21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5. Results for the NNLO-f:. approach 149<br />

out.14 A very similar situation for the spurious states happens at NNLO also <strong>in</strong> other S-, P- and<br />

D-waves. Note that these unphysical states are purely short range effects: as one can see from the<br />

fig. 4.15 the wave-functions correspond<strong>in</strong>g to such states become negligable for distances above 2<br />

fm. <strong>The</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g root-mean-square matter radii are (ri)1/2 = 0.27 fm and (r�)1/2 =<br />

0.40 fm.<br />

For separations above 2 fm the NNLO deuteron wave-function is very elose to the one obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with the CD-Bonn potential.15 This is shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 4.16. For a discussion on such deeply bound<br />

states <strong>in</strong> effective field theories, see ref. [141]. We end this paragraph with the follow<strong>in</strong>g remark:<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lev<strong>in</strong>son's theorem, the difference between the phase shift at the orig<strong>in</strong> and at<br />

<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity is given by mf, with n the number of bound states. Thus, the phase shifts <strong>in</strong> the S-, Pand<br />

D-waves should become unphysical at large energies. This is, however, of no relevance for<br />

the EFT s<strong>in</strong>ce we do not attempt to correctly reproduce (or predict) the phase shift behavior for<br />

all energies (from threshold to <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity).<br />

4.5 Results for the NNLO-ß approach<br />

We would like now to discuss the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the NNLO-f:. potential. While the LECs<br />

C 3 and C4 are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the f:., see ref. [200], most of the correlated two-pion exchange is<br />

parametrized <strong>in</strong> Cl . Here, we are mostly <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the role of the f:. <strong>in</strong> all partial<br />

waves and therefore keep the cut-off A fixed at 875 MeV but refit the LECs C i (see table 4.1 for<br />

their values). More precisely, a best global fit leads to a very similar cut-off value as <strong>in</strong> NNLO.<br />

Note that, as expected, the precision of the fits is better than NLO <strong>in</strong> the theory without f:. but<br />

somewhat worse than the correspond<strong>in</strong>g NNLO fits. This is due to the absence of contributions<br />

from higher mass states encoded <strong>in</strong> the LEes C 1,3 ,4 not present <strong>in</strong> the NNLO-f:. approach discussed<br />

here. We aga<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t out that it would be <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to calculate the NNLO corrections with<br />

explicit f:. <strong>in</strong> the framework of the EFT expansion as detailed <strong>in</strong> ref. [201]. This would also require<br />

refitt<strong>in</strong>g of the LECs C1, 3 ,4' In fact, a study of pion-nueleon scatter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> that framework is not<br />

yet available and thus the correspond<strong>in</strong>g LECs are not determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Let us now discuss the results of the NNLO-f:. approach. Formally, we follow the Munich<br />

group [109] (for details, see sec. 3.8.3). Aga<strong>in</strong>, it is important to stress that we iterate our<br />

potential to all orders. We refra<strong>in</strong> from show<strong>in</strong>g all partial waves but rat her discuss some particular<br />

examples, collected <strong>in</strong> fig. 4.17. <strong>The</strong> two S-waves shown <strong>in</strong> that figure are not very different<br />

from the NNLO result, although the description of 3 Sl is slightly worse at higher energies. All<br />

P-waves are very similar <strong>in</strong> NNLO and NNLO-f:., the most visible difference appears <strong>in</strong> E1, as<br />

can be seen <strong>in</strong> the figure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most dramatic effects appear <strong>in</strong> the D-waves. This is expected s<strong>in</strong>ce these are parameter-free<br />

predictions and we had already po<strong>in</strong>ted out the cut-off sensitivity <strong>in</strong> sec. 4.3.3. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the<br />

description of 1 D 2 is almost identical <strong>in</strong> the two approaches, consequently any important isobar<br />

effect <strong>in</strong> this partial wave can be weIl represented by contact <strong>in</strong>teractions with their strength given<br />

by the coupl<strong>in</strong>g of the f:. to the 7f N system. In 3 D 3 (also shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 4.17) the absence of the<br />

scalar-isoscalar two-pion correlations is elearly visible. Our result thus confirms a f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g made<br />

14 As soon as one is deal<strong>in</strong>g with only the two-nucleon system there is no need to <strong>in</strong>tegrate out such unphysical<br />

states, s<strong>in</strong>ce this does not modify the low-energy observables. We refra<strong>in</strong> here from the discussion of the complicatians<br />

which may arise <strong>in</strong> three- and more-body calculations due to such spurious states. Note, however, that<br />

accard<strong>in</strong>g to aur power count<strong>in</strong>g one has an additional three-body force at NNLO which possibly can compensate<br />

the effects of the spurious states.<br />

1 5 We would like to thank Hiroyuki Kamada for supply<strong>in</strong>g us with the deuteron wave-function calculated with<br />

the CD-Bonn potential.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!