21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 5. Isosp<strong>in</strong> violation <strong>in</strong> the two�nuc1eon system<br />

potential models (if one assurnes that there is <strong>in</strong>deed some charge dependence <strong>in</strong> the pion�nucleon<br />

coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants, see e.g. the discussion <strong>in</strong> ref. [216].) We remark that the TPE contribution is<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>ally suppressed by one order <strong>in</strong> the small parameter, Le. one would expect its contribution<br />

to be one third of the lead<strong>in</strong>g OPE with different pion masses.<br />

It is also <strong>in</strong>structive to see how the corrections due to the np mass difference come about. For<br />

that, let us write the nucleon mass as m + 6m, where 6m subsurnes the em and strong contribution<br />

to the np mass splitt<strong>in</strong>g, Le. these terms are 0(0:') and O( E) . Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g the lead<strong>in</strong>g isosp<strong>in</strong>�<br />

symmertic amplitude eq. (5.31) with respect to the nucleon mass shift gives<br />

from which it follows that<br />

8A�1 A�1 .<br />

-- = --(/1+Zp) ,<br />

8m 47f<br />

We now turn to CSB. <strong>The</strong> pattern of the various contributions looks different:<br />

LO<br />

Q�2 0:' ,E Q�2<br />

NLO<br />

Q�1 Q�1 0:' ,E<br />

Electromagnetic four�nucleon contact <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

with no derivatives.<br />

Ern four-nucleon contact terms with two derivatives,<br />

strong isosp<strong>in</strong>�break<strong>in</strong>g contact terms with two derivatives,<br />

<strong>in</strong>sert ions proportional to the np mass difference.<br />

(5.42)<br />

(5.43)<br />

We remark that the lead<strong>in</strong>g order CSB effects do not modify the effective range but the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scatter<strong>in</strong>g length. Note furt her that we have not considered effects due to virtual<br />

photons (like, for <strong>in</strong>stance, 7f"( exchanges), see ref. [228]. Such diagrams were calculated with<strong>in</strong><br />

the We<strong>in</strong>berg power count<strong>in</strong>g approach <strong>in</strong> ref. [218]. <strong>The</strong> ISO np low�energy parameters appear<br />

to be very little affected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!