21.12.2012 Views

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />

be described <strong>in</strong> detail below. For gA and i1f we will take the values known from the one-nucleon<br />

sector. Note, however, that we have not performed here a complete renormalization ofthe potential<br />

at NLO, which would also require a calculation of the contributions from disconnected diagrams<br />

(zero- and one-nucleon operators). <strong>The</strong>refore, the values of gA and i1f may, strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

differ from the correspond<strong>in</strong>g ones obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the 1fN scatter<strong>in</strong>g by order Q2 corrections and<br />

should, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, be extracted from the N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g data. It would be <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to perform<br />

a complete renormalization of the effective potential to obta<strong>in</strong> more rigorously the values of these<br />

constants. As we have found, the N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g data can be reproduced quite accurately us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the values i1f = 93 MeV and gA = 1.26.<br />

Let us now make another comment concern<strong>in</strong>g the choice of the loop functions JO,2,4, eq. (3.284).<br />

Clearly, any other choice of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this divergent loop <strong>in</strong>tegrals would give different f<strong>in</strong>ite subtractions<br />

but leads to the same non-polynomial terms (3.300) <strong>in</strong> the potential. For example, to<br />

express the potential <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

Ja = J2/L<br />

T ' - 100 2/L 3<br />

- r�o dl<br />

J4 = 1 dl ,<br />

(3.308)<br />

we have to replace Ja, J2 and J4 by Ja + In 2, J2 + 2f-L2 and J4 + 4f-L4, respectively, <strong>in</strong> eqs.<br />

(3.292)<br />

(3.289),<br />

and (3.297)-(3.299). This only modifies the def<strong>in</strong>itions of the renormalized coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

gA and Gi'S but does not change the expressions (3.300) and (3.270) for the effective potential.<br />

Furthermore, to reproduce the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g dimensional regularization we have to skip<br />

the power-Iaw divergences, i.e. to set J2 = 0, J4 = O. Also <strong>in</strong> that case we get the same expressions<br />

for the effective potential.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effective potential at NNLO correspond<strong>in</strong>g to eq. (3.255) can be renormalized analogously.<br />

As can be seen from eq. (3.255), the contribution to the effective potential <strong>in</strong> the projection<br />

formalism is the same as the one obta<strong>in</strong>ed with time-ordered perturbation theory (<strong>in</strong> the static<br />

limit for nucleons). Furthermore, the related graphs shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.15 <strong>in</strong>volve all possible time<br />

order<strong>in</strong>gs. As a consequence, the contribution to the effective potential can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

covariant perturbation theory and the technique of Feynman diagrams. This has been done by<br />

Kaiser et al. us<strong>in</strong>g dimensional regularization [108]. Here, we will not perform explicit calculations<br />

and simply adopt their result. <strong>The</strong> TPEP at NNLO reads:<br />

where<br />

(3) _<br />

V21f,1-loop - VNNLO + P(k, q) , (3.309)<br />

TPEP<br />

-<br />

VJJtJ -l��;i { -16m(���+ q2) + (2M;(2Cl -C3) -q2 (C3 + ::�)) (2M; + q2)A(q) }<br />

128��ii (Tl ' T2) { -4�1��2 + (4M; + 2q2 -g�(4M; + 3q2))(2M; + q2)A(q)}<br />

� �<br />

+ 51;:�ii ((0\ . ij)(ih . ij) -q2(ih .52)) (2M; + q2)A(q)<br />

3J:ii (Tl ' T2) ((51 ' ij)(52' ij) -l(5l .52))<br />

X {(C4 + _1 4m _)(4M; + q2) - 8m<br />

g� (10M; + 3q2)} A(q)<br />

3g� . ( al � � ) ( � I �) (2M2 2)A()<br />

641fmii z<br />

+ a2 . P x P 1f + q q

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!