Social Justice Activism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Many government systems encourage public support of non-profit organizations bygranting various forms of tax relief for donations to charitable organizations.Governments may attempt to deny these benefits to activists by restricting the politicalactivity of tax-exempt organizations.Page 42 of 161
III. Economic Injustice &InequalityJustice in economics is a subcategory of welfare economics with modelsfrequently representing the ethical-social requirements of a given theory, whether "in thelarge", as of a just social order, or "in the small", as in the equity of "how institutionsdistribute specific benefits and burdens". That theory may or may not elicit acceptance.In the Journal of Economic Literature classification codes 'justice' is scrolled to at JEL:D63, wedged on the same line between 'Equity' and 'Inequality' along with 'OtherNormative Criteria and Measurement'. Categories above and below the lineare Externalities and Altruism.Some ideas about justice and ethics overlap with the origins of economic thought, oftenas to distributive justice and sometimes as to Marxian analysis. The subject is a topicof normative economics and philosophy and economics. In early welfare economics,where mentioned, 'justice' was little distinguished from maximization of allindividual utility functions or a social welfare function. As to the latter, PaulSamuelson (1947), expanding on work of Abram Bergson, represents a social welfarefunction in general terms as any ethical belief system required to order any(hypothetically feasible) social states for the entire society as "better than", "worsethan", or "indifferent to" each other. Kenneth Arrow (1963) showed a difficulty of trying toextend a social welfare function consistently across different hypothetical ordinal utilityfunctions even apart from justice. Utility maximization survives, even with the riseof ordinal-utility/Pareto theory, as an ethical basis for economic-policy judgments in thewealth-maximization criterion invoked in law and economics.Amartya Sen (1970), Kenneth Arrow (1983), Serge-Christophe Kolm (1969, 1996,2000), and others have considered ways in which utilitarianism as an approach tojustice is constrained or challenged by independent claims of equality inthe distribution of primary goods, liberty, entitlements, opportunity, exclusion ofantisocial preferences, possible capabilities, and fairness as non-envy plus Paretoefficiency. Alternate approaches have treated combining concern for the worst offwith economic efficiency, the notion of personal responsibility and (de)merits of levelingindividual benefits downward, claims of intergenerational justice, and other nonwelfarist/Paretoapproaches. Justice is a subarea of social choice theory, for exampleas to extended sympathy, and more generally in the work of Arrow, Sen, and others.A broad reinterpretation of justice from the perspective of game theory, social contracttheory, and evolutionary naturalism is found in works of Ken Binmore (1994, 1998,2004) and others. Arguments on fairness as an aspect of justice have been invoked toexplain a wide range of behavioral and theoretical applications,supplementing earlieremphasis on economic efficiency (Konow, 2003).________Page 43 of 161
Page 2 and 3: Page 2 of 161
Page 10 and 11: 4. Throughout the process, we encou
Page 16 and 17: Matthew 7:1212So in everything, do
Page 18 and 19: This work is not meant to be a piec
Page 20 and 21: beings, in efforts for gender, ethn
Page 22 and 23: SocratesSocrates (through Plato's d
Page 24 and 25: happiness, Hunter also cites ornith
Page 26 and 27: Freedom of association;Freedoms nec
Page 28 and 29: the protection of the rights of the
Page 30 and 31: The official Catholic doctrine on s
Page 32 and 33: society, regardless of background o
Page 34 and 35: movements within the larger ecologi
Page 36 and 37: activist groups use social media to
Page 38 and 39: the protection of the function of c
Page 40 and 41: Charles Tilly developed the concept
Page 44 and 45: Economic InequalityThere are a wide
Page 46 and 47: richest people, a small part of the
Page 48 and 49: 12345678910111213141516171819202122
Page 50 and 51: 73747576777879808182838485868788899
Page 52 and 53: 14714814915015115215315415515615715
Page 54 and 55: Economist Thomas Piketty argues tha
Page 56 and 57: the low-skilled workers in the rich
Page 58 and 59: study says that 25% of gap between
Page 60 and 61: When people were asked, what would
Page 62 and 63: Social Justice ArgumentsPatrick Dia
Page 64 and 65: General limitations on and taxation
Page 66 and 67: people. The criminal justice sector
Page 68 and 69: Key areas of knowledge for learners
Page 70 and 71: learners’ vulnerability to engage
Page 72 and 73: Well-guided educational programs ca
Page 74 and 75: Providing meaningful opportunities
Page 76 and 77: teachers to act for social change.
Page 78 and 79: Examples below provide a variety of
Page 80 and 81: embedded within the ‘informal’
Page 82 and 83: community, while respecting the pri
Page 86 and 87: communities and individuals to func
Page 88 and 89: 1. Compositional - Environmentalist
Page 90 and 91: The Bronx, in New York City, has be
Page 92 and 93:
statistically for effects of race a
Page 94 and 95:
use its technical and financial ass
Page 96 and 97:
has stated a more concrete priority
Page 98 and 99:
Environmental Justice InitiativesTh
Page 100 and 101:
programs have disproportionate impa
Page 102 and 103:
MappingUSFS has established several
Page 104 and 105:
rulemaking process. As of 2012, DR
Page 106 and 107:
Introduced by Henry Waxman, the act
Page 108 and 109:
eradication of the Aral Sea. The En
Page 110 and 111:
AustraliaIn Australia, the "Environ
Page 112 and 113:
victims of such environmental damag
Page 114 and 115:
GR (Global Response) - works to edu
Page 116 and 117:
number of ways - and for a number o
Page 118 and 119:
contributes 20% of the group's reso
Page 120 and 121:
Page 120 of 161
Page 122 and 123:
OriginOriginal MeaningDating back t
Page 124 and 125:
Page 124 of 161
Page 126 and 127:
Notes______________________________
Page 128 and 129:
Page 128 of 161
Page 130 and 131:
See discussions, stats, and author
Page 132 and 133:
Social Justice TheoryS 2795Furtherm
Page 134 and 135:
Social Justice TheoryS 2797competen
Page 136 and 137:
Social Justice TheoryS 2799populati
Page 138 and 139:
Social Networking in Online and Off
Page 140 and 141:
Attachment BDefining Social Justice
Page 142 and 143:
SOCIAL JUSTICEDefining Social Justi
Page 144 and 145:
Reisch • Defining Social Justice
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 132 of 161
Page 156 and 157:
UDK: 316.34FILOZOFIJA I DRUŠTVO XX
Page 158 and 159:
Olga Nikolić, Igor CvejićSocial J
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Advocacy Foundation PublishersPage
Page 174 and 175:
Issue Title QuarterlyVol. I 2015 Th
Page 176 and 177:
Issue Title QuarterlyVol. V 2019 Or
Page 178 and 179:
LINonprofit ConfidentialityIn The A
Page 180 and 181:
Vol. XVIII 2032 Public PolicyLXXVII
Page 182 and 183:
African-American Youth in The May 2
Page 184 and 185:
The Ripple Effects of Ministry TLFA
Page 186 and 187:
The e-Advocate QuarterlySpecial Edi
Page 188 and 189:
Legal Missions InternationalPage 15
Page 190 and 191:
Vol. V 2019XVII Russia Q-1 2019XVII
Page 192 and 193:
The e-Advocate NewsletterGenesis of
Page 194 and 195:
ExtrasThe Nonprofit Advisors Group
Page 196 and 197:
About The AuthorJohn C (Jack) Johns
Page 198:
Page 161 of 161
show all

Social Justice Activism

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?