21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d the follow<strong>in</strong>g expressions:<br />

V (6 -3N )<br />

elf<br />

V(8-3N)<br />

elf<br />

(3.323)<br />

We will now discuss these expressions <strong>in</strong> more detail. Obviously, the lead<strong>in</strong>g order contribution<br />

Figure 3.20: First corrections to the NN potential with ß-excitations: reducible<br />

self-energy corrections to the four-nucleon contact <strong>in</strong>teractions. For notations see<br />

figs. 3.6, 3.16.<br />

(3.322) to the effective N N potential is not changed by the explicit <strong>in</strong>clusion of the ß.47 At<br />

NLO one has many additional contributions to the two-pion exchange diagrams and to the vertex<br />

corrections and self-energy graphs. <strong>The</strong> first four l<strong>in</strong>es of eq. (3.323) give formally the complete<br />

NLO potential <strong>in</strong> the case without ß. In addition to the one-pion exchange diagrams conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

self-energy <strong>in</strong>sertions and vertex corrections discussed <strong>in</strong> sec. 3.8.1 and shown <strong>in</strong> figs. 3.10, 3.11<br />

one has to take <strong>in</strong>to account the graphs <strong>in</strong> figs. 3.17, 3.18. In the diagrams shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.17,<br />

which are related to the first term <strong>in</strong> the second l<strong>in</strong>e and to the last term <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.323), no purely<br />

nucleonic <strong>in</strong>termediate states appear if one sums up over all possible time order<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

projection formalism yields the same result as time-ordered perturbation theory, which agrees after<br />

summation over all time order<strong>in</strong>gs with the one obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the Feynmann diagram technique.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong> one should keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that this statement holds true because of the static approximation<br />

for the nucleons. Note that we have depicted <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.17 the correspond<strong>in</strong>g Feynmann diagrams<br />

without show<strong>in</strong>g all time order<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> one-pion exchange diagrams of fig. 3.18 have a different<br />

topology. <strong>The</strong> irreducible graphs 1-4 correspond aga<strong>in</strong> to the first term <strong>in</strong> the second l<strong>in</strong>e of<br />

47 Note that there are new contributions to the one-nucleon operators due to the diagram with an <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

delta-excitation, which will not be considered <strong>in</strong> what folIows.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!