The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.3. Go<strong>in</strong>g to higher energies: a toy model 25<br />
where A is a momenturn cut-off which separates the low from the high moment um region. Its<br />
precise value will be given below. Apparently, 7]2 = 7], .>..2 = .>.., 7]'>" = '>"7] = 0 and 7] + .>.. = 1. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 7] and .>.. projectors, the Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation takes the form<br />
(2.62)<br />
Obviously, the low and the high momentum components of the state \[f are coupled. Our aim is to<br />
derive a Hamiltonian act<strong>in</strong>g only on low moment um states and which furthermore <strong>in</strong>corporates aH<br />
the physics related to the possible bound and scatter<strong>in</strong>g states with <strong>in</strong>itial asymptotic momenta<br />
from the 7] states. This can be accomplished by an unitary transformation U<br />
H -+ H' = UtHU (2.63)<br />
such that<br />
7]H'.>.. = .>..H'7] = 0 . (2.64)<br />
We choose a parametrization of U given by Okubo15 [51],<br />
where A has to satisfy the condition<br />
-At(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />
'>"(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />
(2.65)<br />
A = '>"A7] .<br />
(2.66)<br />
Different transformations as weH as the relations between the result<strong>in</strong>g effective Hamiltonians are<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> ref. [52]. One can easily check that U given by eq. (2.65) is <strong>in</strong>deed unitary provided<br />
that the operator A satisfy the condition (2.66):<br />
t _<br />
(<br />
7](I +AtA)-lj2 (1 + AtA)-lj2At ) ( 7](I +AtA)-lj2 -At(I +AAt)-lj2 )<br />
U U - -(1 + AAt)-lj2 A '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2 A(1 + At A)-lj2 '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />
( 7](1 + AtA)-lj2(1 + AtA)(1 + AtA)-lj2 0 )<br />
o '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2(1 + AAt)(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />
(2.67)<br />
It is then straightforward to recast the conditions (2.64) <strong>in</strong> a different form,<br />
.>.. (H - [A, H] - AHA) 7] = O . (2.68)<br />
This is a nonl<strong>in</strong>ear equation for the operator A, which takes the explicit form<br />
V(p, ij) J d3 q , A( p, � q �')V(�' q ,q �) + / d3 p , V( p,p � �')A(�' p ,q �)<br />
J d3 q , d3 p , A( p, � q �')V(�' q ,p �')A(�' p ,q �)<br />
(Eq - Ep) A(p, ij) (2.69)<br />
15Note that one obviously can perform additional unitary transformations <strong>in</strong> 1)- and A-subspaces. We do not<br />
consider such transformations here. <strong>The</strong> condition (2.66) shows that we are look<strong>in</strong>g for those transformations that<br />
map 1)- and A-subspaces <strong>in</strong>to each other. We refra<strong>in</strong> from a further discussion ofthe generality of the parametrization<br />
(2.65)