21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuc1ear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

Let us now make a few comments about eq. (3.74). This is, <strong>in</strong> fact, a crucial result for EFT,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce it says, that the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the Goldstone bosons vanishes at low energies. Indeed,<br />

it is seen <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.74) that one can always rewrite the Lagrangian <strong>in</strong> such a form, that only<br />

derivative <strong>in</strong>teractions between the Goldstone bosons are present. We will show below us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

power count<strong>in</strong>g arguments that, as a consequence, the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude for any process with<br />

an arbitrary number of Goldstone particles is proportional to some positive power of external<br />

momenta. We po<strong>in</strong>t out aga<strong>in</strong> that this statement concern<strong>in</strong>g the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude is <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

of any particular choice of the realization of the group G. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, we could equally<br />

well use an arbitrary nonl<strong>in</strong>ear realization (�, cjJ) to construct the Lagrangian, where cjJ denotes a<br />

set of matter fields, their derivatives as well as derivatives of Goldstone fields. However, <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the chiral <strong>in</strong>variance of the Lagrangian density would be a non-trivial problem because of the<br />

complicated nonl<strong>in</strong>ear transformation rules of the fields and their derivatives. Us<strong>in</strong>g the CCWZ<br />

realization to construct the efIective Lagrangian via eq. (3.74) has the advantage that all build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

blocks transform covariantly under G, Le. <strong>in</strong> the way shown <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.54), guarantee<strong>in</strong>g that any<br />

H-scalar is also G-<strong>in</strong>variant.<br />

To complete the discussion about the construction of a chiral <strong>in</strong>variant Lagrangian let us apply<br />

now the chiral SU(Nf)v x SU(Nf)A group as a particular example of the general Lie algebra<br />

(3.52). In that case all <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.52) vary from 1 to Ni - 1 and the structure constants G's<br />

are represented <strong>in</strong> terms of the structure constants f's of the SU(Nf) group as follows:12<br />

Gabe = 0, (3.75)<br />

For example, for the SU(2)v x SU(2)A group we have fijk fijk, where fijk is the ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

three-dimensional totally antisymmetric tensor with f123 = 1. Note that one can represent the<br />

chiral SU(Nf)V x SU(Nf)A group by SU(Nf)L x SU(Nf)R def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g generators<br />

TL and TR as<br />

(3.76)<br />

where Vi and Ai are the generators of the SU(Nf)V and SU(Nf )A, respectively. <strong>The</strong>n SU(Nf)L<br />

and SU(Nf)R build two <strong>in</strong>dependent subgroups of the whole chiral group with the Lie algebra<br />

[(TL ) i , (TL)j]<br />

[(TR) i , (TR)j]<br />

[(TL ) i , (TR)j]<br />

Let us now be more specific and concentrate on the chiral SU(2)v x<br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g representation of the generators Vi and Ai fijk (TL h ,<br />

fijk (TRh ,<br />

o.<br />

A - _ _ ilT i<br />

l - 2 '<br />

SU(2)A<br />

(3.77)<br />

group. We choose<br />

where T i is a Pauli matrix and 1 is some flavor scalar matrix quantity with the properties:<br />

12 = 1 , I t = I .<br />

(3.78)<br />

(3.79)<br />

For example, 1 can be equal to the ')'5 matrix. <strong>The</strong>n, one has the same representation for the<br />

SU(2)A generators as <strong>in</strong> the case of the QCD Lagrangian (3.1), as can be seen from eq. (3.9).<br />

1 2 Here we use a def<strong>in</strong>ition of the chiral Lie algebra, which differs by the factor i from the one given <strong>in</strong> the last<br />

section , eq. (3.36). This factar can be absorbed by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g redef<strong>in</strong>ition of the generators.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!