21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thus, the effective theory with dimensional regularization has a quite small range of validity<br />

and provides an extremely poor fit to the data for the ISO partial wave [85]. <strong>The</strong> problem with<br />

the dimensional regularization is that it does not account for power law divergences of the type<br />

Jooo dnq qm, which turn out to be important for the renormalization of the LS equation. In dimensional<br />

regularization divergent <strong>in</strong>tegrals <strong>in</strong> four dimensions are extended to an arbitrary number<br />

of dimensions D. After the regularization is performed, they are typically expressed <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

f-functions which depend on D. Ultraviolet divergences correspond to poles of these functions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y have to be subtracted <strong>in</strong> order to provide a f<strong>in</strong>ite result. In the m<strong>in</strong>imal subtraction scheme<br />

(MS), which is frequently used <strong>in</strong> field-theoretical calculations with renormalizable theories, all<br />

1/(D-4) poles are subtracted before tak<strong>in</strong>g the limit D --+ 4. This allows to remove all logarithmic<br />

divergences. In the effective theory for N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g without pions no such logarithmic divergences<br />

appear and the regularized <strong>in</strong>tegrals <strong>in</strong> four dimensions rema<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ite and scale <strong>in</strong>dependent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only divergences that appear <strong>in</strong> such an effective theory are the power law divergences, which<br />

vanish after perform<strong>in</strong>g dimensional regularization. Kaplan, Savage and Wise (KSW) proposed to<br />

subtract also poles <strong>in</strong> D = 3 dimensions to keep trace of power law divergences [90]. <strong>The</strong>y called<br />

this formalism power divergence subtraction (PDS). Us<strong>in</strong>g PDS, Kaplan et al. worked out a new<br />

power count<strong>in</strong>g scheme (KSW approach) for systems with a large scatter<strong>in</strong>g length and extended<br />

it to take <strong>in</strong>to account pionic degrees of freedom. Equivalent formalisms with different regularization<br />

schemes are discussed <strong>in</strong> refs. [86], [87], [88]. <strong>The</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g and non-perturbative contribution<br />

to the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude <strong>in</strong> these methods is due to N N contact <strong>in</strong>teractions without derivatives.<br />

Pion exchanges start to contribute at sublead<strong>in</strong>g order and can be treated perturbatively.<br />

That is why analytic calculations are possible. <strong>The</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g S-matrix is (approximately)<br />

unitary7 and does not depend on the renormalization scale which is <strong>in</strong>troduced due to PDS. <strong>The</strong><br />

expansion for the S-matrix is expected to break down at momenta k rv 300 MeV. For a series<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g applications of the KSW approach to various processes see references [90]-[99]. In<br />

spite of a successful description of many observables at low energies the formalism fails badly to<br />

describe the shape parameters <strong>in</strong> the ISO and 3S1 _3 D 1 channels, as has been shown by Cohen and<br />

Hansen [100], [101]. <strong>The</strong>y have po<strong>in</strong>ted out that predictions for these quantities would provide<br />

a sensitive test for the correct <strong>in</strong>elusion of pionic physics. Note furt her that different potential<br />

models give very elose predictions for the shape parameters. This is, accord<strong>in</strong>g to ref. [102] , due<br />

to the correct treatment of the one-pion exchange. Thus, it rema<strong>in</strong>s unelear, whether such a<br />

perturbative treatment of the pion exchange is justified8 [103].<br />

An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g work with<strong>in</strong> the power count<strong>in</strong>g scheme proposed by We<strong>in</strong>berg has been performed<br />

by Park et al. [104], [105]. <strong>The</strong>y concentrated on np scatter<strong>in</strong>g for the ISO partial wave and the<br />

deuteron channel and were able to reproduce the empirical scatter<strong>in</strong>g phase shifts up to momenta<br />

k rv 300 Me V. <strong>The</strong> potential they considered conta<strong>in</strong>ed apart from the contact N N <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

without and with two derivatives also the lead<strong>in</strong>g OPE term. <strong>The</strong> cut-off dependence of the<br />

results was <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Quite recently they also <strong>in</strong>eluded the lead<strong>in</strong>g two-pion exchange as weH<br />

as contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with four derivatives [106]. For the application of the effective field theory<br />

technique to the solar proton burn<strong>in</strong>g process p + p --+ d + e+ + Ve see reference [107].<br />

<strong>The</strong> Munich group considered recently the peripheral np partial waves with<strong>in</strong> chiral perturbation<br />

theory [108]. No contact terms without and with two derivatives contribute <strong>in</strong> such partial waves<br />

(start<strong>in</strong>g from the D-waves) because of the large values of angular momenta. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction is<br />

7 A different approach has been recently proposed by Lutz [89], which preserves unitarity of the S-matrix exactly<br />

and allows far the description of the N N phase shifts at high er energies.<br />

8 Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, for very small energies E « M" � 140 Me V one can even completely <strong>in</strong>tegrate out pionic degrees of<br />

freedom.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!