21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C<br />

Small scale expansion with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

projection formalism<br />

In this appendix we would like to generalize the consideration of appendices A and B to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

the (<strong>in</strong>termediate) Ll-isobar excitations. As discussed <strong>in</strong> the text, the Ll is treated <strong>in</strong> a similar<br />

way as the nucleons, i.e. as the light particle (but not massless as N) with the mass Ll = mf:l. - m1<br />

and with both sp<strong>in</strong> and isosp<strong>in</strong> quantum numbers equal 3/2. Now we will generalize the results<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> appendices A and B to <strong>in</strong>clude also the states related to >.0.<br />

We start with the dimensional analysis of the decoupl<strong>in</strong>g equation (3.206) projected by >.0 and<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e the chiral power v for all terms enter<strong>in</strong>g the left-hand side of this equation .<br />

• >.0 HK,Tj<br />

v = 4 - 3N + r;, 2: 6 - 3N . (C.1)<br />

Note that here and <strong>in</strong> what follows, N corresponds to the number of baryons (also Ll's).<br />

This <strong>in</strong>equality follows because the transition between purely baryonic states requires contact<br />

vertices with four baryon legs or relativistic correction terms. <strong>The</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal possible value<br />

of r;, for such <strong>in</strong>teractions is 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g possibilities are to be considered:<br />

v = 4 - 3N + 2q + j + r;, . (C.2)<br />

1. q = 0, j = 0<br />

In that case we have r;, 2: 2, l 2: 2. Consequently, one obta<strong>in</strong>s:<br />

v 2: 8 - 3N . (C.3)<br />

2. 4q + j # 0<br />

In that case 2q + j 2: 1. Prom the <strong>in</strong>equality (A.5) we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

v 2: 6 - 3N . (C.4)<br />

v 2: 6 - 3N . (C.5)<br />

I This is because a trivial momentum dependence of the f:l.-field due to the nucleon mass is factored out, see<br />

eq. (3.160).<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!