21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

A and B are valid also <strong>in</strong> this case. Furthermore, one has to <strong>in</strong>clude states conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> A ° with<br />

.6.'s and without pions. This is discussed <strong>in</strong> appendix C. Let us now take a closer look at these<br />

modifications.<br />

\ /<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\<br />

,<br />

,<br />

,<br />

\ I I /<br />

, /<br />

\<br />

I<br />

\<br />

\<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

,<br />

,<br />

\ ,<br />

I<br />

2 3 4<br />

\ \<br />

, " I I<br />

, "<br />

, " "<br />

\ \<br />

I I<br />

5 6 7 !\<br />

Figure 3.18: First corrections to the NN potential with .6.-excitations: irreducible<br />

(1-4) and reducible (5-8) vertex and self-energy corrections to the one-pion exchange.<br />

For notations see figs. 3.6, 3.16.<br />

For the projected operator Aa A1] we make the same ansatz as <strong>in</strong> the case without .6., namely that<br />

it consists of an equal number of vertices and energy denom<strong>in</strong>ators. S<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>clusion of the .6.<br />

does not affect the power count<strong>in</strong>g scheme, equations (3.210) and (3.212) are not modified. Here<br />

and <strong>in</strong> what follows, we will denote by N the baryon number. Consequently, the m<strong>in</strong>imal value<br />

of VA is aga<strong>in</strong> given by eq. (3.213). Furthermore, m<strong>in</strong>(vA) = 2 for the operator AOA1], as follows<br />

from eq. (3.210). <strong>The</strong>refore, we will aga<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>e the order l of the operator Aa A1] via eq. (3.214).<br />

As discussed <strong>in</strong> appendix C, the <strong>in</strong>clusion of the ß's does not change the m<strong>in</strong>imal value of the<br />

chiral power v for the projected decoupl<strong>in</strong>g equation (3.206). <strong>The</strong>refore, we can apply eqs.<br />

(3.216)<br />

(3.215),<br />

without any changes. Thus, the system of equations (3.205) can be solved perturbatively<br />

precisely <strong>in</strong> the same way as <strong>in</strong> the case without ß. <strong>The</strong> only modification is that at each order<br />

r one has to start by solv<strong>in</strong>g the equation (3.217) projected with AO • It is shown <strong>in</strong> appendix C<br />

that all operators Aa A/1] of the right-hand side of this equation are of higher orders l 2: r + 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g operator A ° Ar 1] is then used to solve the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g equations at order r projected<br />

onto the states with pions.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce equation (3.217) with 4k + i = 0 vanishes at orders r = 0 and r = 1, the start<strong>in</strong>g equations<br />

are aga<strong>in</strong> (3.221), (3.222). <strong>The</strong>refore, the ansatz about the structure of the operator A can be<br />

justified <strong>in</strong> the same way as <strong>in</strong> sec. 3.6. F<strong>in</strong>ally, all expressions (3.225)-(3.229) can be applied<br />

without any changes to obta<strong>in</strong> the effective potential.<br />

We are now <strong>in</strong> the position to calculate the effective potential <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g .6.-excitations. We will<br />

" "

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!