21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.9. Three-nuc1eon potential<br />

2 3<br />

Figure 3.26: Lead<strong>in</strong>g three-nuc1eon force with b,-isobar excitations. All possible<br />

time order<strong>in</strong>gs should be considered. For notations see figs. 3.6, 3.16 and fig. 3.23.<br />

more-nuc1eon system. First steps <strong>in</strong> this direction have been done <strong>in</strong> refs. [118], [196]. In the<br />

first work, Friar et al. consider the constra<strong>in</strong>ts on a possible form of the TPE force aris<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

requirement of its (approximate) chiral symmetry. <strong>The</strong>y po<strong>in</strong>ted out that any TPE 3N force can<br />

be expressed as<br />

where<br />

117<br />

(3.338)<br />

(3.339)<br />

Here ij and ij' are the moment um transfers between the nuc1eons 1, 3 and 3, 2. Note that these<br />

expressions are valid modulo l/m corrections. <strong>The</strong> authors of ref. [118] extracted the coefficients<br />

a, b, C and d from various exist<strong>in</strong>g 3N forces, which are based on different models, and compared<br />

them with the predictions obta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the framework of chiral perturbation theory without<br />

explicit b,'s. In the latter case, the lead<strong>in</strong>g order values of these coefficients can be calculated<br />

from the 3N force shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.25 (1). <strong>The</strong> values of the relevant 7r7rNN coupl<strong>in</strong>gs Cl , C3 and<br />

C4 are known from the pion-nuc1eon sector, as discussed <strong>in</strong> sec. 3.8.2 and thus the coefficients a,<br />

b, c and d can be predicted without free parameters. It turns out that although the signs of these<br />

coefficients are always the same, their values differ substantially (by factors of two) for different<br />

three-nuc1eon forces. Furthermore, to lead<strong>in</strong>g order <strong>in</strong> low-momentum expansion CHPT leads to<br />

the largest absolute values for the coefficients a, b and d48 and to c = O. <strong>The</strong> c-term does not<br />

vanish for the Tucson-Melbourne (TM) force [43] and thus violates chiral constra<strong>in</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong>refore<br />

<strong>in</strong> ref. [118] it is recommended to drop this c-term <strong>in</strong> the TM force.<br />

In the second work, Hüber et al. analyse the effects of the 3N force correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the second<br />

graph <strong>in</strong> fig. (3.25) <strong>in</strong> elastic neutron-deuteron scatter<strong>in</strong>g at low-energies. <strong>The</strong>y found that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion of such a short-range-long-range force might considerably improve the agreement for<br />

the analyz<strong>in</strong>g power Ay• This study is, however, merely qualitative, s<strong>in</strong>ce only a part of the<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g-order 3N force result<strong>in</strong>g from CHPT has been <strong>in</strong>cluded and no attempt was made to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> a reasonable fit to data.<br />

An important observation has been done by van Kolck <strong>in</strong> ref. [77]. He po<strong>in</strong>ted out that several<br />

vertices enter<strong>in</strong>g the expressions for the lead<strong>in</strong>g 3N force are saturated by virtual b,-isobar ex-<br />

4 8 Note, however, that the authors of ref. [118) used the values for Cl,3,4 as given <strong>in</strong> [71) that are somewhat larger<br />

than the ones from the later publication [195], which we adopt <strong>in</strong> this work.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!