21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

derivatives of<br />

the pion field or pion mass <strong>in</strong>sertions. We count the <strong>in</strong>ner l<strong>in</strong>es twice because the pion propagator<br />

scales as 1/ q2 . <strong>The</strong> total number of <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong>tegrations (loops) equals the number of <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es reduced by the number of delta functions correspond<strong>in</strong>g to each vertex:<br />

where L is the number of loops and Vi the number of vertices of the type i with di<br />

L = 1 - (2: Vi - 1) , (3.145)<br />

where we took <strong>in</strong>to account the overall delta function <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.142). <strong>The</strong>refore we obta<strong>in</strong> the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g result for the total scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension LI of the transition amplitude M:<br />

(3.146)<br />

We<strong>in</strong>berg made <strong>in</strong> 1979 a crucial observation [60] that this number LI is bounded from below.<br />

Indeed, due to the spontaneously broken chiral symmetry and the Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance of the Lagrangian,<br />

no <strong>in</strong>teractions with di � 2 are allowed.28 Furthermore, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g loops leads to a<br />

suppression by at least two powers of external momenta aga<strong>in</strong>st the tree graph with the same<br />

vertices. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to eq. (3.146), the dom<strong>in</strong>ant diagrams with LI = 2 are the tree ones with all<br />

vertices from [J2). <strong>The</strong> first corrections with LI = 4 are given by tree diagrams with one vertex<br />

from .c(4) and l-loop graphs with the lead<strong>in</strong>g order vertices.<br />

1['b (Pb) 1['c (Pc)<br />

1['a (Pa)<br />

/<br />

,<br />

1[' d' (Pd)<br />

+<br />

+<br />

,<br />

,<br />

• • •<br />

/<br />

'e / ,<br />

,<br />

•<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

\ /<br />

\ I<br />

I<br />

, I<br />

\ I<br />

I \<br />

I \<br />

I \<br />

/ \<br />

+ • •<br />

Figure 3.2: Low-energy expansion for pion-pion scatter<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> small filled circles<br />

denote the lead<strong>in</strong>g order vertex from [P) and the filled square corresponds to vertices<br />

from .c(4).<br />

Let us illustrate the above ideas on an example with pion-pion scatter<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

work of We<strong>in</strong>berg [60]. One first <strong>in</strong>tro duces the Mandelstarn variables s, t and u:<br />

S = (Pa + Pb) 2 = (Pe + Pd) 2 ,<br />

28This argumentation is valid not only <strong>in</strong> the chiral limit, but also for chiral symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g terms, s<strong>in</strong>ce we<br />

count Mrr � Q.<br />

, - -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!