Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

bernard.paul.guinto
from bernard.paul.guinto More from this publisher
21.10.2019 Views

4 Uhlmann's 16 z:.bl 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 It:)f3It:)f6 4lt:)c3 e6 5 i.g5 dxc4 6 e4 b5 7 e5 h6 8 i.h4 g5 9 It:)xg5 hxg5 10 .txg5 It:)bd7 11 exf6 i.b7 12 g3 'ii'b6 13 i.g2 c5 14 d5 0-0-0150-0 b416 l:tbl (D) White from opening the b-file. A further example of what might then happen is: B B For many years Uhlmann's 16 l:tb1 failed to attract the attention it deserves. Despite a few very nice wins by the German (former East German) grandmaster in the early 1980s, it is not until the late 1990s that the system was practised regularly. Shirov describes it as not very logical but terribly dangerous, and indeed it is. Its immediate justification may be seen if Black accepts the sacrifice by capturing the knight on c3, i.e. 16 ... bxc3 17 bxc3 'ii'a6 18 l:txb7! followed by 19 dxe6 with a strong attack. In general Black should do his utmost to prevent Piket - lIIescas Dos Hermanas 1995 White has just met 16 ... i.h6 with 17 i.xh6 l:txh6 18 b3!, in the hope of opening the b-file. This may be the case if Black chooses the greedy, albeit consistent, 18 ... bxc3?!, when 19 bxc4 'iVa6 20 l:txb7 1i'xb7 21 dxe6 is terribly dangerous. The key point is that 21...1i'b2?! is met by 22 e7! (22 exd7+ is less clear). Then 22 ... :e8 23 i.c6 'iVd2 24 'ii'b3! 1i'b2 25 i.xd7+ led Black to resign in Khalifman­ Galkin, Elista 1998. There are other options for Black, of which the best attempt is probably 18 ... cxb3, but after

UHLMANN'S 16 'f1.b1 45 19 tLJa4 'iWb5 20 axb3 exd5 21 l:tc1 ~b8, White can, according to Piket, claim an advantage by 22 lVd2! (instead of the game's 22l:tel). The powerful queen While the open b-file might be Black's biggest concern, one should also be wary of the possible consequences following conceding the as-hI diagonal. White's knight sometimes gets access to d5 or e4 but more frequently White moves his queen up to d5, which is a very powerful post, whence it not only attacks pawns on c5, c4 and f7, but also pinpoints the possibility of a check on as. The following example shows that Black must be on his utmost alert to parry all threats: B Kasparov - Kramnik New York peA rpd 1994 19 ... .txe7 Black takes the opportunity to save his rook but nowadays 19 ... .th6 is more popular. 20 fxe7 l:tdg8 Here 20 ....td3! has been shown to be the best defence. Black walks a tightrope to avoid defeat after 21 tLJe4 i.xbl! 22 tLJd6+ ~c7 23 .tf4 but Kramnik managed to do so against Topalov in Dortmund 1996. 21 tLJe4! l:tg6 Black has to defend against tLJd6+. Now Kasparov took his chance to recoup some of the material investment with 22l:txfl ? but he later pointed out that 22 lVaS+ would have given Black serious problems. One line continues 22 ... tLJbS 23 .tf41Vb7 24 'ir'xb7+ ~xb7 25 ~xfl ~c6 26 l:tdl tLJd7 27 tLJd6! :'e6 2S tLJxf7 and White wins. He threatens both 29 tLJxhS and 29 tLJdS+. Quick Summary There are a few interesting things to note about Uhlmann's 16 :bl. First of all, I think the briefly popular 16 ... .th6 (Line A) should be disregarded in view ofPiket's idea 17 .txh6 :'xh6 IS b3!, which looks very strong. Hence, the key question is whether White can find any advantage following 16 .. .'ii'a6 17 dxe6 .txg2 IS e7 .txfl. Line Bl, 191Wd5, seems close to a forced draw, but 19 'iitxfl (Line B2) is very interesting. White seems to hold the better chances after 19 ... 'ir'c6 20 exd81W+ 'iitxdS 21 tLJd5 :'xh2 22 'itgl :'hS 23 .tf4! but 19 ... .th6!? (a move which has hitherto been ignored) deserves attention. However, there is virtually no practical experience with this move.

UHLMANN'S 16 'f1.b1 45<br />

19 tLJa4 'iWb5 20 axb3 exd5 21 l:tc1<br />

~b8, White can, according to Piket,<br />

claim an advantage by 22 lVd2! (instead<br />

of the game's 22l:tel).<br />

<strong>The</strong> powerful queen<br />

While the open b-file might be Black's<br />

biggest concern, one should also be<br />

wary of the possible consequences following<br />

conceding the as-hI diagonal.<br />

White's knight sometimes gets access<br />

to d5 or e4 but more frequently White<br />

moves his queen up to d5, which is a<br />

very powerful post, whence it not only<br />

attacks pawns on c5, c4 and f7, but<br />

also pinpoints the possibility of a check<br />

on as. <strong>The</strong> following example shows<br />

that Black must be on his utmost alert<br />

to parry all threats:<br />

B<br />

Kasparov - Kramnik<br />

New York peA rpd 1994<br />

19 ... .txe7<br />

Black takes the opportunity to save<br />

his rook but nowadays 19 ... .th6 is<br />

more popular.<br />

20 fxe7 l:tdg8<br />

Here 20 ....td3! has been shown to<br />

be the best defence. Black walks a<br />

tightrope to avoid defeat after 21 tLJe4<br />

i.xbl! 22 tLJd6+ ~c7 23 .tf4 but<br />

Kramnik managed to do so against<br />

Topalov in Dortmund 1996.<br />

21 tLJe4! l:tg6<br />

Black has to defend against tLJd6+.<br />

Now Kasparov took his chance to recoup<br />

some of the material investment<br />

with 22l:txfl ? but he later pointed out<br />

that 22 lVaS+ would have given Black<br />

serious problems. One line continues<br />

22 ... tLJbS 23 .tf41Vb7 24 'ir'xb7+ ~xb7<br />

25 ~xfl ~c6 26 l:tdl tLJd7 27 tLJd6!<br />

:'e6 2S tLJxf7 and White wins. He<br />

threatens both 29 tLJxhS and 29 tLJdS+.<br />

Quick Summary<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are a few interesting things to<br />

note about Uhlmann's 16 :bl. First of<br />

all, I think the briefly popular 16 ... .th6<br />

(Line A) should be disregarded in<br />

view ofPiket's idea 17 .txh6 :'xh6 IS<br />

b3!, which looks very strong.<br />

Hence, the key question is whether<br />

White can find any advantage following<br />

16 .. .'ii'a6 17 dxe6 .txg2 IS e7<br />

.txfl. Line Bl, 191Wd5, seems close<br />

to a forced draw, but 19 'iitxfl (Line<br />

B2) is very interesting. White seems to<br />

hold the better chances after 19 ... 'ir'c6<br />

20 exd81W+ 'iitxdS 21 tLJd5 :'xh2 22<br />

'itgl :'hS 23 .tf4! but 19 ... .th6!? (a<br />

move which has hitherto been ignored)<br />

deserves attention. However,<br />

there is virtually no practical experience<br />

with this move.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!