21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4. Deuteron properties 145<br />

the Nijmegen-93 potential. This <strong>in</strong>creased value of PD is related to the strong NNLO TPEP. At<br />

N3LO, we expect this to be compensated by dimension four counterterms. Altogether, we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

a much improved description of the deuteron as compared to ref. [78], where the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy,<br />

magnetic moment and quadrupole moment were used <strong>in</strong> fits. Our results are almost as precise as<br />

the ones obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the much more complicated and less systematic meson-exchange models.<br />

11 Ed [MeV]<br />

Qd [fm2]<br />

77<br />

rd [fm]<br />

As [fm-l/2]<br />

PD[%]<br />

NLO 1 NNLO 1 NNLO-Ll 11 Nijm93 1 CD-Bonn 11<br />

-2.1650 -2.2238 -2.1849 -2.224575 -2.224575<br />

0.266 0.262 0.268 0.271 0.270<br />

0.0248 0.0245 0.0247 0.0252 0.0255<br />

1.975 1.967 1.970 1.968 1.966<br />

0.866 0.884 0.873 0.8845 0.8845<br />

3.62 6.11 5.00 5.76 4.83<br />

Exp.<br />

-2.224575(9)<br />

0.2859(3)<br />

0.0256(4)<br />

1.9671(6)<br />

0.8846(16)<br />

-<br />

Table 4.7: Deuteron properties derived from our chiral potential compared to two "realistic"<br />

potentials (Nijmegen-93 and CD-Bonn) and the data. Here, rd is the root-mean-square matter<br />

radius. An exponential regulator with A = 600 MeV and A = 1.05 Ge V at NLO and NNLO<br />

(NNLO-Ll), <strong>in</strong> order, is used.<br />

It is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to compare our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs with the results reported by Park et al. [105]. <strong>The</strong>re,<br />

np scatter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the 3 SI-3 Dl channel as well as various deuteron properties are <strong>in</strong>vestigated. <strong>The</strong><br />

potential considered <strong>in</strong> this work consists of the lead<strong>in</strong>g OPE plus contact <strong>in</strong>teractions without<br />

and with two derivatives. To fix three free parameters correspond<strong>in</strong>g to these contact terms the<br />

authors of [105] use the deuteron b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy and the experimental values for As and 77. For<br />

the quadrupole moment they obta<strong>in</strong> values from 0.261 to 0.274 fm2 depend<strong>in</strong>g on the choice of<br />

the cut-off. <strong>The</strong> D-state prob ability varies from 3.16% to 5.39%.<br />

Kaplan et al. have recently reported on the NLO calculation of the deuteron charge radius and<br />

the quadrupole moment <strong>in</strong> the KSW scheme [92]. <strong>The</strong>y found analytic expressions for these<br />

quantities. Hav<strong>in</strong>g fixed three free parameters from the 3 SI phase shift, deuteron b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy<br />

and magnetic moment, they made the follow<strong>in</strong>g predictions for the deuteron charge radius and<br />

the quadrupole moment: reh = 1.89 fm 13 and Qd = 0.40 fm2. <strong>The</strong> large discrepancy for the<br />

quadrupole moment is because this quantity is zero at LO <strong>in</strong> this formalism. Thus, the (formally)<br />

NLO correction for Q d yields the first non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g contribution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ate space S- and D-state wave functions obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> our approach are shown <strong>in</strong><br />

fig. 4.14. At NLO they look qualitatively quite similar to the ones obta<strong>in</strong>ed from various potential<br />

models. At NNLO one obta<strong>in</strong>s a lot of structure <strong>in</strong> the wave functions below 2 fm. This is because<br />

two additional spurious (unphysical) very deeply bound states appear <strong>in</strong> the 3S1 _3 Dl channel.<br />

<strong>The</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy of these states varies strongly by chang<strong>in</strong>g the cut-off. For the exponential<br />

regulator with A = 1.05 GeV we get b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energies of EI = 47.1 GeV and E 2<br />

= 2.5 GeV,<br />

respectively. This values correspond to center-of-mass momenta of about a few Ge V which is<br />

clearly out of the applicability range of the low-momentum effective theory. Furthermore, because<br />

of such huge values of the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy these unphysical states obviously do not <strong>in</strong>fluence physics<br />

<strong>in</strong> the energy region below 350 MeV that we are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> and can, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, be <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

1 3 <strong>The</strong> experimental value of the charge radius is 2.1303±O.0066 fm [212].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!