02.01.2020 Views

rx2

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“I highly doubt trade policy reform would make any

meaningful difference,” she said. “The U.S. pays the

highest prices because the market will bear it—until

we figure out how to curb that greed, it will continue.”

The report condemned “free-riding” foreign countries

that force U.S. drug manufacturers to comply with pricing

rules to gain market access. This allows them to undercut

U.S. drug prices and erode manufacturers’ returns.

It also rejected imposing government price-setting on

drug manufacturers, a tactic backed by Democrats, arguing

that “if the United States had adopted the centralized

drug pricing policy in other developed nations 20 years

ago, then the world may not have highly valuable treatments

for diseases that required significant investment.”

But getting other countries to pay “their share” of pharmaceutical

costs is extremely unrealistic, Fox said.

The FDA approved more than 1,000 generic drugs last year, the

highest mark in the history of the agency’s drug approval program.

The FDA has increased competition by expediting reviews

of abbreviated new drug applications where there are limited

approved generics, publishing an off-patent list of branded

drugs without an approved generic and new guidance to improve

communication between manufacturers and the agency.

The White House advisers recommended extending this

strategy to products that are second or third in a class

that have no generics. This could lower prices by providing

quicker entry into monopoly markets, they said.

Rising drug prices have been a focal point of lawmakers,

consumers and others involved in delivering healthcare who

lament the current systems that lacks competition and free

market control. Numerous headlines about drastic price increases

and pharma companies’ system-gaming techniques

to elude competition fueled bipartisan outrage and 100-plus

drug-price related bills. While many ideas have been proposed

to lower drug prices, solutions thus far haven’t stuck.

The Creates Act and FAST Generics Act are two examples targeting

drug prices by trying to close patent loopholes and potentially

saving billions of dollars a year in reduced drug costs.

Per-person spending on prescription drugs covered in

employee-sponsored health plans rose 1.5% in 2017,

less than half the increase in 2016 and the lowest in 24

years that pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts

has tracked the data, the organization reported Feb. 6.

Generic fill rates increased from 85.1% in 2016 to 86.2% and increased

generic competition helped slow drug prices’ steep ascent,

while spending on specialty drugs was up 11.3%, the lowest

increase Express Scripts has reported. Still, pharmaceutical

products cost more in the U.S. than any developed country.

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar

said Friday he would push ahead with drug pricing

reforms despite pushback from the pharmaceutical

industry.Azar was defending the administration’s

latest, and most aggressive action yet, to target escalating

drug prices in the U.S.

A proposal announced Thursday by President

Trump and Azar would base payments for some drugs

off of lower prices in other countries.

In a white paper, the council

proposed increasing

competition for pharmacy

benefit managers, restricting

drug-reimbursement

under the 340B drug

discount program and

moving Medicare Part B

drug coverage into Medicare

Part D, among other

recommendations.

But these “me too” drugs are likely to enter at similar prices

as their competitors, and the strategy fails to address issues

surrounding pharmaceutical companies gaming the

system through citizen petitions, getting additional exclusivity

periods and evergreen their patents, Fox said.

The council also advocated for increasing competition

among biosimilars, which are more complex and expensive

to make, by speeding up the issuance of final guidelines

on demonstrating biosimilar interchangeability. Experts

have widely touted the benefits of increasing the

speed of interchangeable biosimilars to decrease costs.

Still,to the prior impotant policy recommendations

have been thwarted. The Obama administration had

proposed its own drug policy reforms that were ultimately

quashed by pharma companies and providers.

“The Obama administration had an opportunity with the

ACA and control over the House and Senate and there wasn’t

really anything about drug price controls in there,” said

John Kelliher, managing director of the Berkeley Research

Group. “The problem with drug prices is that it is easy to

complain about but the policy tools to fix it are pretty limited,

and even more limited if you’re not doing some price

control-regime. It leaves you tinkering around the edges.”

Looking ahead, health systems can expect drug prices to increase

by 7.35% from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, driven

by the surging prices of branded, specialty medications,

particularly disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, agents

for multiple sclerosis, oral oncology agents, and multiple

treatments for hepatitis C, according to a recent forecast by

the group purchasing and consulting organization Vizient.

That projection was slightly down from last year’s estimate of

7.61% as some specialty drugs like hepatitis C treatments are

expected to level off and fewer drug price hikes are expected

given the rising public scrutiny.

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said Friday

he would push ahead with drug pricing reforms despite pushback

from the pharmaceutical industry.

“Finally seeing this system reformed, in fact, is one of the pharmaceutical

industry’s ultimate nightmares,” said Azar, a former

Eli Lily executive, at a Brookings Institution event in Washington.

“I can tell you that because it used to be my job to have

pharmaceutical nightmares.”

“But now we have a president who is definitely not afraid of upsetting

drug companies and isn’t afraid of taking on ostensibly

invincible special interests,” he added.

Azar was defending the administration’s latest, and most ag-

These relatively modest proposals will not

satisfy Democrats who remain fixated on

adopting a single payer system where the

Federal government can set prices, as is

the case in western Europe

22

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!