21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

lbeS 21 'iWb7! ':fe8 220-0 ':xe6 23<br />

':adl ':de8 24 'iWe4 'iWbs 2S 'iWh4 1-0<br />

Sakaev-Govedarica, Belgrade 1996.<br />

Black will be mated in a few moves.<br />

14lbe4 (D)<br />

14 ..... d5<br />

Centralizing the queen is an important<br />

part of Black's opening plan. <strong>The</strong><br />

queen attacks the d4-pawn and defends<br />

Black's own pawn on c4, thus<br />

making it possible to reactivate the<br />

light-squared bishop on b7, and preparing<br />

the thematic ... cS advance. It is<br />

my feeling that playing ... 'iWdS immediately<br />

is the most accurate, since<br />

there is no point in any of the advances<br />

of the queenside pawns right now.<br />

However, 14 ... 0-0-0 has been the<br />

most common. <strong>The</strong>re has been several<br />

attempts from White to punish Black's<br />

opening play straight away, including<br />

IS b3 and IS lbcs. My preference is<br />

for IS .te2 (1S .tg2? is a common<br />

mistake; White's king is then caught in<br />

the middle ofthe board after IS ... c3!)<br />

IS ... 'iWdS 16 .te3 .tb7 (16 ... cS was<br />

dealt with in the introduction) 17 0-0<br />

(the direct 17 lbgS might in fact be<br />

more accurate) and then:<br />

a) 17 ... .:g8 is aimed against lbgS<br />

and carries the additional possibility<br />

of rounding up the f6-pawn following<br />

... ':g6, but nevertheless seems too<br />

slow. Even 18 h4, renewing the idea of<br />

lbgS, is an option, while 18 'iWf4 cS 19<br />

f3 cxd4 20 .txc4 is also promising according<br />

to Beliavsky and Mikhalchishin.<br />

<strong>The</strong> game Fodor-Tompa, corr.<br />

1977 continued 18 ':fc1 cS 19 lbd2<br />

lLlxf6 (19 ... cxd4!?) 20 'iWxdS (20 dxcS!?)<br />

20 ... exdS 21 dxcSlbd7 22 a3 (22 c6 is<br />

also possible; then after 22 ... .txc6 23<br />

.txa7 .tg7 White can try 24 lbxc4<br />

dxc4 2S ':xc4 ~b7 26 .td4, which<br />

nets four pawns for apiece) 22 ... .tg7<br />

23 lIabl as 24lbf3 ~c7 2SlbgS d4!<br />

26 .tf4+ .teS 27 lbxf7 .txf4 28<br />

lbxd8 lIxd8! and Black's dynamic<br />

pawn-chain promises enough counterplay<br />

after, for example, 29 gxf4 c3.<br />

b) 17 ... cS 18lbd2 (18lbgS is not<br />

so clear here, since after 18 ... 'iWxgS!<br />

19 'iWxb7+ ~xb7 20 .txgS cxd4 21<br />

.txc4lbeS 22 .te2 d3 23 .td 1 .tcS all<br />

Black's pieces take up active posts,<br />

while White must keep a watchful eye<br />

on the threat posed by Black's centre<br />

pawns, S.Bekker-lensen - N.<strong>Pedersen</strong>,<br />

Copenhagen 1996) 18 ... lbxf6 19<br />

dxcS c3 (19 ... lbd7!? is another possibility)<br />

20 bxc3 bxc3 21 c6 'iWxc6 22<br />

lIac1 lbdS 23 .td4 .ta3 24 lbe4! and<br />

White has a clear advantage, Mikhalevski-N.<strong>Pedersen</strong>,<br />

Arhus 1997.<br />

15.te3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!