The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
188 F. <strong>The</strong> complete set of the N N contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with two derivatives<br />
For the terms without derivatives enter<strong>in</strong>g eqs. (F.7) and (F.12) one obta<strong>in</strong>s:<br />
G�O = -la12 '<br />
(F.18)<br />
Gs = -2Gs, (F.19)<br />
Let us now take a closer look at the terms <strong>in</strong> eq. (F.ll). All <strong>in</strong>teractions enter<strong>in</strong>g this equation<br />
can be divided <strong>in</strong>to three different classes: the terms al, 2 , 3 ,4 do not conta<strong>in</strong> Sft, the terms a5,6,7,8<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve just one and the terms ag, ... ,18 two <strong>in</strong>sertions of the sp<strong>in</strong>-operator. One can make use of<br />
partial <strong>in</strong>tegration for each of these classes separately, <strong>in</strong> order to elim<strong>in</strong>ate redundant terms. For<br />
example, the acterm can be expressed as a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the al, 2 , 3-<strong>in</strong>teractions and, thus,<br />
can be completely omitted. It is a matter of choice which terms are required as basis of <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
operators. For <strong>in</strong>stance, to end up with the Lagrangian (F.13) one has to drop the a4,8,17,18-terms,<br />
see eq. (F.18). We, however, po<strong>in</strong>t out that not all rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractions with two <strong>in</strong>sertions of<br />
the sp<strong>in</strong>-operator (ag, ... ,16-terms <strong>in</strong> eq. (F.ll) or G7, ... ,lcterms <strong>in</strong> eq. (F.ll)) are <strong>in</strong>dependent.<br />
Only 7 and not 8 such <strong>in</strong>teractions are <strong>in</strong>dependent from each other, s<strong>in</strong>ce one can express e.g. the<br />
terms a9 ,lO,ll as l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ations of the other a12 , ... ,16-coupl<strong>in</strong>gs. To keep only <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
contact <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> the effective Lagrangian we will use an operator basis, which is different<br />
from eq. (F.13). More precisely, we choose the a = {I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18} -terms<br />
(altogether 13 <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>stead of 14 enter<strong>in</strong>g eq. (F.13)).<br />
Let us now work out the consequences of the requirement of these terms to be reparametrization<br />
<strong>in</strong>variant. Perform<strong>in</strong>g the (<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal) transformation (F.4) and replac<strong>in</strong>g w by v at the end, g<br />
we obta<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the ai 's:<br />
al - a2 + 2a3 1<br />
'2a5 + a6<br />
1<br />
-a5 - a7 2<br />
a14 + a16 - a18<br />
1 1<br />
a12 + -a15 - -a17<br />
2 2<br />
1 1<br />
a1 3 + -a15 - -a17<br />
2 2<br />
0,<br />
0,<br />
0, (F.20)<br />
0,<br />
Consequently, only seven <strong>in</strong>dependent coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants enter the correspond<strong>in</strong>g Lagrangian.<br />
Denot<strong>in</strong>g such coupl<strong>in</strong>gs by Cl, ... ,7 and switch<strong>in</strong>g to the nucleon rest-frame system, our f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
result for the reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variant set of <strong>in</strong>dependent N N contact <strong>in</strong>teractions at order<br />
L:1i = 2 reads:<br />
.c��<br />
- 1Cl [(NtVN)2 + (VNtN)2] - (Cl + C2)(NtVN) . (VNtN)<br />
- 1C2(NtN) [NtV2N + V2NtN]<br />
9 <strong>The</strong> complete effect of the reparametrization transformation (F.3) is given by the shift (F.4) of the nucleon<br />
field, if no I/rn corrections are taken <strong>in</strong>to account. <strong>The</strong>refore, reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variance <strong>in</strong> that case turns <strong>in</strong>to<br />
Galilean <strong>in</strong>variance.<br />
0,<br />
0.