Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />
15 0-0 tLlxd5 16 .i.xe7 rJ;;xe7 17<br />
tLlxb5 'ii'b6 (D)<br />
w<br />
A little thought on this position and<br />
the sequence leading up to it is in place.<br />
First, after White castled on move 15<br />
he was actually threatening 16 d6, so<br />
the last few moves have been more or<br />
less forced. <strong>The</strong> material balance is<br />
equal but Black's pawn-structure is<br />
evidently worse, while also his king is<br />
not very safe. On the positive side<br />
there are lots of open files and active<br />
piece-play but Black must keep playing<br />
actively, otherwise White will<br />
consolidate and eventually round up<br />
the c-pawns or queen the h-pawn.<br />
18 tLla3<br />
In the game Quist-Karolyi, Dieren<br />
1988, White decided that the knight<br />
on d5 was too strong and had to be removed;<br />
and hence preferred 18 tLlc3??<br />
tLlxc3 19 bxc3 i.xg2 20 rJ;;xg2, but<br />
now, rather than the game's 20 ... 'ifc6+,<br />
Black can win with 20 ... 'ifb7+! 21 f3<br />
(21 'iitg1 and 21 'iVf3 are both answered<br />
by 21..Jhh2(+)!) 21...'ifb2+<br />
22 ~f2 ~xh2+ 23 'iitxh2 'iVxf2+ 24<br />
'iith3 f5 and mate in a few more moves.<br />
18 ... ~h4!?<br />
This spectacular idea of Kramnik's<br />
has several purposes:<br />
1) it protects the c4-pawn;<br />
2) the rook can be centralized on<br />
the d4-square;<br />
3) it may prepare doubling rooks;<br />
4) ... tLlf4 becomes a serious option.<br />
Of course, all this is only relevant as<br />
long as White cannot simply take the<br />
rook. But first we should examine the<br />
other main continuation for Black,<br />
namely 18 ... c3, when White has the<br />
following options:<br />
a) 19 bxc3 tLlxc3 is fine for Black.<br />
b) 19 ~b1 cxb2 20 tLlc4 'iVc7 21<br />
~xb2 tLlb6 22 i.xb7 tLlxc4 23 i.xa8<br />
tLlxb2 24 'iff3 tLlc4 25 'ifc3 l:ha8 26<br />
'ifxc4 ~d8 with an equal ending,<br />
Razuvaev-Serper, Tilburg 1993.<br />
c) 19 tLlc4 'ifc7 with a further split:<br />
cl) 20 'ifc1?! ~ag8 (20... cxb2 21<br />
'ifxb2 gives White an edge) 21 f4,<br />
Vladimirov-Dzhandzhgava, Pavlodar<br />
1987, and now Black should play<br />
21...~h7! (it is fairly important that<br />
Black chooses this square for the rook<br />
and not h6), with an advantage. For<br />
example, 22 bxc3 ':gh8 23 h4 ':g8 24<br />
'iith2 ~hg7 25 ~f3 tLlf6 and Black has<br />
a clear advantage. Why 21...~h7! is<br />
the strongest comes to light here, as if<br />
Black had played 21. .. ~h6 the rook<br />
would now have been on g6 and not<br />
g7, which would have given White the<br />
chance to put up some resistance with<br />
26 tLle5!.