21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

a) 19 exd8'ii'+ ~xd8 20 ~e2 is<br />

Yermolinsky's favourite, when after<br />

20 ... ~c8 21 'ii'c2 "e6, he has tried:<br />

a1) 22 ~f41?"g4 23 :fe1.th6 24<br />

.txh6 "f3 (Shabalov claims that Black<br />

already has equalized; in his opinion<br />

White has to allow a perpetual check)<br />

25 ~f1 'ii'hl+ 26 ~e2 "f3+ 27 ~d2<br />

(27 ~f1 =) 27 ... "xf2+ 28 :e2 'iVd4+<br />

29 ~c1 .tf31. A fantastic attacking<br />

idea; in fact White must now play extremely<br />

accurate to maintain the balance;<br />

for example:<br />

all) 30 j,g7?? :xh2! 31 :xh2<br />

'fig1+ 32 ~d2 'ii'xh2+ 0-1 Ermolinsky-Shabalov,<br />

USSR 1986.<br />

a12) 30 "d2 is the only move according<br />

to Shabalov, though he nevertheless<br />

likes Black's position after<br />

30 .. .lhh6 31 'iWxd4 cxd4 32 :d2 d3<br />

33 l:i.f2 .tc6; I am not sure I agree with<br />

this. Black needs a reply to 34 b3 and<br />

neither 34 ... ~xf6 35 bxc4 ~e4 36 l:i.f1<br />

:xh2 37 ~xd3 ~c3 38 l:i.b2 ~xa2+<br />

39 ~b1 nor 34 ... c3 35 ~xd3 .te4<br />

(35 ... a5 36 :a1 .te4 37 ~e1 ~c5 is<br />

too optimistic) 36 ~xb4 .txb1 37<br />

~xbl looks adequate. However, I do<br />

not see why the bishop has to be on c6.<br />

33 ... ~e5 seems more to the point,<br />

when, I think, Black can indeed claim<br />

compensation.<br />

a13) 30 'iWa4 lhh6 31l:i.e8+ ~b7<br />

32 'iVb5+ ~c7 33 'iVa5+ ~b7 and<br />

White does not have better than 34<br />

'iVb5+ with a perpetual check.<br />

a2) 22 f3! .td6 23 :bd 1 and now:<br />

a21) 23 ... .te5 24 :f2 (24 'iVa4!?)<br />

24 ... l:.gX 25 ~f4 'ii'c6 26 ~d5 +-<br />

Yermolinsky-Lapshun, Philadelphia<br />

1998.<br />

a22) 23 ....tc6 24 ~f4 'iVe3+ 25<br />

'fif2 'iVxf2+ 26 l:i.xf2 .te5 27 ~d5 (27<br />

~g2 might be preferable) and now<br />

rather than 27 ....td4? (Ermolinsky­<br />

Makarov, USSR 1986), which gives<br />

White a clear advantage after 28l:hd4!<br />

cxd4 29 ~xb4, Black should play<br />

27 ....txd5! 28 l:i.xd5 .td4 with equal<br />

chances - Makarov.<br />

b) 19 ~d5!? (D) and then:<br />

B<br />

b1) 19 ... 'fie6!?20exf81r' l:.dxf8 21<br />

~e7+ ~d8 22 f3 l:.h5 23 'fid2 l:.fh8<br />

(Uhlmann-Schon, Porz 1990) and now<br />

24 l:i.be1 'iVh3 25 l:i.e2 is the easiest.<br />

Black's attack looks well neutralized.<br />

b2) 19 ... 'fib7!? (this is the point of<br />

retreating the bishop all the way to a8)<br />

20 exf8'iV l:.hxf8 21 ~e7+ ~c7 22<br />

.tf4+ ~e5 23 .txe5+ ~b6. Shabalov<br />

initially assessed this as winning for<br />

Black in view of the forced win of<br />

White's queen, but as Santos soon<br />

pointed out, this is actually far from<br />

clear. He suggested that White has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!