted: 5.03.2020; Accept
- Page 101: companies have even made the implem
- Page 105 and 106: XFig.1. Medical recommender system
- Page 107 and 108: System Using Collaborative Filterin
- Page 109 and 110: processing analysis, in particular
- Page 111 and 112: Statement on ethical issuesResearch
- Page 113 and 114: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Submitted: 12.01.
- Page 115 and 116: Table 1Descriptive statistics of pa
- Page 117 and 118: ison to non-diabetic patients but s
- Page 119 and 120: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Submitted: 4.12.2
- Page 121 and 122: The data have been collected and th
- Page 123 and 124: It is known that the main mechanism
the evaluation of the item occurs. In general, the context
can be divided into 2 following types:
- context in which the user preferences are fixed;
- context in which the recommendation is formed;
Context can also be divided into the following
types:
- time, location, type of user activity, weather, light and
the like, i.e., physical context;
- presence of others and their roles, social context;
- specifications of the instrument, with the help of
which access to the information is supported, i.e. device
context;
- nature of the user, his experience, cognitive abilities,
i.e. modal context.
Of course, all this makes sense only if the information
listed above has a major impact on the selection of
an item, carried out by the user.
Practical experience of the context recommendations
application shows that the most valuable is the
information about the current user, behavior of users
in general, properties of recommended products and
context of the current user interest [1-3].
Based on the experience obtained by many developers,
we can conclude that the context application in
recommendations is a promising direction.
The application of context can get rid of the problems
typical to many recommender systems, especially
collaborative ones: cold start (context allows to
characterize a new user based on his psychological
and national data, mood and professional affiliation),
unusual user problems (taking into account individual
characteristics makes it possible to personalize the
recommendations in the best way), triviality of recommendations,
"filter bubble" (the context allows us not
to be limited by user's last points of view). However, in
the context systems, the problem of resource-intensive
computations due to the large amount of data to
be processed remains, and even increases.
Recommender systems in cardiology
Over the past few decades, number of medical
data (test results, patient health records, treatment
plans, and others) has reached enormous volumes.
Consequently, the amount of information available
for decision-making on patient treatment, increased
significantly, but the problem is that this information
is presented on various websites and resources and to
gather it together is quite difficult. As a solution now
proposed is the creation of personal electronic health
cards (PEHC), which would be stored on a single resource,
and would be available to both the patient and
health care provider.
Moreover, recommender systems start being used
in the medical field more often. These systems are
used both by doctors and patients. The system allows
doctors to speed up and simplify the process of diagnostics,
the patient is able to get a preliminary consultation.
Ricci et al. allocated the recommendation
systems used in medicine, in a separate group, and
called it "medical recommender system (MRS)»[6].
The MRS item is not confidential, scientifically proven,
not tied to a particular patient medical information.
MRS receives and processes data from PEHC
of each particular user and on the basis of them builds
the recommendations. Both the physician and patient
get access to the MRS.
MRS are designed to provide the user with high
quality relevant content. To achieve a high level of relevance
a broader context should be considered. MRS
takes into account the complex relationship between
health concepts, decipher acronyms and interpret
codes of medical classifications, adapts information to
understand by an ordinary patient. Such systems are
able to reduce the effect of information overload at the
end user.
MRS determines the information needs of a particular
user by analyzing PEHC records, user's search
queries or by tracing the history of user views. To obtain
highly relevant recommendations many computing
methods are used. First of all, information retrieval
(IR).
Information retrieval is the process of searching
unstructured information, which satisfies information
needs [23,24].
Term "information retrieval" was first introduced
by Kelvin Muersom in 1948 in his doctoral dissertation,
published and used in the literature since 1950.
Information retrieval is a process of identifying a
set of documents in all those that satisfy a predetermined
search condition (query) or contain the necessary
data. In most cases, the information retrieval includes
wording, determination of information sources,
retrieval of information from these sources, and final
stage, acquaintance with information received and
evaluation of the results.
The retrieval methods are the following: address,
semantic, documentary and factual.
Issue 16. May 2020 | Cardiometry | 101