FUSE#2
FUSE is a bi-annual publication that documents the projects at Dance Nucleus .
FUSE is a bi-annual publication that documents the projects at Dance Nucleus .
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SCOPE#3<br />
There Is<br />
Speficifisfety<br />
- The Work As Scribed Text.<br />
by Lee Mun Wai<br />
In this written contribution to <strong>FUSE#2</strong>, I would like to use this<br />
opportunity to (finally dare to make an attempt to) write about this<br />
work. I would like to (finally dare to) transfer some of my thoughts<br />
and feelings (a lot of them still very hazy) about There Is Speficifisfety<br />
into words.<br />
It is about encounter and what an encounter produces.<br />
This is the first time that I have embarked on a creative journey<br />
where it has been so hard for me to say in words what exactly it is<br />
about. Of course I know it is about something. But for a long time I<br />
had been hiding behind the convenient disguise of pretending that<br />
this work has no about-ness to it. How can that be?<br />
Perhaps I find it difficult to write about the work because its<br />
about-ness is so different from the previous works I had done.<br />
Previous works sought to describe or analyse certain world-views or<br />
topics using the contemporary dance form. Thus, choreography,<br />
movement and the bodies in space served to make these topics<br />
visible to the audience.<br />
With the Speficifisfety project however, the focus falls directly on the<br />
act and the situation itself – the very encounter between Ren Xin<br />
and I so to speak. It is the first time a project I am involved in ended<br />
up being about itself and nothing else but its very self.<br />
As the project began taking shape from 2016, Ren Xin and I soon found out that<br />
with every meeting or rehearsal, we were trying to find ways to encounter each<br />
other. Though we both share a great interest in each other’s practices and bodies<br />
of work, it is clear that our approaches are very different.<br />
Initially, this created some minor personal crises. I was not used<br />
to this non-deterministic way of working, where each rehearsal<br />
/ meeting began and ended with as many, if not even more,<br />
options, directions and unanswered questions. My headspace<br />
and my being were constantly splintering off in different<br />
directions instead of streamlining themselves into a sense of<br />
organised linearity. The questions that arose from our process<br />
kept looping back to ourselves and our encounter. We were<br />
questioning all our working habits and the personal practices<br />
that each of us had grown used to.<br />
Rehearsing not to determine or foreclose, but instead, to learn how to navigate and<br />
negotiate.<br />
Because of the way we were working, the very meaning of rehearsal – what was<br />
being rehearsed – changed drastically. No more was I rehearsing in order to set in<br />
stone a certain kind of spatial, temporal and bodily organisation that would be<br />
replicated on stage for the audience. No more was I rehearsing in order to make<br />
invisible a process wrought with surfeit and hiccups. Instead, rehearsals were<br />
about honing a sensitivity towards our encounter. Rehearsals were about learning<br />
how to tune in to the plethora of sensorial and tactile information arising from our<br />
encounter; which ones to listen to, which ones to discard, which ones to ignore,<br />
which ones to develop. Rehearsals were about learning how to negotiate our<br />
partnership actively throughout the work. Rehearsals were less about attempting<br />
to flatten unevenness and difference in favour of showing a smooth, uninterrupted,<br />
culminated singularity, and more about training our bodies to readily face the<br />
clashes and disruptions arising from the meeting of two very different bodies.<br />
103 104