XI YPP Book
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Patrons:<br />
Mindaugas Raila, the family of Nicolas Ortiz, Dali Van Rooij Rakutyte,<br />
Lewben Art Foundation and Bajorunas/Sarnoff Foundation<br />
Young Painter Prize 2019<br />
Editor: Julija Dailidėnaitė<br />
Translation: Tomas Čiučelis<br />
Design: Toma Brundzaitė / www.brunto.lt<br />
<strong>YPP</strong> organizer: VšĮ Šiuolaikiniai meno projektai<br />
Sponsors:
07 The Young Painter Prize Competition<br />
Brings Painters from Across the Baltic States<br />
09 <strong>XI</strong> <strong>YPP</strong> Jury<br />
13 Finalists<br />
Content<br />
55 <strong>XI</strong> <strong>YPP</strong> Winner<br />
57 Interview with <strong>XI</strong> <strong>YPP</strong> Winner<br />
29 Articles<br />
60 About Painting and Becoming<br />
64 Young Artists meet institutions: some important transformations<br />
68 You can only sink in quicksand to your shoulders<br />
73 About the portrait of the young painter once again<br />
76 Brackets, question - marks and exclamations marks<br />
80 Young in Latvia<br />
86 About the street<br />
90 A few remarks and anecdotes about contemporary painting<br />
94 The subjunctive sexual mood blossoms allegedly<br />
98 I Can’t - But We Can<br />
102 Welcome to the Dollhouse: On Painting and Perspective<br />
108 Today painting media are more visible than ever<br />
110 Changes in the Everyday practices in the Estonian Art Scene<br />
04<br />
114 A decade of young art<br />
120 Where do you go to, my lovely
The Young<br />
It is the eleventh time when the annual Young Painter Prize project, an art chronicler of the young<br />
generation of painters, become a platform for the up-and-coming artists from Lithuania, Latvia<br />
and Estonia. The opening of the exhibition showcasing the works of the finalists of the <strong>XI</strong> <strong>YPP</strong><br />
competition was held in Vilnius on 8 November. The event was also feature the announcement of<br />
this year’s <strong>YPP</strong> winner.<br />
Painter Prize<br />
Competition<br />
Brings Painters<br />
from Across<br />
This year the artists competed for the award, worth 5,000 EUR, which includes a two month<br />
residency in SomoS Art House, Berlin, a cash prize, and an opportunity to hold a solo show in<br />
“Pamėnkalnio” Gallery, Vilnius. One of the highlights of the <strong>YPP</strong> award is that the winner’s work<br />
was included into the art collections of the Lithuanian Art Museum and National Art Gallery which<br />
are the possessors of the artworks of the previous ten <strong>YPP</strong> winners.<br />
As a continuation of the last year’s initiative, friends of <strong>YPP</strong>—the creative communications agency<br />
“Autoriai” and the contemporary art gallery “The Rooster”—introduced their own additional<br />
prizes. The “Autoriai” agency—a close collaborator with the artists of the Baltic region—offered a<br />
“Special mention” cash prize. The winner of the prize was selected by the dedicated interdisciplinary<br />
jury. One of the finalists also received “The Rooster Open”, an encouragement award from<br />
the “Rooster” gallery which works exclusively with the up-and-coming young artists.<br />
The key objectives of <strong>YPP</strong> are to introduce the work of the young artists to a wider audience, and<br />
help specialist audiences in Lithuania and abroad, which include art collectors, art managers and<br />
curators, discover new talents of the Baltic region. To ensure the successful realisation of these<br />
goals each year, the <strong>YPP</strong> organisers host an international jury comprised of a diverse range of art<br />
professionals: gallerists, collectors, art theorists, artists, and curators.<br />
the Baltic<br />
States<br />
When asked how it feels to be organising the <strong>YPP</strong> competition for the eleventh time already, the<br />
art historian Julija Dailidėnaitė could not contain her joy: “Actually, this annual project marks the<br />
beginning of my ‘calendar year’. It is shocking to realise that we started a decade ago. Sometimes<br />
it seems like we are looped in a single moment, but it is very reassuring to look back and summarise<br />
all the discoveries, achievements and events that accumulated over the years. I still see<br />
the potential in developing and expanding our project further.”<br />
The project initiator, painter Vilmantas Marcinkevičius added: “What I find especially rewarding is<br />
the realisation that creativity is more real than the idea of a perpetual motion engine. Creativity<br />
is limitless. This is clearly evident in the work of the young generation. The young artists of the<br />
Baltic states use the means of painting to navigate a whole variety of paths, and yet we see a tendency<br />
to return to the figurative painting that reflects on the existential states and experiences,<br />
living environments and situations, the influence of animation and computer games, as well as<br />
the art history itself. These are all very positive signs of the future of painting.”
<strong>XI</strong><br />
<strong>YPP</strong><br />
Jury:<br />
08<br />
Vilius<br />
Kavaliauskas<br />
(1978) – contemporary art patron, collector,<br />
initiator and Chairman of the Board of two<br />
art foundations – Lewben Art Foundation and<br />
Lithuanian Expatriate Art Foundation, has a<br />
representative collection of Lithuanian and international<br />
art dating from the end of the 18th<br />
century to the present day.<br />
Vilius Kavaliauskas not only collects art, but<br />
also makes donations to state institutions –<br />
since 2013 he has made donations to the Lithuanian<br />
Art Museum, M. K. Čiurlionis National<br />
Museum of Art and the Vilna Gaon State Jewish<br />
Museum. In addition, Mr Kavaliauskas is an<br />
ardent supporter of both exhibitions of contemporary<br />
art institutions such as the Contemporary<br />
Art Centre, the National Gallery of Art,<br />
Vartai Gallery, the center for art and education<br />
Rupert, and projects such as the international<br />
contemporary art fair ArtVilnius and Vilnius<br />
City Opera. In recent years Vilius Kavaliauskas<br />
has supported young artists, by contributing to<br />
the Young Painter Prize project. Over the period<br />
from 2010 to 2019 Vilius Kavaliauskas has<br />
been the patron of close to twenty exhibitions<br />
and over ten publishing projects.<br />
Since 2014 he has been a member of the Russia<br />
and Eastern Europe Acquisitions Committee<br />
(REEAC) at the TATE museum in the United<br />
Kingdom. Members of REEAC work alongside<br />
the TATE curatorial team to frame the collecting<br />
strategy.<br />
Maarit Murka<br />
(1981) is a hyperrealist who comes from the<br />
younger Estonian contemporary artists generation.<br />
The themes for Murka’s works come from<br />
life itself: urban living, collective histories, the<br />
everyday and the political climate. Murka has<br />
also contributed for the analyse of war zones<br />
and the life of soldiers in Afghanistan. However<br />
in other works Murka draws back from social<br />
criticism and instead dives into the human psyche,<br />
considering its essences through study of<br />
the Freudian subconscious. It is through explorations<br />
among this range of different subjects,<br />
while remaining true to hyperrealism in style,<br />
that Murka has painted herself into the history<br />
of Estonian contemporary art.
Paulus Fugers<br />
is active as visual artist since 1981, as curator<br />
since 1999. He is founder/director of SomoS<br />
Art House, Berlin. In his art, he applies a project-based,<br />
conceptual way of working. Much<br />
of his work is based on extensive research<br />
into the language of ornamentation and queer<br />
themes, making use of techniques like painting,<br />
installation, ceramics and light projection.<br />
He has been active as curator, initiating and<br />
producing projects since the post-wall era<br />
of Berlin’s “temporary spaces,” that blurred<br />
the lines between the visual arts and the music-<br />
and club scenes. Since that time, he has<br />
sought to independently produce his projects<br />
that included an exhibition on the Iraq War, a<br />
series of Craftism exhibitions, and a recycling<br />
project during the Berliner Kunstsalon Art Fair.<br />
Subsequently, from 2008-2011 he worked on a<br />
program of international exhibitions in project<br />
space “Kunstraum Richard Sorge” in a historic<br />
former brewery in Berlin Friedrichshain, presenting<br />
artists like Charles Craft, Nava Lubelski,<br />
Jn.Ulrick Desért, Hiroki Otsuka and Mumbleboy.<br />
In 2012 he co-founded SomoS, where he<br />
organizes exhibitions and Artist in Residence<br />
Program.<br />
10<br />
Šelda Puķīte<br />
(b. 1986) - Latvian freelance art critic, curator<br />
and researcher living in Estonia. She has studied<br />
art history in Art Academy of Latvia receiving<br />
both Bachelor and Master degree and<br />
now is continuing her doctoral studies preparing<br />
dissertation about pop art influences in<br />
Latvian art. Šeldas special interest is projects<br />
which examines the contact-points between<br />
sociopolitical issues, mass culture and art executed<br />
through interdisciplinary research and<br />
whimsical presentation. For the last years she<br />
has been working on several important exhibition<br />
projects, curating educational programs<br />
and creating catalogues for art festivals, as well<br />
as participating both in local and international<br />
discussion boards, symposiums and lectures<br />
and writing reviews and essays for Baltic press<br />
and publications. Šelda has collaborated with<br />
such institutions as Latvian National Museum<br />
of Art, Latvian Center for Contemporary Art,<br />
Riga Photography Biennale, Tartu Art House<br />
and Tartu Art Museum.<br />
Arūnas Gelūnas<br />
(1968) – head the Lithuanian Art Museum,<br />
Doctor of Humanities. From 2012 until 2016,<br />
A. Gelūnas was an Ambassador of Permanent<br />
Delegation of the Republic of Lithuania to<br />
UNESCO and from 2010 until 2012 - a Minister<br />
of Culture. A. Gelūnas studied printmaking and<br />
graphic art at the Vilnius Academy of Arts (VAA)<br />
and Japanese painting (Nihonga) at the Tokyo<br />
University of the Arts (Tokyo Geidai), has held<br />
exhibitions of his prints and paintings in Lithuania,<br />
France, Japan and other countries around<br />
the world, and has been awarded various prizes<br />
for printmaking and book design.<br />
After defending his doctoral thesis at the Vytautas<br />
Magnus University in 2001, he became<br />
more seriously invested in philosophy and art<br />
theory, taught printmaking, ink painting and<br />
calligraphy, art theory and philosophy at the<br />
VAA and other universities in Lithuania. He has<br />
contributed to the creation of the Lithuanian<br />
Association of Creative and Culture Industries,<br />
was the first chairperson of its board, and it<br />
was during his tenure as the minister of culture<br />
that the foundation for the Lithuanian Council<br />
for Culture was laid and the Lithuanian Film<br />
Centre was founded. In 2013, A. Gelūnas was<br />
named an honorary doctor of the Aalto University<br />
(Finland).
F<br />
I<br />
N<br />
A<br />
L<br />
I<br />
S<br />
T<br />
S<br />
Adomas Storpirštis<br />
Alvīne Bautra<br />
Arnolds Andersons<br />
Augustė Santockytė<br />
Aurelija Bernataitė<br />
Dovilė Bagdonaitė<br />
Eglė Norkutė<br />
Gytis Arošius<br />
Ieva Kampe-Krumholca<br />
Ingrida Bagdonaitė<br />
Jegors Buimisters<br />
Kristen Rästas<br />
Raminta Blaževičiūtė<br />
Rasa Deveikytė<br />
Rūta Matulevičiūtė<br />
Sabīne Vernere<br />
Samanta Augutė<br />
Sandra Strēle<br />
Siiri Jüris<br />
Tadas Tručilauskas
Adomas Storpirštis / LT<br />
Harvester 3000. 200x100cm, new media & computer graphics. 2019<br />
Detox Extremism came into existence sometime around in 2020. It was forbidden to use any type<br />
of pleasure stimulant - those who’d use alcohol, drugs and have sex, would be sent to concentration<br />
camps, created by a company named as “Harvester 3000”. Minor relaxation activity - like<br />
drinking a non-alcoholic beer and masturbating privately would leave a person with a financial<br />
penalty. Users of alcohol and drugs (Power Hedonists) would be closed in so-called “overcharged<br />
detox camps”. Using the prisoners as human machines, Harvester 3000 would convert detox<br />
slime into powerful pharmaceuticals which would appear as lollipops. These lollipop pharmaceuticals<br />
would be delivered to aristocrats who’d accelerate their immortality via this drug.<br />
14
Alvīne Bautra / LV<br />
Between the presence and absence. 130x200cm, oil on canvas. 2018<br />
Presence and absence can be seen both temporally and physically, as well as spiritually. Through<br />
our body, its’ materiality and movement that is seen by everyone, consciousness is realized,<br />
however small these movements may be. The composition of the painting embody the feeling of<br />
the movement in slow motion which is metaphor of the diverse and multi-layered human nature<br />
and the uncertainty of being. The engagement of the elusive inner world with thoughts and<br />
emotions which are not known to others. However, in order to exist, a person needs a body and it<br />
is seen by everyone.
Arnolds Andersons / LV<br />
Modest. 100x100cm, acrylic on canvas. 2018<br />
These five paintings are part of my last solo exhibition ‘Disappear here’ which took place in London,<br />
UK. The concept of ‘Disappear here’ is not about the here or the now, it’s about the void and<br />
the endless possibilities. When all appears absent, all can be found.<br />
What’s in focus – not a lot, but it’s this accidental nihilism, a place seemingly stripped of possibilities,<br />
which ironically is the place where almost anything could happen.<br />
A pause, a gap, a space – that inbetween time where you allow yourself to be lost and open to<br />
the unexpected. That fleeting moment of neutrality that predicates a happening or a step towards<br />
who you are.<br />
‘Disappear here’ is about the fogginess of the mind – to look and look again. Where there’s nothing,<br />
there’s everything.<br />
18
Augustė Santockytė / LT<br />
The other side. 90 x 70 cm, acrylic on canvas. 2019<br />
This painting is a depiction of the confrontation of material, cultural and spiritual life.OVER<br />
CHAOS. Up there, where there is silence in black and dark. The circular blue thing hanging somewhere<br />
in the dark universe is full of noise, sounds, action ... axioms that are acceptable to most.<br />
A supposed order that helps survive in the blue bubble. The painting depicts a soul longing for<br />
that chaos, but it can only feel the cries of its loved ones - the souls - on the “other side”. It is<br />
said that the soul is concentrated in the human heart. Souls feel for each other. Cultural quotations<br />
sculpturally depict the soul, the immortal part of man, the creator of the earth, the blue<br />
planet.<br />
The painting is born of many sketches, dreams, memories.<br />
I use personal experiences, existential questions, experiences, reflections, feelings, loss. Intangible<br />
(soul) life in the material world as a starting point in my creation. The details are very important<br />
in the piece. Every detail and immediacy ‘mastering’ of the object is important. I create objects<br />
and forms with a realistic - hyperrealistic stroke. Objects so depicted are like readable text,<br />
speaking to the viewer.
Aurelija Bernataitė / LT<br />
No artificial flowers bloom there anymore. 120×60cm, oil on canvas. 2019<br />
With my paintings, I would like to awaken beautiful memories for the viewer, make them feel like<br />
children again and remember the places where they spent their childhoods, their grandparents. I<br />
want to show them my Belarusian village (my grandparents lived there, my father grew up there<br />
and I spent a lot of time there as a child).<br />
Of course, the village they will see will be my interpretation. Also, since I am painting a disapearing<br />
village, I am trying to transfer the spirit of that place into the medium of painting/fine ars,<br />
into the environment where I live / study (Vilnius, the art scene).<br />
For me, Belarus is very close as a memory, but in reality I rarely visit it and it is unrelated to my<br />
daily routine anymore. I create these images as scenography for myself. Naturally the form of the<br />
paintings is stylized, conveyed through essential characteristic features (bright colors, especially<br />
specific Belarusian bright blue color, carpets on the walls, etc.). With certain accents, I try to<br />
show the peculiarities of that place.<br />
22
Dovilė Bagdonaitė / LT<br />
I went to E.Schiele’s exhibition and after that I wanted to paint myself the way he painted<br />
himself. 32x24cm, gouache on 300 g/m2 paper. 2019<br />
I went to E.Schiele’s exhibition and after that I wanted to paint myself the way he painted<br />
himself.
Eglė Norkutė / LT<br />
Art and Collectibles. Oil on canvas, varios forms. 7-50cm variable sizes, installation. 2019<br />
According to Walter benjamin, cultural and religious objects or works of art that enter museums<br />
lose their aura once pulled out of their initial context. I feel as if I was performing a similar action<br />
when cutting my motifs out of my paintings. Admiring the metamorphosis of the status of a real<br />
thing into a work of art, and by tearing it out of its original context into an object to be explored<br />
and exhibited, a museum exhibit, I allow myself to re-enter the vicious circle of transformation<br />
when painting newly arranged exhibitions. Passed through a chain of transformations observed<br />
image is once again an object, an artifact – a thing. It seems that by removing painted motifs<br />
from the borders of the square of a picture, they pretend to be more of their own foremost<br />
images. Artisanally rendered images become a kind of anti-ready-made objects. When creating<br />
these moulages embodied in materials that belong to painting medium, I consider issues of<br />
authorship, originality and status of an artwork.<br />
26
Gytis Arošius / LT<br />
5G.180 x 130cm, oil on canvas. 2019<br />
Brutal architecture, industrial building constructions and militaristic transport are the main<br />
aspects that dominate in my creative activity. These things symbolize the fear of upcoming bad<br />
things and disastrous consequences, in addition, it encourages to consider the impact of technologies<br />
for human daily life, the future and the consequences of progress.<br />
Brutalism spreads grotesque energy, it’s like a monument of power, which could basically withstand<br />
everything, while being harsh and unacceptable. As well it is the symbol of industrialism<br />
where functionality is a top priority.<br />
Nowadays, it is not uncommon for people to think about their future and become anxious. These<br />
feelings may interfere with daily routine and even lead to paranoia. Feeling worried all the time<br />
makes you confused, insecure and helpless. Uncertainty about the future and paranoia makes<br />
imagination picture the things which do not exist. Moreover, the experience of the previous generations<br />
intensifies those feelings.<br />
I construct my paintings using my own photographs, as I adjust them by inserting a non-existing<br />
object created by own imagination or by using historic military transport of the Cold War. People<br />
may recognize their own thoughts and feelings while looking into my paintings and get comfort<br />
by learning that these fears are more common to human race than it is an individual experience.<br />
The materialisation of those feelings into the piece of art might encourage to see the situation<br />
from the different angle and evaluate to which extent these fears are rational.
Ieva Kampe-Krumholca / LV<br />
We all come from one tree. 80x120cm, oil on canvas. 2019<br />
This artwork, just as all my other botanical theme paintings, is a symbolic family relation depiction.<br />
I am keen on finding symbolic family member situation similarities in nature’s forms- how<br />
plant character tells stories so similar to human relationships. This particular painting speaks<br />
about peculiar feeling where you feel most lonely while being with your family members- even<br />
though we “come from one tree” we tend to go to opposite directions and lose our connection<br />
spots. Some of us tend to look “taller/higher” than others, some of us already has some broken<br />
leaves. The branch (bloodline) keeps us together, jet we are so different and tend to move away<br />
from each other.<br />
30
Ingrida Bagdonaitė / LT<br />
Gathering. Dyptic 232x129cm, charcoal on canvas. 2019<br />
My work explores the society where self-image is overloaded and overrepresented I’m<br />
interested in disconnection and abandonment of individual through spaces that are cultural,<br />
institutional and discursive, that are somehow ‘other’: disturbing, intense, incompatible,<br />
contradictory or transforming. Places that have more meaning then the eye meets from the first<br />
glimpse, spaces that somehow are transitory or are empowering the spectator by being<br />
connected to others- heterotopias.
Jegors Buimisters / LV<br />
The violent bear it away. 120x190cm, acrylics on canvas. 2019<br />
“The Violent Bear It Away” is a painting that attempts to depict a fugitive moment of apocalyptic<br />
transgression that separates profane and sacred world. It is created as a reaction on the contemporary<br />
situation in which, as said by German philosopher Dietmar Kamper, after several millennia<br />
of mankind’s pacification we have to state an unexpectedly strong surge of violence on earth.<br />
Everything changes, flows and exists in continuous movement, however, for the artist it is important<br />
to depict the moment in which daily violence becomes transgressive, sacred violence.<br />
Deeply rooted in the philosophy of George Bataille and Rene Girard, this artwork draws<br />
references from both classic art and modern history, quoting Karl Brullov’s “Last Day of Pompei”<br />
together with the execution of Nguyen Văn Lém, and puts Leon Bakst’s “Terror Antiquus”<br />
in the same composition with photos of Robert Capa. Through such juxtaposition, the painting<br />
comment on the situation of the perpetual and yet ever momentary brutality of life — however,<br />
attempting to symbolically open up and trace a transgressive path out of this situation.<br />
Both shocking and awe-inspiring, “The Violent Bear It Away” combines figurative and abstract<br />
motifs into a powerful composition that catches a single moment in the constant eschatological<br />
race of people, images and forms.<br />
34
Kristen Rästas / EE<br />
Over the hills. Hills over. 90x320cm, painting installation. Two panels, oil on canvas, Yoga<br />
matts. 2018<br />
“Over the hills. Hills over” is an author’s signature style painting installation. The two piece<br />
panorama painting depicts an unrealistic and vague landscape. The curled up yoga matts are<br />
trying to find a comfy space in the physical room. The work got influenced by commercial advertisements<br />
and nature photographs that involve travelling and tourism. These images paint the<br />
viewer pictures of unimaginable fantasy lands that must get visited at least once in a lifetime.<br />
This work has previously been displayed at a group exhibition “Home and Away”, which took<br />
place at Viljandi City gallery in Viljandi, Estonia in 2018.
Raminta Blaževičiūtė / LT<br />
Madonna and the Child. The first Trip. 130x200cm, oil on canvas. 2019<br />
Madonna and Child. A first Trip.<br />
...<br />
- As I began painting this piece, it changed three times. The first two were about a prince who<br />
was looking for his princess.<br />
- And the third one turned into a piece about a princess and prince?<br />
- Something like that. As soon as I finished painting it, I realized that it is, in fact, Madonna and<br />
the King. A real sacred painting. Not the usual today‘s saints, they don‘t even look like saints. Even<br />
suspiciously happy, bravely accepting their vividness, otherness, extravagant and humorous, just<br />
like real comedians. But I find the effect of the painting a bit bizarre, maybe therapeutic even?<br />
So be cautious while looking at them – the pieces may revive you and fulfill all of your dreams.<br />
I‘ve tried it already.<br />
38
Rasa Deveikytė / LT<br />
Honey, I’m home. 140x150cm, acrylic, oil on canvas. 2019<br />
The reality itself is a problematic sphere because of the complicated understanding of concept<br />
and manifestation of different truths concerning it. The uncertainty of reality begins then we<br />
face simulation of reality or reality fiction which can remove the clear border where one ends<br />
and the other begins. Jean Baudrillard suggests the term hyperreality, which describes virtual<br />
reality becoming more real than physical reality which is, in fact, the original one. This is an issue<br />
which I am personally interested in and the essential context is the cult of the image - sequential,<br />
strategic construction of image and prestige on social media. I will submit a hypothetical<br />
example which is originated from stereotypical analogues noticeable in social media. For example:<br />
consumer traveler is absolutely joyful by sharing his pictures from “all inclusive” holiday<br />
in Pula which are mainly the pictures of pina colada cocktails and stunning tanned bodies near<br />
the Adriatic sea. But there is no doubt that the storyline will not reveal to us how romance in the<br />
hotel can be turned into a nightmare when disagree about the perfect evening movie emerges.<br />
Still, the perfect image can make the viewer feel stuck in everyday life and so, the pleasures he<br />
does not experience at the moment can become a big issue. Yet, not the criticising exact stereotypes<br />
and situations is the marrow, but the gap between reality and facadic (un)reality which can<br />
turn situations into comic ones. I oppose the impozant cult of image by emphasizing everyday<br />
life situations as pure reality, which is distinguished from simulating self’s presentation on social<br />
media.
Rūta Matulevičiūtė / LT<br />
The Read. 170x100cm, oil on linen. 2019<br />
This artwork is a part of on-going series, an artistic reseach focusing on the relations between<br />
human and the environment. The figures in painting are placed in urban or natural organic environment<br />
with the hypothesis of these two components being indivisible, which is based on the<br />
ancient philosophy sources and finding similarities with the contemporary theories and daily<br />
existence in urban, glam and popculture. In my artistic practice I focus on the fundamental questions<br />
on existence, looking through the eyes of a today‘s human being.<br />
The creation process of painting is executed in several phases, when I use the synthesis of<br />
various media. This synthesis makes painting an interdisciplinary creation, in this way the boundaries<br />
between the pure painting, performance art, photography, digital and internet art, etc. are<br />
dissolved. Such manner of the practice is based on the holistic philosophy suggesting the all<br />
inclusive oneness. The dissolving view, glimmering light in the painting‘s motive are both a hint<br />
to the digital screen and the environment being created by the figure in painting and<br />
creating that pictured figure as well, as equals.<br />
42
Sabīne Vernere / LV<br />
UN-touch / NOT-touch. 50x60cm, acrilyc, indian ink, airbrush & paper on canvas. 2019<br />
Some time ago i found a wonderful text on internet about why roses have thorns: “Roses happen<br />
to be beautiful to look at, fragrant to smell, and sweet to taste. All of that would most likely<br />
attract all sorts of creatures great and small, right? Right! So, all of these di erently sized creatures<br />
would obviously be going up to the roses and looking at them, smelling them, and tasting<br />
them. All of that would be pretty rough on the rose, wouldn’t it? That’s where the thorns come”<br />
This text, written so simply by someone over-enthusiastic made me very inspired. I saw so many<br />
similarities to human attitudes and relationships that I decided to explore this matter. It was so<br />
simple for somebody to decribe it for roses but when it comes to people it somehow gets very<br />
complexed.<br />
UN-touch/NOT-touch is a series of work about accidentally (or maybe not?) asking for unwanted<br />
touches. This particular work is about the game of a ection, flirting and mingling with potential<br />
partners, that goes terribly wrong, because the main character has prepared itself to be very desired<br />
by one particular victim, but did not give a thought (or maybe did?) that its looks are inviting<br />
everybody. And now there is an inside battle of pride, curiousity, sadness, fear and unrealistic<br />
expectations.<br />
Painting is made using various materials. Background is raw, thick white layer of paint, even like<br />
sand paper as a reference to inconvenient situation. The figure that reminds something like a<br />
branch of a tree and human figure on its knees is made by indian ink. Its body almost fades away<br />
in the light and goes out of the canvases, reminding of how never ending this ritual of finding a<br />
partner is in nature. Black airbrush spray is the symbol of unwanted touch. It is faded, not firm<br />
and concrete because it is only an idea, a potentiality, maybe even just a gaze from somebody or<br />
invisible sexual energy that nobody can see and describe but can always feel in the air. The last<br />
component is attached papper. With the di erent material I want to show that it is movement of<br />
thought, happening on di erent level - figures mind - as a devious thougth of taking the touch,<br />
the curiousity of having, expierincing this unwanted touch for unknown (or maybe known?) reasons.<br />
All my artistic practise is based on investigating nature of human being. Comparing and interpreting<br />
the forms of human body to nature, looking for simlar forms of expression. It challenges<br />
the binaries we continually reconstruct between Self and Other, between our own ‘cannibal’ and<br />
‘civilized’ selves. Sex is mostly the medium I use to bring out the story line, but it is never the<br />
final message.
Samanta Augutė / LT<br />
Thank God (who is unhappy, is unwise). 30x25cm, oil on cancas, collage, sewing. 2019<br />
Often I question myself if the path that I’ve chosen fits me. I am constantly looking for answers to<br />
main questions of being. If I find those answers I become joyful. I protect the truth that I descover<br />
and try to live accoridingly. Even if time passes and I start seeing that thruth in a different light,<br />
or even loose it, I naively believe that there is a right path and a right destination. I love collecting<br />
inspiring quotes and proverbs. I use them for self encouragement and cultivation. “Who is<br />
unhappy, is unwise” part of the title came from an old lithuanian proverb “A person who is unhappy<br />
is usually considered for an unwise one.” This statement apeared to me as very unfamiliar<br />
and even radical but I could not deny it’s truth.<br />
46
Sandra Strēle / LV<br />
Nostalgia. 200x405cm, canvas / mixed media. 2019<br />
I REMEMBER MY PREVIOS EXHIBITION.<br />
IT WAS IN JURMALA.<br />
ITS TITLE WAS MELANCHOLY.<br />
AS TIME CONTINUES PASSING BY<br />
MORE AND MORE I AM WILLING TO<br />
RETURN TO MOMENTS<br />
WHEN SOMETHING ARTISTICALLY NEW WAS DISCOVERED.<br />
MELANCHOLY FOR ME WAS OF THAT KIND.<br />
IF PAINTING DIES.<br />
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN IT.<br />
IT HAS TO OCCUPY A ROLE<br />
IN THE TRAGEDY OF FUTURE ART. NEW PROFFESIONS ARE TO SHOW UP.<br />
AND ONE OF THEM WILL BE<br />
A NOSTALGIST.<br />
Painting from the serie “NOSTALGIA” depicts a new possibility of making exhibitions and<br />
developing different ideas. Creating a concept for an exhibition I constantly end up with having<br />
many possible ideas and visualities. For artist it is always a complicated choice what to<br />
develop, what to consider for future artworks and what to forget. I am not sure if it is a tragedy<br />
of the painting itself or the fortune that during a lifetime the quantity of artworks made by one<br />
author is limited. This painting shows how to make an exhibition without a real exhibition space<br />
or create multiple exhibitions within one. And this method also allows to adjust the exhibition<br />
space to the artworks imagined.
Siiri Jüris / EE<br />
Touch III. 170x130cm, acrylic on canvas. 2019<br />
For the past two years I have been studying and looking into the relationship between a patient<br />
(with limited mobility) and a caregiver, focusing on the care aspect and on the physical contact.<br />
Work samples presented for this competition are on that subject. How does a person feel when<br />
their body has turned into a prison, which cannot even feel the most immediate human contact?<br />
Who helps the (compassionate; empathic) helper with their emotional distress? The paintings<br />
are based on the ergonomic principles taught to caretakers, which have been purposefully taken<br />
out of their medical context. That makes the visible more ambiguous. The portrayed touch is not<br />
only intimate, but also is almost intrusive, overstepping the autonomy of the person, and possibly<br />
carried out without consent. Therefore, something warm and intimate can simultaneously<br />
feel cold and calculated. Materiality is unavoidable - at some point we are all helpless and depend<br />
on others. One moment matter snaps and gives in. Despite all the above, people continue<br />
the search for physical closeness, each other’s touch.<br />
50
Tadas Tručilauskas / LT<br />
Sip sis sip on this melted ice that I brought from the top of the Alps. Diptych 180x205cm, oil on<br />
canvas. 2019<br />
Sip sis sip on this melted ice that I brought from the top of the Alps is a painting series right now<br />
limited to 100 paintings. There will be more in the future. My idea is to study this pose and make<br />
a sculpture and then paintings from different angles. These paintings function as a helping hand<br />
from the Great Spirit. The narative of the painting goes like this. I woke up in the morning and<br />
decided to go to the alps there I put some snow into my diamond glass. Later I came back home<br />
and my two sisters were having a morning swim. I gave them to taste the melting snow. They<br />
were pleased. As I was looking from the pool of where I exist in the milky way. I was able to see<br />
them to beings not of human nature looking at me in the pool of all existence. I was pleased. In<br />
that reality of Earth the snow which I handed them was purely extremely clean. Because in that<br />
Earth there is no pollution and things are just created through sheer thought power. For example<br />
I would need a watch so I would have to imagine every part of the mechanism, it would later appear<br />
before me. For me to wear this creation of my own mind which now I can wear on my hand<br />
and with functions only my mind is capable of imagining. These paintings serve a function of the<br />
help from far far away beyond the human comprehension. Those two sisters are like angels, archangels<br />
came here to our earth through the help of my hand. To help with the research of technology,<br />
preserving wildlife and much more. This is the empire of Light. On them will I impose my<br />
will the law of light. Artefact which later in life there is a possibilty for me to have is the diamond<br />
glass from which hopefuly one day I will be able to drink the melting snow without any harmful<br />
stuff in it only the purest of purest of mother nature.<br />
Simbolicaly two sisters that can not meet on the mountain in Lithuanian folk literature is two<br />
eyes, To live the ideal life first our eyes must see everything this way. Even if the day is shrouded<br />
by someone screaming at us that we are worthless and stupid and we should better turn to God<br />
to save our souls. This is nonsense to the one that knowes that everything was s.p.e.c.i.a.l and<br />
perfect from the begining. I fone has a ideal vision. Then one day the children future generations<br />
will be able to use even the worst circumstances to their own best advantage. Creating the infinite<br />
engine. Which will serve everyone to infinitum posisbilities. You need to charge your car?<br />
No problem it was charged before you even thought you needed to charge it.<br />
What we do not even imagine today. With ideal vision things are possible to our future self.<br />
Which is not so far away from the one you are now.<br />
So sip sis sip upon this melted ice that I brought from the top of the alps.
WINNER<br />
Sandra Strēle / LV<br />
(Nostalgia. 200x405cm, canvas / mixed media. 2019)
Interview<br />
with <strong>XI</strong> <strong>YPP</strong> Prize Winner Sandra Strēle / Latvia<br />
Painting? Why?<br />
Was there a pivotal moment when you decided to follow your path as an artist?<br />
(how did this media appear on your creative road, why is it?)<br />
For as long as I can remember, I have always had the desire to tell stories. For several hours every<br />
night, my pa invented tales, thus developing my passion for creating different fictitious, illusory<br />
subworlds. Every story I create now is a continuation of the previous one - like a series in which<br />
its protagonists do not age, but experience new transformations. They are affected by time, predictions<br />
of the future, or invented future scenarios, as well as reflection and devotion to memories<br />
of the past.<br />
I have studied mathematics, languages and literature until at the secondary school I understood<br />
that painting is a way to interlink all my interests – painting has some aspects and principles of<br />
mathematics, physics, as a form of information it is definitely very close to language and literature<br />
possibilities.<br />
Who inspires you?<br />
What is your greatest indulgence in life? (personality, context, etc.)<br />
The greatest inspiration I get is from my daily life and routine actions. I enjoy observing and<br />
creating stories from my observations. I would say that every person whom I meet in my life<br />
somehow impacts me. I try to collect stories and experiences of different people.<br />
Main motive.<br />
(Who are your most interested in your work?<br />
What topics do you consider in your work)<br />
In my creative work, I create large-scale installations based on classic painting - a series of paintings<br />
that, in chronological order, advance from one story to another. I focus on creating and<br />
interpreting secluded, alienated, sometimes lonely places, their architecture, and fictitious<br />
everyday scenes, offering the viewer the role of an observer. The painted places and landscapes<br />
in each series of paintings preserve some of their attributes from the previous one and simultaneously<br />
offer the viewer to perceive the changes and transformations that have occurred. In<br />
painting, I try to introduce cinema aesthetics, where frame replaces frame. In my work, painting<br />
replaces painting, and they are all subject to a single time system, which is simultaneously<br />
seemingly real and veritable, but at the same time abstract. Building on the idea of a holographic<br />
universe, I try to merge the planes of the past, present, and future, but at the same time offer the<br />
viewer small edges of reality that for a moment can be read off these points of overlap. There is<br />
always a story or even an infinite set of stories among the serial paintings. What fascinates me<br />
most in painting is this opportunity to create a large number of stories, stemming from one original<br />
narrative.<br />
Can you tell us about the process of making your work?<br />
From what does it begin and when does your artwork “end”?<br />
My large-scale installations, which are pursuing new ways of creating and developing narrative<br />
painting, could be considered examples of expanded painting. To achieve complete and distinct<br />
56<br />
storylines that connect the installation’s paintings, I create artist’s books that contain small<br />
textual fragments whose narrative connects them to one of the paintings. Expanded painting<br />
as a field of contemporary painting research has been a source of attraction for me for a long<br />
time. Addition of three-dimensional objects to paintings, either depicting them in paintings or<br />
displaying them in the installation space, is a powerful method of narrating a story. Painting is a<br />
very emotionally saturated medium, and in my opinion, it is always important for the viewer to<br />
recognize something familiar in paintings. And reproducing painted objects or their replicas in a<br />
three-dimensional plane and incorporating them in a single exposition with paintings ensures it.<br />
I attach great importance to the size of the paintings. That is why I usually create large-scale<br />
paintings that encourage the viewer to perceive painting as a physical experience. Painting is my<br />
emotional, mental, and physical work, as well as a process of physical and spiritual enjoyment,<br />
during which I must continually work, think, and care for my viewer.<br />
It is very difficult to define the beginning or the “end” of the artwork. The process of making my<br />
works I would describe as a compilation of intellectual and physical work that is predicted and<br />
predefined from my former experiences, intellectual capacity and imagination. The process of<br />
the production of an artwork starts when the exact amount of thoughts, spontaneous feelings,<br />
emotions, practical experience and individual observations of the hole surrounding life coincide<br />
in one point.<br />
I believe that my work in a sense of an artwork starts when it is carried out of my studio and<br />
shown to a wider public. In my opinion, the definition of an art object – an artwork – starts and<br />
ends with the public. If the exhibited piece creates “a specific aura” for the public to feel, it can<br />
be called an artwork. But the “auras” are different and sometimes difficult to capture and understand.<br />
Do you have moments in your life when you have been keen on the chosen artist’s<br />
path? Have you ever had a moment when you questioned your career entirely?<br />
(if so, who then returned you? Stopped?)<br />
I enjoy being an artist. Nowadays, when the high technologies are changing and improving so<br />
rapidly, I would call artist a nostalgist of society. I believe that a profession of an artist will remain<br />
in the future and that is pleasant to know that something you do now and enjoy doing will<br />
not disappear because of technological achievements or different changes in the world. I have<br />
heard that scientists predict that one of the new future professions would be a nostalgist that<br />
creates home interiors from different time periods. Probably in some way that is also the future<br />
of the future artists – continuation of being nostalgists of the society.<br />
Are you interested in the art field of the Baltic region?<br />
(write your opinion on the context of the Lithuanian, Latvian, and Estonian artistic<br />
field: differences, similarities, advantages, aspirations, etc.)<br />
I believe that nowadays contemporary art can be described as plural. Artists can work everywhere<br />
in the world even without being here or there physically. But I also consider that the<br />
regional background or even the impact from growing up in an exact village, city or home plays a<br />
role in the development of individuals personality.<br />
Baltic region if we look at the map is comparatively small. In my opinion, the most significant<br />
resource of the Baltic region are people and their intellectual and creative achievements and<br />
abilities. So, I can say that I am definitely interested in the art field of the Baltic region and its<br />
opportunities to grow and gain more impact in the international art field.<br />
As an artist I would like to make a closer cooperation among artists from Latvia, Lithuania and<br />
Estonia. In my opinion, it is a big advantage that we have a possibility to work and develop bigger<br />
art projects together as a Baltic region. I do not think that there are any huge differences between<br />
Latvian and Lithuanian art field, Lithuanian and Estonian art field or Latvian and Estonian<br />
art field. There are possibly some differences in mentality, colouring, temper and impacts each of<br />
three countries has historically had, but I would rather analyse concrete authors and artists more<br />
than their affiliation to a country.
<strong>YPP</strong> Articles<br />
About Painting and Becoming<br />
Young Artists meet institutions:<br />
some important transformations<br />
You can only sink in quicksand<br />
to your shoulders<br />
About the portrait of the young<br />
painter once again<br />
Brackets, question - marks and<br />
exclamations marks<br />
Young in Latvia<br />
About the street<br />
A few remarks and anecdotes<br />
about contemporary painting<br />
The subjunctive sexual mood<br />
blossoms allegedly<br />
I Can’t - But We Can<br />
Welcome to the Dollhouse: On<br />
Painting and Perspective<br />
Today painting media are more<br />
visible than ever<br />
Changes in the Everyday practices<br />
in the Estonian Art Scene<br />
A decade of young art<br />
Where do you go to, my lovely
About<br />
Painting<br />
and<br />
Becoming<br />
by art critic and curator Jolanta Marcišauskytė-Jurašienė / Lithuania / 2011<br />
60<br />
The Lithuanian language is rich of etymologic<br />
links of word meanings. Is it accidental that in<br />
the Lithuanian language words standing for<br />
“painting/paint/brush” are “tapyba/ tapymas/<br />
tepti”, which are so similar to “tapimas (Eng.<br />
be- coming)”? (This relation of “brush” and<br />
“become” at a time was mentioned by art critic,<br />
essayist and poet Alfonsas Andriuškevičius.)<br />
Possibly there is a constant necessity encoded<br />
in the genetics of painting - to become<br />
something, to change, to be thought over and<br />
over, to be reassessed.<br />
If we imagine painting this way, then the whole<br />
history of it seems to be a vibrant sea of transformations<br />
and becomings. Alternation and<br />
becoming something new are its conditions of<br />
survival. However, this excursion to the eld of<br />
ety- mology is not a pompous ode or an attempt<br />
to give painting an extraordinary place.<br />
A stray into links of meanings typical to the<br />
Lithuanian language alone is provocative and<br />
not very honest with regard to other languages.<br />
Even though, the Lithuanian language is capable<br />
of being proud of its old age and closeness<br />
to Sanskrit. Many times painting used to<br />
be romanticized, animated and the spirit was<br />
deprived of it, it was constructed and deconstructed.<br />
In addition, this excursion seems as<br />
an invitation to try to cognize the essence of<br />
painting from one more side – linguistic. This<br />
is probably not a very productive way. However,<br />
since there is no a single truth, it is more<br />
important to raise new questions. Precisely<br />
questions create background for existence.<br />
Becomings of painting are determined by<br />
many tangible and intangible, objective and<br />
subjective elements, and it is impossible to<br />
cover their panorama of alternation of ideas<br />
and in uences. No matter what kind of art<br />
history we wrote, it would be written wrongly.<br />
Furthermore, attempts of this text to explore<br />
painting and becoming will be only understood<br />
as unpretentious sketches of possibility.<br />
First of all, about the factor, why did a requirement<br />
to newly talk of painting arise on the<br />
whole? Is it due to a competition organized for<br />
the third time already, this year acquiring an<br />
international shade - “Young Painter Prize”?<br />
During its rst year of existence, the event<br />
rounded up and raised mainly the scene of<br />
painters of Vilnius. This event yet became a<br />
station for observation and introspection of<br />
young generation of Lithuanian painters. At<br />
Abo<br />
least for me, and probably for most art viewers<br />
and assessors of my generation, the view<br />
of young painting existed as a wishy-washy<br />
and ephemeral phenomenon until the competition<br />
exhibitions have started. Time to time<br />
somebody used to organize some exhibition,<br />
Pai<br />
somebody used to be noticed by curators or<br />
gallerists, while some – emigrated or settled<br />
somewhere into silence. The result is that we<br />
know artists of the older and middle generations,<br />
which are already institutionalized, however<br />
we have an empty space with desultory<br />
and<br />
names of young artists, more or less known to<br />
us. Yet we have quite clear scenery of young<br />
painters stabilized by “Young Painter Prize”.<br />
We can only have a sigh that the latter artists<br />
have been luckier – their road to publicity is<br />
less winding. Just work, have ideas, while the<br />
Bec<br />
presentation and publicity of you will be taken<br />
care of by organizers of the competition, at<br />
least partially.<br />
During rst years of project arrangement, the<br />
following proposition reasoning its demand<br />
seemed right and motivat- ing: the credit of<br />
youth is shortterm and it is essential to use it<br />
qualitatively. After 30 years pass, it becomes<br />
too late for that. For some time the conditions<br />
for using the credit of youth have not been<br />
established in Lithuania. However, today,<br />
thinking of the situation of painting and young<br />
painters, I would say that precisely through<br />
this project the condi- tions for young painters<br />
have improved and became better. Of course,<br />
it would be a lie to state that suddenly gallerists<br />
and collectors have started to ow into<br />
studios of painters or crowds of interested<br />
people started coming to their exhibitions. Still<br />
the participants of the competition became<br />
much more visible. Now critics, collectioners,<br />
some colleagues recognize their artworks<br />
from a distance, while those art- ists who try<br />
to be productive and participate in different<br />
ex- hibitions became even boring, since seen
many times. For several years together, I see<br />
the same names among ten best participants<br />
of the competition and I even catch myself<br />
asking: “Is that really everything? Are they the<br />
best painters of Lithuania“? I must admit that<br />
the good will idea of organizers to help young<br />
painters actually gained institu- tionalizing<br />
power. So, “Young Painter Prize” means business<br />
and actually contributes to the writing of<br />
the painting history. We must look at it seriously.<br />
This seriousness produces a requirement<br />
to more attentively look at painting media.<br />
Once I have heard wind of the question presented<br />
to the organizer of the competition<br />
by one of the theorists of dif- ferent media:<br />
“And what is painting these days?“. As a fact,<br />
its de nition cannot be contained in frames<br />
of canvas. This situation has been present for<br />
some time already. Long ago we have settled<br />
down with Yves Klein, drawing by bod- ies of<br />
naked women, Shigeko Kuboto’s painting using<br />
va- gina, or Jurga Barilaitė, boxing canvas with<br />
gloves soaked with paint. All the previously<br />
mentioned forms of art fall under the category<br />
of painting. However, when seniors of the department<br />
of painting defend their graduation<br />
theses, which are accomplished in forms of<br />
installation, photography, video or sculpture,<br />
the question of what the painting is arises<br />
justly. Painter diploma sort of enables to partici-<br />
pate in the competition and allows presenting<br />
an artwork which should not necessarily<br />
be accomplished in a form of painting. However,<br />
the format of the competition perceives<br />
painting in a traditional way – using paint and<br />
canvas. So what is the contemporary painter<br />
and what did his or her painting become? Why<br />
do we talk of painting as of a sepa- rate eld of<br />
creation, if it became interdisciplinary already<br />
long ago, and learned to talk new and modern<br />
language?<br />
Painting has experienced crises many times<br />
during its time of existence. When photography<br />
originated, the realistic stimulation of the<br />
scenery has lost its meaning, and experiments<br />
with dab and colour have started. When moving<br />
images appeared, painting has started to<br />
imitate the move and to use a narrative way of<br />
story-telling. For sev- eral times painting has<br />
also experienced its own “funeral” while being<br />
actually alive (the avant-garde movements<br />
in the 7th decade of the XX c.). In Lithuania<br />
this took place much later, in the presence of<br />
postmodernism. Together, the self-perception<br />
of the painter was changing. From almighty,<br />
able to recreate miracles of God on canvas,<br />
the painter has transformed into a scientist<br />
and discoverer. From a madman, pouring his<br />
sores of the spirit, he has changed into a rational<br />
critic and destroyer of the image.... So,<br />
different crises have encouraged painting to<br />
transform. In the presence of crisis, painting’s<br />
self-re ection encouraged to reconsider the<br />
crea- tion and approach of the image: from a<br />
mirror of the spirit inspired by inner aspirations<br />
to a re ection of picture, creating such<br />
image, with its beginning and end. So, painting<br />
became painting about painting as well as<br />
about a painter.<br />
If in uence of lm, television, internet, photography<br />
and press is so clear in contemporary<br />
painting (the in uence functioning as a source<br />
of painting crisis or a competitor and as a direct<br />
transmitter of “new seeing”), and if images,<br />
compo- sitional structures, virtuality issues<br />
borrowed from them are so obvious, then what<br />
could be painting interesting about? I think<br />
that precisely the fact that painting, re ecting<br />
itself and its own essence is constantly under<br />
the necessity to update its lexicon, borrowing<br />
words from other medias, shows that it is in a<br />
not a very comfortable position. Therefore, in a<br />
hier- archy of arts painting is still standing on<br />
a separate step. But that position is not more<br />
uncomfortable than, for instance, in textile or<br />
graphic art; they are also under the necessity<br />
to constantly reassess them. Probably, only<br />
photography goes one step forward and does<br />
not care about itself. (Its rise could be illustrated<br />
by the fact that since the Middle Ages<br />
up to Baroque, tapestries imitating painting<br />
have been weaved, while contemporary textile<br />
imitates photographic images.)<br />
In spite of supposed creation method of painting<br />
as retrograde media, it still stays favorite,<br />
purchased and dominant. In a eld of all disinterested<br />
arts it is distinct as an art form expressing<br />
the most proximate relation between<br />
the creator and his or her environment. And<br />
here there is no any modernistic animation –<br />
since it is elementary that a movement made<br />
by hand echoes everything, what is cumulated<br />
in the head of a painting man and synthesized<br />
from environment, more accurately and more<br />
sensitively, as compared to a camera, for instance.<br />
In general, looking snappy at this matter, if<br />
a question of self- perception is important<br />
to a phenomenon, it means that it is in a dynamic<br />
stage of adolescence. This applies to<br />
both: painting and a painter, who re ects on<br />
painting’s nature, his place in painting and his<br />
possibilities. Therefore, “Young Painter Prize”<br />
is a handy means for exposition of transformations<br />
and “yet” alive searches under the<br />
window-case glass. As long as questions concerned<br />
with painting are raised, it will keep<br />
becoming something new over and over again.<br />
Due to the reason mentioned, senility does not<br />
threaten painting so far.
Young Artists<br />
meet<br />
institutions:<br />
some important<br />
transformtions.<br />
Youn<br />
meet<br />
insti<br />
some<br />
tran<br />
by art critic Anneli Porri / Estonia / 2011<br />
64<br />
It is an ungrateful task to speak about young<br />
art of today, because this topic is one of the<br />
most eager to change. It is unstable and more<br />
or less yet unexplored area that will alter<br />
immediately even before we can draw our<br />
conclusions about it. Therefore I think it would<br />
be good to start a little ashback to contemporary<br />
history of young art in Estonia and also, in<br />
order to speak about collaboration between<br />
in- stitutions and young artists in Estonia nowadays,<br />
we have to agree the concepts in use.<br />
First we have to look at this as a continuous<br />
process and second, both issues – young art<br />
and an institution – had transformed into new<br />
concepts.
The meaning of Young Art<br />
Today, being a young artist is not a big value on<br />
its own any more. This label is not working as<br />
a handicap or unique selling proposition as it<br />
was common to two heydays of young art. First<br />
wave of young art excitement happened in<br />
1990s, with its peak in the years of 1996-1998.<br />
In the end of 1990’s art students were the<br />
crowd who were in advantaged position, they<br />
had no burden of the Soviet-Modernist conception<br />
of art and re ned taste, but they were the<br />
best informed about new trends, theories and<br />
esthetics and dared to use the new media, as<br />
well as new presentation techniques. The new<br />
reformed contemporary art in 1990’s favored<br />
that kind of bold attitude and anti-esthetics,<br />
which was quite handy and accomplishable to<br />
art students. The Soros Center for Arts, Estonia,<br />
did a good job with younger generation, functioning<br />
as a gateway or facilitator to the international<br />
art life. The second high tide of young<br />
art was in the middle of 2000’s, which showed<br />
its positive attitude by publishing books, organizing<br />
seminars on young art and especially<br />
doing large scale exhibitions with strong institutional<br />
support, New Wave (at Tallinn Art Hall,<br />
curated by Anders Härm and Hanno Soans) and<br />
Concequences and Proposals (with CCA, curated<br />
by Rael Artel and Anneli Porri) for example.<br />
A unique compilation of interviews with artists<br />
by Karin Laansoo bears a title “22+ Young Estonian<br />
Artists” (Estonian Academy of Arts, 2005)<br />
and gives a good introspection to the life and<br />
possibilities of an artist at the age of 22+.<br />
Today, it is dif cult to see an extreme fascination<br />
about freshmen in art. The courage and<br />
loud alternativeness of 1990’s has transformed<br />
into a new professionalism of 2010’s. If in the<br />
elds with developed gallery systems the alternative<br />
means something that is not willing to<br />
obey the rules of the market, then in Estonia<br />
one doesn’t need to struggle with that kind of<br />
dilemmas. Here are no obstacles to be and look<br />
professional, mature or well-trained. As the<br />
bewildered actress Katariina Lauk expressed<br />
her feelings after seeing the exhibition of<br />
the Köler Prize at CAME in the weekly cultural<br />
TV-broadcast OP: „Where is the rebellion?!<br />
Where is the bursting energy of youth?! Why<br />
they are talking so seriously, so neatly? What is<br />
going on with youngsters?!“<br />
The meaning of Institution<br />
What are the most important characteristics<br />
of an institu- tion in art eld for collaborating<br />
artist? One can assume the facilities, exhibition<br />
space, budget, professional personnel, contacts,<br />
network and public recognition perhaps.<br />
The list of institutions that are collaborating<br />
with artist has got some appendage: in addition<br />
to statefunded museums and gal- leries<br />
there are new initiatives like independent<br />
curators and independent project spaces. To<br />
face the truth, being an independent artist or<br />
being a state institution, both of them have<br />
to depend on the royalties and stipends of<br />
the Cultural Endowment to ful ll the nancial<br />
needs of planned projects. If some years ago<br />
a contract to some state-funded art institution<br />
functioned as a good recommendation and<br />
a letter of guarantee for the Cultural Endowment<br />
application, then now it is not, because it<br />
means bigger budget, bigger needs and bigger<br />
expectations. Also a bigger chance to fail.<br />
But what collaboration means? Provide a professional<br />
service and know - how, held in favor;<br />
take into account the wishes, ideas, suggestions<br />
and applications by young artists. What is<br />
the most important thing in collaboration? To<br />
end up with a positive result, I would say.<br />
Maybe this sumup by a cultural researcher<br />
Aili Aareleid helps to understand the relations<br />
between younger genera- tion of today and<br />
leaders of institutions: „Young people in<br />
1990’s got an extraordinary opportunity to<br />
use their energy and daring for reconstruction<br />
of the state and to renovate it in a novel way.<br />
Many of our political and business elite are<br />
from the age group of 35—45. Today’s 20 year<br />
olds have lived in the conditions of expanding<br />
consumerist society, and their opportunities<br />
for self-implementation are austere be- cause<br />
of the former generation who are lling the<br />
positions.“ There are basically no galleries that<br />
use the idea of young art as their tag line. I<br />
think, this is not expressing despise of the art<br />
works by latest generation, but this is underlining<br />
the above mentioned professionalism:<br />
there are no need to give a handicap to youngsters;<br />
they are able to contest in general level.<br />
Of course, there are galleries that have been<br />
extremely kind to young artists, Hobusepea,<br />
Draakon and Tallinn City gallery, the Contemporary<br />
Art Museum of Estonia has gave chance<br />
to students to gain the very rst but DIY- professional<br />
exhibiting experiences, also Y Gallery in<br />
Tartu and City galleries in Võru and Haapsalu,<br />
Art Halls in Tartu and Pärnu, if to mention the<br />
most active non-pro t ones. Commercial galleries<br />
Vaal and late ArtDepo has put some effort<br />
to rise up young generation artists, now is the<br />
Gallery of Temnikova&Kasela shown itself as<br />
an energetic new con- tender in the eld of artist-representing<br />
galleries.<br />
Of course there was an exception in the gallery<br />
and cura- torial eld of Estonia, I am thinking<br />
of the Rael Artel Gal- lery: Non-Pro t Project<br />
Space, which was active during years 2004-<br />
2008 in Tartu and Pärnu. An independent<br />
curator Rael Artel has stated that she will collaborate<br />
as a curator only with artist from her<br />
own generation. She explains her choic- es in<br />
the beginning of working up her own non-pro t<br />
project space: “There was no problem with artists<br />
from the younger generation – their drawers<br />
mainly held school works and the chance to<br />
do something new seemed more like a positive<br />
challenge than interference in the creative<br />
bursts of an artist.” So this is also pointing out<br />
the differences in working methods among<br />
different generations, and the clear decision<br />
made inside of the institutional frame.<br />
What comes this very year, the Capital of Cultural<br />
Tallinn 2011Foundation has involved<br />
many artist and authors from younger generation<br />
to their programme and the outcome of<br />
this liaison is quite outstanding. There are several<br />
large scale projects that cannot be realized<br />
without the additional support of the institution<br />
of The Capital of Culture, both in nancial<br />
and ideological scale. Maybe the festival of urban<br />
installations LIFT 11 is the most charming<br />
example of such project. And also all kinds of<br />
events in festival format seem to appeal more<br />
young performers, for example yearly ART IST<br />
KUKU NU UT in Tartu.<br />
And nally a cherry on the top: prizes for artists<br />
who are active in the eld of ne art. The rst, who<br />
established a prize for young artist, was the<br />
Gallery Vaal in 1991, it was announced up to<br />
year 2008. Last years of it the prize has got a<br />
practical angle, the winner was sent to some<br />
contem- porary art event in Europe to gain<br />
experience and ideas. Seven years ago in the<br />
conditions of economic and young art boom,<br />
a handful of kind businessmen started also a<br />
prize for BA and MA students of the Fine Arts<br />
faculty of the Estonian Academy of Arts, the<br />
Young Artist’s Prize. The prizewinner is to be<br />
chosen out of all graduates, the jury make their<br />
deci- sion after seeing the BA portfolios and<br />
MA thesis. This little nancial injection is meant<br />
to be as a collegial recognition and a material<br />
aid to keep the young and promising talent<br />
working as an artist.<br />
And last but not least, the Köler Prize, established<br />
this year by the Contemporary Art Museum<br />
of Estonia. This is not par- ticularly initiated<br />
as an award for young artist, but all nomi- nees<br />
were still representing the younger generation.<br />
Köler Prize as the local analogue for the Turner<br />
Prize set up an extremely spectacular show and<br />
we sincerely hope it will go on in the future.
You can<br />
only sink in<br />
quicksand<br />
to your<br />
shoulders<br />
by art critic Danutė Gambickaitė / Lithuania / 2012<br />
68<br />
Becoming as quicksand<br />
In her text for last year’s Young Painter Prize<br />
catalogue, the art critic Jolanta Marcišauskytė-Jurašienė<br />
addressed the etymology of the<br />
Lithuanian word tapyba (painting) and its links<br />
with the word tapsmas (becoming), which<br />
refers to an existential transformation. Another<br />
art critic, Alfonsas Andriuškevičius, once<br />
mentioned it, too. Now it appears to me that<br />
the connection of painting and becoming is<br />
so fascinating, alluring and viscous that upon<br />
entering its domain one’s consciousness/subconscious<br />
finds itself to be much like some<br />
living creature struggling in quicksand. And in<br />
quicksand, the more one struggles, the faster<br />
one becomes trapped. Did you know that it is<br />
impossible to completely sink in quicksand?<br />
That the body always submerges in it only to<br />
the shoulders? Struggling only accelerates the<br />
process, but the end is always the same – only<br />
to the shoulders.<br />
I must confess that asking me to write about<br />
painting was a somewhat risky decision. I have<br />
written and said on a number of occasions<br />
that I am not interested much in contemporary<br />
painting (save for a few favourite authors). One<br />
may wonder why someone who is not interested<br />
much in contemporary painting would nevertheless<br />
agree to write a text about, and for<br />
the Young Painter Prize catalogue of all things.<br />
The answer is very simple – every attempt at<br />
writing is, in a way, a search for an answer as<br />
well as reading, even if one is not willing to<br />
engage in that. This text is a search for a missing<br />
(answer), the territory of the search is the<br />
art field, and the search party are those writing<br />
and reding this text. Perhaps in the end (of the<br />
text) it will become clear what the writer and<br />
the reader will have found, and whether their<br />
findings coincide, finally – whether they were<br />
searching for the same thing at all.<br />
It is most sensible to start the search with reviewing<br />
what you already know and remember.<br />
Thus, I would also like to begin with an overview<br />
of what I already said about contemporary<br />
painting in my text about last year’s Young<br />
Painter Prize. In this text, I transfer the inklings<br />
from the earlier text to the present and elaborate<br />
on them in the form of it still seems to me.<br />
You<br />
The reason I am doing this is not laziness; the<br />
fact is, my insights presented in that text have<br />
barely changed, only now they are augmented<br />
with other insights.<br />
only<br />
It still seems to me that contemporary young<br />
It still seems to me...<br />
Lithuanian painting is so far trapped in the<br />
stage of painting about painting. That it resembles<br />
a serpent that devours its own tail and<br />
gets stuck at some point. It still seems to me<br />
that self-reflection in painting looks more vivid<br />
quic<br />
and forceful (perhaps it is so because those<br />
who employ it are considered, quite deservedly,<br />
to be the best in qualitative and other<br />
senses, or maybe because a critical mass is<br />
absent). The discourse of painting about painting,<br />
intertwined with umpteenth declaration of<br />
to yo<br />
painting’s “death”, incessantly reapproached<br />
concepts by Richter and Tuymans, and emphasis<br />
on the process of painting itself still induce<br />
certain tedium.<br />
shou<br />
It still seems to me that many young painters<br />
(no all of them, mind you) strive to do everything<br />
right and are afraid of mistakes, which<br />
makes painting that is not about painting look<br />
timid. After all, everybody has their own favourite<br />
themes, which seem to flash here and<br />
there, but the wish to “do it right” still prevails<br />
in the end. The format of a competition does<br />
not help much here, because it naturally inspires<br />
thoughts that are associated with the<br />
desire to win. It still seems to me that the paradox<br />
of the reverse fasces can still be helpful in<br />
discussing the participants of the Young Painter<br />
Prize ’11 competition (or the young painting<br />
scene in general). While the Italian fascists<br />
claimed that it was more difficult to break a<br />
bundle of rods than a single rod, in the case of<br />
the <strong>YPP</strong>, on the contrary, it is more difficult to<br />
break a single rod than a bundle. Many of the<br />
young painters look stronger separately than<br />
together. When they are bundled together,<br />
the weak points and complexes of their works
ecome apparent. Or the boredom that engulfs<br />
the viewer simply intensifies. On the other<br />
hand, would the situation change if it was not a<br />
competition that wrote the history of contemporary<br />
young painting?<br />
Still, the question I mentioned in the text<br />
which I am quoting and slightly paraphrasing<br />
now emerges almost instinctively: what<br />
happened/happens to painting when the<br />
competition format became/becomes nearly<br />
the principal “writer” of the history of contemporary<br />
painting? The very surfacing of this<br />
question says and answers quite a lot. The<br />
confusing juxtaposition of the past and present<br />
tense forms of the verbs “to happen” and “to<br />
become” is not accidental. It shows that the<br />
writer of this and that texts is unsure whether<br />
the <strong>YPP</strong> (starting with the very first one) only<br />
presented a clearer view of the already wellestablished<br />
contemporary young Lithuanian<br />
painting scene, or whether it also contributed<br />
to its formation. Ultimately, this lack of certainty<br />
leads to some progress in the search for the<br />
missing answer and somewhat slows down the<br />
process of sinking in quicksand. This is how the<br />
time for assumptions comes eventually.<br />
The tautology and old age of painting,<br />
but still…<br />
It still seems to me that contemporary painting<br />
is tautological. On the other hand, tautology<br />
lurks in many places: iron iron, photographic<br />
photography, picturesque painting, as well as<br />
in that it still seems to me that it still seems to<br />
me. There is a saying: if you’re seeing visions,<br />
cross yourself, but still…<br />
I often think about the situation of contemporary<br />
painting as a certain tautology of the<br />
medium or its old age. In its young years it was<br />
handsome, selfconfident and even somewhat<br />
narcissistic. It has lived through centuries,<br />
changed many times, adapted to the environment,<br />
attempted to arouse interest or shock,<br />
please or, on the contrary, induce disgust.<br />
Today, this vitality and energy of painting have<br />
exhausted themselves somewhat. Painting has<br />
grown tired, and the only way out is to understand<br />
this fatigue, accept and make friends<br />
with it, and the go with the flow upon understanding<br />
it. A void/gap instantly opens in the<br />
inner space, and painting, like any other medium,<br />
like any other thing, really needs this void/<br />
gap.<br />
But still painting, even though tired, is dictatorial.<br />
It is very difficult to understand it, and perhaps<br />
only one who paints and becomes can do<br />
it. Others can only imagine and suppose how<br />
the one who paints is feeling while experiencing<br />
the dictate, tautology and senility of painting,<br />
and at the same time trying to find a still<br />
uninhabited void and gap in its inner space.<br />
Phantom Limb<br />
There is an odd psychological phenomenon<br />
known as a phantom limb 1 . Imagine that some<br />
part of your body – for instance, a leg – has<br />
been amputated. It seems that it is really absent,<br />
you cannot touch it, you cannot rest on it<br />
while walking, but you still feel it, as if it became<br />
invisible. One can find something similar<br />
in the Lithuanian poet Justinas Marcinkevičius’<br />
poem Ballad of a Leg 2 . You could learn to live<br />
with this loss, but that ghost leg keeps haunting<br />
you. In a sense, the situation of painting has<br />
been very similar from the middle of the 20th<br />
century to this day. Something is constantly<br />
being amputated, something is being lost and<br />
rejected, but the ghost of the things that are<br />
rejected, negated and amputated seems to<br />
remain. Finally, the notion of a phantom limb<br />
can also be used to refer to the death of painting,<br />
the dictate of painting, or the fact that<br />
the painter gets rid of the hand, yet still keeps<br />
thinking about it…<br />
In any case, the phantom limb condition in the<br />
context of contemporary painting is related<br />
to painting’s self-reflexivity, mentioned many<br />
times in this text already, the syndrome of a<br />
painter who does everything right, or, finally,<br />
(in my case) the boredom that overwhelms one<br />
while thinking about contemporary painting.<br />
In a certain sense, boredom is also a phantom<br />
limb. I am bored, but I am still reflecting on<br />
why I am bored, sinking into boredom ever<br />
more.<br />
On the other hand, the situation is not as dramatic<br />
as it might seem. There definitely are<br />
young painters who do not attempt to once<br />
again rethink their relationship with the chosen<br />
medium or the possibility of doing everything<br />
right, but rather just speak out on the issues<br />
they care about by painting.<br />
Coming back to the search, becoming,<br />
and quicksand<br />
Has the end of this text revealed what the reader<br />
and the writer have found? So far it is only<br />
the writer who can answer this question. The<br />
writer has found a way out in the following saying:<br />
let it go. It is impossible to sink completely<br />
in quicksand anyway. In the end, you always<br />
sink to your shoulders only. In conclusion, here<br />
are the guidelines for escaping from quicksand.<br />
Guidelines for escaping from quicksand<br />
1. Stay clear of quicksand.<br />
2. If you have entered a zone with quicksand<br />
risk, find a long staff.<br />
3. If you start sinking in quicksand, drop<br />
all of your things away as quickly as possible.<br />
4. Relax.<br />
5. Breathe deeply.<br />
6. If possible, try lying on yor back.<br />
7. Be patient.<br />
8. If you have a long staff, use it.<br />
9. Take a long break after each action.<br />
1<br />
This is also the title of a contemporary painting exhibition<br />
currently on show at the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Art<br />
(until October 21).<br />
2<br />
Once a man came back from war<br />
and brought with him a giant scar.<br />
He isn’t doing anything since,<br />
searching for his leg and failing to find it.<br />
Maybe his leg is dancing somewhere,<br />
and a soldier is playing for it in a backstreet.<br />
People throw him a brass coin<br />
for an unusually large leg.<br />
Ah, that leg! It could do anything.<br />
One couldn’t be ashamed of it.<br />
Most importantly, it walked. It walked!<br />
And had a foot, just like others.<br />
Stand apart, deep beds of soil,<br />
listen – a soldier is playing:<br />
simply, wistfully, monotonously.<br />
Holding a leg instead of a violin.
About<br />
the portrait<br />
of the young<br />
painter<br />
once again<br />
by “The Rooster gallery” gallerist Jurgita Juospaitytė-Bitinienė / Lithuania / 2012<br />
72
As the competition of “Young Painter Prize”<br />
runs up, every year wel- coming more and<br />
more participants and observers, it becomes<br />
in- teresting to have a look at young painters<br />
out<br />
from the art management perspective.<br />
The pro tability research accomplished analyzing<br />
European culture and creative sector<br />
showed that the highest pro tability index<br />
was present in the eld of the ne arts. Though<br />
rait<br />
local Lithuanian market is too small to keep<br />
the competitive ability in most elds of creative<br />
in- dustries as well as in the contemporary art,<br />
we need to consider the fact that the global<br />
demand for creation is growing without<br />
cease, establishing unique possibilities for a<br />
young artist. In the context of globalization<br />
programs, international residences, traveling<br />
nter<br />
sectional exhibitions – changes in the career<br />
of the young artist are more prompt and more<br />
visible.<br />
processes- participation in student exchange<br />
gain<br />
TODAY’S YOUNG CREATOR<br />
The portrait of today’s creator is rather distant<br />
from the im- age of the artist, which is still<br />
strong in the general public romantic, ranging<br />
through torment of inspiration, pain and<br />
de- sires. Young artists - ef cient, responsible,<br />
hardworking and much demanding from themselves.<br />
He or she does not wait to be noticed<br />
by exhibition curators, art critics or galleries.<br />
Instead, they look for opportunities to be accredited<br />
to the art market.<br />
THE WAY ARTISTS WORK<br />
Every person has his or her own daily routine –<br />
the sequence of actions and works, determined<br />
by abilities and habits. It is a myth that<br />
artists are different and live from one inspiration<br />
moment to another. Most famous artists,<br />
writers, philosophers plan their time. There is<br />
a joke that Gerhard Richter holds to his daily<br />
rou- tine schedule so sharp, that it is possible<br />
to set clocks following it. The agenda and consistent<br />
abidance by it nurtures the talent. Thus<br />
most often young artists have their well-established<br />
work routine.<br />
CREATION<br />
A young creator acts in the context of the tradition<br />
and in uenc- es coming from the West. The<br />
spectrum of creation is very wide. Therefore it<br />
would be dif cult to single out some common<br />
denomi- nator outlining the creation of young<br />
people. In all probability it is the whole of<br />
ideologies or attitudes, which crystallizes out<br />
to certain tendencies. Idealistic background<br />
of works in the crea- tion of Lithuanian young<br />
artists is not very wide. It ranges from rather<br />
formal to philosophical and personal matured,<br />
visually ex- plicated and reasoned ideas. The<br />
oneness of the young generation of artists is<br />
related to the western assimilation of discourses<br />
and contexts as well as rethinking and their<br />
relation to the tradition.<br />
ACHIEVEMENTS<br />
The index of activity and achievements of Lithuanian<br />
painters could be the number of scholarships<br />
and honours. Here Alina Melnikova a<br />
few times in a row received a SLEIPNIR scholarship<br />
from Nordic Council of Ministers. Painter<br />
Eglė Karpavičiūtė became a laureate<br />
of international competition “The Sovereign<br />
European Art Prize”. Povilas Ramanauskas was<br />
awarded a premium of IInd place and received<br />
a reward of “International Panathlon” in the<br />
exhibition “Fair Play”. While Darius Jaruševičius<br />
received a public artist’s scholarship for<br />
implementation of painterly animated lm<br />
“Polyrabbit. Du- plicate”. Eglė Ulčickaitė was<br />
awarded a premium of Viktoras Vizgirda, and<br />
Petras Lincevičius gained a premium of Dalia<br />
Gruodienė’s name. Paulė Boculaitė has created<br />
a scenography for the performance “Mr.<br />
Fluxus arba Šarlatanai”, and the creative team<br />
of it received three Golden Stage Crosses (lith.<br />
Auksinius scenos kryžius).<br />
WHAT MISTAKES ARTISTS MAKE<br />
As auctions increasingly present artists outre<br />
“million for an artwork”, art agents string doors<br />
of art academies looking for new talents. Yet<br />
many artists stay unnoticed.<br />
One of the mistakes often made by young artists<br />
– they “overvalue” their works. Huge prices<br />
during their rst exhibitions create obstacles to<br />
run their further activity. In the beginning of<br />
their career most famous artists (for example,<br />
Warhol or Basquiat) used to sell their works for<br />
really conservative prices. One more mistake<br />
made by young painters is too poor attention<br />
devoted for the technical aspect of the creation.<br />
Sometimes, realization possibilities of a<br />
ne artwork are highly in uenced by not qualitative<br />
or wrongly prepared canvas.<br />
THE GALLERY AND THE ARTIST<br />
In the beginning of the creative road artists<br />
often take up self-man- agement. The coming<br />
of the gallery makes the start in the art world<br />
easier for a young artist, therefore the relation<br />
between the gallery and the artist becomes<br />
more and more important. This in a way reminds<br />
of a moment of a gathering of artist<br />
groups however it is more than just an idealogical<br />
compound.<br />
Looking from the gallery’s perspective, the<br />
description “young artist from the Baltic state”<br />
does not function as a unique spell word in the<br />
global art market. However work with young<br />
painters is full of exciting discoveries.
Brackets,<br />
question -<br />
marks and<br />
exclamations<br />
marks<br />
by art critic and curator Julija Dailidėnaitė / Lithuania / 2012<br />
76<br />
BRACKETS. PROCESS<br />
Bra<br />
In the latter decades, the rapidly changing economic,<br />
technological, social, cultural resources<br />
and the speeding way of life, consumer thinking,<br />
priorities and values of the society, have<br />
determined the situation of culture as well<br />
as its institutions – art centres and art galler-<br />
que<br />
ies have altered their activities. The essential<br />
changes in the art of Lithuania took place in<br />
the end of the 20th century, and in the rst<br />
decade of the 21st century: new institutions<br />
were established, the number of exhibitions<br />
has expanded, and the work of artists be- came<br />
mar<br />
more active. The latter phenomena have determined<br />
changes and certain processes of topical<br />
globalization as well as the artist’s junction<br />
with post-industrial reality, adjusting to changes<br />
of scenery. When analyzing the situation<br />
of young artists in the society, it is not easy to<br />
excl<br />
talk of the creative work of the young generation<br />
artists, since this area is one of the most<br />
dynamic in the cultural eld. On the other hand,<br />
it is the area with little analysis done, since<br />
it keeps constantly experiencing alternation.<br />
mar<br />
Therefore, it is distinguished for multi-meaning<br />
and interpretation possibilities, opening ways<br />
for discussions.<br />
Young artist‘s integration into social space – a<br />
continuous process. Creators constantly face<br />
an increasing ow of information (Internet,<br />
social Internet sites, mobility programs, etc.).<br />
Their thinking ac- quires a more cosmopolitan<br />
character – young creators do not associate<br />
their activity with a simply national paradigm.<br />
In other words, creators become free from<br />
their geographic place of residence or a place<br />
of creation and that conditioned limitation. As<br />
a result of the reaction to this kind of changes,<br />
art institutions become more open to „untested“<br />
art and declare their support to young<br />
creators. In the latter decade the number of<br />
different institutions cooperating with young<br />
artists is signi cantly increasing: beside the<br />
institutions and galleries which are nanced<br />
by the government, new initiatives start their<br />
activity, art curators successfully implement<br />
their work, new independent project spaces
uild up. Despite the fact that the artist works<br />
independently or cooperates with state institutions,<br />
his or her status is always in uenced<br />
by nancial resources, because the creative<br />
productivity of artists mostly depend on the<br />
nancial means assigned to them, such as scholarships,<br />
honorariums and assets of cultural<br />
support fund, intended for implementation of<br />
projects. Often this becomes the essential condition<br />
and possibility to realize their creative<br />
ideas.<br />
In the making of Lithuanian art market the<br />
con icting forces become evident – the ones<br />
between art creators and state institutions.<br />
This confrontation is constantly present in the<br />
public discourse: young creators, after they<br />
graduate their art academies, nd it dif cult to<br />
integrate into a vivid social and cultural environment<br />
of the state. Danutė Gambickaitė, art<br />
critic of the young generation, has named<br />
this pecking situation as intermediate, re ecting<br />
an entirety of change and indeterminacy<br />
factors. It appeared in the latter decade, in the<br />
context of art uctuation process.<br />
Today’s complicated relations between the<br />
young artist and art institutions, frequently<br />
arising complex in exible processes of cultural<br />
product creation and information dissemination,<br />
again make this theme very relevant.<br />
Institutions which have the biggest in uence in<br />
the art eld do not devote enough attention to<br />
the creation process of the young artist, as well<br />
as to the realization of his or her artworks or<br />
further advertising of them. Due to the reason<br />
mentioned only a small number of galleries<br />
and curators decide to represent young artists.<br />
Often, in order to justify the importance<br />
of different cultural phenomena, it is shaded<br />
by some famous names or desert. Therefore<br />
young artists are left behind and stay in a<br />
certain art periphery. It is often forgotten that<br />
young artists, if motivated and trained, could<br />
actually represent the State’s higher art in the<br />
future perspective. Young generation of artists<br />
is able to realize and under- stand themselves<br />
only in a case of a wider context. The investment<br />
orientated to the future is basically risky,<br />
however why should not we try it?<br />
QUESTION MARKS. TODAY<br />
The creative work of young artists has always<br />
had a form of manifest and protest. What kind<br />
of a young creator is the one of today? What<br />
is the idealistic background of their works?<br />
Does the contemporary generation of young<br />
artists preserve a moment of identi cation and<br />
exclusivity? It could be presumed that a new<br />
generation of artists is in the process of formation<br />
at the moment. Maybe not so actively as<br />
we would like to, without any big revolutions,<br />
however with strong conceptual decisions.<br />
The maturing generation of new artists, being<br />
under the in uence of older generation and<br />
having less and less connection to historical,<br />
political and economic past of Lithuania<br />
creates social aspects and art highlighting<br />
critical relation of the artist and the society.<br />
The young generation is characteristic of<br />
narrative, minimalism or cardinal maximalism,<br />
defragmentation of memory, recall, rehash<br />
and appropriation. Really, in the era of modern<br />
technologies and cheap ights appropriation is<br />
widely spread. It could be assumed that it has<br />
acquired features of a virus. Yes, that what it is,<br />
a young person – a researcher, creator, observer,<br />
learner (in a wider sense). However, we wish<br />
him or her to be a personality, able to think<br />
and capable of selecting proper information,<br />
searching as well as choosing the creative road<br />
which could re ect him or her best.<br />
When analyzing the status of the young artist<br />
in the eld of contemporary culture it becomes<br />
evident that often a young creator gradu- ates<br />
an academy of art without any knowledge of<br />
survival using his speciality. Also, he or she<br />
lacks knowledge of self-representation and art<br />
management. The artist creates and designs<br />
himself being dependent on pecking conditions:<br />
if the talent is noticed and evalu- ated,<br />
then he works with galleries and is invited to<br />
group exhibitions of the contemporary art or<br />
international art fairs; however, if the galleries<br />
take no interest in the young talent, then<br />
groups of artists develop – their actions are organized;<br />
or the specialization is being changed,<br />
and the artistic expression is pushed away to a<br />
hobby level.<br />
EXCLAMATION MARKS.<br />
“YOUNG PAINTER PRIZE“<br />
In the latter decade the objective of art institutions<br />
to cooperate with young artists has<br />
evidently energized. Recently, next to state,<br />
institutional and private art centres and galleries,<br />
there is an increase in non-institutional<br />
initiatives, designed for young artists. One of<br />
the rst prime non-institutional initiatives is the<br />
project “Young Painters Prize“. It aims at patronization<br />
of young artists (up to 30 years of<br />
age, inclusive). It helps to open roads to publicity,<br />
encourages artists to improve and preserve<br />
faith in their power of creation. This project<br />
combines a huge potential of young artists.<br />
By organizing the exhibitions and events of<br />
“Young Painter Prize“, by publishing informational<br />
publications, catalogues, we aim at<br />
gath- ering not only the youth who paint (the<br />
representatives of which participate in the<br />
competitive programme), but also art critics<br />
(who write texts for project’s catalogues),<br />
young designers (who create models of catalogues<br />
and design of posters), young specialists<br />
of humanitarian sciences (who accomplish<br />
tasks of text translation, in- terpretation of direct<br />
speech, and text editing), young musicians<br />
(who prepare their performances for the evening<br />
of awards). There fore, this project covers<br />
much more art elds than its title declares.<br />
Young creators are writing a new page of art<br />
history even today. The more the state, institutional<br />
or personal initiatives appear, opening<br />
roads to „possibility“, the stronger their con<br />
dence become and the more purposeful their<br />
creative activity is.
Young in Latvia<br />
by “Gallery 21” gallerist Ivonna Veiherte / Latvia / 2013
In Latvia, too, young artists have an everincreasing<br />
range of opportunities to win recognition,<br />
not only in the context of their own country<br />
or the Baltic States. The world has become<br />
more accessible. The following account reveals<br />
that in Latvia, too, there is funding available<br />
for young artists (admittedly, most of it coming<br />
from private patrons of the arts).<br />
Latvia’s largest private galleries focus on promoting<br />
young painters in particular, because<br />
the State Culture Capital Foundation tends to<br />
allocate great- er support to other forms of<br />
visual arts, which means that painting ends up<br />
‘getting less’. Accordingly, the private galleries<br />
are almost alone (with the ex- ception of several<br />
exhibitions in the frame of the Creative<br />
Workshop at the Arsenāls Exhibition Hall of<br />
the National Museum of Art and the Intro Hall<br />
of the Riga Art Space) in offering regular exhibitions<br />
of painting. Since the visual art scene<br />
in Latvia is, by tradition, strongly centralised,<br />
the main possibilities for exhibiting one’s work<br />
and achieving signi cant results are available in<br />
Riga, although the ambitious Cēsis Art Festival<br />
also invites one of the young artists every year,<br />
and during the last year the Daugavpils Mark<br />
Rothko Art Centre has emerged as a promising<br />
venue.<br />
Skatindama visų trijų Baltijos šalių menininkų<br />
bendradarbiavimą, Gallery 21 Rygoje suorganizavo<br />
parodas, kuriose buvo eksponuojami<br />
ne tik Latvijos, bet ir Lietuvos, Estijos jaunųjų<br />
menininkų darbai. Galerija taip pat aktyviai<br />
rek- lamuoja jaunuosius menininkus ir tarptautiniu<br />
lygmeniu. Šiuo metu atidaryta dar<br />
viena privačių parodų vieta – Mūkusala meno<br />
salonas, suteikiantis jauniesiems menininkams<br />
galimybę pristatyti savo darbus. Jaunieji latvių<br />
men- ininkai taip pat bendradarbiauja su<br />
Rygos galerija Māksla XO. Be abejonės, yra ir<br />
daugiau galimybių eksponuoti savo darbus,<br />
tačiau minėtosios galerijos savo veikla parodė<br />
kryptingesnį požiūrį ir pasiekė reikšmingesnių<br />
ilgalaikių rezultatų.<br />
In order to promote collaboration between all<br />
three Baltic States in the eld of art, Gallery 21<br />
has organised exhibitions in Riga featuring the<br />
work not only of young Latvian artists, but also<br />
young Lithuanian and Estonian artists. The gallery<br />
has also been active in promoting young<br />
artists at an international level. Nowadays,<br />
there is a second private exhibition venue<br />
offering the possibility for young painters to<br />
present their work, namely the Mūkusala Art<br />
Salon. Young Latvian artists also collaborate<br />
with the Riga gallery Māksla XO. Of course,<br />
there are many other exhibition opportunities,<br />
but the above-mentioned galler- ies have<br />
demonstrated a more purposeful approach<br />
and have achieved more signi cant long-term<br />
results through their exhibition activity.<br />
Latvia has a fairly large number of galleries,<br />
so the possibility of exhibiting one’s work<br />
does exist. And if we consider the support<br />
programmes for artists, examined below, then<br />
we may conclude that there really is ample<br />
support for young artists, although it does not<br />
re ect the particular signi cance of painting as<br />
a language of visual art. Priorities have also<br />
changed in terms of the actual means of expression<br />
in painting. The professionalism that<br />
was once essential no longer has any signi<br />
cance, and the search for re ned tonal relationships<br />
has ceased to matter, because the rapid<br />
tempo of the age presents entirely different<br />
demands in this realm, too, ignoring the special<br />
character of painting as a language. No longer<br />
signi cant, and gradually being forgotten, are<br />
‘old- fashioned’ aspects that used to be very<br />
important: mastering the profession, talent,<br />
studies from life. This means that the number<br />
of artists is increasing and competition can<br />
no longer be objective, since it proceeds from<br />
other criteria: topicality and originality of the<br />
subject, innovation, adaptation of concepts.<br />
Unavoidably, we see increasing clamour for<br />
attention, with an increase in the size of works,<br />
leading to unjusti ably large formats, the use of<br />
impermanent materials and engagement with<br />
taboo themes, thus diverting public attention<br />
from works that demand contemplation, visual<br />
training and other ‘élite’ skills that are no longer<br />
being cultivated.<br />
All the more laudable, then, is the Lithuanian<br />
<strong>YPP</strong> (Young Painter Prize) initiative, which represents<br />
another opportunity to discuss painting<br />
and bring it to public attention. It does not<br />
matter whether the painting under discussion<br />
is gural, abstract or of some other kind, but<br />
rather that the discussion should keep to the<br />
same categories. And, as always, one often has<br />
cause to doubt whether certain of the competitors<br />
have actually mastered the means of<br />
expression of the form of art in which they are<br />
engaged.<br />
In Latvia, as everywhere else, the techniques<br />
of painting, sculpture and graphic art are seen<br />
as outmoded, and those galleries that exhibit<br />
painting more than the ‘new media’ are described<br />
as ‘commercial’ (because a paint- ing is<br />
theoretically more likely to nd a buyer than an<br />
installation). However, institutional support is<br />
restricted, which means that more of it goes to<br />
media employing a different visual language.<br />
Accordingly, even young people nd it more<br />
advantageous to study at the Department of<br />
Visual Communications of the Latvian Academy<br />
of Art.<br />
However, if we ignore the local situation, we nd<br />
that among the younger generation of Latvian<br />
artists the names known relatively well in the<br />
world are connected with painting, namely<br />
Jānis Avotiņš and Ēriks Apaļais, who are represented<br />
by galleries outside of Latvia. There are<br />
some other painters making a career abroad<br />
(such as Anita Arbidāne), whose work nds its<br />
way directly into the collections of painting<br />
connoisseurs. They don’t even attempt to show<br />
their work in Latvia, where they’d have to compete<br />
with all the above-mentioned, provincially<br />
misunderstood trends in contemporary art.<br />
It has to be said that in general artists tend<br />
to feel rather unappreciated, because to be<br />
known only in Latvia soon becomes insuf cient<br />
for a young artist.<br />
Everyone hopes in their heart that they’ll get<br />
noticed in the great world of art. And this<br />
brings them to the next questions. What will<br />
get me noticed? How can I achieve this? At<br />
what age should I already be more seriously<br />
involved in the art scene?<br />
Since the galleries of the little Baltic States do<br />
not and cannot shape the process of world art,<br />
and in uential curators arrive only too rarely,<br />
the young ar- tist painters among them – seek<br />
their own answers to these questions. And as<br />
elsewhere in the world, so too in Latvia, it’s<br />
all based on the principle that “it’s up to you”.<br />
Many go abroad in search of success, take part<br />
in competitions and artist-in-residence programmes,<br />
and hope that a gallery will represent<br />
them at an international art event and that<br />
someone from the outside world will notice<br />
them.<br />
A problematic aspect for the recognition of<br />
a young artist in Latvia is undoubtedly the<br />
restricted publicity, owing the lack of press<br />
publications in the eld, which, in its turn, limits<br />
the possibilities for high quality reviews. Often<br />
an artist feels entirely forgotten and redundant<br />
after an exhibition, because, unless an article<br />
about them has appeared in the magazine<br />
Studija, which comes out six times a year, an<br />
exhibition will leave no lasting impression. On<br />
the other hand, the Latvian art portal www.arterritory.com,<br />
which is oriented towards the art<br />
of all the Baltic States, Scandinavia and Russia,<br />
active reports on cur- rent developments, and<br />
accordingly is to be seen as the most important<br />
voice promoting art.<br />
The most ambitious and important event in<br />
visual arts in Latvia is the Purvītis Prize. Every<br />
two years since 2008 work by eight nalists is<br />
exhibited in the Arsenāls Exhibition Hall of the<br />
Latvian National Museum of Art and an international<br />
jury chooses one winner, who receives<br />
a prize of 20 000 lats and the chance to hold a<br />
solo exhibition. This prize is organised by the<br />
Latvian National Museum of Art in collaboration<br />
with a private patron, SIA Alfor, which has<br />
currently emerged as the leading supporter<br />
of various forms of art in Latvia. With the aim<br />
of directly promoting achievement in Latvian<br />
contemporary art, the Purvītis Prize, being the<br />
main form of recognition, is based on a multi-
tiered system, which, according to the statutes,<br />
covers all the exhibitions and events within<br />
Latvia. There is a nomination for ‘excellence<br />
and innovation’ in visual art, and the artists<br />
nominated for the award are in any case noted<br />
in the publications relating to the Purvītis<br />
Prize. In a sense, the jury of the nal, which has<br />
so far included the Minister of Culture, the<br />
Director of the National Museum of Art, one of<br />
the collectors, one of the Latvian critics, along<br />
with celebrated foreign curators, has had to<br />
take on the responsibility of focussing attention<br />
on the particular medium represented by<br />
the prize-winner. The very rst Purvītis Prize<br />
went to the young multimedia artist Katrīna<br />
Neiburga, and this year, too, it was won by a<br />
young artist, in this case one who represents<br />
and has technically mastered the traditional<br />
medium of painting, namely Andris Eglītis, for a<br />
series of works painted using natural materials,<br />
one that convinces the viewer by its fresh and<br />
creative approach.<br />
Evidently with the aim of revealing and presenting<br />
the most interesting de- velopments<br />
in the painting of the younger generation,<br />
D. Barčevska has curated two the ambitious<br />
exhibitions, “Candy bomber. Young in Latvian<br />
paint- ing I” (2007) and “Urban children. Young<br />
in Latvian painting II” (2010), at the Arsenāls<br />
Exhibition Hall of the National Museum of Art.<br />
As far as possible, the two exhibitions have<br />
once again focussed attention on painting and<br />
on those engaged in it: each artist was able<br />
to show several paintings, thus giving an insight<br />
into their work. Thirtyve is the accepted<br />
age limit for an artist to be regarded as young,<br />
which means that work by students and their<br />
teachers could be displayed together.<br />
Also providing support for young painters are<br />
the scholarships and prizes for students organised<br />
by the Latvian Academy of Art, where<br />
painting was historically a priority right up to<br />
the 1990s, when, as a result of various develop-<br />
ments, the Department of Visual Art and<br />
Communication became much more active in<br />
promoting its students.<br />
In a sense, this tendency, too, can be explained<br />
in terms of world trends. As elsewhere, there is<br />
in Latvia a wish to follow these trends. However,<br />
knowing the unique accomplishments represented<br />
in Latvian painting, this focus away<br />
from it seems rather a shame.<br />
The main professional stimulus and publicity<br />
for students of the Painting Department in particular<br />
is the SEB Scholarship in Painting, established<br />
in 2008 (funding travel along with 1200<br />
lats nancial support) and received thus far by<br />
Neonilla Medvedeva, Atis Jākobsons, Zane<br />
Tuča, Elza Sīle, Laimdota Steķe and Klāvs Loris.<br />
The competition jury includes the Director of<br />
the National Museum of Art, the Rector of the<br />
Academy of Art and the Head of the Department<br />
of Painting as well as recognised artists<br />
and theoreticians.<br />
Alongside the international Erasmus scholarship<br />
programmes, signi cant at the present day<br />
is the Ināra Tetereva Art Scholarship, which<br />
supports several of the most talented and zealous<br />
with a total scholarship fund of 18,600 lats<br />
per year. This includes study trips and the holding<br />
of an exhibition on graduation from the<br />
Latvian Academy of Art. Currently it is being<br />
received by the young painter Sandra Strēle.<br />
The cooperation project “Boris and Ināra<br />
Teterev Foundation Programme for Excellence<br />
in Education” has been established, as set out<br />
in a memorandum of cooperation concluded<br />
between the academy and the Teterev Foundation<br />
in 2011, with the aim of promoting “the<br />
strategic development of a high standard of artistic<br />
education in Latvia”. Since 2011 the Latvian<br />
Academy of Art Prize has been awarded in<br />
collaboration with the foundation. In the Young<br />
Artists Category, it has so far been received by<br />
painter Jānis Avotiņš.<br />
In collaboration with entrepreneur Guntis<br />
Rāvis, the Boriss Bērziņš Scholarship (100 lats<br />
a month for a year) has been awarded to three<br />
students every year since 2010. In this case the<br />
criterion – for students of the Painting Department,<br />
too – is the accomplished use of line.<br />
The Brederlo von Sengbusch Prize in Art (EUR<br />
4000) has been awarded biannually since<br />
2006, the jury being permitted to subdivide it.<br />
For 14 years now a lump sum of 1000 USD has<br />
been awarded at the begin- ning of the teaching<br />
year as the scholarship of the Paul Puzinas<br />
Figure Painting Masterclass Prize.<br />
The Latvian Academy of Art currently also<br />
offers “Support for the master’s study programmes<br />
of the Latvian Academy of Art”. Thus,<br />
interest in painting has not died altogether in<br />
Latvia. It has to be said that this is also due to<br />
the efforts of the Janis Rozentāls Secondary<br />
School of Art, which equips young people with<br />
the professional skills for further studies.<br />
Many thanks once again to the organisers and<br />
supporters of <strong>YPP</strong> who promote and maintain<br />
the prestige of painting.
About<br />
the street<br />
by art critic Gerda Paliušytė / Lithuania / 2013<br />
86<br />
Making its debut this year, Vilnius Street Art<br />
Festival chooses the façade of the closed<br />
cinema theatre Lietuva as one of the walls<br />
dedicated to street artists, newly painted on<br />
the occasion of Lithuania’s presidency over<br />
the EU Council in order to hide the graf ti<br />
drawings which have already been there for<br />
quite a while. As part of the festival, the wall<br />
is adorned with a pseudo-realistic drawing;<br />
however, the Vilnius street logic operates under<br />
its own agenda: shortly after wards, unauthorised<br />
graf ti inscriptions reemerge on top<br />
of the politically correct drawing initiated by<br />
the festival. In other words, the street makes<br />
its come- back and resumes its own speech at<br />
a presumably faster pace, which is far more<br />
complex and interesting by its social, political,<br />
hierarchical and other relations than the<br />
said attempt to represent it. A paradox can be<br />
observed at this point: the street art tried to<br />
be ‘only about a certain kind of art of a certain<br />
street’ but the falsi ed public space failed to<br />
match the expectations of the ruling structure.<br />
The Young Painter’s Prize competition also<br />
functions in the manner of any other representative<br />
model, actively interacting in the<br />
displayed space by simultane ously accepting<br />
a certain responsibility in its respect. In this<br />
case, the competition makes an attempt of observing<br />
and promoting the motives and goals<br />
of the young painters from the Baltics in the<br />
space of a white cube. On the other hand, The<br />
Young Painter’s Prize by itself functions as a<br />
public, continuously produced space. Its functioning<br />
and strategy are targeted at the goals<br />
to identify the painting situation of a speci cally<br />
de ned eld, resulting in a certain responsibility<br />
of the competition and the subject participating<br />
in it. Active observation of these public<br />
spaces and their (self)development as well as<br />
a re ective growth in them are important in<br />
both organising the competition (festival) and<br />
participat- ing in it or perceiving oneself as a<br />
representative of the stage of Baltic painting.<br />
In the attempt to re ect on the concept of space<br />
and its relation to the subject, I would like to<br />
recall and refer to the classical authors Michel<br />
de Certeau and Henri Lefebvre who wrote<br />
about space as a continuously produced social<br />
for- mation. Both Michel de Certeau and Henri<br />
Lefebvre speak about the practices of experiencing<br />
space and the production of space. It is<br />
appropriate to rely on the distinction between<br />
place and space made by Michel de Certeau,<br />
i.e. the denition of “space as a practiced place”:<br />
Abou<br />
the s<br />
“thus, the street geometrically de ned by urban<br />
planning is transformed into a space by walkers.<br />
In the same way, an act of reading is the<br />
space produced by the practice of a particular<br />
place: a written text, i.e., a place constituted<br />
by a system of signs”1. Michel de Certeau<br />
also un- derlines the process determining the<br />
production of space and the importance of the<br />
subject in it. According to him, space derives<br />
from mobile overlapping elements activating<br />
it: “space occurs as the effect produced by the<br />
operations that orient it, situate it, temporalize<br />
it, and make it function in a polyvalent unity of<br />
con ictual programs or contractual proximities.<br />
On this way, in relation to place, space is like<br />
the word when it is spoken, that is, when it is<br />
caught in the ambiguity of an actualization,<br />
transformed into a term dependent upon many<br />
different conventions, situated as the act of a<br />
present (or of a time), and modied by the transformations<br />
caused by successive contexts.” In<br />
The Practice of Everyday Life, Michel de Certeau<br />
describes everyday modes of action as<br />
ac- tions that leave behind not only material<br />
traces in space but also invisible ones.<br />
It leads to the necessity of selfre ection of the<br />
individual wishing to act in the public space<br />
and together with it. After starting with Michel<br />
de Certeau and the concept of space formulated<br />
by him, it is now worthwhile to look at<br />
another theorist, the aforementioned Marxist<br />
Henri Lefebvre. This author separates three<br />
types of space: mental space, social space and<br />
physical space, which are in some way invisibly<br />
linked with one another as each space inherits<br />
cer- tain implications from the others. We cannot<br />
talk about a pure mental space that is not<br />
contaminated with social relations and physical<br />
perceptions; in the same way, the mental<br />
space is where we conceive and analyse social<br />
events and physical surroundings; nally, the<br />
physical space can be approached as a conse-
quence of mental and social spaces2. According<br />
to him, social space spans the dichotomy<br />
between public and private space; it is also<br />
linked to subjective and phenomenological<br />
space. Therefore, each public space is a complex<br />
social structure based on rooted values<br />
and the social production of meanings, determining<br />
the perception of space. The thinker<br />
argues that in respect of the subject, the entire<br />
space is social, while social space is al- ways a<br />
social product which is in the constant process<br />
of creation, as a social structure and a mental<br />
construction, asserting that the conception of<br />
space as an experienced and simultaneously<br />
produced phenomenon is usually determined<br />
by external power structures, leading to the<br />
passively experienced representation of space.<br />
Such a passive representation of space comes<br />
into play as soon as the subject eliminates<br />
responsibility in respect of the space where he<br />
acts. Naturally, it leads to confusion between<br />
several occasionally opposing positions or<br />
the absence of any position. It would imply<br />
an unconditional conformity and loss of sensuality<br />
in relation to the space itself. It is the<br />
reason which often prevents us from seeing a<br />
situation in the broader context and, as a rule,<br />
provokes rather unusual and insigni cant decisions,<br />
as seen from an unbiased viewpoint. As<br />
regards public space, Lefebvre main- tains that<br />
specialists, such as urbanists and scientists,<br />
tend to assert an oficial representation of social<br />
space as the one true space, a central reference<br />
point to knowledge, government, and<br />
authority. They privilege the element of conceived<br />
space and repress the element of lived<br />
space, thereby forcefully producing homogeneous<br />
buildings, restricted social environment<br />
and monotonous everyday life. The author contends:<br />
“thus everybody consensually knows<br />
what he is talking about when he refers to the<br />
town hall, the post of ce, the police station, the<br />
grocery store, the bus and the train, train stations,<br />
and bistros – all the underlying aspects<br />
of a social space as such. an arti cial edi ce of<br />
hierarchically ordered institutions, of laws and<br />
conventions.”4<br />
Hence, instead of trying to reveal the relations<br />
embedded in social space (by applying the<br />
classical division of society), instead of concentrating<br />
on the production of space and the<br />
social relations underlying in this process – the<br />
relations determining the contradiction that<br />
derives from the production, thus re ecting a<br />
contradiction between private property and<br />
a social character of production – we nd ourselves<br />
in traps by perceiving space as selfsuf<br />
cient, as a constant or as something which simply<br />
is. Public space also affects the subject as a<br />
tool of thought and action, and the attempt to<br />
comprehend the multiplicity of spaces made<br />
productive in social practices requires us to<br />
look back at a contradictory, con ictual and<br />
political character of the production of space.<br />
In respect of the individual, the continuous<br />
production of space means control, power,<br />
domination. According to the author, in opposition<br />
to the representations of ‘true space’ are<br />
representations of the truth of space which<br />
include diverse, even divergent sociospatial<br />
processes that are not authorized by the dominating<br />
culture. Within our urban spaces opposition<br />
and new representa- tions appear in the<br />
form of the aforementioned street art, graf ti,<br />
vandalism, protest rallies and street marches.<br />
Nevertheless, each active subject is important<br />
in respect of a new representation. Lefebvre<br />
proposes him to shift from the passive conception<br />
of things in space to the production of<br />
space itself5.<br />
To summarise the aforesaid, it can be stated<br />
that when space is a practiced place and a<br />
social product, we allow for space to emerge<br />
by simultaneously identifying ourselves. When<br />
space is perceived as a relationship between<br />
things, the subject should apprehend his own<br />
possibilities of space production and refuse<br />
the role of a passive observer. This is where<br />
the moment of responsibility comes into play:<br />
each social space functions as a certain scenario<br />
unfolding in the mind of the subject, which<br />
is determined by external power structures<br />
and functions existing in space. To be free<br />
means a shift from the examination of space<br />
as such to the observation of the process of<br />
its production. Of course, from the point of<br />
view of this text, the type of social space we<br />
are referring to is of secondary importance: be<br />
it the façade of the cinema theatre Lietuva in<br />
Vilnius, the Young Painter’s Competition or the<br />
Baltic painting stage with its range of problems,<br />
etc. While observing space as a unity<br />
of relation- ships among things, a possibility<br />
for the subject to produce space arises in the<br />
apprehension of the nature of relationships<br />
among things and the likely shift of those<br />
relationships. Every space mentioned above is<br />
continually renewed, always created, unstable<br />
and dynamic, and each individual is acting in<br />
it and together with it. Those who are creating<br />
in a speci c environment and together with<br />
it should not raise the issue of existence of<br />
space itself; instead, they should get to know<br />
the modes of participation in it, its logic, and<br />
its production. The vain denial of existence of<br />
social space which is often driven by a wish to<br />
act “differently” frequently leads to a constant<br />
contradiction and attempt to solve the abstract<br />
problems as if pertaining to the space itself as<br />
a static component or a constant the raising<br />
of which does not per se have a solid foundation,<br />
the more so, it does not create a new<br />
action model. Such a movement often leads to<br />
a deadend. There are more movement trajectories<br />
and creativity, when action is based on<br />
acquaintance with the space where one grows<br />
by conceiving it as a living unity of mobile<br />
elements. But how does this text see artistic<br />
creation in the context of the production of<br />
space?<br />
When writing about the functioning of artists<br />
and their works, American author Annie Dillard6<br />
points out that each universally accepted<br />
interpretation of the world is a consensus<br />
accommodating various “inventions”, which<br />
reign until the consensus changes. Therefore,<br />
we are again brought back to the phenomenon<br />
of social space encompassing artists and their<br />
works that originate from the use of humanly<br />
meaningful spaces of the world (worlds) and<br />
continue to function in the social space operating<br />
as a product produced and controlled<br />
by external power structures. When posing<br />
a question whether artistic interpretations<br />
obtain outside artistic contexts and whether<br />
they make any sense to the outer world and<br />
how they affect it, the author declares that<br />
artistic interpretations are active and function<br />
as much as they are related to the humanly<br />
comprehensible order of the world and human<br />
factors. Annie Dillard sums up her point by<br />
asserting that the ctive ability to invent and to<br />
order makes possible the imaginative conception<br />
and the tools required for the apprehension<br />
of the environment (the world); however,<br />
everything only functions in our brains, which<br />
are very well adapted for inventing and handling<br />
complex abstractions.<br />
Nevertheless, while existing in social space,<br />
we do not have to lock ourselves up in it. To<br />
act in the space and to be re ective in its respect<br />
means the apprehension of oneself and<br />
the space where one acts as one out of myriad<br />
parts of the world, the observation of relationships<br />
between things and their production as<br />
well as the self-awareness that you are a part<br />
of that world.<br />
I have recently started thinking about it when<br />
I met an artist who told me how he once tried<br />
to render a colour he saw at night and he had<br />
never seen before. According to him, for the<br />
colour to come into being he had to necessarily<br />
paint the whole picture and to create a<br />
context for it; in other words, he had to diligently<br />
use other colours to enable the nightly<br />
colour to emerge in connection to them. Space<br />
in this case was evaluated as a necessary precondition<br />
and the means for the new colour to<br />
appear.<br />
1<br />
Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley,<br />
Los Angeles, London: University<br />
of California Press, 1984, p. 157<br />
2<br />
Andy Merri eld „A Socialist in Space“, In: Thinking Space, / Ed.<br />
M. Crang, N. Thrift. London, New York: Routledge, 2000, p. 170<br />
3<br />
Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell,<br />
1991<br />
4<br />
Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell,<br />
1991, p. 224-225<br />
5<br />
Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell,<br />
1991, p. 179<br />
6<br />
Annie Dillard’s Living By Fiction (New York: Harper & Row,<br />
1982)
A few remarks<br />
and anecdotes<br />
about<br />
contemporary<br />
painting<br />
by art critic Edgaras Gerasimovičius / Lithuania / 2015<br />
90<br />
In an article that has already become a classic,<br />
titled “Why are conceptual Artists Painting<br />
Again? Because They Think It’s a Good Idea1”,<br />
art critic Jan Verwoert talks about the paradoxes<br />
of the state of contemporary painting<br />
that are, in my view, particularly relevant for<br />
today’s younger painters searching for creative<br />
inspiration as well as nancial and symbolic motivation.<br />
According to Verwoert, after the<br />
wave of conceptual art in the 1950s, painting—though<br />
it remained perhaps the main eld<br />
of artistic creation—was forced to discover<br />
itself anew based on traits completely uncharacteristic<br />
of painting. A work’s formal characteristics,<br />
its materiality in general, and an artist’s<br />
technical contribution became matters of<br />
third-rate importance. The question changed<br />
from “how have the limitations of a given eld,<br />
in this case painting, been reshaped in a speci<br />
c artistic work?“ to “what means can be employed<br />
to create an artistic work that would<br />
ask the question: what are the limits to art in<br />
general?” Such an ideological shift seemed to<br />
have foreshadowed the death of painting—<br />
something that has not, apparently, come to<br />
pass: paintings today are perfectly capable of<br />
re ecting the contemporary world without losing<br />
their artistic relevance. History has, however,<br />
left its traces. Today it seems inadequate<br />
to judge painting as a separate eld of art with<br />
its own characteristic traits, or to demand of<br />
painting some consistent conceptuality since<br />
gestures, colors, and gures cannot be translated<br />
into words, no matter the bureaucratic<br />
precision or order with which they may be<br />
selected. In other words, after conceptual art,<br />
a contemporary work of painting, even when<br />
it maintains all the traits characteristic of<br />
painting shaped during the period of high<br />
modernism, will always be something more<br />
than just painting. Painting thrives between<br />
two extremes: hermetic isolation within the<br />
traits of its own media and the use of conceptual<br />
painting as a means to achieve general<br />
creative goals. What does the relevance of contemporary<br />
painting consist of? It could be variations<br />
of these extremes, the forms of which<br />
are determined not by esthetic criteria, but by<br />
the functions of power: institutions, sources<br />
of nancing, curatorial trends, the perception<br />
of prestige, and countless other circumstances<br />
A fe<br />
that transform a painter into a kind of agent<br />
within a wide network of possibilities. The relevance<br />
of his painting is largely determined by<br />
how developed and how active such a network<br />
is.<br />
Let me present an example that, in my view,<br />
presents a perfect parody of such power<br />
games. In Paolo Sorrentino’s lm The Great<br />
and<br />
Beauty there is a moment when the main character,<br />
the writer Jep Gambardella, arrives to<br />
conduct an interview with a young female performance<br />
artist. The artist needs that interview<br />
with Gambardella to appear in the press, while<br />
Gambardella seems to need nothing from the<br />
abou<br />
artist. The performance goes something like<br />
this: the naked artist kneels and gathers her<br />
strength before running to hit the wall with her<br />
head as hard as possible—which she succeeds<br />
in doing. As she stands, the camera shows her<br />
pubic hair painted red, with a hammer and<br />
cont<br />
sickle shaved into the hair. Looking at it quite<br />
simply, a hammer and sickle shaved into pubic<br />
hair could be understood as a politicized<br />
public need to protect and continue life, while<br />
smashing one’s head into a wall represents the<br />
dif culties of politicized social life that lead<br />
pain<br />
us to individual self-de- struction. The performance<br />
piece’s symbols, it seems, are easily<br />
deciphered. As she gives her interview, the<br />
artist turns out to be a supersensitive medium,<br />
referring to herself in the third person and basing<br />
her creative work on “vibrations”. Gambardella<br />
xates on these “vibrations” that the artist<br />
is completely unable to explain. The critic<br />
annoyingly terrorizes the artist with repeated<br />
requests to clearly explain what these vibrations<br />
are, which the artist inevitably fails to do,<br />
subsequently falling apart. In the next scene<br />
we see Gambardella in the magazine’s editorial<br />
of ce. From the conversation he has with his<br />
editor it becomes evident that the completely<br />
botched interview will appear in print as it was<br />
seen by the lm’s audience. The scene shows<br />
how comical a display of power can be when<br />
it is veiled in the rhetoric of esthetic judgment<br />
and authority.
1<br />
Jan Verwoert, “Why Are Conceptual Artists Painting Again? Because<br />
They Think It’s a Good Idea“, in: Afterall, autumn/winter<br />
2005, London: The MIT Press, 2005.<br />
2<br />
Rainer Maria Rilke, to Clara Rilke 29 rue Cassette, Paris VI*, October<br />
8, 1907 [online at: https://archive.org/stream/lettersofrainerm030932mbp/lettersofrainer-<br />
m030932mbp_djvu.txt]<br />
3<br />
Ibid.<br />
The parody of power in the art world is not a<br />
new phenomenon. Irony was a part of Renaissance<br />
era paragone—theoretical discussions<br />
about the hierarchical position of different<br />
elds of art. But irony blended with sadness<br />
and hatred became most clearly evident in<br />
the modernist era, when the targets of parody<br />
became those participants in the world of art<br />
who were unable to fully appreciate what the<br />
new art said to them or changed within them.<br />
One more anecdote from the period of modernism.<br />
In letters to his wife Clara, Rainer Maria<br />
Rilke writes about Paul Cézanne’s talent and<br />
highlights two mundane, seemingly insigni<br />
cant moments from the painter’s life: tired and<br />
ailing in his old age, Cézanne walks from home<br />
to his studio laughing at something known<br />
only to himself, paying no attention whatsoever<br />
to the children throwing pebbles at him; and<br />
the words shouted out by Cézanne, at work in<br />
his studio, after he is surprised by a rare visitor:<br />
“Work without worrying about anyone and<br />
become strong!” This moment from the artist’s<br />
life is taken from the life stories of Claude<br />
Lantier (modeled after Cézanne), a character<br />
in The Work, a novel by Cézanne’s childhood<br />
friend Émile Zola2.<br />
In Cézanne’s sickly persona Rilke sees the<br />
embodiment of painting’s paradox, which later<br />
generations of artists stubbornly sought to reveal<br />
in their work. On the one hand, a painting<br />
hides nothing from the viewer—the entirety of<br />
its brushstrokes is always open to the gaze of<br />
the viewer. On the other hand, the information<br />
about a painting’s structure, immortalized on<br />
its surface, is not easily verbalized, while various<br />
different details mysteriously expand and<br />
change with any attempt to squeeze them into<br />
one description. The translation of painting<br />
into words is an exhausting, demanding, and<br />
unsettling endeavor.<br />
In his letters, Rilke mentions that one of his<br />
most favorite pastimes was walking through<br />
the galleries of Paris on a Sunday. On one such<br />
walk he overheard a conversation between<br />
several gentlemen looking at a portrait of<br />
Madamme Cézanne. In the company of elegant<br />
women, one of the men said enigmatically, as<br />
if speaking about some crude portrait: “Il n’y a<br />
absolument rien, rien, rien.” There is absolutely<br />
nothing here. Nothing, nothing, nothing3.<br />
As I look at the artistic works uploaded onto<br />
the site of the Young Painter’s Prize, it is clear<br />
that the great majority of them constitute<br />
painting par excellence. We can assign them,<br />
preliminarily, to a conservative and a more<br />
experimental group. There are also works that<br />
clearly only resemble painting, but that are<br />
part of a greater project or effort. Some of<br />
them are similar to each other, perhaps inspired<br />
by the same artists, and as such could<br />
possiblybe categorized by school. It would be<br />
more precise to say that, rather then being<br />
inspired by the same artists, they are in uenced<br />
by the distorted and recreated representations<br />
of works by such artists in the changing<br />
world of uid imagery. Painting from nature has<br />
apparently become only a means to develop<br />
one’s technique to be later utilized in the<br />
repainting on canvas of images that already<br />
exist on screen. Though all of the artistic works<br />
appear to be paintings, it would be particularly<br />
dif cult to summarize them all as Painting. The<br />
shortcomings of some of the works are the<br />
strengths of others, and attempting to develop<br />
evaluation criteria for each work from within<br />
each piece would mean an appraisal not of<br />
Painting, but of separate creative worlds—<br />
worlds much larger than the images that have<br />
settled on the surface of each canvas and that<br />
resist reduction and attempts at generalization<br />
of Painting.<br />
Without a doubt, the competition’s prizes are<br />
important achievements for any young artist.<br />
But the most important recognition is the<br />
attention of the curators who are sensitive to<br />
painting’s subtleties, but who do their work<br />
without categorizing artistic work into elds<br />
and genres. Such attention can allow the presentation<br />
of painting as something more than<br />
just painting—alongside sculptures that may<br />
resemble sculpture but that are not just sculpture,<br />
or alongside lms that are similar to lms,<br />
but are more than just that.
The<br />
subjunctive<br />
sexual mood<br />
blossoms<br />
allegedly<br />
by art critic Aistė Marija Grajauskaitė / 2015<br />
94<br />
Today’s lively, young painting is, for me personally,<br />
more than a canvas or an idea. I believe<br />
it is an entire story—one that encompasses<br />
more than the viewer sees or could possibly<br />
see. It is intimacy. Something that always<br />
brings forth a feeling—like a familiar smell<br />
that transports you to a moment in the past in<br />
which the person associated with that smell<br />
once existed, yet in our memory there remains<br />
only an emotion, not an image. I was overcome<br />
by a similar sensation last autumn, while walking<br />
through that mecca of modern art in<br />
Vilnius, the Contemporary Art Centre (CMC):<br />
I could see, but not everything. And I must<br />
admit, I don’t know if painting would move me<br />
so if not for that unsaid moment, that untold<br />
story.<br />
-<br />
I—mindfulness—the canvas.<br />
A game for three players.<br />
-<br />
Where I lead next is my game. On my canvas.<br />
The three of us. I—Vilnius—You.<br />
- - -<br />
I am a young painter. I usually blend the kaleidoscopic<br />
memory of facial features with the<br />
curves and sculptures atop the churches of Vilnius,<br />
with the light of the Cathedral Tower, with<br />
shadows, adding to them the imagined sound<br />
of the bell of St. Augustine’s Church eching<br />
down the walls of the Old Town’s narrow<br />
streets and— voilà—your portrait emerges.<br />
-<br />
For some inexplicable reason, I have never<br />
seen a more painterly city than the prosaic Vilnius<br />
I measure with each footstep. I’m not saying<br />
I’ve traveled the entire world or have seen<br />
every single city, but Vilnius has something<br />
especially magical within it (admit it, you’re<br />
nodding in agreement). I won’t even begin to<br />
talk about how moving are its small streets and<br />
each of their curves, or the concert of sounds<br />
that emerges at night in the Old Town: old<br />
doors, pointy high-heeled shoes, old musicians<br />
playing in Kalvarijų Market… What I want to<br />
tell you about this time is something that, in<br />
all likelihood, is seen by me alone—because I<br />
can’t know how much You can see without the<br />
use of my eyes.<br />
-<br />
I have several of the portraits like the one I<br />
mentioned at the start. Surely one for each<br />
of my beloved. And no one can punish me<br />
or write some awful text, teeming with criticism<br />
(to which I, a painter, won’t know how<br />
to respond, since my instrument is a thought<br />
brush, and not a thought quill) because I create<br />
these portrait images as I see them today. Or<br />
because, even if the sun is shining, I will still<br />
choose to see my subject against the<br />
grayish-white sheets of a Vilnius sky.<br />
-<br />
„Žinot, o Jus reikia tapyti, kaip peizažą.“<br />
“You know… You need to be painted like a<br />
landscape.”<br />
k.s.<br />
For as long as I’ve lived in this city—a city<br />
beloved by more than one nation, ravaged by<br />
more than one blaze—I’ve associated most of<br />
its churches with an event or a person. Some<br />
of them remind me of how I fell in love with art<br />
history, others how I fell in love with people,<br />
still others with betrothal, and the rest—with<br />
separation (from memories, people, things).<br />
There are even some that only the guiding<br />
hand of Dionysus can bring me to. It is then<br />
that you understand that a feeling, like a<br />
brushstroke, lies somewhere between magic<br />
and masterpiece.
-<br />
Ultimately, if we start down the twisting road<br />
of thoughts, one could make the supposition<br />
that, if anything has ever happened in the<br />
Vilnius Old Town, than that event can be associated,<br />
post factum, with one or another architectural<br />
creation, because the city abounds<br />
with them. If they are not directly in front of<br />
you, then they are behind you, or just off to<br />
the right. And if you dislike churches, then be<br />
a good urbanite and remember the Orthodox<br />
shrines or, if you are drawn to what is long<br />
gone—the synagogues.<br />
-<br />
There are also those picturesque places in<br />
Vilnius that reveal fantastic views. There is just<br />
one problem though: self-respecting Vilnius<br />
dwellers forget that they are, in fact, self-respecting<br />
Vilnius dwellers, and thus rarely pay<br />
a visit to these places. Very rarely. Hey, clever<br />
Vilnius resident, would you like me to name<br />
them for you? Not ashamed to encourage me?<br />
As if you don’t already know what you’ll hear…<br />
-<br />
The Basilian Gates, painted in saffron yellow<br />
(Povilas Ramanauskas, Dedikacija tapybai – A<br />
Dedication to Painting)<br />
-<br />
Gediminas’ Grave Hill, engulfed in Celadon<br />
greenery<br />
(Tadas Jočys, Tonas – Tone)<br />
-<br />
The City Wall Bastion, resounding in black<br />
pearl playfulness<br />
(Alvīne Bautra, Bar kodas – Bar Code)<br />
-<br />
St. Casimir’s Chapel, captivating in elephant<br />
gray<br />
(Sanda Skujiņa, Fuetė – Fuet)<br />
-<br />
St. Anne’s Chapel and St. Francis of Assisi<br />
Church, shimmering in the glow, twice each<br />
day<br />
(Dalia Juodakytė, Paslaptys – Secrets, a series<br />
in six parts)<br />
-<br />
The Vilnius Old Town in Persian pink from St.<br />
Saviour’s Hill<br />
(Kristina Česonytė, Be pavadinimo – Untitled)<br />
-<br />
The silent paleness of St. Augustine’s Church,<br />
like a grass widow<br />
(Krista Dzudzilo, NEUTER III neuter 1)<br />
-<br />
Sts. Peter and Paul’s Church, almost white-hot<br />
(Marta Ivanova, Be pavadinimo 4 – Untitled 4)<br />
-<br />
St. Catherine’s Church, hidden within motherof-pearl<br />
and the steps of passersby<br />
(Veiko Klemmer, Rayman)<br />
-<br />
The Bell Tower of St. John’s Church, powdered<br />
in incarnate color, looking out on Vilnius below<br />
(Alise Medina, Ji – She)<br />
-<br />
Was that enough to draw out of the grayness of<br />
a long-spun and forgotten memory the recollections<br />
of a first kiss? A first book? The first<br />
dawn?...<br />
-<br />
I painted the last portrait of my Beloved in<br />
front of the blood-red velvet pediment of the<br />
Church of St. Philip and St. James. Apparently,<br />
I toyed with this portrait the most. To put it<br />
more precisely: I’m still toying with it. It was<br />
this painting, into this monologue between<br />
Vilnius and one thoroughly non-Vilnius face,<br />
that I was able to incorporate the greatest<br />
number of this city’s places, sounds, colors,<br />
and smells—the greatest amount of Vilnius’<br />
texture and form.<br />
-<br />
For six whole days, without nourishing my spirit<br />
beast with any French eclairs or similar such<br />
splendor, I was engaged in the painting process<br />
with my entire being, or perhaps, damnit, I<br />
myself became the painting process. Somehow<br />
finding myself immersed in the night’s<br />
cashmere gentleness, I laughed to myself as I<br />
came to understand that Vilnius is a wonderful<br />
city to fall in love. Not with someone else—but<br />
with oneself in the image of another. With oneself<br />
alongside another.<br />
-<br />
I’ve often woven that image into the city’s<br />
panorama—a panorama that, unlike the one<br />
you just pictured in your mind, is not seen<br />
from some high point in the city. Usually, it’s a<br />
panorama from a lower point of view (from the<br />
“frog’s perspective”, as art terminology would<br />
say), more or less as far off the ground as I am<br />
tall, since that’s as far as my own panorama can<br />
reach. About one meter and sixty nine centimeters.<br />
-<br />
Sunday is a sacred day in Vilnius. All of us, at<br />
least in part, immerse ourselves into Stendhal’s<br />
state of crystallization. Somewhere very<br />
close to insanity, we try to slow the flow of<br />
time instead of simply laughing in the face of<br />
it. We sink into an excessive care for others,<br />
forgetting that, in the end, everything will reverberate<br />
in heartbeats on the flowing surface<br />
of the Vilnelė River.<br />
-<br />
We leave the museum satisfied until, suddenly,<br />
in the light of the sun, we remember the tickets<br />
(but not the film) from a movie we liked,<br />
the cover (but no quote) from our favorite<br />
book, our grandmother’s hands (but not her<br />
face), an old yellowed photograph from our<br />
childhood (but not the smell of the sweater we<br />
wear in the photo)—all of these are not works<br />
of art on display, but just their brushstrokes,<br />
hues, texture and materiality. From all of this<br />
we craft together our own personal museum<br />
to which we sell no tickets, and which we gift<br />
to but a few people in our lives. This is the true<br />
and cult-like exhibition of young, immortal<br />
painting, whose opening is grand in the moment,<br />
but forgotten in the flow of hours and<br />
springtimes. And remembered again as we<br />
seek to reconstruct the exhibition in the<br />
autumn.<br />
The<br />
read through texts, I think to myself: I don’t<br />
-<br />
And sometimes, in moments like these, as I<br />
care, let the great philosophers, art critics and<br />
art historians fight it out amongst themselves,<br />
defining definitions for their concepts, juggling<br />
them for hours on end in an attempt at<br />
conversation, trying to discover some innova-<br />
subj<br />
tive constant. If you would ask me today what<br />
painting is for me, I would tell you that, first<br />
and foremost, it is not form, color, or line. It is<br />
something intangible, between rock, blues, and<br />
classical music. Between a smile and smells.<br />
Between black, dark blue, and red. Something<br />
sexu<br />
between chocolate, wine, whiskey, and Campari.<br />
It is bitterness, the sky, curly hair, a flannel<br />
shirt on skin chilled by the cold of night.<br />
This is what I see when I look at young painting<br />
(which is not only still alive, it is looking<br />
back at those of us who think this way with a<br />
blos<br />
mocking gaze from the cafe across the street,<br />
drinking a black espresso and paging through<br />
Vogue in search of a new dress for a grandiose<br />
homecoming).<br />
alleg<br />
I see a memory and future nostalgia, seemingly<br />
-<br />
created and designed by that someone who<br />
painted just for You. I see it even with my eyes<br />
closed, just standing in front of a work.<br />
-<br />
And the glory of it all — your image in me<br />
-<br />
because we are mortal Vilnius brushstrokes on<br />
an enchantingly forgotten canvas
I Can’t -<br />
But We Can<br />
by painter, <strong>YPP</strong>’09 winner Andrius Zakarauskas / Lithuania / 2016<br />
98
Dear fellow painter, I hereby begin this text<br />
by claiming that you are not the one and only<br />
cause of your painting. For me this assertion<br />
acquires increasingly more importance and<br />
clarity. We are affected by environment during<br />
creative processes, therefore the resulting<br />
artwork is an outcome of these influences as<br />
well. Today, while speaking of my own art, I<br />
cannot claim that a certain painting or drawing<br />
belongs exceptionally to me. I am thankful for<br />
everything I created to all those people I meet<br />
and all these situations I was involved in. Thus<br />
the resulting artwork is always a visual reflection<br />
of all these thoughts, discussions, and<br />
actions.<br />
The theme of my current reflection is the<br />
self-importance of a painter who participates<br />
in the competitions such as this one. Participation<br />
in such events gives us a chance to<br />
interact, reflect on each other’s work and show<br />
support, which is extremely important for every<br />
aspiring artist.<br />
A painter might think that she is doing all the<br />
work while picking up a theme, coining an idea,<br />
choosing tools, creating images or defining her<br />
field of research. However the final result is<br />
only finished thanks to this relation between<br />
an artwork, a painter, and a viewer. A competition<br />
allows us see all that and progress as<br />
artists.<br />
We might recall the soviet times our professors<br />
were telling us about, when they felt it necessary<br />
to share their work among themselves<br />
in the circles of friends and colleagues, thus<br />
supporting each other. They used to share<br />
their comments actively, even without actually<br />
encountering each other’s work directly. This<br />
is why, in my view, Lithuania gave birth to so<br />
many artist groups: Angis, 24, Keturios, Post<br />
Ars, and many more… It means we can always<br />
get the necessary feedback not only through<br />
participating in the exhibitions, but during the<br />
Can’t -<br />
process of painting itself.<br />
I was inspired to think about the fact that an<br />
e<br />
artist is<br />
Can<br />
not a sole author of what we call a<br />
“final result” when I read an interview with<br />
Glen Brown (published in ZOO Magazine)<br />
whose reply to a question about “his paintings”<br />
was that these paintings were not exactly<br />
his. Brown was saying that during the creative<br />
process an artist meets various people who<br />
have something to say, something to share,<br />
and something to discuss. This is how those<br />
first viewers/participants get to touch upon<br />
and intrude into the process of creation, thus<br />
shaping the result accordingly. Therefore, the<br />
result does not belong to the hands and mind<br />
of a painter alone.<br />
There is always a relation involved. I am absolutely<br />
certain that even the smuggest artist<br />
needs to be related to those around her, which<br />
means that her work is shaped by this relation<br />
as well.<br />
Finally, nothing is possible without the divine<br />
grace, as it gives me the strength to exhibit the<br />
result. After all, we participate in art because<br />
we all have hope. And what we receive as a<br />
result is the confirmation of this hope. This is<br />
what we should be grateful for.<br />
For me, everything started from hunger – this<br />
is how I call my sense of curiosity. Hunger is<br />
a much wider term, it refers to the desire to<br />
touch, explore, and devour the information<br />
that hovers in the air around me. The hunger is<br />
satisfied by sharing this gift – my talent, if you<br />
will – with others.<br />
I feel like I have to explore painting in order<br />
to be touched by grace. I regard painting as a<br />
way of thinking, seeing, and communicating. I<br />
was not satisfied by mere exploration or play. I<br />
wanted to share and communicate, I wanted a<br />
feedback. This is why I decided to participate<br />
in the 2009 Competition for the Young Painter’s<br />
Prize.<br />
I wanted to win. I was surrounded by all these<br />
people close to me – tutors, colleagues, etc. At<br />
that time I became to be interested in the<br />
photo editing software, which reflected on the<br />
result. I asked for an advice as to which artwork<br />
to choose for the competition. After all, it does<br />
matter how I see my work in the context of<br />
contemporary painting. I think it is crucial to<br />
share one’s work and discuss it. We must create<br />
these dialogues both visually and verbally,<br />
and it needs to be a sensual communication.<br />
Not monologue, but dialogue. A good dialogue<br />
is possible while reflecting on anything, including<br />
art history, oneself, one’s environment.<br />
Articulation is the most important thing. And I<br />
learn how to do it every day. My hunger increases<br />
with each challenge.<br />
A willingness to participate in a competition<br />
already presupposes a certain position. An<br />
artist becomes stronger as she strengthens and<br />
clarifies her position. Here I recall a saying that<br />
one needs courage to paint. One needs courage<br />
not only in order to paint, but also in order<br />
to ask oneself the question ‘why?’ Not because<br />
of some nostalgia for painting, but because<br />
one needs to understand why one should paint<br />
and perceive the world as an artist today.<br />
The Young Painter’s Prize is a form of communication.<br />
We all have an opportunity to communicate,<br />
share our findings, ask questions and<br />
have a good time in this gathering.<br />
By submitting my artwork for this competition I<br />
ask for attention, I want to be heard, and I want<br />
to be challenged.<br />
This gathering of painters from all three Baltic<br />
States significantly widens the context and<br />
unites us all. We might start thinking about our<br />
uniqueness as representatives of our countries.<br />
This uniqueness is possible through the<br />
efforts to reflect on our traditions, our teachers<br />
and those close to us, those who help us<br />
breathe.<br />
I am happy that the competition covers all<br />
three Baltic countries and I hope that the area<br />
of its coverage will expand. In order for this<br />
to happen, all of us – organisers, participants,<br />
committee members, and sponsors – need to<br />
support each other. I can’t do it on my own, but<br />
we all can do it together.
Welcome to<br />
the Dollhouse:<br />
On Painting<br />
and Perspective<br />
by writer and art critic, currently the international editor at Artforum Kate Sutton / 2016<br />
104<br />
Though titled The Façade, a façade is precisely<br />
what is missing in Vita Opolskytė’s 2015<br />
painting, which peels back the outer layer of a<br />
house to reveal a cross-section of its interiors.<br />
The rooms are stacked like shoeboxes, with<br />
the walls and floors rendered in the rumpled<br />
manner of old cardboard. The architecturally-induced<br />
wooziness is enhanced by the stark<br />
contrast of the dazzlingly-patterned wallpaper<br />
against the murky warmth of the wood paneling,<br />
or the quiet pauses of the plainly-painted,<br />
pastel walls. The composition is built along a<br />
central zigzagging spine, which starts at the<br />
very bottom edge of the canvas, with what appears<br />
to be a stepping-stone footpath to what<br />
might be a door, had the façade not been pared<br />
away. The line continues, reversing its course<br />
up the set of banistered stairs lurching into the<br />
second floor, where a spindly ladder then leads<br />
back the other direction through an opening in<br />
the floor up to the attic. The ladder’s tip comes<br />
to an end immediately in front of a canvas,<br />
which is positioned so that its contents remain<br />
blocked to the viewer. This unaccommodating<br />
angle adds another slap at that “façade” from<br />
the title, as yet another visual curiosity denied.
When surveyed more broadly, Opolskytė’s<br />
paintings of domestic interiors tend to enclose<br />
their viewers into intimate (if not uncomfortable)<br />
positions not only in relation to the furniture<br />
or other figures sharing the space, but also<br />
in relation to the space itself. Elements like<br />
patterned throw rugs, kitschy flower paintings<br />
or bulky armchairs take on personal characteristics,<br />
as their presence migrates from one<br />
canvas to another, suggesting that these rooms<br />
are consistent features of a single house. The<br />
scale and perspective of the images reinforces<br />
this idea, suggesting the viewer is peering<br />
into a dollhouse. This impression is seconded<br />
not only by the toy-like rendering of the human<br />
bodies, but by the occasional, impossible<br />
viewpoints, perspectives that would have been<br />
inaccessible to a human figure moving about<br />
an actual house. In this sense, the artist takes<br />
on the role of a kind of domestic drone, driven<br />
stir-crazy within its interior and thus pushed<br />
to provide ever more inventive angles on the<br />
objects it surveils.<br />
And yet, Opolskytė’s paintings resist a mechanical<br />
reading through their sheer lack of precision,<br />
the perspectival swooning that imbues<br />
each painting. Traditional linear perspective is<br />
implied through the arrangement of the floors,<br />
walls, and ceilings, but the lines that constitute<br />
these arrangements are given to tilting, bulging<br />
or veering just barely askew, so that the<br />
edges appear rounded off. While the spaces<br />
may fit together conceptually, visually they<br />
are studies in disjuncture. For instance, the tip<br />
of the ladder may peer into the attic, forging<br />
conceptual continuity between the second and<br />
third floors of the house, but visually the forms<br />
of this ladder are separated, with the attic presented<br />
as if slanted slightly down towards the<br />
viewer, like a dinner plate offered for approval.<br />
The disjuncture is all the more extreme in the<br />
oil on canvas, The Guest Room. Talks about<br />
Migraine and Velázquez (2015). The painting<br />
depicts a room whose edges are only just<br />
visible on the second floor of The Façade. The<br />
walls are the same deep hunter green with the<br />
same wooden parquet floor and a throw rug,<br />
edged in a red-and-blue checkerboard pattern.<br />
In The Guest Room, this space is rendered almost<br />
illegibly. The painting assumes an aerial<br />
view, and the throw rug, dueling armchairs and<br />
a side table are all depicted accordingly. But<br />
within this basic frame, the walls have been<br />
collapsed into almost an extension of the parquet,<br />
so that the maudlin floral image on the<br />
left edge of the canvas reads like a welcome<br />
mat, rather than a wall-mounted painting. On<br />
the opposite edge, a wardrobe, dresser and<br />
nightstand are placed side-by-side along the<br />
floor, instead of lining the wall. Perhaps the<br />
most disorienting thing about this space, however,<br />
are the two figures at the bottom edge of<br />
the image. The pair is rendered from the waist<br />
down, one in a blue dress, the other in dark<br />
slacks. The rest of their bodies are concealed<br />
under the parquet, as if paper dolls slipped<br />
through a notch in a sheet of paper. The question<br />
left is not who they are, but rather where<br />
they are and how they got there.<br />
This is where the title of the painting helps<br />
lend legibility. A conversation about Velázquez,<br />
for instance, immediately conjures ties to Michel<br />
Foucault and his masterful reading of the<br />
perspectival flourishes tucked within Diego<br />
Velázquez’s 1656 masterpiece, Las Meninas.<br />
But in this case, the true clue to Opolskytė’s<br />
painting rests in the first subject of these<br />
“talks”: the migraine. Those who suffer from<br />
these debilitating headaches have reported<br />
that episodes are sometimes accompanied by<br />
bouts of visual flushing, moments when one’s<br />
perception of the space around them gives<br />
way to distortion. This phenomenon has also<br />
been observed – independently of migraines–<br />
in young children, whose accounts of their<br />
disorientation are often dismissed as mere<br />
indulgences of powerful imaginations. Perhaps<br />
for this reason, the disorder has been dubbed<br />
“Alice in Wonderland Syndrome,” though it<br />
is also known as “Lilliputian Hallucinations,”<br />
or, in a less literary incarnation, “Todd’s Syndrome.”<br />
In her practice, Opolskytė openly acknowledges<br />
the tie between her particular constructions<br />
of perspective and the symptoms of Alice<br />
in Wonderland Syndrome. These symptoms<br />
cannot be translated into a photograph nor recorded<br />
through digital means (yet), as they exist–<br />
are produced, really – only within the mind<br />
of the artist. To be communicated, they require<br />
the flexibility of painting, as a medium capable<br />
of intervening between fact and fiction, reality<br />
and imagination.<br />
As a genre, painting is accorded a peculiar<br />
vulnerability. It must constantly be defended,<br />
whether from ideological dictates or religious<br />
sanction; the onset of photographic technologies<br />
and mechanical reproduction; or now, a<br />
digital age that has eaten away at our visual literacy<br />
as a society. Perhaps, “eaten away” is not<br />
the right verb. Rather, it has altered our strategies<br />
at reading and comprehending images.<br />
The distinction between an image and a painting<br />
(or, by extension, the painting-as-image<br />
and image-as-painting) has become an critical<br />
one. When photography first emerged as a<br />
viable technology for the mass reproduction<br />
and dissemination of images, it gave birth to<br />
what Walter Benjamin, in his watershed 1936<br />
essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical<br />
Reproduction,” termed the “aura” of authenticity.<br />
In short, it made “the original” – that<br />
is, the painting – matter. Benjamin’s conceit<br />
still holds true, even if the term “aura” is now<br />
more popularly associated with the hoodoo<br />
practices of crystals, acupuncture and reflexology.<br />
The link holds as long as the aura retains<br />
its position as part-spiritual, part-speculative–<br />
a wholly psychological phenomenon. In this<br />
sense, it is the attribute of painting that allows<br />
it to exist as an interloper between the worlds<br />
of fact and fiction.<br />
More than two decades before Benjamin’s<br />
essay, Kazimir Malevich had declared painting<br />
dead through his Black Square. An effective<br />
eulogy, true, but premature to say the least.<br />
Painting’s continued prevalence has been an<br />
art historical enigma for the better half of the<br />
last century (particularly to those who refuse<br />
to assign import to painting’s status as a commodity<br />
object.) The currently canonized narrative<br />
holds that over the course of the twentieth<br />
century, Western painting underwent an entire<br />
life cycle in regards to its relation to representation.<br />
Purportedly “freed” of the burden of<br />
Wel<br />
representation by the proliferation of photography<br />
(as Benjamin’s essay tracks), Western<br />
painting as a genre supposedly set off into the<br />
wilds of our collective id, reveling in an abstraction<br />
of forms whose every stroke was read<br />
as an act of resistance, a slap in the face of<br />
the<br />
Western painting’s historical fidelity to its subject<br />
matter. As this same narrative still follows,<br />
abstract concepts like feelings or emotions<br />
no longer assumed the guise of allegory; they<br />
could play out in great gestural swoops of oil<br />
on canvas, soft dabs of egg tempera or brashly<br />
applied acrylics.<br />
On P<br />
and<br />
image of image-making. The canon shifted into<br />
Peculiarly, this bounty and boundlessness of<br />
abstraction began to broadcast its own limitations.<br />
Towards the mid-1960s, abstraction<br />
began to read as a representation of itself, an<br />
a more conceptual mode, trading in an attempt<br />
at originality in favor of dismantling the mechanisms<br />
of making pictures. With every slash to<br />
the canvas or stenciled semiotic flourish, the<br />
painting increasingly gave way to image.<br />
Today we find ourselves afloat in visual<br />
streams of data and social media, which have<br />
trained us not only to consume images at a<br />
certain clip, but to produce them already in<br />
such a way that they are already embedded<br />
within this framework. In answer to the images<br />
around us, we are no longer goaded in delivering<br />
Foucauldian dissections of placement<br />
and power; rather, our responses have been<br />
streamlined to a more immediately digestible<br />
set of options: thumbs-up, thumbs-down,<br />
smiley face, sad-face. Indeed, under a certain<br />
spin, we are living in an age of complete faith<br />
in the image’s ability to communicate, with<br />
the rise of emojis taking us back to the era of<br />
pictograms, a linguistic technology that pivots<br />
around the notion that a picture could be<br />
worth a thousand words.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, however,<br />
the emoji negates roughly nine hundred<br />
and ninety of them. Even with Apple’s recent<br />
much-heralded expansion of international<br />
emoji vocabulary, increasing the diversity of<br />
age, gender and skin tone of the available<br />
smiley faces, for most users, “dancing” still<br />
involves salsa steps in a ruffled red dress. To<br />
capture the true multitude of experiences that<br />
could be considered “dancing,” or, for that<br />
matter, the rush of emotions or impulses associated<br />
with this activity, requires a wider representational<br />
syntax. When it comes to communication,<br />
convenience still cannot trump<br />
comprehensiveness.<br />
Technology hasn’t just affected the reception<br />
of work. It is at the core of its production. Lack<br />
talent? Outsource, or apply a filter, whose aesthetics<br />
come pre-ascertained. When so-called<br />
easel painters (for who has time for an easel?)<br />
arise on the scene today, the trend and trope<br />
is to read them as relics, fanciful throwbacks<br />
the way pour-over coffee, artisanal cheeses<br />
and “slow food” can now be considered all the<br />
rage. This lens of nostalgia is inherently tied<br />
to innovation. Art history is, first and foremost,<br />
a narrative, and a narrative depends on plot.<br />
What Benjamin may have unwittingly unleashed<br />
when lauding the original was a priority<br />
of primacy. Accordingly, we have produced<br />
a canon as a series of firsts, ignoring aesthetics<br />
for ingenuity.<br />
What was lost in this process – or rather, covertly<br />
discounted as naïve – was the psychological<br />
weight of the aura of painting. Before<br />
I proceed further, let me say up front that<br />
photography can be a laborious, painstaking<br />
process, similarly weighted with psychological<br />
endeavor. Take an artist like the young Siberian<br />
photographer Danila Tkachenko, who has been<br />
known to wait for hours in the snow for just the<br />
right light conditions, so that his photographs<br />
of abandoned military or industrial objects<br />
emulate the blurred surfaces of watercolors.<br />
But there is another, arguably more dominant<br />
mode of photography – sooner image-making–<br />
that feeds into the stream of selfies, sunsets<br />
and food pornography. In this mode, the image-maker’s<br />
investment is minimal. If it isn’t<br />
the right lighting, just adjust the brightness or<br />
add a filter. These images are caught up in a<br />
concern beyond the immediate aesthetic; they<br />
are elaborated emojis, constructed to communicate<br />
an experience as an extension of self. I<br />
have this. I have been here. I have seen this.<br />
The physical and psychological investment of<br />
painting affords another possibility for spelling<br />
out one’s self. Not just “I have seen this,”<br />
but “this is how I see this.” And again, here I<br />
should qualify that certain types of painting<br />
can also undoubtedly operate in the mode<br />
of image-making described above, but as a<br />
representational technology, painting has the<br />
inherent ability to do more, simply out of the<br />
necessity of having to build an image from<br />
scratch, rather than mechanically appropriate<br />
it into the frame.<br />
In this context, it is an easy thing to fetishize<br />
the act of painting. The image of the (typically<br />
white, typically male, typically European)<br />
painter in his studio, fingers reeking of turpentine<br />
and linseed oil, runs deep in our shared<br />
cultural imagination. This got a tweak in the<br />
twentieth century, with so-called action painting<br />
– painting as performance, which shifted<br />
emphasis on the production process. In this<br />
reading, the marks left on canvas are reduced<br />
to witness, evidence of a choreography acting,<br />
but no longer present. This trend is still visible<br />
today. If anything, the pronouncements of<br />
painting’s most recent demise have been met,<br />
rather improbably, by a resurgence of painting<br />
on the international market. Much of the<br />
focus of this market has been on a wedding<br />
of concerns both aesthetic and conceptual, a<br />
prolonged attempt to question the means of<br />
painting by experimenting with methods and<br />
techniques of application, be it a fire extinguisher,<br />
a motorcycle or a digital printer. While<br />
these works – disparagingly nicknamed “Zombie<br />
Formalism” by American critic (and pop<br />
painter) Walter Robinson – may have revived<br />
the branding of originality, they do so at a<br />
direct deficit of the psychological imprint, the<br />
aura of the experience of the painting.<br />
This isn’t to throw painting into opposition<br />
with technological advances. If anything, as<br />
our technology develops, it allows us to convey<br />
new experiences and incorporate them<br />
into acts of both image-making and painting<br />
alike. Digital photography, virtual or augmented<br />
realities do not preclude nor supplant<br />
painting, but they can act on our perception as<br />
it is communicated through painting, just as an<br />
affliction like Alice in Wonderland Syndrome<br />
can manifest itself within Opolskytė’s paintings.<br />
Think of it as applying a psychological<br />
filter, rather than a technical one.<br />
The breadth of possibility presented by these<br />
psychological filters is what fuels the Young<br />
Painter Prize. By limiting the medium (though<br />
by no means limiting the technique of its<br />
application or its content), the competition<br />
expands to show painting’s true range, from<br />
Opolskytė’s interiors to the brash impasto,<br />
near-sculptural quality of Maria Ader’s work,<br />
the Surrealist-tinged fantasy landscapes of<br />
Asta Stasionytė or the expressionistic portraits<br />
of Jurcikas Jonas. While speaking in different<br />
syntax, visually, these works are united by a<br />
shared psychological imprint, the physical investment<br />
of time and imagination that must go<br />
into each canvas.
Today<br />
painting media<br />
are more<br />
visible<br />
than ever<br />
Is painting dead? This idea has been declared<br />
all over the world for so many years that even<br />
talking about it is boring. The competition of<br />
medium was intense both in the 1800s, when<br />
photography emerged and at the end of the<br />
20th century–the beginning of the 21st century,<br />
in the era of prosperity of contemporary<br />
and conceptual art. Painting media was declared<br />
obsolete. However, such a struggle of<br />
the medium is absolutely meaningless. Painting<br />
was and is one of the main and leading<br />
forms of art medium. The world’s largest museums<br />
constantly supplement their collections<br />
with impressive paintings of famous artists<br />
as well as new ones, and painting exhibitions<br />
receive extremely positive texts in the professional<br />
press that analyse the topic of return of<br />
painting media and its longevity.<br />
Today painting media is more visible than ever.<br />
Without trying to diminish any of other media,<br />
I believe that today, compared to painting,<br />
conceptual art seems elitist, incomprehensible<br />
and invisible. In any case, both traditional<br />
painting and conceptual art are levelling up.<br />
As a result, we are increasingly seeing paintings<br />
in exhibitions of contemporary conceptual<br />
art, and artists who create with the use of<br />
traditional techniques more freely interpret<br />
painting media by adopting conceptual art<br />
ideas. Paradoxically, a tendency is becoming<br />
increasingly evident for artists who have built<br />
their careers in the field of contemporary art to<br />
return to this so-called traditional technique.<br />
In any case, the Young Painter Prize is not<br />
aimed to persuade the younger generation that<br />
painting media is superior. Our goal is to create<br />
an opportunity for young artists of all areas<br />
engaged in painting to be noticed, encouraged<br />
and appreciated. For more than a decade I was<br />
myself and still am an active observer of the<br />
art field, and I clearly see the difference. Many<br />
things have changed in a decade. Starting from<br />
the institutions, buyers of pieces of art, the<br />
attitude of older generations of artists towards<br />
young creators, and to the most important<br />
point - the courage and self-confidence of<br />
young, curious and creative people.<br />
Thanks to our project, young artists get the<br />
opportunity to develop and represent their art<br />
in the presence of people of most importance<br />
in the world of art. The <strong>YPP</strong> offers support - a<br />
monetary prize, an art residency and an opportunity<br />
to organize a personal exhibition. This<br />
is a package of opportunities. It depends only<br />
on the very artist himself/herself how his/her<br />
career as this of an artist will develop. I am<br />
glad that the majority of the artists who did<br />
not necessarily win the main prizes in the <strong>YPP</strong><br />
project have made great use of our platform -<br />
professional art galleries have started to cooperate<br />
with them, they are invited to important<br />
group exhibitions, their works have found their<br />
places in both museum and private collections.<br />
For young developers, this is a huge benefit -<br />
both a moral incentive to continue their work<br />
and a great record in their biographies, creating<br />
their own careers as an artist.<br />
by art critic and curator Julija Dailidėnaitė / Lithuania / 2018<br />
108
Changes in the<br />
Everyday<br />
practices in the<br />
Estonian Art<br />
Scene<br />
Overview of the Institutional Patterns<br />
An overview of the young generation of Estonian<br />
artists would be impossible without a<br />
reflection on how the local art scene benefited<br />
from the general changes at the institutional<br />
level. There have been significant changes<br />
during the past six years (although their origins<br />
go back further in time)—a period during<br />
which a new generation of artists, curators,<br />
critics, directors and project managers have<br />
emerged. In contrast to the previous times,<br />
their roles are often intertwined and their<br />
everyday work is directed outwards, toward<br />
achieving international cooperation and acknowledgement.<br />
The Estonian Contemporary Art Development<br />
Center (ECADC), a noteworthy newcomer in the<br />
local art scene, started its work in 2012 under<br />
the direction of Karin Laansoo. Although at first<br />
the aims of ECADC seemed similar to those<br />
of the Center for Contemporary Arts Estonia<br />
(CCAE, since 2013 directed by Maria Arusoo,<br />
the commissioner of the Estonian Pavilion at<br />
the Venice Biennale since 1999, and a co-commissioner<br />
of the Baltic Triennial since 2016),<br />
ECADC proved itself to be active on an even<br />
bigger scale. The ECADC has initiated a significant<br />
part of large scale international projects,<br />
including Outset Estonia, Estonian Pavillion<br />
Without Walls at the Performa Biennial 2017,<br />
the Curatorial Program for Research, and Gallerist<br />
Master Course. This activity has played a<br />
big part in the careers of many Estonian artists<br />
mainly still in their late 20s, 30s and early 40s,<br />
as they were introduced to the international<br />
audiences.<br />
Apart from ECADC and CCAE, which both have<br />
played an important role in the professionalisation<br />
and internationalisation of the Estonian<br />
art scene, there are number of exhibition spaces<br />
that deserve mentioning. Tartu Art Museum<br />
(Tartmus) managed to cause quite a stir with<br />
their provocative and socially engaging exhibitions<br />
program during the period of 2013–2017<br />
when the curator and critic Rael Artel was<br />
director of the museum. The transformative<br />
aim towards producing, exhibiting, collecting<br />
and popularising local and international contemporary<br />
art has been important for both<br />
Tallinn Art Hall and Contemporary Art Museum<br />
of Estonia (EKKM). Since 2015, Tallinn Art Hall<br />
is directed by Taaniel Raudsepp who is also a<br />
member of an artist group Visible Solutions<br />
LLC. Marten Esko and Johannes Säre are directors<br />
of EKKM since 2016, with Säre also being<br />
active as an artist himself. Artists taking over<br />
the leading roles in the large scale projects has<br />
been a growing trend for a while already. Other<br />
examples include Tallinn Photomonth Contemporary<br />
Art Biennial (under the management of<br />
Laura Toots, an artistic director since 2017)—a<br />
current leading international biennial in Estonia—and<br />
the Estonian Photographic Art Fair,<br />
the only art fair in the local scene (under the<br />
direction of Helen Melesk since 2010).<br />
A pilot project started by the Estonian Artists’<br />
Union together with the Ministry of Culture is<br />
another important development that causes<br />
polemic reactions in the media. This project<br />
aims to provide artists, writers, curators and art<br />
critics with a monthly wage that enables them<br />
to dedicate themselves to creative work for a<br />
longer period of time (the wage is paid out for<br />
the period of three years)a significant attempt<br />
to contribute to the development of Estonian<br />
culture. The Artists’ Wage Project is definitely<br />
one of the most significant steps towards securing<br />
a more autonomous and socially stable<br />
life for freelance artists, curators and writers in<br />
Estonia.<br />
by art critic, independent curator and art producer Merilin Talumaa / Estonia / 2018<br />
110
The Young Scene<br />
As noted above, today it is not uncommon to<br />
be managing and marketing different projects<br />
while also being active as a practicing artist.<br />
Precarious working conditions and project-based<br />
lifestyle while producing sitespecific<br />
works and organising exhibitions usually don’t<br />
have anything glamorous about them. New<br />
works are often produced in different places<br />
around the world and, due to their fragile<br />
nature, often break during shipping. A lot of<br />
artworks are still being produced under poor<br />
conditions: underpaid or free labour, lack of<br />
institutional help during stages of preparation<br />
and promotion of exhibitions, not to mention<br />
the need to produce a lot of new works within<br />
a short timeframe with a low budget and without<br />
any long-term vision. These traits have become<br />
apparent in the practices of most of the<br />
Estonian artists born in the 1980s and early<br />
1990s—the so-called ‘millennial generation.’<br />
The first thing that comes to mind when trying<br />
to describe the trends among the younger<br />
generation of Estonian artists is their constant<br />
migration between different exhibitions and<br />
residencies which is explained by the prevailing<br />
desire to be part of the international art<br />
world. All of the aforementioned institutions<br />
have been playing a big role in this phenomenon<br />
by maximising the international cooperation<br />
and promoting the Estonian artists. Over<br />
time, this resulted not only in the fragmentation<br />
of art production, but also in the fusion<br />
between different cultural references, techniques<br />
and materials. This is especially evident<br />
in the work of Kris Lemsalu, one of the most<br />
influential young Estonian artists who is also<br />
currently gaining a worldwide prominence. Her<br />
nomadic lifestyle bearing a wide range array of<br />
cultural influences is clearly expressed in her<br />
works as well as her personal appearance.<br />
Eventually the nomadic and precarious working<br />
conditions have become part of the everyday<br />
practices of the whole Estonian millennial<br />
generation and have started to reflect on their<br />
creative work. This does not necessarily mean<br />
that their art has become homogenous but<br />
rather that its production became more complex.<br />
Young artists tend to prefer to work in<br />
bigger teams and in various locations, produce<br />
complex largescale installations, test different<br />
knowledge bases and material skills, thus also<br />
increasing their geographical visibility. This is<br />
also made possible by residencies around the<br />
world that provide access to well equipped<br />
studios and professional networks. All this in<br />
turn has greatly influenced artistic media such<br />
as painting, sculpture, photography, ceramics<br />
and textile design—e.g., the installations are<br />
now becoming increasingly site-specific.<br />
Generally the Estonian millennial art practice<br />
seems to be showing the signs of the DJ<br />
mixing culture where different mediums and<br />
techniques are intertwined in order to create<br />
mesmerising new works. When describing the<br />
young generation of Estonian painters like<br />
Kristi Kongi, Merike Estna, Mihkel Ilus, one<br />
notices a mixture of painting, textile and sculptural<br />
works dissolving into a painting in an<br />
‘expanded field.’ Estna and Ilus are well known<br />
for their performance practices using painting<br />
as a set-up for social stage—a form of a collaborative<br />
act intended to bring the audience<br />
closer to their works. In Estna’s performances,<br />
painting might not only take a form of a dressing<br />
gown, but also that of a drink, a cake or a<br />
carpet, thus creating new ways of perceiving<br />
the layered nature of a painting. Kongi’s largescale<br />
room installations provide a sensitive<br />
ground to new ways of perceiving painting as<br />
something fragile and ephemeral—documentation<br />
is often the only thing that remains after<br />
the performances. The process of the disappearance<br />
of an artwork is thus turned into a<br />
playful and captivating experience.<br />
There are a yet another couple of aspects that<br />
distinguish the visual language of the young<br />
Estonian artists from that of their foreign<br />
colleagues—namely, a certain nostalgia and<br />
the raw post-soviet aesthetics. Most of these<br />
Estonian artists spent their childhood and<br />
teenage years in the 1990s—a controversial<br />
historical period of remarkable social and political<br />
changes. It is notable that these changes<br />
are also prevalent in the art of the millennials<br />
as well. Mihkel Maripuu, whose paintings have<br />
been linked to the postinternet culture and<br />
underground music scene, was one of the first<br />
artists to start mixing the cosmopolitan anonymity<br />
with the trashy East European aesthetics.<br />
In Alexei Gordin’s paintings, videos and<br />
performances, the robust abandoned ruins and<br />
Soviet architectural forms are imbued with a<br />
post-soviet nostalgia.<br />
In conclusion, the contemporary Estonian art<br />
scene is currently experiencing a number of<br />
changes. Art institutions are run by the new<br />
generation of curators, directors and managers<br />
whose roles are often intertwined. The goal<br />
of their work is to make Estonian art scene<br />
visible internationally and to help artists with<br />
different aspects of art and exhibition production.<br />
On the other hand, their everyday life and<br />
work have also become more layered, and the<br />
production of artworks has become more fragmented<br />
due to constant travelling and working<br />
in big teams. Altogether, the young generation<br />
of Estonian artists is lead to create layered and<br />
often ephemeral artworks and exhibitions.<br />
In the near future, one of the most important<br />
challenges for the growth and viability of the<br />
artist community will be sustainability in terms<br />
of labour and the availability of social and<br />
financial resources.
A decade<br />
of young art<br />
by art critic Justina Augustytė / Lithuania / 2018<br />
114<br />
Today Lithuanian visual arts scene is noticeably<br />
more active, and it owes its revival to a<br />
growing community of young artists. Over<br />
the last decade the young have been actively<br />
contributing to the dynamics, diversity, and<br />
livelihood of the contemporary art field. The<br />
public sphere has now become increasingly<br />
saturated with the discussions showcasing the<br />
impact that the young artists are having on our<br />
culture, analysing the difficulties they have<br />
to face, and offering solutions to make their<br />
creative careers easier. It is only natural that<br />
the ten year anniversary of an annual Young<br />
Painter Prize (<strong>YPP</strong>) Award calls for a retrospective<br />
overview. Let us try to sum up the creative<br />
successes and challenges of the Lithuanian<br />
young art during the last decade.<br />
Young Artists and their Challenges<br />
Let us attend to the notions first. Today the<br />
use of generational breakdowns belongs to a<br />
rather obsolete and inert tradition: the distinction<br />
between the ‘young’ and ‘old’ generations<br />
is just too vague as far as artistic practices are<br />
concerned. However, the emphasis on the category<br />
of ‘young artist’ remains relevant both<br />
in art and in cultural politics. Formally, this<br />
category included artists that fell into a clearly<br />
defined age group the upper limit of which is<br />
usually 30–35 years. While such a strict categorisation<br />
benefits bureaucratic processes, it<br />
remains highly problematic. Usually the challenges<br />
that a lot of artists have to face at the<br />
early stages of their careers are not related to<br />
their age. Which is why the expression ‘young’<br />
sometimes gets substituted with ‘up-andcoming,’<br />
thus eliminating the age criterion<br />
altogether and focusing on a certain stage of<br />
an artist’s career instead. However this question<br />
has now lost its relevance. Despite all the<br />
inconsistencies, the term ‘young artist’ became<br />
a convenient and conventional way of referring<br />
to an art professional who is about to start her<br />
career as an independent artist.<br />
Apart from the discoveries and inventions,<br />
there are also challenges and risks that the<br />
up-and-coming artists have to face. Artists find<br />
themselves particularly vulnerable right after<br />
their graduation: no longer protected by their<br />
student status, with their work still largely unknown,<br />
without any ties with galleries and institutions,<br />
they have to struggle to get noticed<br />
and find their place in the art world. This circularity<br />
of their situation can be well illustrated<br />
by the statement “There is no exposure without<br />
prominence, but there is no prominence<br />
without exposure”—an observation made by<br />
the organisers of ‘Zugzwang’, an international<br />
show of the Baltic art held in 2010. Thus young<br />
artists are an extremely precarious and vulnerable<br />
category—they are often in need of a<br />
‘proper’ help with boosting and shaping their<br />
careers. Here it is important to note that institutional<br />
and non-institutional initiatives play<br />
the most important roles in supporting young<br />
artists and facilitating their integration into the<br />
art market.<br />
The relationship between artists and institutions<br />
is often complicated. It was only recently,<br />
when the very use of the expressions ‘young<br />
artists’ and ‘institutions’ in the same sentence<br />
was still causing tensions. Institutions used<br />
to be associated with the established—and,<br />
consequently, older—authors, which was why<br />
being a ‘young artist’ implied an alternative<br />
opposition to the institutions. Institutional<br />
mentality and the creative freedoms of the<br />
young generation seemed utterly incompatible.<br />
Contrary to the institutionalised authors,<br />
the young thus remained largely invisible to<br />
both professional art critics and wider audiences.<br />
In order to compensate for the lack of<br />
their institutional representation, young artists<br />
were prone to gather into various groups,<br />
thus sharing their burdens of organising group<br />
exhibitions.<br />
There are various governmental strategies<br />
aimed at supporting young artists, which is<br />
among the top priorities of the national cultural<br />
policy, and the Program for the Support
of Young Artists approved by the Government<br />
of the Republic of Lithuania in 2003 envisions<br />
several forms of that support. The governmental<br />
initiative is thus a significant step towards<br />
providing young artists with the necessary<br />
support, however a full assessment of the<br />
Program would require a separate analysis.<br />
It is worth mentioning that, for a number of<br />
years now, individual and educational stipends<br />
as well as nationally funded residencies have<br />
been significant factors in helping the young<br />
artists in their daily lives, increasing their<br />
mobility and productivity, and thus proving to<br />
be a significant way of fostering the creative<br />
output of the young. The young creatives—<br />
particularly those who manage to rise into<br />
prominence in the early stages of their careers<br />
and demonstrate their contribution to the<br />
national culture—are awarded by the Culture<br />
Ministry of the Republic of Lithuania with<br />
The Debut of the Year Award and the Young<br />
Creatives Award. Involvement of the private<br />
capital is often regarded as a more significant<br />
and more efficient way to directly contribute<br />
to the young art scene. Acknowledgement by<br />
the big national institutions might be more<br />
significant, but due to their limited funds they<br />
are less able to substantially contribute to the<br />
careers of the young. Therefore the fact that<br />
the governmental institutions of the art field<br />
are joined by private sponsors and buyers can<br />
only result in wider professional networks,<br />
increased collaborative possibilities, as well as<br />
a more dynamic and competitive art market.<br />
The traditions of art collecting and sponsorship<br />
began only a few years ago. Because of their<br />
unstable careers, young artists used to be seen<br />
by art collectors as a risky investment. Thus<br />
it is no surprise that both private and institutional<br />
capital are in need of encouragement.<br />
Lithuanian art community is relatively small,<br />
and even private art market often requires<br />
support from the State funds, which is understandable—any<br />
cases of cultural support, even<br />
on the level of private initiatives, should be<br />
considered as part of the national cultural policy.<br />
As far as young art is concerned, concerted<br />
efforts and multiple sources of investment can<br />
only lead to the best results.<br />
The Young Painter Prize: Changes<br />
The Young Painter Prize was conceived precisely<br />
as an initiative that consolidates various<br />
participants of the art field, and it proved to be<br />
one of the most successful non-institutional<br />
projects of that kind. Notably, its birth coincided<br />
with the financial crisis of 2009 that affected<br />
all aspects of the country’s life, obviously<br />
including its culture sector as well. In order<br />
to bring their project to life, the organisers—<br />
painter Vilmantas Marcinkevičius art theorist<br />
Julija Dailidėnaitė—had to face difficult conditions.<br />
While institutions were busy adopting<br />
the austerity measures, the organisers had to<br />
look for the alternative ways to reinvigorate<br />
the art market. The nation-wide financial slowdown<br />
has also led to the formation of trans-institutional<br />
cooperation and non-institutional<br />
initiatives. When the art market started stagnating,<br />
a relatively cheap work of the young<br />
artists proved to be a good source of interest<br />
for both art collectors and the general public,<br />
thus showing a potential for reinvigorating<br />
the art market. The organisers had ambitious<br />
goals: to showcase the most promising and<br />
outstanding young (younger than 30) painters;<br />
introduce the young artists to a wide public;<br />
and help art collectors, managers and curators<br />
discover new talents. After making a modest<br />
start in 2009 with the applications from<br />
28 Lithuanian artists, in 2011 the <strong>YPP</strong> Award<br />
turned international after it opened its doors<br />
to the young painters of Latvia and Estonia.<br />
Over a period of a decade, the <strong>YPP</strong> Award grew<br />
into a one of the biggest annual events in the<br />
Lithuanian art scene.<br />
The <strong>YPP</strong> Award remains one of the most successful<br />
examples of both institutional and<br />
non-institutional collaboration between the<br />
governmental and private sectors. By taking<br />
part in the Award Committee and making efforts<br />
to promote and ensure the continuity of<br />
<strong>YPP</strong>, the institutional partners are also contributing<br />
to the buildup of its so-called ‘symbolic<br />
capital,’ while sponsors and patrons are taking<br />
care of <strong>YPP</strong>’s material basis. The Award winners<br />
are motivated both financially (in the form<br />
of cash prizes, residency invitations, and solo<br />
shows) and symbolically (through prominence<br />
and exposure). While young artists often tend<br />
to take their accomplishments with a pinch of<br />
salt, they also admit that acknowledgement is<br />
always pleasant and inspiring. Therefore art<br />
competitions are regarded not only as sources<br />
of financial incentives but also as a way to<br />
build an identity and become acknowledged<br />
by the art world professionals, the press, and<br />
the general public. For an up-and-coming<br />
artist, publicity and promotion are among the<br />
most important career catalysts. Thanks to<br />
today’s technological advancements, artists<br />
are able to publicise and share their work<br />
via online galleries and social networks thus<br />
reaching out to their audiences independently.<br />
However most of the up-and-coming artists<br />
are lacking in the capacity to present their<br />
work professionally. Meanwhile the <strong>YPP</strong> Award<br />
receives a wide press coverage and dominates<br />
both public and private discourses among the<br />
art professionals, and it certainly contributes<br />
to the popularisation and promotion of young<br />
art. The participants get noticed by the art<br />
critics, curators, and gallerists, while their work<br />
is promoted and contextualised by the professional<br />
press. Apparently, the Award had also<br />
brought the question of young art back into<br />
discourses of art theory as well. Every year the<br />
<strong>YPP</strong>-inspired polemics leads us to rethink the<br />
status of a young artist, identify the trends in<br />
painting, and examine the individual aspirations.<br />
The <strong>YPP</strong> Award had also contributed to the rehabilitation<br />
of painting as such. In the context<br />
of contemporary art, painting has been regarded<br />
as somewhat secondary: too old-fashioned,<br />
too traditional, not conceptual enough. The<br />
popularisation of young painters eventually<br />
led to the contemporary painting itself becoming<br />
popular again. The Award had demonstrated<br />
that contemporary painting can be just as<br />
important a participant in the contemporary<br />
art scene as any other discipline, and it can<br />
be innovative and relevant without loosing<br />
touch with the tradition. Art theorists, artists,<br />
and viewers find the geography of the Award<br />
particularly advantageous as it allows them<br />
to discover the specificities that are not only<br />
national, but also regional. This way the capital<br />
city gets to know more about the lesser known<br />
artists from other towns, while Lithuanians get<br />
A de<br />
more acquainted with Latvians and Estonians,<br />
and vice versa. The artists themselves thus<br />
have an opportunity to meet each other and<br />
develop creative partnerships that often end<br />
up in group shows and successful collaborations.<br />
Apart from making the young artists vis-<br />
of yo<br />
ible to the art professionals and cultural press,<br />
the <strong>YPP</strong> Award also performs an educational<br />
mission. In their determination to bring the<br />
art of painting to a wide audience through the<br />
use of understandable language and attractive<br />
format, the Award organisers are staying true<br />
to a general tendency towards the democratisation<br />
of culture that aims to oppose the image<br />
of the art world as a hermetic, elitist, and<br />
self-referential sphere. While the forms of this<br />
democratisation remain a matter of an ongoing<br />
debate, one thing is sure: it is already having<br />
an undoubtedly positive effect on the visibility<br />
of the young artists. Every year the Award<br />
becomes eagerly awaited for by both artists<br />
and gallery-goers—in fact, it has now turned<br />
into one of the most popular and most visited<br />
annual events of the Lithuanian art world.<br />
One would like to believe that the project will<br />
justify its international status and will find its<br />
audiences in other countries as well.<br />
The last decade saw a variety of participants.<br />
Some of them have made it to the <strong>YPP</strong> finalist<br />
shows only to fade into an oblivion afterward.<br />
However the majority of the finalists managed<br />
to remain on track, and their names keep<br />
reappearing in the finalist lists year after year.<br />
Quite a few of them have not only outgrown<br />
their ‘young artist’s’ clothes, but brought their<br />
art to a new level and joined the ranks of the<br />
most influential Lithuanian painters. Their<br />
artworks are now noticeable in all the major<br />
events of contemporary art across the whole<br />
Baltic region, and their names appear even in<br />
a global context of contemporary art fairs and<br />
competitions. And, of course, in addition to<br />
the ‘basis’ of the established names, each year
ings some new discoveries and surprises.<br />
The history of the <strong>YPP</strong> Award can thus be seen<br />
as a concise history of contemporary Lithuanian<br />
painting.<br />
The Next Decade: Possibilities<br />
The <strong>YPP</strong> Award was conceived during the<br />
transitional time in Lithuanian culture. The<br />
opportunities that the young artists are offered<br />
today are rather different from those they had<br />
only a decade ago. <strong>YPP</strong>’s bold start and its<br />
successful integration into the Lithuanian art<br />
world inspired the emergence of other similar<br />
projects aimed at the promotion of young art.<br />
In 2010 Lithuanian Photographers Association<br />
successfully revived the ‘Debut’ Award, an<br />
annual competition that used to be held during<br />
the period of 1970s–80s. The year 2011 saw<br />
the successful launch of the Young Designer<br />
Prize, a now widely acknowledged annual<br />
award that has a similar format as <strong>YPP</strong>. The<br />
JCDecaux Award, an annual competition for<br />
the young contemporary Lithuanian artists has<br />
been launched in 2016 and is now gaining its<br />
momentum as well. Starting with 2016, young<br />
contemporary artists from around the Baltic<br />
region are free to take part in the Baltic Young<br />
Artist Award, an initiative that has recently<br />
grown into the Nordic & Baltic Young Artist<br />
Award.<br />
The last decade saw a notable intensification<br />
of the activities of the Lithuanian galleries.<br />
Even though many galleries are openly declaring<br />
their support for and interest in young art,<br />
only a few of them are actually working with<br />
young artists. Established in 2008, The Rooster<br />
Gallery was one of the first galleries that<br />
started working exclusively with the young art<br />
graduates. Notably, at the time the gallery was<br />
considering itself as a non-institutional alternative<br />
to the traditional and rigid institutions.<br />
It was also one of the first mobile galleries<br />
without a permanent exhibition space. Due to<br />
the absence of the tradition of working with<br />
the young artists the gallery had to develop its<br />
own practices through experimental heuristics.<br />
The Rooster Gallery was growing along with<br />
the artists it represented, and over the last decade<br />
it became one of the most active participants<br />
in the Lithuanian art scene, while other<br />
newly established galleries started following<br />
its lead.<br />
The older and more established galleries are<br />
growing more interested in the young artists<br />
as well. In 2011 the “Meno parkas” Gallery<br />
launched the project “The Young: Raw Minds,”<br />
while the “Vartai” Gallery has been holding its<br />
“Thursday Previews” for a few years. Here we<br />
should also mention the galleries “Meno niša”<br />
and “AV17” as active popularisers of young<br />
art, not to mention the Vilnius Academy of Arts<br />
Gallery that regularly showcases the art of its<br />
students and graduates. The question of young<br />
art is attended to in other cities as well: Kaunas<br />
is hosting young art in the galleries such as<br />
“Meno parkas,” “101,” “POST,” and Vytautas<br />
Magnus University Art Gallery, while both<br />
Klaipėda Culture Communication Centre and<br />
Šiauliai Art Gallery are known for their projects<br />
aiming at the local young artists and curators.<br />
Gradually the spectrum of the young-art-related<br />
activities is becoming wider<br />
and the art field is constantly joined by the<br />
new participants open to use the non-traditional<br />
approaches and eager to employ new<br />
forms of curatorial work through artist residencies,<br />
education, etc. The year 2011 saw<br />
the opening of Nida Art Colony, followed by<br />
the launch of the Rupert Centre for Art and<br />
Education in 2012. Opened in 2016, “Editorial”<br />
Project Space is focused on curating various<br />
non-traditional art practices. The same<br />
year the art lab “SHCH/ŠČ” and its partners<br />
launched the “Tapybos maršrutizatoriai” project,<br />
an initiative that showcases the work of<br />
young painters on the city trolleybuses. Lithuanian<br />
art world is also ripe with various private<br />
and communal initiatives such as “Malonioji 6”<br />
(opened in 2012) which later expanded into its<br />
more institutionalised version “Sodų 4.”<br />
The young art scene is actively shaped by cultural<br />
press. Since its launch in 2011, an online<br />
magazine Echo Gone Wrong has been showcasing<br />
the work of contemporary artists and<br />
critics from around the whole Baltic region; for<br />
a number of years now artnews.lt remains one<br />
of the central online hubs for contemporary<br />
Lithuanian art news; “7 meno dienos” is a Lithuanian<br />
culture weekly that has been active for<br />
over two decades, and in 2015 it introduced<br />
“m-pages”, an editorial section dedicated to<br />
the up-and-coming artists.<br />
Contemporary art market is positively impacted<br />
by the growth of the large private<br />
collections largely comprised of the works of<br />
contemporary young artists. Apart from artwork<br />
collection curation and administration,<br />
organisations such as MO Museum (formerly<br />
known as Modern Art Centre) and Lewben Art<br />
Foundation are also fostering the gallery life<br />
and sponsoring various art publishing initiatives.<br />
Young artists are given a lot of attention<br />
at the Art Vilnius, a contemporary art fair that<br />
has been giving the Best Young Artist Award to<br />
its participants since 2009.<br />
The partnership between art and business is<br />
strengthened through various collaborations<br />
between governmental and private art institutions.<br />
This makes a positive impact not only<br />
on the visibility and prominence of young<br />
artists, but on the vitality of the art world as<br />
such. Young artists are now being showcased<br />
in all the key art institutions both national<br />
and private, and their artworks are included<br />
in private art collections. They no longer have<br />
to wait until they are of a ‘respectable age’ in<br />
order for their artworks to finally be acquired<br />
by the national art institutions. The system is<br />
far from perfect (do such things even exist?)<br />
but it is gaining the momentum and it certainly<br />
justifies our hopes for the better. Finally, the<br />
expression ‘a successful young artist’ is no longer<br />
considered an oxymoron.
Where do you<br />
go to, my lovely<br />
by art historian and curator Lina Birzaka-Priekule / Latvia / 2018<br />
120<br />
The phrase “young painter” containsan inexplicablecomplication<br />
that reveals itself when<br />
thinking of young painters in Latvia or what<br />
could it generally mean and what any one of<br />
us might understand by that. If a painter is<br />
called “young”, it has a meaning that we as<br />
art lovers should agree on collectively. It is a<br />
specific phrase (and who does like those) that<br />
is understood quite differently. When asking a<br />
group of friends, mostly consisting of “young<br />
artists”, I received an advice to replace the<br />
word “young” with “promising”, “talented” or<br />
“emerging” (which in Latvian is used as a direct<br />
translation from the English phrase). When<br />
asked what the “young painter” could actually<br />
mean, versions are given that it could be a person<br />
under 30, moments later reaching a mark<br />
of 35. (In that case, how could the Estonian artist<br />
Juhan Soomets receive the Baltic Young Artist<br />
Award being 41 years old?) Perhaps it is an<br />
artist straight out of academy, but maybe what<br />
matters is how many exhibitions and what<br />
curators have noticed him/her, or quite the opposite<br />
- have not noticed? Could it be someone<br />
who’s been creating video pieces for decades<br />
and suddenly felt a calling for painting thus<br />
becoming a “young painter”, as was the case<br />
with Kaspars Groševs, an artist and head of the<br />
427 Gallery? “Young” therefore is someone<br />
relatively young of age, showing characteristics<br />
of youth (whatever that would be); someone<br />
with recent activity, who emerged not long<br />
ago and has little experience, or someone who<br />
is different, other, and has replaced the previous.<br />
Within this tangle of meanings we can<br />
still agree that it is usually somebody else - a<br />
critic, curator, lecturer or viewer - who calls<br />
you a “young painter” and by that immediately<br />
brackets you with The Emerging.<br />
For some time already in the Latvian<br />
institutional art scene there have been attempts<br />
to nominate and show the “emerging”,<br />
yet undiscovered painters. The Latvian National<br />
Museum of Art has taken care of it already<br />
three times by organising the young painters’<br />
exhibitions. The first exhibition was “Candy<br />
Bomber” (“Našķu bumba”) in 2007, then “City<br />
Children” (“Pilsētas bērni”) in 2010, and “Tension”<br />
(“Spriedze”) in 20161. In the “Candy<br />
Bomber” exhibition catalogue Diāna Barčevska,<br />
art scholar and the author of the idea, explains<br />
that such an initiative came due to a necessity<br />
to recognize and conclude what is the artistic<br />
mission awarenessof the young artist generation<br />
that haschosen painting as their way of<br />
personal growth. Admittedly, the proportion of<br />
painters is very large in comparison with students<br />
in other departments of the Art Academy<br />
of Latvia (only Department of Visual Communication<br />
could compete). More than ten young<br />
painters graduate from bachelor and master’s<br />
studies every year, which theoretically could<br />
allow to make “young painters’” exhibitions<br />
once a year. That is not the only program supporting<br />
young painters in particular. In their<br />
communications, the annual SEB Bank Scholarship<br />
in Painting foster giving new and contemporary<br />
dimension to painting and encourage<br />
the Art Academy of Latvia students to use the<br />
language of painting to resolve such intellectually<br />
and artistically challenging issues as the<br />
role of painting, its place and development in<br />
the nearer or further future. This clearly shows<br />
that the role of painting is an issue, although<br />
until the late 19th century painting and art<br />
were almost synonymous, and only in the 20th<br />
century, with the art medium hierarchy ceasing<br />
to exist, painting became only one of the many<br />
possible forms of expression in visual arts.<br />
Already in 1994, in his essay “On Painting”,<br />
art critic Adrain Searle suggestsnot to focus<br />
on the “death” and “crisis” of painting as if it<br />
needed to see a therapist. This raises a question<br />
whether in the modern world distinction<br />
of painting is itself problematic. Art historian<br />
and critic Terry Smith argues that since mid-<br />
20th century contemporary art has become<br />
homogeneous by focusing on a widespread<br />
art infrastructure including markets, museums,<br />
critics, publicists in large European and American<br />
art centers. On the other hand, contemporary<br />
art is diverse in regard to the unlimited<br />
range of materials, vast possibilities, horizons<br />
and unpredictability that artists’ works offer<br />
to viewers. This also shows the wide range of<br />
interests that contemporary art encompasses.<br />
Artists can work in any place in the world, and
their art is circulating everywhere, even in cyberspace.<br />
Possibly for the first time in history,<br />
contemporary art is actually art of the world<br />
- by geographic means and in its diverse expressions,<br />
but inevitably as a united element.<br />
And exactly this diversity of stylistic means in<br />
contemporary art is what allows a much wider<br />
area for expression also in painting - occasionally<br />
raising a question why is this what I’m<br />
seeing defined as painting? Art scholar Ieva Astahovska<br />
in her reading “Tendencies of Latvian<br />
Contemporary Art” (“Tendences Latvijas laikmetīgajā<br />
mākslā”) argues that it is hard to find<br />
any specific characteristics or reliable indications<br />
in contemporaneity itself. If we’re trying<br />
in any way to describe what contemporary art<br />
is, we’re bound to be struck by how uncertain,<br />
vague and flowing this territory is. It is often<br />
rather better characterized by its paradoxes<br />
and contradictions; yet the search for criteria is<br />
ongoing.<br />
In a situation where there’s no consensus<br />
on specific features of contemporary art, as<br />
in our case is for painting, three young artists<br />
become my reference point to describe tendencies<br />
in Latvian painting - Amanda Ziemele,<br />
Elza Sīle and Elīna Vītola2 - all of whom in their<br />
creative work not only study painting as a medium<br />
and form, but use painting as their way of<br />
thinking. All three of them inhere a ceaseless<br />
urge to paint and study not only what they<br />
paint themselves, but also the relationship<br />
between painting itself and the possibility to<br />
exist as an artist. In “Tate Modern” their works<br />
would best fit in the Expanded Painting display<br />
along with Pinot Gallizio, Niki de Saint Phalle,<br />
Richard Smith and others. For some time now<br />
this is called the new comprehension of painting<br />
(Mark Titmarsh, Expanded Painting: Ontological<br />
Aesthetics and the Essence of Colour,<br />
2017) But I would like to think of it as a logical<br />
development of painting since the mid-20th<br />
century.<br />
What is really important about the three young<br />
Latvian painters is that they are all very sophisticated<br />
and read a lot. This could be one of<br />
the reasons leading Amanda Ziemele to speak<br />
about forgetting in her work. Our mind is like a<br />
sponge. Our earliest ancestors were probably<br />
sponge-like. At least once a week we sense a<br />
sparkling at the end of tongue: “Suppose we<br />
try to recall a forgotten name. The state of our<br />
consciousness is peculiar. There is a gap therein;<br />
but no mere gap. It is a gap that is intensely<br />
active. A sort of wraith of the name is in it,<br />
beckoning us in a given direction, making us<br />
at moments tingle with the sense of our closeness<br />
and then letting us sink back without the<br />
longed-for term. If wrong names are proposed<br />
to us, this singularly definite gap acts immediately<br />
so as to negate them. They do not fit<br />
into its mould. And the gap of one word does<br />
not feel like the gap of another, all empty of<br />
content as both might seem necessarily to be<br />
when described as gaps.” (William James, The<br />
Principles of Psychology, 1893, p. 251) There<br />
are no gaps, everything is in a continuation of<br />
our flowing conversation.<br />
The young painter Amanda Ziemele depicts<br />
this very familiar feeling - suddenly forgetting<br />
such generally known thing as, for example,<br />
the author of “The Last Supper”. In her exhibition<br />
at the Stockholm gallery “Candyland”<br />
large format abstract paintings show strange,<br />
unordered maps of thought-waves (but am<br />
I supposed to say this if the painting is abstract?).<br />
Scattered on the floor are ceramic<br />
tongues once again reminding that “you’re not<br />
getting this on your tongue now”. Ideas that<br />
Amanda Ziemele has found by an in-depth<br />
research here interact with an unobtrusive and<br />
subtle humor.<br />
The ability to laugh, mostly at oneself, is also<br />
possessed by painter Elīna Vītola. For the last<br />
28 years she’s been hoping to become an<br />
artist. To achieve that she has used very different<br />
strategies. Her latest attempt was an<br />
exhibition at the Kogo Gallery in Tartu titled<br />
“Common Issues in Painting and Everyday<br />
Life – Crapstraction”3. Elīna examined ways<br />
of becoming a renowned crapstractionist. But<br />
it must be admitted that her success depends<br />
only on us – the curators, gallerists, collectors,<br />
wall decorators and critics, because the artist<br />
herself has little influence in this hierarchy.<br />
And it’s unlikely that we will soon see a day<br />
when Elīna is going to pick her laurels. The<br />
thing is that Elīna was born in Eastern Europe<br />
and although the UN has recognised all three<br />
Baltic states as part of Northern Europe, it will<br />
probably not help the artist.<br />
The only survivors in the complicated art<br />
market hierarchy are those who are discovered<br />
or remembered by curators. When looking at<br />
Elīna’s paintings, perhaps you already have an<br />
idea of what is in front of you. Use your “magic<br />
eye” and see the image4. Perhaps you will<br />
get lucky, and a deer, a fairy or the Lion King<br />
will appear in front of you. Or maybe it is the<br />
pattern from the upholstery of your grandmother’s<br />
armchair? Or maybe you will get<br />
extremely lucky and catch the artist herself,<br />
who will tell you that for the first time in her<br />
life she has created a new pattern that is a mix<br />
of all the previous patterns she did not invent<br />
herself. Maybe from all of this you might come<br />
to a conclusion that trying to find recognisable<br />
images in abstraction is a common everyday<br />
issue. Elīna Vītola has made her manifesto<br />
that I am not going to reveal to you, although<br />
it has already appeared on Instagram. But it is<br />
important to add that the manifesto is being<br />
consequently realized on a painted sofa and on<br />
an incredibly long canvas roll of which only a<br />
very tiny part is visible.<br />
Also in Elza Sīle’s exhibition “A Decent Little<br />
Hike on Roads Rural and Dangerous, Plus Ugly”<br />
at gallery Alma one can find many things except<br />
for painting in its classical (conservative?)<br />
conception. Nevertheless, in an interview the<br />
artist tells: “I used classic painting materialsgraphite,<br />
oil, acrylic. The painting - or rather<br />
this composition - is something between a<br />
painting, a board game, a miniature stage; it<br />
looks like a landscape, it’s created with classic<br />
painting materials and keeps the material conventions.”<br />
Although the artist has used typical<br />
materials, her approach is definitely unconventional.<br />
In this case the painting materials are<br />
used as construction materials to build houses<br />
and towns, playgrounds and parks, toilets and<br />
what not. The exhibition displayed adhesive<br />
prints with tattoos, which reflect the paintings<br />
in the same room, but put on a human body;<br />
plates with maps of imaginative places and artist’s<br />
poetry - placed horizontally (no one said<br />
that paintings must be always placed vertically<br />
by the wall). See how precisely she speaks of<br />
standard conceptions about painting (what<br />
does it even mean - pure hue or impure, to<br />
construct a painting, too big or too small?) and<br />
what can bee seen in her works:<br />
‘’construction of an image’’<br />
‘’to construct a meaning’’<br />
‘’to build a painting’’<br />
what what<br />
Brushstrokes literary hold the image<br />
if. then<br />
scale and conventions<br />
how<br />
standardize building materials<br />
on<br />
semantic plan<br />
or<br />
grid of the drawing<br />
trough and to<br />
exaggerated givens<br />
So it happened that I’ve been chosen to curate<br />
the next young painters’ exhibition. I<br />
respect the interconnectedness of mediums<br />
in contemporary art, and keeping in mind the<br />
similarity to topical frames in group exhibitions<br />
(would the theme be animals, folklore<br />
or future predictions), I made a decision to<br />
rename it the young artists’ exhibition and not<br />
to restrict artists by nonexistent frames. As for<br />
the three artists mentioned before, I can only<br />
wish them luck - even though sometimes luck<br />
can turn out to be ill luck and vice versa. In any<br />
case - they will participate in the young artists’<br />
exhibition and not because they are painters.
www.ypp.lt<br />
All Participants: www.ypp.lt/2019