21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 E. Anti-symmetrization of the contact <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

Now it is easy to perform anti-symmetrization of eq. (E.1):<br />

where<br />

1<br />

4 (a1 - a2 - a3 - 3(4) ,<br />

1<br />

4( -al - 3a2 + 5a3 + 3(4) . (E.6)<br />

Note that only two <strong>in</strong>dependent constants ß1 and ß2 enter the expression (E.5) for the antisymmetrized<br />

contribution. <strong>The</strong>refore, we can choose only two operators of the four contact terms<br />

<strong>in</strong> eq. (E.1) as the basis. For example,<br />

Vo = C s + Cr eh . eh . (E.7)<br />

Requir<strong>in</strong>g that the anti-symmetrized contributions of eqs. (E.1) and (E.7) are the same we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

us<strong>in</strong>g eqs. (E.5), (E.6)<br />

Cr (E.8)<br />

One can proceed <strong>in</strong> the same way to consider the contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with two derivatives. Altogether<br />

fourteen such <strong>in</strong>teractions contribute <strong>in</strong> the two-nucleon cms system (seven terms <strong>in</strong><br />

eq. (3.270) plus the the correspond<strong>in</strong>g ones with <strong>in</strong>sert ions of the isosp<strong>in</strong> matrices). For our purpose<br />

it is sufficient to consider a subclass of these <strong>in</strong>teractions, namely those depend<strong>in</strong>g on q 2, k2<br />

(s<strong>in</strong>ce the other contact terms requir<strong>in</strong>g anti-symmetrization enter eq. (3.296)):<br />

V2 =<br />

,1<br />

q 2 + ,2 ih . eh q 2 + ,3 Tl . T2 q 2 + ,4 (0\ . eh) (T 1 . T2) q 2<br />

+ ,1 k 2 + ,2 ih . ih k 2 + '3 Tl ' T2 k 2 + '4 (51 . (2) (Tl ' T2) k 2 .<br />

Note that A[g] = -2k, A[k] = -g/2. <strong>The</strong>refore, we obta<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g eq. (E.4):<br />

v2 W1 q - 12 W1 + W3 + W4 0"1 ' 0"2 q + W2 Tl . T2 q .<br />

(E.9)<br />

A 2 1 ( 4 3 ) - - 2 2 (E 10)<br />

1<br />

-<br />

12<br />

( 4W2 + W3 - W4) (51 . (2) (Tl ' T2) q2 + W3 k2 -1 ( W3 + 4W1 + 12w2 ) 51 . 52 k2 ( W4 + 4W1 - 4W2 ) (51 . 52 ) (Tl . T2) k2 ,<br />

+ W4 Tl . T2 k2 -1<br />

where W1,2,3,4 are given by<br />

1 1<br />

2'1 - 32 (,5 + 3,6 + 3'7 + 9,8 ) ,<br />

1 1<br />

2'3 - 32 (,5 + 3,6 - ,7 - 3'8 ) ,<br />

1<br />

2(,5 - ,1 - 3'2 - 3'3 - 9'4 ) ,<br />

1<br />

2(,7 - ,1 - 3'2 + '3 + 3'4) .<br />

(E.ll)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!