06.11.2019 Views

Weidmueller Heavy Duty Connectors

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical data<br />

Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)<br />

Overview<br />

A<br />

Many interfaces require the use of a connector that is<br />

EMC-compliant.<br />

What is meant by the phrase EMC-compliant?<br />

Electro-magnetic compatibility (EMC) refers to the<br />

ability of electrical equipment to function satisfactorily<br />

in its electromagnetic environment without introducing<br />

intolerable electromagnetic disturbances to anything in that<br />

environment.<br />

(DIN VDE 0870). An electrical component or electrical<br />

equipment is considered to be compatible when their<br />

emissions and sensitivity levels are within a tolerable range<br />

(i.e., when there is sufficient interference immunity).<br />

The basics<br />

There are several types of measurements that can be used<br />

to determine the effectiveness of a cable shield. The method<br />

used here is the KS 04 B measurement from VG 95 373‐41<br />

“Electromagnetic compatibility of devices – methods for<br />

measuring shielded cable and shielded protective cable<br />

hoses”. This method enables the quality of the shield to<br />

be evaluated. It also assesses the influence of the contact<br />

points of the shielding braid as well as the male and female<br />

plug components.<br />

A standardised test cable with a length of one metre is used.<br />

This, and the fact that this measurement is carried out in a<br />

50-ohm system which does not take the actual line<br />

impedance into account, leads to characteristic resonance<br />

effects. This means that this measurement process only<br />

delivers meaningful results up to a frequency of 30 to<br />

100 MHz. It is, however, well suited for evaluating and<br />

comparing the effectiveness of various shielding and shieldcontacting<br />

methods. It does not deliver an absolute value<br />

that would enable the limiting of voltages coupled in a<br />

cable, using an imposed HF electromagnetic field. The user<br />

should always consider the measurement results relative to<br />

the laboratory operational situation. Your actual, real-world<br />

shield attenuation values will normally be less than the<br />

values achieved in the lab because of different cable lengths,<br />

impedance behaviour and non-optimal earthing.<br />

Testing methods<br />

The method applied does not use the normative tri-axial<br />

measuring platform, but instead uses an aluminium plate<br />

(with dimensions 500 x 380 x 10 mm). This plate serves<br />

as the test’s reference earth. HF sockets (N-standard) are<br />

mounted on two standing angular panels and are used to<br />

connect the measuring device. The flange along with the<br />

plug are mounted to one of the angular panels.<br />

The limit value of the shield attenuation Sa is<br />

f < 1 MHz: 60 dB<br />

1 MHz < f < 100 MHz: 60 – 30 dB with15 dB per decreasing<br />

decade f = 100 MHz: 30 dB<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

According to VG 95373-41, a frequency range up to 30 MHz<br />

is specified for the measurement process. However the<br />

range can be extended to about 100 MHz for information<br />

purposes.<br />

The insertion loss as of the test object is determined by<br />

the relationship between the voltage on the interior wire<br />

and the supplied voltage. The VG95373-41 also refers<br />

to the insertion loss as the shield attenuation factor.<br />

The relationship between insertion loss as and coupling<br />

resistance Zk is characterised as follows:<br />

Insertion loss: a s ≈ 20 l g 50 Ω / | Z k | in dB<br />

Coupling resistance: Z k ≈ 50 Ω x 10 a s / 20 in Ω<br />

<br />

According to VG 95373-41, this relationship has sufficient<br />

precision when Z k < 500 mΩ.<br />

A.30 2028800000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!