21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3. Go<strong>in</strong>g to high er energies: a toy model 23<br />

To estimate the quantum averages of the various terms <strong>in</strong> the expansion (2.5) they used the lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

order wave function of the low-energy bound state. (In the real world no bound state exists <strong>in</strong> this<br />

partial wave.) Such a wave function corresponds to the potential V(p' ,p) = Co()(A2_p'2)e(A 2 _p2)<br />

and is proportional to<br />

'IjJ (O)(p) cx ()(A2 -p2)<br />

mB+p2 ,<br />

(2.58)<br />

where B denotes the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy. For this case it has been shown that the quantum averages of<br />

all terms <strong>in</strong> the expansion (2.5) with two and more powers of momenta are of the same size. Here<br />

we refra<strong>in</strong> from do<strong>in</strong>g similar estimations. We do not want to restrict ourselves to cut-off values<br />

much smaller than 1/r as it is guaranteed by the second equality <strong>in</strong> (2.57). Requir<strong>in</strong>g only aA » 1<br />

does not lead to simple scal<strong>in</strong>g properties of an coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants, which would be present for<br />

rA « 1, as it follows from eqs. (2.45), (2.46). Also the lead<strong>in</strong>g order wave function of the bound<br />

state might be a too naive approximation for calculat<strong>in</strong>g quantum averages. Rather , one should<br />

take low-energy scatter<strong>in</strong>g states. A more careful <strong>in</strong>vestigation of convergence of the expansion<br />

(2.5) would necessarily require a more complicated algebra and apply<strong>in</strong>g numerical methods. l3 In such a case the outcome might be different. We will co me back to this question <strong>in</strong> the next<br />

section, where a more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g example will be considered and the outcome is <strong>in</strong>deed different.<br />

To summarize, we have illustrated the ideas discussed <strong>in</strong> sec. 2.1 with the example of two-nucleon<br />

scatter<strong>in</strong>g at low energies. <strong>The</strong> effective potential consists of contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with any number<br />

of derivatives. Such an effective theory works as wen as the effective range expansion for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>verse of the T -matrix. Cut-off regularization is an appropriate tool to provide f<strong>in</strong>iteness of the<br />

amplitude. One should keep the cut-off f<strong>in</strong>ite and of the order of the pion mass. <strong>The</strong>re exists<br />

an upper bound for the cut-off, above which no real solutions for the constants Ci are available.<br />

Dimensional regularization with the standard subtraction scheme fails to provide an adequate<br />

description of the amplitude if the scatter<strong>in</strong>g length is very large.<br />

2.3 Go<strong>in</strong>g to higher energies: a toy model<br />

In the last section we have considered the effective theory for nucleon-nucleon scatter<strong>in</strong>g at very<br />

low energies. This analysis was quite general and applicable, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, to any underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

theory. <strong>The</strong> only <strong>in</strong>formation we used is that the underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teraction has a f<strong>in</strong>ite range of<br />

order rv Such a theory can clearly fit the data for nucleonic three-momenta sm aller<br />

1/M7r•<br />

than M7r• It was shown that the effective theory <strong>in</strong> this case reproduces the effective range<br />

expansion for the amplitude but cannot go beyond it. We will now consider another example<br />

and go to higher energies. Our start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is a simple model of the S-wave nucleon-nucleon<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction, which conta<strong>in</strong>s long and short range parts. <strong>The</strong> parameters of this model are adjusted<br />

to reproduce phase shifts <strong>in</strong> the 1 So and 3 SI channels. This model is our "fundamental" theory.<br />

We will construct an effective theory for that case and keep explicitly the long range part of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>teraction. This is different to the considerations of the last section. Short range physics<br />

is aga<strong>in</strong> represented by contact <strong>in</strong>teractions. To make the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude f<strong>in</strong>ite we will<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce a sharp cut-off A <strong>in</strong> the momentum space, which is chosen between the two scales<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to long and short range parts of the underly<strong>in</strong>g force. Thus, our effective theory<br />

is def<strong>in</strong>ed on the subspace of momenta below A. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and new po<strong>in</strong>t is that we are<br />

ahle to explicitly <strong>in</strong>tegrate out high moment um components from the underly<strong>in</strong>g theory [124].<br />

For that we divide the moment um space <strong>in</strong>to two subspaces, spann<strong>in</strong>g the values from zero to A<br />

1 3 For <strong>in</strong>stance, at higher orders <strong>in</strong> the derivative expansion one has more complicated non-l<strong>in</strong>ear conditions for<br />

fix<strong>in</strong>g the constants Ci .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!