The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in a Chiral Effective Field Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.8. Two-nuc1eon potential 101<br />
Clearly, J2 (J4) is quadratically (quartically) divergent while Jo diverges logarithmically for large<br />
momenta and p, is some quantity with the dimension of mass (renormalization scale). Note that<br />
we could <strong>in</strong>troduce other forms of divergent <strong>in</strong>tegrals, which depend on a s<strong>in</strong>gle dimensionsfull<br />
scale (denoted here by p,). Another choice of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these divergent loop <strong>in</strong>tegrals would give<br />
different f<strong>in</strong>ite subtractions but leads to the same non-polynomial terms <strong>in</strong> the potential. We will<br />
comment more on that later on.<br />
Consider first the one-Ioop corrections to the OPEP, eq. (3.282). <strong>The</strong> relevant divergent <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />
lS /<br />
d3Z ZiZj<br />
(2n)3 w( = a Oij , (3.285)<br />
where i, j = 1,2,3 and a is some (<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite) constant. No other two-dimensional symmetrical (<strong>in</strong> i<br />
and j) tensors apart from Oij can enter the right-hand side of this equation, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>tegrand<br />
depends only on Z and the <strong>in</strong>tegration is performed over the whole space. Multiply<strong>in</strong>g both sides<br />
of eq. (3.285) by Oij and perform<strong>in</strong>g the summation over i,j we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
1/ d3Z Z2<br />
a = - ---<br />
3 (2n)3 w(<br />
. (3.286)<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g eqs. (3.285), (3.286) and (D.1) we can now rewrite the OPEP (3.282) as:<br />
4<br />
. 2<br />
V1�\-lOOP = 48�� 1: (Tl ' T2)(0'1 . if)(0'2 . if) �� {5M; + 3M; In :� + 4h -6M;Jo} , (3.287)<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms ofthe two divergent loop functions JO,2 def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.284). <strong>The</strong>refore, this contribution<br />
has exactly the same form as the OPEP (renormalized OPE),<br />
(3.288)<br />
provided we redef<strong>in</strong>e the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant g� (the superscript "0" denotes the lead<strong>in</strong>g term <strong>in</strong><br />
the chiral expansion) <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way:42<br />
(gT)2 = (gO)2 _<br />
{5M2 + 3M 2 In M; + 4J _<br />
(g�)4<br />
A A 12n2 fir 11: 11: 4p,2<br />
2 11:<br />
6M2 J }<br />
0 (3.289)<br />
Clearly, gA and g� differ by terms of second order <strong>in</strong> the chiral dimension. Consequently, all NLO<br />
one-Ioop corrections to the OPEP can be taken care off by renormalization of g�.<br />
In addition, there are the one-Ioop corrections to the lowest order four-fermion <strong>in</strong>teractions shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> eq. (3.283). Proceed<strong>in</strong>g analogously to eqs. (3.285), (3.286) and mak<strong>in</strong>g use of eq. (D.1) one<br />
can express the divergent <strong>in</strong>tegral enter<strong>in</strong>g eq. (3.283) <strong>in</strong> terms of the loop functions JO,2 as<br />
(2)<br />
V NN,1-1oop -6::1 ; C� (3 - Tl . T2) (0\ . 0'2) / d3ZZ4 wi3 (3.290)<br />
- g� j2 C� (3 - Tl ' T2) (0'1 . 0'2) {5M; + 3M; In M<br />
4 � + 24n 4h -6M;Jo}<br />
11: p,<br />
or <strong>in</strong> a more compact notation<br />
(3.291)<br />
42 Note that this expression may change if one performs a complete renormalization (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the wave function<br />
renormalization) .