21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 4. <strong>The</strong> two-nuc1eon system: numerical results<br />

waves OPE does already a fairly good job, but the improvement <strong>in</strong> some of these phases due to<br />

the NNLO TPEP clearly underl<strong>in</strong>es the importance of chiral symmetry <strong>in</strong> a precise description of<br />

low-energy nuclear physics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g situation <strong>in</strong> the peripheral partial waves appears for the 3 G5 phase,u In<br />

these channel the OPE and the lead<strong>in</strong>g TPE are not sufficient to describe the phase shift correctly<br />

at energies higher than 100 MeV and the largest discrepancy of our NLO predictions with the<br />

data is observed. Add<strong>in</strong>g the sublead<strong>in</strong>g TPE exchange (NNLO potential) that <strong>in</strong>corporates the<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g effects of the heavier meson exchanges and <strong>in</strong>termediate ..6.-excitations, which is hidden <strong>in</strong><br />

the values of the coupl<strong>in</strong>gs Cl,3,4 allows to improve the NLO result considerably and to obta<strong>in</strong> an<br />

excellent parameter free and cut-off <strong>in</strong>dependent description of the phase shift. Perform<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

calculations with the NNLO-Ll potential we were even able to separate the lead<strong>in</strong>g effects of the<br />

..6.'s. We will comment on that later on. It is comfort<strong>in</strong>g to have such a clear <strong>in</strong>dication that the<br />

values for Cl,3,4 fixed from 7f N scatter<strong>in</strong>g are consistent with N N calculations.<br />

4.4 Deuteron properties<br />

We now turn to the bound state properties. At NNLO (NLO), we consider the exponential<br />

regulator (4.13) with n = 2 and A = 1.05 (0.60) GeV, which reproduces the deuteron b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

energy with<strong>in</strong> an accuracy of about one third of a permille (2.5 percent).We make no attempt to<br />

reproduce this number with better precision.12 <strong>The</strong> results for the phase shifts, which correspond<br />

to these values of the exponential regulator, are very similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the sharp<br />

cutoff A = 0.875 (0.50) GeV. For completeness, we list <strong>in</strong> table 4.6 the values of the coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constants <strong>in</strong> the 3 SI - 3 Dl channel correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the exponential regulator.<br />

NLO -0.0363 0.186 -0.190<br />

NNLO -14.497 15.588 -4.358<br />

NNLO-..6. -8.637 7.264 -0.447<br />

Table 4.6: <strong>The</strong> values of the LECs as determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the 3 SI _ 3 Dl channel. We use an<br />

exponential cut-off with A = 0.6 GeV and 1.05 GeV at NLO and NNLO (NNLO-..6.), respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> LEC 0 3 5 1 is <strong>in</strong> 104 GeV-2 , while the others are <strong>in</strong> 104 GeV-4 . <strong>The</strong> parameters of the NLO,<br />

NNLO and NNLO-..6. potentials are obta<strong>in</strong>ed from fitt<strong>in</strong>g to the Nijmegen PSA.<br />

In table 4.7 we collect the deuteron properties <strong>in</strong> comparison to the data and two realistic potential<br />

model predictions (the pert<strong>in</strong>ent formulae are given <strong>in</strong> app. H). We give the results for NLO and<br />

NNLO. We note that the deviation of our prediction for the quadrupole moment compared to<br />

the empirical value is slightly larger than for the realistic potentials. <strong>The</strong> asymptotic D / S ratio,<br />

called ry, and the strength of the asymptotic wave function, As, are weIl described. <strong>The</strong> D-state<br />

probability, which is not an observable, is most sensitive to small variations <strong>in</strong> the cut-off. At<br />

NLO, it is comparable and at NNLO somewhat larger than the one obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the CD-Bonn or<br />

ll Note that the 3Zj=I+I-phases show, <strong>in</strong> general, the largest effects when go<strong>in</strong>g from NLO to NNLO and thus are<br />

most sensitive to the short range physics. <strong>The</strong> three extreme cases are the 1 P 2 -, 3 D 3 - and 3G5-waves. We assurne<br />

some sort of cancelation <strong>in</strong> the potential <strong>in</strong> these channels, wh ich leads to a suppression of the OPE and the lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

TPE contributions.<br />

12Note that the deuteron b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy is not used to fit the free parameters <strong>in</strong> the potential.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!