21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

25 f4 e3<br />

2S .. .'~c7!? deserves consideration.<br />

26 bxe3 bxe3<br />

After 26 ... c4? 27 cxb4 ~c7 28 g4<br />

White's initiative is clearly more important<br />

than Black's diminishing material<br />

advantage, Beliavsky-Shirov,<br />

Ljubljana 1995. It is a mystery why<br />

Shirov rejected the text-move even<br />

though he had seen ...<br />

27 .:tbl e21<br />

... when White can claim some compensation<br />

after 28 'iYxc2 'iYc6 29 .:tdl,<br />

but it is very far from certain that this<br />

is adequate.<br />

82)<br />

19 ~xf1 (D)<br />

B<br />

This simple capture has somewhat<br />

overtaken the seemingly impressive<br />

19 'ifdS. White has fared quite well<br />

with it, and the evidence is primarily<br />

based on the fact that Shirov has had<br />

big problems handling the black position.<br />

19 ... ~h61?<br />

When I had finished reviewing<br />

most of the available material after 19<br />

'it'xfl, it struck me that this typical<br />

move of the <strong>Botvinnik</strong> System had for<br />

some reason been totally ignored. My<br />

first thought was that there had to be<br />

an obvious refutation. How else could<br />

a move that is the main defence against<br />

19 'ifdS have been ignored like this?<br />

However, after spending some time on<br />

it, I am inclined to believe that it is<br />

Black's best move - perhaps due to<br />

current negative status of the alternatives.<br />

But first, here is what happens<br />

when Black respectively tries to win<br />

material, save material or seize control<br />

ofthe sensitive hl-a8 diagonal:<br />

a) 19 ... bxc3? is too greedy, and<br />

now White should continue with the<br />

amazingly cool 20 bxc3! rather than<br />

Uhlmann's 20 'ifdS, which permits<br />

Black to muddy the waters with the<br />

disruptive 20 ... ~xe7 21 fxe7 c2!, as in<br />

Uhlmann-Alexandria, Halle 1981.<br />

However, after 20 bxc3! Black is dead<br />

lost; e.g., 20 ... ~h6 21 ~xh6 tLlxf6<br />

(21.. . .:txh6 22 :b8+ +-) 22 exd8'iY+<br />

:xd8 23 :b8+ ~xb8 24li'xd8+ +-.<br />

b) 19 ... ~xe7?! 20 fxe7 :dg8 is an<br />

idea with which Kramnik has experimented.<br />

21 tLle4 li'c6 22 tLld6+ ~b8<br />

23 ~f4 :xh2 (if 23 ... ~a8, 24 h4<br />

keeps the h-pawn and avoids counterplay)<br />

24 ~e2! ~a8 2S 'iYc2!. After this<br />

very fine move, White's queen is about<br />

to take a powerful outpost on fS, and<br />

this gives him a more or less decisive<br />

advantage in most lines, as shown by<br />

Kramnik's analysis in In/armatar:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!