21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation o{ nuclear {orces {rom chiral Lagrangians<br />

scale as l/Q. Let us now consider the two different cases shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.3. In the two-nucleon<br />

center-of-mass system the energy denom<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong> the graph a) <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.3 is given by<br />

1 1<br />

Ei - E p2 Im -pl2 Im -vi q2 + M; (3.179)<br />

where Ei is the <strong>in</strong>itial energy of two nucleons and q = p' -p and p = 1P1, p' = Ip'l, q = 1iJ1. This<br />

estimation is valid modulo 11m corrections. Consider now the second diagram. For the energy<br />

denom<strong>in</strong>ator correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the energy cut <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.3 b) we have:<br />

1 1 m m .<br />

Ei - E p2 Im -[2 Im + iE [2 (3.180)<br />

p2 _<br />

+ iE' rv Q2<br />

Thus, the energy denom<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>in</strong> the second case is mlQ times larger than for the first diagram.<br />

In the limit m ---+ (X) it becomes even <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itely large. <strong>The</strong>refore, the power count<strong>in</strong>g (3.177) is<br />

not valid any more. To solve the problem with the large energy denom<strong>in</strong>ators aris<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate states with only two nucleons, We<strong>in</strong>berg proposed to apply the technique of CHPT<br />

not directly to the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude but to the effective potential. <strong>The</strong> latter is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a sum<br />

of all irreducible diagrams, i. e. those diagrams without pure nucleonic <strong>in</strong>termediate states. <strong>The</strong><br />

S-matrix elements are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by putt<strong>in</strong>g this potential <strong>in</strong>to a Lippmann-Schw<strong>in</strong>ger equation.<br />

In fact, many equivalent schemes for deriv<strong>in</strong>g the effective potentials <strong>in</strong> nuclear and many-body<br />

physics are known like that due to Bloch and Horowitz [183] or the Ta<strong>in</strong>m-Dancoff approximation<br />

[184]. <strong>The</strong> effective potential, derived us<strong>in</strong>g old-fashioned time-ordered perturbation theory,<br />

possesses one unpleasant property: it is, <strong>in</strong> general, explicitly dependent on the energy of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g nucleons and, as a consequence of this, not hermitian. Furthermore, the nucleonic wave<br />

functions are not orthonormal <strong>in</strong> this approach [185].<br />

One can avoid these problems by us<strong>in</strong>g the method of unitary transformation. It was already<br />

applied successfully <strong>in</strong> cases where one has an expansion <strong>in</strong> a coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant, such as the<br />

pion-nucleon coupl<strong>in</strong>g, see e.g. refs. [186]. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g sections we will show how to apply<br />

this method to the case of chiral perturbation theory for pions and nucleons, <strong>in</strong> which the small<br />

momenta of extern al particles play the role of the expansion parameter. In fact, our considerations<br />

are more general s<strong>in</strong>ce they can be applied to any effective field theory of Goldstone bosons coupled<br />

to some massive matter fields.<br />

3.5 Bloch-Horowitz scheme and the method of unitary transfor­<br />

mation<br />

<strong>The</strong> method of unitary transformation (projection formalism) was already applied <strong>in</strong> the chapter 2<br />

to decouple the spaces of small and large momenta <strong>in</strong> the quantum mechanical two-body system.<br />

Here we would like to repeat the ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts, mostly to establish our notation and keep the<br />

section self-conta<strong>in</strong>ed. We will also compare it with the Bloch-Horowitz scheme of deriv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

effective <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

A system of an arbitrary number of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g pions and nucleons can be completely described<br />

by a Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation<br />

(3.181)<br />

with Ho (Hf) denot<strong>in</strong>g the free (<strong>in</strong>teraction) part of the Hamiltonian. In order to solve this<br />

equation for nucleon-nucleon scatter<strong>in</strong>g, it is advantageous to project it onto a subspace<br />

{IN), INN), INNN),<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!