The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104 3. <strong>The</strong> derivation of nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians<br />
be described <strong>in</strong> detail below. For gA and i1f we will take the values known from the one-nucleon<br />
sector. Note, however, that we have not performed here a complete renormalization ofthe potential<br />
at NLO, which would also require a calculation of the contributions from disconnected diagrams<br />
(zero- and one-nucleon operators). <strong>The</strong>refore, the values of gA and i1f may, strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
differ from the correspond<strong>in</strong>g ones obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the 1fN scatter<strong>in</strong>g by order Q2 corrections and<br />
should, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, be extracted from the N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g data. It would be <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to perform<br />
a complete renormalization of the effective potential to obta<strong>in</strong> more rigorously the values of these<br />
constants. As we have found, the N N scatter<strong>in</strong>g data can be reproduced quite accurately us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the values i1f = 93 MeV and gA = 1.26.<br />
Let us now make another comment concern<strong>in</strong>g the choice of the loop functions JO,2,4, eq. (3.284).<br />
Clearly, any other choice of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this divergent loop <strong>in</strong>tegrals would give different f<strong>in</strong>ite subtractions<br />
but leads to the same non-polynomial terms (3.300) <strong>in</strong> the potential. For example, to<br />
express the potential <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
Ja = J2/L<br />
T ' - 100 2/L 3<br />
- r�o dl<br />
J4 = 1 dl ,<br />
(3.308)<br />
we have to replace Ja, J2 and J4 by Ja + In 2, J2 + 2f-L2 and J4 + 4f-L4, respectively, <strong>in</strong> eqs.<br />
(3.292)<br />
(3.289),<br />
and (3.297)-(3.299). This only modifies the def<strong>in</strong>itions of the renormalized coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
gA and Gi'S but does not change the expressions (3.300) and (3.270) for the effective potential.<br />
Furthermore, to reproduce the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g dimensional regularization we have to skip<br />
the power-Iaw divergences, i.e. to set J2 = 0, J4 = O. Also <strong>in</strong> that case we get the same expressions<br />
for the effective potential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effective potential at NNLO correspond<strong>in</strong>g to eq. (3.255) can be renormalized analogously.<br />
As can be seen from eq. (3.255), the contribution to the effective potential <strong>in</strong> the projection<br />
formalism is the same as the one obta<strong>in</strong>ed with time-ordered perturbation theory (<strong>in</strong> the static<br />
limit for nucleons). Furthermore, the related graphs shown <strong>in</strong> fig. 3.15 <strong>in</strong>volve all possible time<br />
order<strong>in</strong>gs. As a consequence, the contribution to the effective potential can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
covariant perturbation theory and the technique of Feynman diagrams. This has been done by<br />
Kaiser et al. us<strong>in</strong>g dimensional regularization [108]. Here, we will not perform explicit calculations<br />
and simply adopt their result. <strong>The</strong> TPEP at NNLO reads:<br />
where<br />
(3) _<br />
V21f,1-loop - VNNLO + P(k, q) , (3.309)<br />
TPEP<br />
-<br />
VJJtJ -l��;i { -16m(���+ q2) + (2M;(2Cl -C3) -q2 (C3 + ::�)) (2M; + q2)A(q) }<br />
128��ii (Tl ' T2) { -4�1��2 + (4M; + 2q2 -g�(4M; + 3q2))(2M; + q2)A(q)}<br />
� �<br />
+ 51;:�ii ((0\ . ij)(ih . ij) -q2(ih .52)) (2M; + q2)A(q)<br />
3J:ii (Tl ' T2) ((51 ' ij)(52' ij) -l(5l .52))<br />
X {(C4 + _1 4m _)(4M; + q2) - 8m<br />
g� (10M; + 3q2)} A(q)<br />
3g� . ( al � � ) ( � I �) (2M2 2)A()<br />
641fmii z<br />
+ a2 . P x P 1f + q q