28.02.2020 Views

FUSE#2

FUSE is a bi-annual publication that documents the projects at Dance Nucleus .

FUSE is a bi-annual publication that documents the projects at Dance Nucleus .

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCOPE#3<br />

There Is Speficifisfety<br />

- The Work As Scribed Text.<br />

by Lee Mun Wai<br />

Some questions I posed to myself during rehearsals include:<br />

What are the ways of acknowledging the other bodies?<br />

How many relations can I handle?<br />

What is the nature of each relation?<br />

How am I gazing?<br />

How am I being gazed at?<br />

What is moving the body?<br />

What am I acknowledging?<br />

When do shifts happen?<br />

What happens when a shift happens?<br />

How long does it take for a thing to become something else?<br />

The answering of these questions then becomes the doing of the dance.<br />

The answering then becomes the performance.<br />

One thing that was mentioned a lot in our rehearsals was the idea of<br />

a mode of inhabiting and a mode of achievement. These modes<br />

were modes of performance and they could be treated as opposite<br />

ends of the spectrum that Ren Xin and I were modulating ourselves<br />

within. A large part of what I have described above – about learning<br />

how to listen, navigate and negotiate – exists closer to the “mode of<br />

inhabiting” end of the spectrum. That is not to say that the “mode of<br />

achievement” end is not important. We soon realised that the work<br />

would tend to meander unendingly and uninterestingly if we only<br />

parked ourselves on the end closer to “mode of inhabiting”. Perhaps<br />

it might then be of interest to unpack the idea of what constitutes as<br />

“uninteresting”. What did it mean to say that a part of our dance was<br />

uninteresting? Uninteresting to whom? To us? To the audience? And<br />

by subsequently trying to negotiate these uninteresting parts, what<br />

kinds of pressures could we have been acquiescing to? Were we<br />

giving in too easily to a kind of conventional mode of watching? What<br />

alternative strategies did we have to get around these uninteresting<br />

parts? Could one of the strategies have been staying steadfast in<br />

this uninteresting part, to resist the want to get rid of it as soon as it<br />

appeared, in order for something to organically appear later on?<br />

Occupying either end of the spectrum was not useful to the work.<br />

Instead, we were modulating appropriately within the spectrum<br />

throughout the work, understanding that at some points, it would be<br />

necessary for certain situations to peak, and at others it was<br />

imperative to dissolve something that had been going on for some<br />

time even though it felt like it had some relevance. Indeed, the<br />

knowledge of how and when to employ these strategies of<br />

negotiation were honed during our rehearsals.<br />

I see you see her see them see us see me.<br />

105 106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!