20.12.2012 Views

LOCAL HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPELINE JOINT WELDED BY ...

LOCAL HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPELINE JOINT WELDED BY ...

LOCAL HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPELINE JOINT WELDED BY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Melichar, J. Háková, J. Veselský, L. Michlík<br />

306<br />

ζ s (1)<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

5x10<br />

Re (1)<br />

4 5x105 105 0.0<br />

Fig. 7. Values of basic local loss coefficient for the βPP-H tube joint ζ in dependence on Reynolds number.<br />

Obr. 7. Hodnoty základního součinitele místní ztráty spoje βPP-H trub ζ v závislosti na Reynoldsově čísle.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The paper shows basic values of the local loss<br />

coefficient for the βPP-H tube joints with butt<br />

welds that were experimentally determined for turbulent<br />

flow with Reynolds numbers within the<br />

range of 60 000 < Re < 500 000. The local loss<br />

basic coefficient at pipeline joints was for the<br />

above-mentioned range of Reynolds numbers constant<br />

with the average value of ζ = 0.6 . This value<br />

was determined for PP tube diameter of 72.5 mm<br />

and for the joint and diameter proportion<br />

d0/d = 0.87 .<br />

It is necessary to point out that in practice the local<br />

loss value can be dependent on various butt<br />

weld dimensions that depend on a technological<br />

process of the assembly. However, taking into account<br />

the exact size variability is practically impossible.<br />

With regard to large pressure drops at buttwelded<br />

PP tube joints that become significant in<br />

particular for long pipelines it is possible to recommend<br />

removing the butt welds projections<br />

and/or using tube joint technology, which would<br />

not result in this kind of local losses.<br />

Acknowledgement. The authors are particularly<br />

grateful to the companies FIS CZ s.r.o. Praha and<br />

BHV sensory s.r.o. Praha. Thanks are expressed to<br />

the Company FIS CZ for necessary material supply<br />

and experimental pipeline assembly and to the<br />

Company BHV for granting the techniques for experimental<br />

measurements.<br />

Received 15. December 2005<br />

Review accepted 14. June 2006<br />

List of symbols<br />

b, b´ – width of inner butt weld projection at pipeline joint<br />

[m], [mm],<br />

c – mean flow velocity [m s -1 ],<br />

d – inner pipeline diameter [m], [mm],<br />

h – height of butt-welds projections [m], [mm],<br />

I – electric current [A], [mA],<br />

K – constant in Eq.(6),<br />

k – hydraulic roughness of inner pipeline wall [mm], constant<br />

in Eq.(9),<br />

l – length of straight pipelines sections [m], [mm],<br />

p – static pressure [Pa],<br />

Q – flow rate [m 3 s -1 ],<br />

Re – Reynolds number [–],<br />

T – fluid temperature [ 0 C],<br />

Y – specific fluid energy [J kg -1 ],<br />

λ – friction factor [–],<br />

ν – kinematic viscosity [m 2 s -1 ],<br />

ρ – fluid density [kg m -3 ],<br />

ζ – local loss coefficient [–],<br />

∆ – difference.<br />

Subscripts<br />

e – equivalent,<br />

f – frictional,<br />

l – local loss,<br />

s – pipeline joints,<br />

z – loss-making,<br />

0 – at pipe contraction,<br />

12, 2S, S3 – at cross sections between marked locations,<br />

eventually between pressure taps.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

HÁK V., 2002: Long force main projection speciality by pipeline<br />

thermoplastic PE-HD application. (In Czech.) Heating,<br />

ventilation, installation no. 4, p, 142–145.<br />

IDELČIK I. E., 1960: Handbook of hydraulic. (In Russian.)<br />

Moskva: Gosenergoizdat, p. 123.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!