21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

'fif7 and now 18 'fixf7+ gives White a<br />

superior version of Line A222, but 18<br />

'iWg4! is even more effective, and after<br />

18 ... ltJf8 19 ltJe4 'iWe7 20 :th5!, intending<br />

:tg5, White had a clear advantage<br />

in Dautov-Gabriel, Altensteig<br />

1994.<br />

17 i.e4 ltJe7 (D)<br />

w<br />

18 ltJxbS<br />

I am surprised that this move has<br />

not been investigated more than it has.<br />

It is clearly the most consistent move<br />

as White wins material, but while the<br />

material balance is unusual, three<br />

pieces against two rooks and a pawn is<br />

not that bad for Black if he can make<br />

his pieces cooperate nicely. Maybe<br />

that is why White has been keener to<br />

find a direct way to knock over Black's<br />

position:<br />

a) 18 0-0-0 (this seems to be too<br />

slow) 18 ... i.a6! 19 ltJe2 i.g7 20 ltJf4<br />

ltJf8. This is basically the set-up Black<br />

should be aiming for; the f8-knight<br />

and bishop on g7 cover possible entrances<br />

for White's rook down the<br />

h-file while the knight also guards the<br />

pawns on e6 and g6. Furthermore, the<br />

solid pawn-structure limits the options<br />

for possible pawn-breaks by White,<br />

meaning that Black has a reasonably<br />

quiet time to manoeuvre his pieces<br />

into even better positions. Beliavsky­<br />

Kramnik, Linares 1993 continued 21<br />

ltJh3 0-0-022 ltJg5 'iWe8! (the queen<br />

would be almost stalemated on g8) 23<br />

'iWf3 (23 ltJxe6? 'iWd7) 23 ... ltJf5 24<br />

'iWa3! i.b7 (24 ... ~b7? 25 i.g2!, intending<br />

ltJe4, is annoying) 25 'fixa7<br />

'iWe7 26 ltJf3 c5! 27 i.xb7+ 'iWxb7 28<br />

'iWxb7+ ~xb7 29 dxc5 :tc8 30 b4 cxb3<br />

31 axb3 :'xc5+ 32 'it>b2 ltJe7 with an<br />

edge for Black.<br />

b) 18 :th8!? and now:<br />

bl) 18 .. .'~d8 19 i.c2?! (here White<br />

could also consider 19 ltJxb5 with<br />

similar play to the main line) 19 ... ~c7<br />

20 0-0-0 i.g7 21 :th7 ltJf8 22 l'th2<br />

i.b7 23 ltJe4 :'d8 24 ltJg5 'iWg8 25<br />

~bl ltJf5 26 'iWf4 c5 27 dxc5 :'xdl +<br />

28 i.xd 1 ltJd7 + Davies-McDonald,<br />

Wrexham 1995.<br />

b2) 18 ... i.a6?! 19 a4! b4 20 ltJb5<br />

i.xb5 21 axb5 was already very difficult<br />

for Black in Eingorn-Onishchuk,<br />

Cuxhaven 1994.<br />

b3) 18 ... 'fig7!? is mentioned by<br />

Akopian. White's best might be 19<br />

'iWh3 as 19 'iWxe6 'iWxh8 20 i.xc6 :'b8<br />

21 ltJe4 fails on account of 21...~d8!<br />

(Black might even survive 21. .. 'iWh 1 +<br />

22 ~e2 'ti'xal 23 ltJd6+ 'it>d8 24 ltJf7+<br />

~c7 25 'ti'd6+ ~b6) 22 ltJg5 (22 ltJd6<br />

ltJxe5 -+) 22 ... ltJxc6! 23 'iWxc6 (23<br />

ltJf7 + 'it>c7 24 ltJxh8 ltJdxe5 wins for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!