21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. Inc1ud<strong>in</strong>g nuc1eons 75<br />

to elim<strong>in</strong>ate derivatives of the nucleon field <strong>in</strong> higher order Lagrangians. In eq. (3.167) the dots<br />

correspond to terms of order Q and higher. Us<strong>in</strong>g this equation we can rewrite derivatives act<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the nucleon field <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions like � ... 82n fJk'J! <strong>in</strong> terms of other operators of the same<br />

and higher orders. Such terms are anyway present <strong>in</strong> the effective Lagrangian, which conta<strong>in</strong>s all<br />

possible chiral <strong>in</strong>variant <strong>in</strong>teractions. Thus, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the nucleon time derivatives only modifies<br />

the values of coupl<strong>in</strong>gs accompany<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> L. With other words, one can simply<br />

drop time derivatives act<strong>in</strong>g on the nucleon field <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>teraction terms, leav<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle time<br />

derivative <strong>in</strong> the free Dirac Lagrangian. Another more elegant way to elim<strong>in</strong>ate the derivatives of<br />

the nucleon field is to use (nonl<strong>in</strong>ear ) field transformations [133]. For a recent discussion on that<br />

approach as well as for concrete examples see the reference [71]. For various problems related to<br />

the <strong>in</strong>clusion of higher derivative operators <strong>in</strong> the Lagrangian see refs. [176], [177], [178], [179].<br />

As soon as one has solved the problem with the time derivatives act<strong>in</strong>g on the nucleon fields, the<br />

nonrelativistic reduction can be performed <strong>in</strong> a similar way as for free nucleons. <strong>The</strong> only difference<br />

is that the equations of motion for the large and small component fields conta<strong>in</strong> corrections from<br />

higher order terms. Elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g h from the Lagrangian yields then coefficients of 1/ m corrections.<br />

Equivalently, the effective Lagrangian can from the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g be derived <strong>in</strong> terms of nonrelativistic<br />

nucleon fields. In such a case not all of the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants are arbitrary: so me of them have<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite coefficients proportional to <strong>in</strong>verse powers of the nucleon mass. Those coefficients are<br />

fixed by the Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance of the orig<strong>in</strong>al relativistic Lagrangian. <strong>The</strong> simplest example of<br />

such terms is the nonrelativistic k<strong>in</strong>etic energy Nt\!2/ (2m)N. Technically, one can obta<strong>in</strong> those<br />

fixed coefficients <strong>in</strong> the easiest manner requir<strong>in</strong>g the so-called reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variance of the<br />

Lagrangian [182]. Consider the heavy baryon effective field theory discussed at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

this section. Instead of the usual fields for nucleons it is convenient to <strong>in</strong>troduce the large and<br />

small component fields accord<strong>in</strong>g to eq. (3.160). If the nucleon mass is very large, the four velo city<br />

becomes a conserved quantum number. As can be seen from eq. (3.160), the fields H and h are<br />

velocity dependent and should be, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, denoted by the <strong>in</strong>dex v.32 <strong>The</strong> effective Lagrangian<br />

is then given by<br />

Leff = L Lv (Hv, vf.t, ... ) , (3.168)<br />

v<br />

where dots correspond to other <strong>in</strong>gredients like, for <strong>in</strong>stance, covariant derivatives of the nucleon<br />

and pion fields. Reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variance says that we could equally well chose another<br />

parametrization of the four moment um to describe the same physics:<br />

(3.169)<br />

where qf.t has to satisfy (vf.t + qf.t/m)2 = 1. Luke and Manohar [182] proposed to construct the<br />

effective Lagrangian <strong>in</strong> terms of Hv def<strong>in</strong>ed as33<br />

where<br />

- 1 + #<br />

Hv = Hv ,<br />

J2(1 +w·v)<br />

(3.170)<br />

(3.171)<br />

32We did not do that <strong>in</strong> the above discussion s<strong>in</strong>ce the velo city is anyway conserved.<br />

33In a more general case when one has to <strong>in</strong>corporate external fields and/or pions the derivative of the nucleon<br />

field <strong>in</strong> eqs. (3.170), (3.171) should be replaced by a covariant one.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!