Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
84 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />
lbeS 21 'iWb7! ':fe8 220-0 ':xe6 23<br />
':adl ':de8 24 'iWe4 'iWbs 2S 'iWh4 1-0<br />
Sakaev-Govedarica, Belgrade 1996.<br />
Black will be mated in a few moves.<br />
14lbe4 (D)<br />
14 ..... d5<br />
Centralizing the queen is an important<br />
part of Black's opening plan. <strong>The</strong><br />
queen attacks the d4-pawn and defends<br />
Black's own pawn on c4, thus<br />
making it possible to reactivate the<br />
light-squared bishop on b7, and preparing<br />
the thematic ... cS advance. It is<br />
my feeling that playing ... 'iWdS immediately<br />
is the most accurate, since<br />
there is no point in any of the advances<br />
of the queenside pawns right now.<br />
However, 14 ... 0-0-0 has been the<br />
most common. <strong>The</strong>re has been several<br />
attempts from White to punish Black's<br />
opening play straight away, including<br />
IS b3 and IS lbcs. My preference is<br />
for IS .te2 (1S .tg2? is a common<br />
mistake; White's king is then caught in<br />
the middle ofthe board after IS ... c3!)<br />
IS ... 'iWdS 16 .te3 .tb7 (16 ... cS was<br />
dealt with in the introduction) 17 0-0<br />
(the direct 17 lbgS might in fact be<br />
more accurate) and then:<br />
a) 17 ... .:g8 is aimed against lbgS<br />
and carries the additional possibility<br />
of rounding up the f6-pawn following<br />
... ':g6, but nevertheless seems too<br />
slow. Even 18 h4, renewing the idea of<br />
lbgS, is an option, while 18 'iWf4 cS 19<br />
f3 cxd4 20 .txc4 is also promising according<br />
to Beliavsky and Mikhalchishin.<br />
<strong>The</strong> game Fodor-Tompa, corr.<br />
1977 continued 18 ':fc1 cS 19 lbd2<br />
lLlxf6 (19 ... cxd4!?) 20 'iWxdS (20 dxcS!?)<br />
20 ... exdS 21 dxcSlbd7 22 a3 (22 c6 is<br />
also possible; then after 22 ... .txc6 23<br />
.txa7 .tg7 White can try 24 lbxc4<br />
dxc4 2S ':xc4 ~b7 26 .td4, which<br />
nets four pawns for apiece) 22 ... .tg7<br />
23 lIabl as 24lbf3 ~c7 2SlbgS d4!<br />
26 .tf4+ .teS 27 lbxf7 .txf4 28<br />
lbxd8 lIxd8! and Black's dynamic<br />
pawn-chain promises enough counterplay<br />
after, for example, 29 gxf4 c3.<br />
b) 17 ... cS 18lbd2 (18lbgS is not<br />
so clear here, since after 18 ... 'iWxgS!<br />
19 'iWxb7+ ~xb7 20 .txgS cxd4 21<br />
.txc4lbeS 22 .te2 d3 23 .td 1 .tcS all<br />
Black's pieces take up active posts,<br />
while White must keep a watchful eye<br />
on the threat posed by Black's centre<br />
pawns, S.Bekker-lensen - N.<strong>Pedersen</strong>,<br />
Copenhagen 1996) 18 ... lbxf6 19<br />
dxcS c3 (19 ... lbd7!? is another possibility)<br />
20 bxc3 bxc3 21 c6 'iWxc6 22<br />
lIac1 lbdS 23 .td4 .ta3 24 lbe4! and<br />
White has a clear advantage, Mikhalevski-N.<strong>Pedersen</strong>,<br />
Arhus 1997.<br />
15.te3