21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3. Go<strong>in</strong>g to higher energies: a toy model 25<br />

where A is a momenturn cut-off which separates the low from the high moment um region. Its<br />

precise value will be given below. Apparently, 7]2 = 7], .>..2 = .>.., 7]'>" = '>"7] = 0 and 7] + .>.. = 1. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 7] and .>.. projectors, the Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation takes the form<br />

(2.62)<br />

Obviously, the low and the high momentum components of the state \[f are coupled. Our aim is to<br />

derive a Hamiltonian act<strong>in</strong>g only on low moment um states and which furthermore <strong>in</strong>corporates aH<br />

the physics related to the possible bound and scatter<strong>in</strong>g states with <strong>in</strong>itial asymptotic momenta<br />

from the 7] states. This can be accomplished by an unitary transformation U<br />

H -+ H' = UtHU (2.63)<br />

such that<br />

7]H'.>.. = .>..H'7] = 0 . (2.64)<br />

We choose a parametrization of U given by Okubo15 [51],<br />

where A has to satisfy the condition<br />

-At(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />

'>"(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />

(2.65)<br />

A = '>"A7] .<br />

(2.66)<br />

Different transformations as weH as the relations between the result<strong>in</strong>g effective Hamiltonians are<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> ref. [52]. One can easily check that U given by eq. (2.65) is <strong>in</strong>deed unitary provided<br />

that the operator A satisfy the condition (2.66):<br />

t _<br />

(<br />

7](I +AtA)-lj2 (1 + AtA)-lj2At ) ( 7](I +AtA)-lj2 -At(I +AAt)-lj2 )<br />

U U - -(1 + AAt)-lj2 A '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2 A(1 + At A)-lj2 '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />

( 7](1 + AtA)-lj2(1 + AtA)(1 + AtA)-lj2 0 )<br />

o '>"(1 + AAt)-lj2(1 + AAt)(1 + AAt)-lj2<br />

(2.67)<br />

It is then straightforward to recast the conditions (2.64) <strong>in</strong> a different form,<br />

.>.. (H - [A, H] - AHA) 7] = O . (2.68)<br />

This is a nonl<strong>in</strong>ear equation for the operator A, which takes the explicit form<br />

V(p, ij) J d3 q , A( p, � q �')V(�' q ,q �) + / d3 p , V( p,p � �')A(�' p ,q �)<br />

J d3 q , d3 p , A( p, � q �')V(�' q ,p �')A(�' p ,q �)<br />

(Eq - Ep) A(p, ij) (2.69)<br />

15Note that one obviously can perform additional unitary transformations <strong>in</strong> 1)- and A-subspaces. We do not<br />

consider such transformations here. <strong>The</strong> condition (2.66) shows that we are look<strong>in</strong>g for those transformations that<br />

map 1)- and A-subspaces <strong>in</strong>to each other. We refra<strong>in</strong> from a further discussion ofthe generality of the parametrization<br />

(2.65)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!