21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

derivative. Further helpful equalities are<br />

1);2:1 ,<br />

1);2:-2+p<br />

173<br />

(A.5)<br />

(A.6)<br />

Whereas (A.5) is generally valid s<strong>in</strong>ce no renormalizable <strong>in</strong>teractions are allowed by chiral symmetry,<br />

(A.6) follows from simple <strong>in</strong>spection of eq. (3.211): for n = 0 there are at least two derivatives<br />

and for n 2: 2 it is immediately apparent.<br />

Below we will exam<strong>in</strong>e the chiral power v for all terms enter<strong>in</strong>g the left-hand side of eq. (3.206).<br />

• )..4k +iHK'fl<br />

v = 4 - 3N - 4k - i + I); • (A.7)<br />

This follows from eq. (3.210) if one notes, that now there is one energy denom<strong>in</strong>ator less.<br />

We then obta<strong>in</strong> from eqs. (A.3), (A.4), (A.6):<br />

v 2: 4 - 3N, when k = 0 ,<br />

v 2: 2 - 3N, when k > 0<br />

• )..4k +i HK)..4Q+ j Az'fl<br />

v = 4 - 3N - 4k - i + 2q + j + I); + l .<br />

<strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g possibilities are to be considered:<br />

(A.8)<br />

1. q::;k-l<br />

In this case the number of pions at the vertex is restricted by p 2: 4k + i - 4q - j.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the <strong>in</strong>equality (A.6) takes the form<br />

It then follows from eq. (A.8), that<br />

2. q = k<br />

Here we have:<br />

I); 2: -2 + 4k + i - 4q - j<br />

v 2: 4 - 3N - 2k<br />

p 2: Ij - il<br />

(A.9)<br />

(A.I0)<br />

(A.11)<br />

Apply<strong>in</strong>g eq. (A.4) and us<strong>in</strong>g the (obvious) <strong>in</strong>equality j - i 2: -Ij - il one can justify<br />

eq. (A.I0) also for that case.<br />

3. q 2: k + 1<br />

One can easily prove eq. (A.I0) far this case us<strong>in</strong>g eq. (A.5) and not<strong>in</strong>g, that j -i 2: -3.<br />

• E()..4k +i ) .. 4k+i Az'fl<br />

v 2: 4 - 3N - 2k + l 2: 4 - 3N - 2k . (A.12)<br />

This follows immediately from eq. (3.214). Here, the first <strong>in</strong>equality becomes the exact<br />

equality when only the pion k<strong>in</strong>etic energy is taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> E()..4k +i ).<br />

• )..4k +iAZ'flHK'fl<br />

v = 4 - 3N - 2k + l + I); • (A.13)<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g operator 'flHK'fl with I); < O. That is why the <strong>in</strong>equality (A.I0) is<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> valid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!