21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.9. Three-nucleon potential 115<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g-order 3N force with<strong>in</strong> time-ordered perturbation theory. It is weIl known that the static<br />

2 3 4<br />

5 6<br />

Figure 3.24: Lead<strong>in</strong>g contributions to the three-nucleon potential: reducible twopion<br />

exchange diagrams and reducible one-pion exchange graphs with the NN contact<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction. For notations see figs. 3.6, 3.23.<br />

TPE 3N force cancels aga<strong>in</strong>st the recoil corrections of the nucleons to the static OPE 2N potential,<br />

when the latter is iterated <strong>in</strong> the Lippmann-Schw<strong>in</strong>ger equation [191], [46]. <strong>The</strong> same sort<br />

of cancelation happens for the lead<strong>in</strong>g TPE and OPE 3N forces related to diagrams 1-8 and 10<br />

<strong>in</strong> fig. 3.23, as has been found by van KoIck [77]. S<strong>in</strong>ce the energy dependence of the NLO 2N<br />

potential is entirely given by recoil corrections of the nucleons to the static OPE, one can describe<br />

systems of three or more nucleons us<strong>in</strong>g the energy-<strong>in</strong>dependent part of the 2N potential and<br />

without explicit three- and many-nucleon forces (at next-to-Iead<strong>in</strong>g order <strong>in</strong> the chiral expansion<br />

for the potential). However, such type of cancelations does not help to remove the problems<br />

<strong>in</strong> the two-nucleon sector due to the explicit energy-dependence as noted before (i.e. that the<br />

wavefunctions are only orthonormal to the order one is work<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

Let us now take a closer look at the 3N force obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the projection formalism. As already<br />

stated above, for the TPE graph 9 <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.23 one obta<strong>in</strong>s the same result us<strong>in</strong>g both schemes.<br />

Apart from the irreducible TPE diagrams 1-8 and OPE diagram 10 <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.23, one also has to<br />

take <strong>in</strong>to account "reducible" graphs shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.24. <strong>The</strong> diagrams 1-4 <strong>in</strong> this figure refer to the<br />

last two terms <strong>in</strong> the third l<strong>in</strong>e of eq. (3.254), whereas the graphs 5 and 6 <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the N N contact<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions arise from the terms <strong>in</strong> the fourth l<strong>in</strong>e of this equation. Obviously, the cancelation of<br />

the lead<strong>in</strong>g 3N force with the iterated energy dependent part of the 2N potential, as observed <strong>in</strong><br />

the context of old-fashioned perturbation theory, is now not possible because the potential <strong>in</strong> the<br />

projection formalism is energy <strong>in</strong>dependent. Nevertheless, the lead<strong>in</strong>g-order 3N force completely<br />

vanishes <strong>in</strong> the method of unitary transformation, although the mechanism of the cancelation<br />

is different from the above case. In the projection formalism, the 3N force vanishes because of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!