The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
112 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />
moment um dependence is due to the loop <strong>in</strong>tegration ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the result is given solely by a<br />
power-Iaw divergent <strong>in</strong>tegral. Note that no analogous diagrams with purely nucleonic <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
states contribute to the effective potential <strong>in</strong> our approach.<br />
We now discuss the most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g type of correction, the two-pion exchange diagrams with<br />
.6.-excitations. Different to the purely nucleonic case, one has no "reducible" graphs and, consequently,<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>s the same results with time-ordered perturbation theory and the projection<br />
formalism. <strong>The</strong> TPE graphs with the .6.'s at NLO correspond<strong>in</strong>g to eq. (3.323) are shown <strong>in</strong><br />
fig. 3.22. <strong>The</strong> tri angle diagram 1 <strong>in</strong> this figure is related to the second, third and fourth terms <strong>in</strong><br />
the first l<strong>in</strong>e of eq. (3.323). <strong>The</strong> first term <strong>in</strong> the second l<strong>in</strong>e and the last term <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.323) refer<br />
to graphs 2-5 <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.22.<br />
We will not calculate the complete NLO potential s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>clusion of the .6. is performed,<br />
basically, to <strong>in</strong>terpret the physics associated with the low-energy pion-nucleon constants. Such a<br />
calculation has been performed by the Munich group [109]. <strong>The</strong>y have found that all one-Ioop selfenergy<br />
and vertex corrections with .6.-isobar excitations lead only to mass and coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant<br />
renormalization and have the same structure as the OPE and N N contact <strong>in</strong>teractions. <strong>The</strong> only<br />
new <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> the Hamiltonian, that <strong>in</strong>cludes the .6.-field and is relevant for calculation of<br />
the NLO potential is<br />
where the 2x4 sp<strong>in</strong> and isosp<strong>in</strong> transition matrices Si and Ti are normalized via<br />
�<br />
(28" - if."kO'k)<br />
3<br />
1 .<br />
-(28·· - Zf."kTk)<br />
3<br />
1) 1) ,<br />
1) 1) •<br />
(3.324)<br />
(3.325)<br />
(3.326)<br />
An explicit form for the matrices S and T can be found, for example, <strong>in</strong> ref. [189]. In eq. (3.324) we<br />
adopt the same value for the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the 7r N .6. vertex with one derivative<br />
as <strong>in</strong> [109]. <strong>The</strong> TPE diagrams with .6.-excitation were also evaluated (but not renormalized)<br />
by Ord6iiez et al. [78] us<strong>in</strong>g time-ordered perturbation theory. For completeness, we collect here<br />
the pert<strong>in</strong>ent formulae for the renormalized TPEP with .6.'s worked out by the Munich group<br />
[109]. <strong>The</strong>re are three dist<strong>in</strong>ct contributions .<br />
.6.-excitation <strong>in</strong> the tri angle graphs:<br />
with<br />
s<br />
L(q)<br />
D(q)<br />
.6.<br />
E<br />
V4M; + q2 ,<br />
� In s + q<br />
q 2M1': '<br />
1 100 dJ.l<br />
arctan<br />
mt::. - m = 293 MeV ,<br />
2M; + q2 _ 2.6.2 .<br />
..6. 2M" J.l2 + q2<br />
V J.l2 - 4M2<br />
2.6.<br />
1':<br />
(3.327)<br />
(3.328)<br />
(3.329)<br />
(3.330)<br />
(3.331)<br />
(3.332)