21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. Includ<strong>in</strong>g nucleons 77<br />

Next, we write the number of loops <strong>in</strong> the form<br />

L=I- :L Vi+C. (3.175)<br />

Here, we modified the earlier expression (3.145) to be valid also for C disconnected diagrams.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, the numbers of <strong>in</strong>ternal and external particle l<strong>in</strong>es l and E = En + Ep , where En = 2N,<br />

can be collected via the follow<strong>in</strong>g identity:<br />

(3.176)<br />

where ni is the number of nucleon fields at the vertex of type i. Us<strong>in</strong>g eqs. (3.174)-(3.176) and<br />

eq. (3.173) we end up with the result<br />

where<br />

v = 4 - N + 2(L - C) + :L Vi�i , (3.177)<br />

(3.178)<br />

As already discussed above, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices �i are not negative for the purely pionic<br />

Lagrangian.36 Analogously, �i are not negative for pion-nucleon as weIl as for nucleon-nucleon<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. In particular, the m<strong>in</strong>imal possible value �i = 0 is achieved for the vertices with two<br />

nucleons and one derivative (and any number of pion fields) or for the four nucleon <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

without derivatives and pion mass <strong>in</strong>sert ions (and, therefore, also without pion fields). Thus, v<br />

<strong>in</strong> eq. (3.177) is aga<strong>in</strong> bounded from below and, therefore, it seems that the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude<br />

für the process N N ----7 N N can be calculated perturbatively <strong>in</strong> powers of low external threemomenta<br />

of nucleons <strong>in</strong> a similar way as <strong>in</strong> the case of pion-pion scatter<strong>in</strong>g discussed <strong>in</strong> the last<br />

section. This already sounds suspicious, s<strong>in</strong>ce the presence of the low-energy bound state <strong>in</strong> the<br />

np 3S 1 _3 D 1 channel clearly signals the failure of perturbation theory .<br />

.. J .. .. J 11 J ..<br />

p ! I p' P I l I p'<br />

't<br />

I!<br />

I !<br />

I<br />

.. .. .. .. i ..<br />

-p _p' -p -f -I<br />

-p<br />

a) b)<br />

Figure 3.3: Irreducible and reducible time-ordered diagrams. <strong>The</strong> vertical dotdashed<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es are the energy cuts. <strong>The</strong> solid (dashed) l<strong>in</strong>es correspond to nucleons<br />

(pions).<br />

To solve this paradox let us take a closer look at old-fashioned perturbation theory. In the above<br />

derivation of the power count<strong>in</strong>g rule (3.177) we made an assumption that all energy denom<strong>in</strong>ators<br />

36 More precisely, it is zero for the Lagrangian for free pions and positive für <strong>in</strong>teractions (<strong>in</strong> the absence of external<br />

sources).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!