The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
186 F. <strong>The</strong> complete set of the N N contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with two derivatives<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are also two terms with one derivative:<br />
Note that the terms with just one <strong>in</strong>sertion of the sp<strong>in</strong>-operators S/1 like, for <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />
are not parity and charge conjugation <strong>in</strong>variant, see table F.l. <strong>The</strong> same holds true for the term<br />
(F.8)<br />
(F.9)<br />
(F.10)<br />
Both terms <strong>in</strong> eq. (F.8) are redundant and can be elim<strong>in</strong>ated from the effective Lagrangian apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the lead<strong>in</strong>g order equation of motion (EOM) (3.165) of the field Hv : (v · ö)H = 0. 6 Note, however,<br />
that the terms <strong>in</strong> (F.8) are reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variant. This can easily be checked us<strong>in</strong>g eqs. (F.4)<br />
and (F.6).<br />
Let us now consider the contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with two derivatives. <strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g terms appear <strong>in</strong><br />
the effective Lagrangian:<br />
.c�� = �Ü1 [ (Hv 7J /1 Hv)(Hv 7J/1 Hv) + (Hv 8 /1Hv)(Hv 8/1 Hv )]<br />
+ ü 2 (Hv 7J /1 Hv )(Hv 8/1 Hv )<br />
+ ü3(HvHv)(Hv( 82 + 7J2 )Hv)<br />
+ ü4(HvHv)(Hv 8 /1 7J/1 Hv)<br />
1 [ - ---itv - ,="p - ,="v - ---itp ]<br />
+ 2i Ü5 E/1VpuV /1 (Hv iJ Hv )(Hv 'ä SU Hv ) - (Hv 'ä Hv)(Hv SU iJ Hv)<br />
+ i Ü6 E/1vpuv /1 (HvHv)(Hv 8v s p7Ju Hv)<br />
- - '="P---itu<br />
+ i Ü7 E/1vpuv/1(HvSV Hv)(Hv 'ä iJ Hv)<br />
+ �i ÜS E/1VpuV /1 [(Hv 7Jv Hv )(HvS p7Ju Hv) - (Hv 8v Hv )(Hv 8u S P Hv)]<br />
1<br />
+ 2 (ügg/1Pgvu + ü10g/1ugvP + üllg/1vgpu)<br />
X [(HvS pa/1 Hv)(Hvs u7Jv Hv) + (Hv 8/1 S P Hv)(Hv 8V sU Hv)]<br />
+(Ü1 2 g/1pgvu + Ü13g/1ugvp + Ü14g/1vgpu ) (HvS p7J/1 Hv )(Hv 8v s u Hv )<br />
+ � (�Ü15 (9/1Pgvu + g/1ugvp) + Ü169/1V9pu)<br />
x [(Hv 8/1<br />
s<br />
p7JV<br />
Hv)(HvSU Hv) + (Hv 8v<br />
sP7J/1 Hv )(HvSU Hv)]<br />
1 1 ( ) - '="/1'="V ---it/1---itv P ---itv -<br />
(F.ll)<br />
+ 2 2Ü17(9/1Pgvu + g/1ugvp) + Ü1Sg/1vgpu (Hv( 'ä 'ä + iJ iJ )S iJ Hv)(HvS Hv)<br />
where Ü1, ... ,lS are constant coefficients. Here we have not shown terms which <strong>in</strong>clude the operator<br />
v . Ö, s<strong>in</strong>ce they can be elim<strong>in</strong>ated apply<strong>in</strong>g the equation of motion (3.165) for the field Hv .<br />
6<strong>The</strong> EOM (3.165) is only valid modulo higher order terms. If no pion fields are considered, such higher order<br />
terms may be divided <strong>in</strong>to two classes: the on es with just one field operator Hv and those ones <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more field<br />
operators (like, for <strong>in</strong>stance, the term (HvHv)Hv). <strong>The</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g correction of the first k<strong>in</strong>d is given by the term<br />
-iß2/(2m). <strong>The</strong> higher order corrections to eq. (3.165) of the second k<strong>in</strong>d would lead to contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with six<br />
and more nucleon legs and are irrelevant for our discussion. Thus, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the terms (F.8) us<strong>in</strong>g the EOM for Hv<br />
would modify the contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with four nucleon legs at order .6.i = 3 (terms like l/m(Hv 7J. a Hv )(HvHv)).<br />
For further discussion on such redundant terms see e.g. refs. [133], [71].<br />
U