Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

bernard.paul.guinto
from bernard.paul.guinto More from this publisher
21.10.2019 Views

34 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV w B dl) 24 l:tfal?! 'iWxa5 25 ':xa5 cxb2 26 ':xa6+ ~xa6 27 'iWxc4+ ~b7 28 'iWd5+ =. d2) 24 bxc3 'iWxa5 25 l:tbl + 'iWb5 26 lhb5+ axb5 (26 .. .'it;xb5 27 ~c7) 27 'iWxf7 is probably good for White but not entirely clear. d3) 24 l:ha6+! 'iitxa6 25 l:tal + 'iitb5 (25 ... ~b6 26 ~c7+ rl;xc7 27 l:ta7+ +-) and now: d3l) 26 'iWb7+ is tempting but not the right move-order; White only has a draw after 26 ... ttJb6 27 ~c7 ':d6 28 ~xb6 (28 .l:ta6?? cxb2! -+; 28 ~xd6?? cxb2! -+; 28 bxc3?? 'iWb2 29 l:ta6 l:tdl+ 30 ~g2 ':xh2+ -+) 28 ... l:txb6 29 'iWd7+ l:tc6 30 'iWb7+. d32) 26 ~c7! ttJb6 27 'iWxd8 'iWxb2 (27 ... ~c6? 28 ~xb6 cxb2 29 'iWc8+ ~d5 30 'iWd7+ and White wins) 28 'iWe8+ 'iitb4 29 .l:ta6 ttJd7 30 'iWa8! (30 'iWxd7 allows Black a perpetual check: 30 ... 'iWbl+ 31 ~g2 'iWe4+) 30 .. .'~b3 31 l:tal (D). Note the nice geometry in all this; 'iWe8-a8 and now the rook backwards, threatening ii'a4#. In some lines even bringing the queen back to e4 becomes an option. Now Black has two possibilities: d321) 31. .. ii'xal + 32 'iWxal c2 33 ~a5 with a further branch: d3211) 33 ... ~d6 34 ~c3! followed by 'iWb2+ and 'iWxc2+. d32l2) 33 ... ~h6 34 f4 ~xf4 35 ii'c3+! (35 gxf4? l:th3 36 ~d2 ':'d3 37 ~c1 l:tdl+ 38 ~g2 ':xcl 39 'iWxcl ttJxf6 and Black should make at least a draw; e.g., 40 h4 ttJd5 41 h5 ttJb4 42 h6 ttJd3 43 ii'n cl'iW 44 'iWxcl ttJxcl 45 h7 c3 46 h8ii' and now 46 ... ttJd3 47 ii'b8+ ttJb4 48 'iWa7 c4 or 46 ... c2!?) 35 ... 'iita4 36 gxf4 l:tc8 (36 ... .l:th3 37 ii'xc2+ rl;xa5 38 'iWd2+ picks up the knight) 37 'iWxc2+ ~xa5 38 'iWd2+ c3 39 ii'xc3+ ~b5 40 'iWb3+ ~a5 41 'iWxf7 +-. d3213) 33 ... ttJe5 34 ii'c3+ ~a4 35 'iWxc2+ 'iitxa5 36 'iWc3+ ~a4 37 ii'xe5 'iitb4 (for 37 ... ~b3 38 ii'd5 'iitb4 39 ii'xf7, see 37 ... ~b4) 38 'iWb8+ ~a3 39 'iWa7+ ~b4 40 'iWxf7 c3 41 'iWa2 ~h6 42 f7 and I suppose White should be able to win, although Black has some

THE MAIN LINE: 17 a3 35 counter-chances after, for example, 42 ... ig7!? followed by ... %:td8. d322) 31...~c2!? may be Black's best chance. Then after 32 %:tel!? Black can perhaps play 32 ... itJxf6!? or even 32 ... ~b3!?, while 32 .. :i'b3? runs into a mating-net following 33 'iii'e4+ ~b2 34 ii'bl + ~a3 35 'i'al + 'iii'a2 36 ii'xc3+ ~a4 37 ii'a5+ ~b3 38 l:te3+, etc., and 32 ... ih6? 33 'i'xh8 id2 34 %:tf1 ~b3 (34 .. :WWb7? 35 'i'h7+ +-) 35 ii'e8! c2 36 'iii'xd7 clii' 37 l:txcl ii'xcl + 38 ~g2 should win for White. 23 ii'xh5 cxb2 (D) w 24:adl 24 bxc5+ ixc5, threatening to play ... ixf2+, and 24 :a5 'iii'xb4 do not make much sense, so that leaves White with a choice of the text-move and two other rook moves. The text-move looks like the most logical as it opposes Black's rook on d8, thus making it more difficult for Black to free the d7- knight. The disadvantage is that Black may eventually be able to get a pawn to c2 and so attack the rook on dl. a) 24 :ael (this has the advantage, as just mentioned, that when a black pawn eventually arrives at c2 it does not attack the rook, but the disadvantage of not attacking the d7-knight is probably greater) 24 ... cxb4 25 'i'xf7 (25 ic7+ ~c6 26 ii'xb5+ ~xb5 27 .iixd8 c3 is an inferior version of the main line) 25 ... c3 26 'iii'e6+ ~b7 27 f7 c2 28 'iii'e8 l:tc8 29 h4 'iii'd3 30 ~h2 liJf6 -+ Sakaev-Se.lvanov, St Petersburg rpd 1997. b) 24 l:tabl cxb4!? 25 ic7+ ~c6 26 'i'xb5+ ~xb5 27 ixd8 (27 .u.xb2 %:tc8 -+) 27 ... c3 wins for Black. Black will simply play ...'iitc4-b3 followed by ... c2 or run the a-pawn all the way to a2, while White's kingside pawns are obviously not fast enough. 24 ... cxb4! As if one rook is not enough, Black sacrifices a further rook and a knight, leaving White with two rooks for only a single pawn! However, White will have to make use of his entire army to stop the massive pawn-front on the queenside. 25.iic7+ This is the most consistent approach; White accepts all the material Black offers. An interesting alternative, however, is 25 ie3+!?, when Black should probably refrain from 25 ....i.c5 26 l:td6+ ~c7 27 ixc5ltJxc5 (27... fixc5?? 28 l:txd7+! +-) 28 .u.xd8 ~xd8 29 ii'xf7, which seems far from clear, and instead play 25 ... ~c6! 26 ii'f3+ (26 ii'xf7 c3) 26 ... ~c7, and now White has two possibilities: 27

THE MAIN LINE: 17 a3 35<br />

counter-chances after, for example,<br />

42 ... ig7!? followed by ... %:td8.<br />

d322) 31...~c2!? may be Black's<br />

best chance. <strong>The</strong>n after 32 %:tel!? Black<br />

can perhaps play 32 ... itJxf6!? or even<br />

32 ... ~b3!?, while 32 .. :i'b3? runs into<br />

a mating-net following 33 'iii'e4+ ~b2<br />

34 ii'bl + ~a3 35 'i'al + 'iii'a2 36<br />

ii'xc3+ ~a4 37 ii'a5+ ~b3 38 l:te3+,<br />

etc., and 32 ... ih6? 33 'i'xh8 id2 34<br />

%:tf1 ~b3 (34 .. :WWb7? 35 'i'h7+ +-) 35<br />

ii'e8! c2 36 'iii'xd7 clii' 37 l:txcl<br />

ii'xcl + 38 ~g2 should win for White.<br />

23 ii'xh5 cxb2 (D)<br />

w<br />

24:adl<br />

24 bxc5+ ixc5, threatening to play<br />

... ixf2+, and 24 :a5 'iii'xb4 do not<br />

make much sense, so that leaves White<br />

with a choice of the text-move and two<br />

other rook moves. <strong>The</strong> text-move looks<br />

like the most logical as it opposes<br />

Black's rook on d8, thus making it<br />

more difficult for Black to free the d7-<br />

knight. <strong>The</strong> disadvantage is that Black<br />

may eventually be able to get a pawn<br />

to c2 and so attack the rook on dl.<br />

a) 24 :ael (this has the advantage,<br />

as just mentioned, that when a black<br />

pawn eventually arrives at c2 it does<br />

not attack the rook, but the disadvantage<br />

of not attacking the d7-knight is<br />

probably greater) 24 ... cxb4 25 'i'xf7<br />

(25 ic7+ ~c6 26 ii'xb5+ ~xb5 27<br />

.iixd8 c3 is an inferior version of the<br />

main line) 25 ... c3 26 'iii'e6+ ~b7 27 f7<br />

c2 28 'iii'e8 l:tc8 29 h4 'iii'd3 30 ~h2<br />

liJf6 -+ Sakaev-Se.lvanov, St Petersburg<br />

rpd 1997.<br />

b) 24 l:tabl cxb4!? 25 ic7+ ~c6<br />

26 'i'xb5+ ~xb5 27 ixd8 (27 .u.xb2<br />

%:tc8 -+) 27 ... c3 wins for Black. Black<br />

will simply play ...'iitc4-b3 followed<br />

by ... c2 or run the a-pawn all the way<br />

to a2, while White's kingside pawns<br />

are obviously not fast enough.<br />

24 ... cxb4!<br />

As if one rook is not enough, Black<br />

sacrifices a further rook and a knight,<br />

leaving White with two rooks for only<br />

a single pawn! However, White will<br />

have to make use of his entire army to<br />

stop the massive pawn-front on the<br />

queenside.<br />

25.iic7+<br />

This is the most consistent approach;<br />

White accepts all the material<br />

Black offers. An interesting alternative,<br />

however, is 25 ie3+!?, when<br />

Black should probably refrain from<br />

25 ....i.c5 26 l:td6+ ~c7 27 ixc5ltJxc5<br />

(27... fixc5?? 28 l:txd7+! +-) 28 .u.xd8<br />

~xd8 29 ii'xf7, which seems far from<br />

clear, and instead play 25 ... ~c6! 26<br />

ii'f3+ (26 ii'xf7 c3) 26 ... ~c7, and<br />

now White has two possibilities: 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!