The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.3. Go<strong>in</strong>g to high er energies: a toy model 23<br />
To estimate the quantum averages of the various terms <strong>in</strong> the expansion (2.5) they used the lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
order wave function of the low-energy bound state. (In the real world no bound state exists <strong>in</strong> this<br />
partial wave.) Such a wave function corresponds to the potential V(p' ,p) = Co()(A2_p'2)e(A 2 _p2)<br />
and is proportional to<br />
'IjJ (O)(p) cx ()(A2 -p2)<br />
mB+p2 ,<br />
(2.58)<br />
where B denotes the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy. For this case it has been shown that the quantum averages of<br />
all terms <strong>in</strong> the expansion (2.5) with two and more powers of momenta are of the same size. Here<br />
we refra<strong>in</strong> from do<strong>in</strong>g similar estimations. We do not want to restrict ourselves to cut-off values<br />
much smaller than 1/r as it is guaranteed by the second equality <strong>in</strong> (2.57). Requir<strong>in</strong>g only aA » 1<br />
does not lead to simple scal<strong>in</strong>g properties of an coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants, which would be present for<br />
rA « 1, as it follows from eqs. (2.45), (2.46). Also the lead<strong>in</strong>g order wave function of the bound<br />
state might be a too naive approximation for calculat<strong>in</strong>g quantum averages. Rather , one should<br />
take low-energy scatter<strong>in</strong>g states. A more careful <strong>in</strong>vestigation of convergence of the expansion<br />
(2.5) would necessarily require a more complicated algebra and apply<strong>in</strong>g numerical methods. l3 In such a case the outcome might be different. We will co me back to this question <strong>in</strong> the next<br />
section, where a more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g example will be considered and the outcome is <strong>in</strong>deed different.<br />
To summarize, we have illustrated the ideas discussed <strong>in</strong> sec. 2.1 with the example of two-nucleon<br />
scatter<strong>in</strong>g at low energies. <strong>The</strong> effective potential consists of contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with any number<br />
of derivatives. Such an effective theory works as wen as the effective range expansion for the<br />
<strong>in</strong>verse of the T -matrix. Cut-off regularization is an appropriate tool to provide f<strong>in</strong>iteness of the<br />
amplitude. One should keep the cut-off f<strong>in</strong>ite and of the order of the pion mass. <strong>The</strong>re exists<br />
an upper bound for the cut-off, above which no real solutions for the constants Ci are available.<br />
Dimensional regularization with the standard subtraction scheme fails to provide an adequate<br />
description of the amplitude if the scatter<strong>in</strong>g length is very large.<br />
2.3 Go<strong>in</strong>g to higher energies: a toy model<br />
In the last section we have considered the effective theory for nucleon-nucleon scatter<strong>in</strong>g at very<br />
low energies. This analysis was quite general and applicable, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, to any underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />
theory. <strong>The</strong> only <strong>in</strong>formation we used is that the underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teraction has a f<strong>in</strong>ite range of<br />
order rv Such a theory can clearly fit the data for nucleonic three-momenta sm aller<br />
1/M7r•<br />
than M7r• It was shown that the effective theory <strong>in</strong> this case reproduces the effective range<br />
expansion for the amplitude but cannot go beyond it. We will now consider another example<br />
and go to higher energies. Our start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is a simple model of the S-wave nucleon-nucleon<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction, which conta<strong>in</strong>s long and short range parts. <strong>The</strong> parameters of this model are adjusted<br />
to reproduce phase shifts <strong>in</strong> the 1 So and 3 SI channels. This model is our "fundamental" theory.<br />
We will construct an effective theory for that case and keep explicitly the long range part of<br />
the <strong>in</strong>teraction. This is different to the considerations of the last section. Short range physics<br />
is aga<strong>in</strong> represented by contact <strong>in</strong>teractions. To make the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude f<strong>in</strong>ite we will<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduce a sharp cut-off A <strong>in</strong> the momentum space, which is chosen between the two scales<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to long and short range parts of the underly<strong>in</strong>g force. Thus, our effective theory<br />
is def<strong>in</strong>ed on the subspace of momenta below A. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and new po<strong>in</strong>t is that we are<br />
ahle to explicitly <strong>in</strong>tegrate out high moment um components from the underly<strong>in</strong>g theory [124].<br />
For that we divide the moment um space <strong>in</strong>to two subspaces, spann<strong>in</strong>g the values from zero to A<br />
1 3 For <strong>in</strong>stance, at higher orders <strong>in</strong> the derivative expansion one has more complicated non-l<strong>in</strong>ear conditions for<br />
fix<strong>in</strong>g the constants Ci .