21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />

15 0-0 tLlxd5 16 .i.xe7 rJ;;xe7 17<br />

tLlxb5 'ii'b6 (D)<br />

w<br />

A little thought on this position and<br />

the sequence leading up to it is in place.<br />

First, after White castled on move 15<br />

he was actually threatening 16 d6, so<br />

the last few moves have been more or<br />

less forced. <strong>The</strong> material balance is<br />

equal but Black's pawn-structure is<br />

evidently worse, while also his king is<br />

not very safe. On the positive side<br />

there are lots of open files and active<br />

piece-play but Black must keep playing<br />

actively, otherwise White will<br />

consolidate and eventually round up<br />

the c-pawns or queen the h-pawn.<br />

18 tLla3<br />

In the game Quist-Karolyi, Dieren<br />

1988, White decided that the knight<br />

on d5 was too strong and had to be removed;<br />

and hence preferred 18 tLlc3??<br />

tLlxc3 19 bxc3 i.xg2 20 rJ;;xg2, but<br />

now, rather than the game's 20 ... 'ifc6+,<br />

Black can win with 20 ... 'ifb7+! 21 f3<br />

(21 'iitg1 and 21 'iVf3 are both answered<br />

by 21..Jhh2(+)!) 21...'ifb2+<br />

22 ~f2 ~xh2+ 23 'iitxh2 'iVxf2+ 24<br />

'iith3 f5 and mate in a few more moves.<br />

18 ... ~h4!?<br />

This spectacular idea of Kramnik's<br />

has several purposes:<br />

1) it protects the c4-pawn;<br />

2) the rook can be centralized on<br />

the d4-square;<br />

3) it may prepare doubling rooks;<br />

4) ... tLlf4 becomes a serious option.<br />

Of course, all this is only relevant as<br />

long as White cannot simply take the<br />

rook. But first we should examine the<br />

other main continuation for Black,<br />

namely 18 ... c3, when White has the<br />

following options:<br />

a) 19 bxc3 tLlxc3 is fine for Black.<br />

b) 19 ~b1 cxb2 20 tLlc4 'iVc7 21<br />

~xb2 tLlb6 22 i.xb7 tLlxc4 23 i.xa8<br />

tLlxb2 24 'iff3 tLlc4 25 'ifc3 l:ha8 26<br />

'ifxc4 ~d8 with an equal ending,<br />

Razuvaev-Serper, Tilburg 1993.<br />

c) 19 tLlc4 'ifc7 with a further split:<br />

cl) 20 'ifc1?! ~ag8 (20... cxb2 21<br />

'ifxb2 gives White an edge) 21 f4,<br />

Vladimirov-Dzhandzhgava, Pavlodar<br />

1987, and now Black should play<br />

21...~h7! (it is fairly important that<br />

Black chooses this square for the rook<br />

and not h6), with an advantage. For<br />

example, 22 bxc3 ':gh8 23 h4 ':g8 24<br />

'iith2 ~hg7 25 ~f3 tLlf6 and Black has<br />

a clear advantage. Why 21...~h7! is<br />

the strongest comes to light here, as if<br />

Black had played 21. .. ~h6 the rook<br />

would now have been on g6 and not<br />

g7, which would have given White the<br />

chance to put up some resistance with<br />

26 tLle5!.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!