21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 5. Isosp<strong>in</strong> violation <strong>in</strong> the two-nucleon system<br />

�AII<br />

1,-2<br />

.. I ..<br />

$ + 2<br />

.. ..<br />

+ +<br />

Figure 5.3: Relevant graphs contribut<strong>in</strong>g to charge <strong>in</strong>dependence break<strong>in</strong>g at lead<strong>in</strong>g order aQ -2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> open (filled) circle denotes a pion mass <strong>in</strong>sertion rv 8M2 (an <strong>in</strong>sertion of the lead<strong>in</strong>g fournucleon<br />

operators rv aEb 1 )). For charge symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g, the lead<strong>in</strong>g contribution is given by<br />

the last diagram with the filled circle denot<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>sertionrv aEb2) .<br />

From this we conclude that OPE diagrams with different pion masses have the isosp<strong>in</strong> structure<br />

T(I)i��T(I)j and lead to CIB s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

012 =<br />

= (a + b) T(I) . T(2) - bT(31) T(3 2)<br />

(ppIOdpp)cs<br />

(npIOdnp)<br />

(nnI012Inn) = a ,<br />

+ (npI012Ipn) = a + 2b , (5.34)<br />

for the various isosp<strong>in</strong> components of the two-nucleon system and 'Cs' stands for Coulombsubtracted.<br />

Obviously, these effects are of order aQ-2. <strong>The</strong> np amplitude was already calculated<br />

by KSW. We have worked out the lead<strong>in</strong>g corrections �A = Ann - Anp = A�: - Anp due to the<br />

pion mass difference. <strong>The</strong> pert<strong>in</strong>ent diagrams are shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 5.3. We follow the notation of<br />

KSW and call these correspond<strong>in</strong>g three amplitudes Ai�_,.IiI,IV where the first (second) subscript<br />

refers to the power <strong>in</strong> a (Q) and the superscripts to the first three diagrams of the figure. We f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

r =<br />

r [<br />

4 � 2 In (1 + �;) - M; : 4p2] ,<br />

(mMnA_l) [ 1 2p i ( 4p2) 1 + � ]<br />

47r pMn Mn 2pMn M; M; + 4p2<br />

r -arctan -+ -- In 1 +- _ 7T<br />

r (mMnA_l) 2 [ i 2p 1 ( M; + 4p2) I 1 1 1 + � ]<br />

47r M2 M 2M2 1/2 M2 2 M2 + 4p2<br />

2<br />

n n n ,.., n n<br />

- arctan - - -- n + - - - ---- -c:------"---;o-<br />

-8M2 �;; , 8M2 = M;± -M;o , M; = M;o + 28M2 , (5.35)<br />

with A-1 == AO,-1 the lead<strong>in</strong>g term <strong>in</strong> the expansion of the np I SO amplitude [91], see eq. (5.31)<br />

Here, J.l is the PDS regularization scale. Note while the diagrams II and III are f<strong>in</strong>ite, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegral <strong>in</strong> the �A{v:..2 diverges logarithmically. <strong>The</strong>refore, the Lagrangian must conta<strong>in</strong><br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!