The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuc1ear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />
Let us now make a few comments about eq. (3.74). This is, <strong>in</strong> fact, a crucial result for EFT,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce it says, that the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the Goldstone bosons vanishes at low energies. Indeed,<br />
it is seen <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.74) that one can always rewrite the Lagrangian <strong>in</strong> such a form, that only<br />
derivative <strong>in</strong>teractions between the Goldstone bosons are present. We will show below us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
power count<strong>in</strong>g arguments that, as a consequence, the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude for any process with<br />
an arbitrary number of Goldstone particles is proportional to some positive power of external<br />
momenta. We po<strong>in</strong>t out aga<strong>in</strong> that this statement concern<strong>in</strong>g the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude is <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
of any particular choice of the realization of the group G. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, we could equally<br />
well use an arbitrary nonl<strong>in</strong>ear realization (�, cjJ) to construct the Lagrangian, where cjJ denotes a<br />
set of matter fields, their derivatives as well as derivatives of Goldstone fields. However, <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on the chiral <strong>in</strong>variance of the Lagrangian density would be a non-trivial problem because of the<br />
complicated nonl<strong>in</strong>ear transformation rules of the fields and their derivatives. Us<strong>in</strong>g the CCWZ<br />
realization to construct the efIective Lagrangian via eq. (3.74) has the advantage that all build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
blocks transform covariantly under G, Le. <strong>in</strong> the way shown <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.54), guarantee<strong>in</strong>g that any<br />
H-scalar is also G-<strong>in</strong>variant.<br />
To complete the discussion about the construction of a chiral <strong>in</strong>variant Lagrangian let us apply<br />
now the chiral SU(Nf)v x SU(Nf)A group as a particular example of the general Lie algebra<br />
(3.52). In that case all <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.52) vary from 1 to Ni - 1 and the structure constants G's<br />
are represented <strong>in</strong> terms of the structure constants f's of the SU(Nf) group as follows:12<br />
Gabe = 0, (3.75)<br />
For example, for the SU(2)v x SU(2)A group we have fijk fijk, where fijk is the ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
three-dimensional totally antisymmetric tensor with f123 = 1. Note that one can represent the<br />
chiral SU(Nf)V x SU(Nf)A group by SU(Nf)L x SU(Nf)R def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g generators<br />
TL and TR as<br />
(3.76)<br />
where Vi and Ai are the generators of the SU(Nf)V and SU(Nf )A, respectively. <strong>The</strong>n SU(Nf)L<br />
and SU(Nf)R build two <strong>in</strong>dependent subgroups of the whole chiral group with the Lie algebra<br />
[(TL ) i , (TL)j]<br />
[(TR) i , (TR)j]<br />
[(TL ) i , (TR)j]<br />
Let us now be more specific and concentrate on the chiral SU(2)v x<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g representation of the generators Vi and Ai fijk (TL h ,<br />
fijk (TRh ,<br />
o.<br />
A - _ _ ilT i<br />
l - 2 '<br />
SU(2)A<br />
(3.77)<br />
group. We choose<br />
where T i is a Pauli matrix and 1 is some flavor scalar matrix quantity with the properties:<br />
12 = 1 , I t = I .<br />
(3.78)<br />
(3.79)<br />
For example, 1 can be equal to the ')'5 matrix. <strong>The</strong>n, one has the same representation for the<br />
SU(2)A generators as <strong>in</strong> the case of the QCD Lagrangian (3.1), as can be seen from eq. (3.9).<br />
1 2 Here we use a def<strong>in</strong>ition of the chiral Lie algebra, which differs by the factor i from the one given <strong>in</strong> the last<br />
section , eq. (3.36). This factar can be absorbed by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g redef<strong>in</strong>ition of the generators.