21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84<br />

.... .<br />

- - .... \ .<br />

•<br />

A<br />

.... .<br />

. - - - - .... \<br />

•<br />

A<br />

.. _ - - - - - ,<br />

•<br />

a)<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

- - - _. - .... .<br />

.... .<br />

.... .<br />

\<br />

. .... \ \<br />

• • •<br />

b)<br />

\<br />

- -- - -, ...<br />

'"'<br />

.... .<br />

- - - - \<br />

•<br />

Figure 3.4: Some lead<strong>in</strong>g order contributions to matrix elements of the operators<br />

.x a A'T} with a = 9 <strong>in</strong> the left pannel and a = 3 <strong>in</strong> the right pannel. All vertices have<br />

ßi = o.<br />

Here, the parametrization 4k + i of the number of pions <strong>in</strong> the state .x is convenient, s<strong>in</strong>ce the pion<br />

self<strong>in</strong>teractions with ßi = 0 have at least four pion field operators. For example, one particular<br />

topological structure of the matrix element .x 9 A'T} with the m<strong>in</strong>imal possible value VA = -4 is<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.4, a). Here, the two disconnected purely pionic subdiagrams lead to the negative<br />

value of VA. Another example correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the lead<strong>in</strong>g order matrix element .x3 A'T} is shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> fig. 3.4, b). Note that no <strong>in</strong>ner pion l<strong>in</strong>es appear <strong>in</strong> the lead<strong>in</strong>g order diagrams apart from those<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to .x 4k +i A'T} with i = 3. In that case one <strong>in</strong>termediate state with one pion may aiso<br />

occur.<br />

Let us count the power of Q for the operator .x4k +iA'T} start<strong>in</strong>g from its m<strong>in</strong>imal value. For that<br />

we def<strong>in</strong>e the order l (l = 0, 1,2,3, ... ) of the operator .xa A'T} to be<br />

(3.214)<br />

and <strong>in</strong>troduce the follow<strong>in</strong>g notation: .x4k + i A/'T}. We will now f<strong>in</strong>d the power v of Q for every term<br />

<strong>in</strong> eq. (3.206). By HK, we denote a vertex from the <strong>in</strong>teraction Hamiltonian HJ, with the <strong>in</strong>dex K,<br />

given by eq. (3.211). Details are relegated to appendix A. It can be seen from eqs. (A.7), (A.10),<br />

(A.12), (A.15) and (A.16) that the m<strong>in</strong>imal possible value of v for the various terms <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.206)<br />

is given by<br />

m<strong>in</strong>(v) = 4 - 3N - 2k (3.215)<br />

In these cases the number of energy denom<strong>in</strong>ators is one less than the number of vertices. This<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>s the difference between eqs. (3.213) and (3.215).<br />

We now show how to solve the system of eqs. (3.205) perturbatively. For that, we def<strong>in</strong>e the order<br />

of r :::: : 0 of eq. (3.206) via<br />

r = v - m<strong>in</strong>(v) . (3.216)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!