21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 <strong>The</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g CIB and CSB effects <strong>in</strong> the np 1 So channel 161<br />

a counterterm of the structure E61) (J.l)a(Nt T3 N)(Nt T3 N) (cf. sec. 5.2) s<strong>in</strong>ce it is needed to make<br />

the amplitude scale-<strong>in</strong>dependent. Note that for the graph IV we have used the same subtraction<br />

as performed <strong>in</strong> [91] . Consequently, for operators of this type with 2n derivatives we can establish<br />

the scal<strong>in</strong>g property E�� rv Q-2+n. This does not contradict the KSW power count<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />

isosp<strong>in</strong> symmetrie theory s<strong>in</strong>ce a « 1. Stated differently, the lead<strong>in</strong>g CIB term of order aQ-2 is<br />

numerically much smaller than the strong lead<strong>in</strong>g order contribution rv Q-l. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>sertion from<br />

this contact term is shown <strong>in</strong> the last diagram of fig. 5.3 and leads to an additional contribution to<br />

ßA. In complete analogy, we can treat the lead<strong>in</strong>g order CSB effect which is due to an operator<br />

of the form aE6 2) (J.l) (Nt T3N) (Nt N). This term is, however, f<strong>in</strong>ite. Putt<strong>in</strong>g pieces together, we<br />

get<br />

ßA V 1 = -a<br />

(E(l) + E(2)) [A_l] 2<br />

1,-2,pp 0 0 Co ' ßAV 1 = _ (E(l<br />

_ ) E(2)) [A-l] 2<br />

1,-2,nn a 0 0 Co '<br />

where the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants E61,2) (J.l) obey the renormalization group equations,<br />

(5.36)<br />

(5.37)<br />

Note that from here on we do no longer exhibit the scale dependence of the various coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

constants E61,2),CO,2,D2. We can now relate the pp and nn scatter<strong>in</strong>g lengths to the np one (of<br />

course, <strong>in</strong> the pp system Coulomb subtraction is assumed),<br />

1<br />

1<br />

For the effective ranges, we have only CIB<br />

(5.38)<br />

(5.39)<br />

Note that this last relation is scale-<strong>in</strong>dependent and that it does not conta<strong>in</strong> any unknown parameter.<br />

We re mark that for the CIB scatter<strong>in</strong>g lengths difference the pion contribution alone is<br />

not scale-<strong>in</strong>dependent and can thus never be uniquely disentangled from the contact term contribut<br />

ion rv While the lead<strong>in</strong>g OPE contribution resembles the result obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> meson<br />

E61).<br />

exchange models, the mandatory appearance of this contact term is a dist<strong>in</strong>ctively new feature<br />

of the effective field theory approach. It is easy to classify the lead<strong>in</strong>g and next-to-lead<strong>in</strong>g em<br />

corrections to these results. At order aQ-l, one has the contribution from two potential pions<br />

with the pion mass difference and also contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with two derivatives. Effects due to the<br />

charge dependence of the pion-nucleon coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants, i.e. isosp<strong>in</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g terms from .c�N,<br />

only start to contribute at order aQo . Such effects are therefore suppressed by two orders of Q<br />

compared to the lead<strong>in</strong>g terms. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> agreement with the various numerical analyses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!