18.12.2012 Views

Deutsche Tagung f ¨ur Forschung mit ... - SNI-Portal

Deutsche Tagung f ¨ur Forschung mit ... - SNI-Portal

Deutsche Tagung f ¨ur Forschung mit ... - SNI-Portal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Magnetismus Poster: Do., 13:00–15:30 D-P246<br />

Where are the li<strong>mit</strong>s of non-exponential relaxation ?<br />

Catherine Pappas 1 , Robert Cywinski 2 , Adrian Hillier 3 , Pascal Manuel 3 , Ian<br />

Campbell 4 , Ferenc Mezei 1<br />

1 Hahn Meitner Institut Berlin, Germany – 2 Physics and Astronomy Department,<br />

Leeds, UK – 3 ISIS, Didcot UK – 4 Université de Montpellier 2, France<br />

The fundamental question of the universality of the precursor features of a low temperature<br />

disordered phase cannot be easily answered. Non-exponential relaxation is<br />

found in glasses and spin glasses but not in disordered ferromagnets and antiferromagnets.<br />

According to an Griffithss argument, however, the paramagnetic phase above<br />

disordered ferromagnets should be anomalous showing non-exponential relaxation. We<br />

searched for this so-called Griffithss phase in the disordered system Au1−xFex, by combining<br />

Neutron Spin Echo (NSE) spectroscopy and Muon Spin Relaxation (µSR). This<br />

system is spin glass for x0.155. At the spin<br />

glass side, for x=0.14, the analysis of the strongly non-exponential relaxation leads to<br />

an excellent agreement between NSE and µSR, an unambiguous proof of the homogeneous<br />

character of the spin glass relaxation. A slight increase of the Fe concentration<br />

leads to the disordered ferromagnetic phase (x=0.16, 18) and an abrupt change of the<br />

relaxation seen by NSE, which becomes exponential. The µSR spectra on the other<br />

side remain non-exponential and at high temperatures they are very similar to those of<br />

the spin glass side of the phase diagram, as expected by the Griffithss argument. The<br />

puzzling discrepancy between NSE and µSR in the disordered ferromagnetic phase explains<br />

why neutron scattering and macroscopic magnetization measurements failed up<br />

to now to identify the Griffithss phase in disordered magnets. The observation of the<br />

Griffiths phase by muons and of the disordered ferromagnetic transition with neutrons<br />

provides a deeper link between theory and experiment and gives a natural explanation<br />

of the marked influence of strong disorder on the ferromagnetic and antiferromagetic<br />

second order phase transitions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!