21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 1. Introduction<br />

the Thcson-Melbourne 3NF does not lead to a significant improvement. This problem still rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

unsolved [196].<br />

In spite of a very successful description of most of the experimental data the modern realistic<br />

N N potentials are quite phenomenological approaches. For <strong>in</strong>stance, one of the basic <strong>in</strong>gredients<br />

of these models is a fictitious (J' (550 MeV) boson, which is needed to produce the rather strong<br />

attraction <strong>in</strong> the central part of the potential. This attraction is evident from the N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data, see also discussion <strong>in</strong> ref. [48]. Such a (J'-meson, however, has never been observed experimentally.<br />

For a recent discussion about the experimental evidence of the (J'-meson see ref. [49].<br />

Another common feature of the boson-exchange models is the ad hoc <strong>in</strong>troduction of the strong<br />

form-factors4 at each meson-nucleon vertex <strong>in</strong> order to correct the large momentum behavior of<br />

the potential and to allow for practical calculations. Such form-factors are usually <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of higher-order (<strong>in</strong> a coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant) meson-nucleon and meson-meson <strong>in</strong>teractions,<br />

dress<strong>in</strong>g each vertex. Because of the non-perturbative nature of such <strong>in</strong>teractions one is not able to<br />

directly calculate these form-factors and approximates them typically by some smooth functions<br />

of momenta. Only <strong>in</strong> the case of the so-called Ruhr-potential (RuhrPot) [50] the form-factors<br />

are generated dynamically by solv<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegral equations. Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

feature of this potential is its manifest energy <strong>in</strong>dependence result<strong>in</strong>g from the method of unitary<br />

transformation [51], [53] which has been used to def<strong>in</strong>e the nuclear force. On the contrary, the<br />

standard approach based on the time-ordered perturbation theory leads necessarily to an effective<br />

Hamiltonian which depends on the <strong>in</strong>itial energy of the nucleons (i.e. to an operator which<br />

depends explicitly on its own eigenvalue). Such an energy dependence of the nuclear forces causes<br />

many complications <strong>in</strong> practical calculations for more than two nucleons. Another problem of the<br />

various meson-exchange potentials is how to systematicaHy improve these models and whether<br />

the one-boson exchange approximation is well justified. Indeed, if one takes the meson-exchange<br />

picture of the nuclear force seriously, one would expect that two- and more-meson exchanges are<br />

also important (because of the strong meson-nucleon coupl<strong>in</strong>g). Usually one argues at this po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

that the force based on the two- and more-meson exchanges are, <strong>in</strong> general, of shorter range than<br />

the one-meson exchange force and thus are less relevant for the energy region of nuclear physics<br />

(with exception of pion-exchange <strong>in</strong>teractions). Although quite plausible, such arguments should<br />

be considered more qualitative than quantitative.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> conceptual problem of the OBE models, however, can be illustrated <strong>in</strong> terms of the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g "classical" picture [54]: ass urne that hadrons are hard spheres. <strong>The</strong> charge radius of the<br />

proton is .J(rI) rv 0.6 fm, while the typical size of light mesons is about 0.5 fm. <strong>The</strong>n mesons<br />

can not mediate the nuclear force at distances below rv 2 x 0.6 fm + 2 x 0.5 fm = 2.2 fm. Even if<br />

this picture is very much simplified and does not take <strong>in</strong>to account quantum mechanical effects,<br />

it becomes clear that the traditional meson-exchange picture should not be adequate to describe<br />

the nuclear matter phenomena at distances below 2 fm.<br />

One hopes that quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the fundamental theory of the strong <strong>in</strong>teraction,<br />

can help to avoid these problems of the OBE models and provide us with a deeper understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the nature of the nuclear forces. QCD is a SU(3)color gauge theory of the strong<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction, formulated <strong>in</strong> terms of quarks and gluons. <strong>The</strong> structure of nucleons as weH as <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

between them are, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, completely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by QCD. Direct calculations of the<br />

nuclear force from QCD are not possible up to now. This is because at low energies the <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

is too strong to apply the usual perturbative methods. However, many attempts were made<br />

to <strong>in</strong>corporate more <strong>in</strong>formation from QCD <strong>in</strong> models of the N N <strong>in</strong>teractions. In the so-called<br />

4 Such form-factors are anyway not well-def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> quantum field theory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!