21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />

w<br />

a131) 24 ~a6? is tempting but<br />

gives Blackjust the breathing space he<br />

needs. 24 ... ~f5! (an excellent defensive<br />

and attacking move) 25liJb6 (25<br />

h4 l:tc2 and 25 .l:.d2 'iWh3+ 26 ~f3<br />

'it'h5+ win for Black) 25 ... l:txh2+! 26<br />

'it>xh2 ~xf2+ 27 ~h3 (27 'it>h1 'it'f3+<br />

28 ~h2 l:tc2+ and White is mated)<br />

27 .. :ii'f5+ 28 g4 'it'f3+ 29 ~h4 ~f2+!<br />

(Black had a last chance to go wrong<br />

with 29 .. :ii'xf6+? 30 g5 ~f4+ 31 'it>h3,<br />

when there is nothing better than a<br />

perpetual check) 30 ~h3 ~e3+ 31<br />

'iti>h4 ~h6+ 32 'ifi>g3 i.d6+ 0-1 Van<br />

Wely-Piket, Wijk aan Zee 1994.<br />

a132) 24 'ii'xf7! liJe5 (24 ... liJxf6<br />

25liJb6 ':'h7 26liJd7+! wins for White<br />

- Van Wely) 25 ~d5 ~xf6 26 ~b5+<br />

'it>c7 27 ':'ac 1 + liJc6 28 l:tc2! l:th6 29<br />

'it'a6 'ifi>b8 30 liJb6! l:tc7 31 liJd7+<br />

l:txd7 32l:txd7 1-0 Galliamova-Buturin,<br />

L vov 1995.<br />

a2) 20 ... 'ii'xb4! 21 liJc3 (the endgame<br />

after 21 'ii'f3 'it'b7 22 'it'xb7+<br />

~xb7 23l:tac1liJb6 24liJxb6 axb6 25<br />

l:hc4 'ifi>c6 is probably even better for<br />

Black, as it is easier for Black to set his<br />

queens ide pawns in motion than it is<br />

for White to advance his phalanx on<br />

the kingside) 2l...dxc3 22 ':'xa7 ~6<br />

23 ~a4 is unclear according to some<br />

older analysis by Dolmatov but this<br />

obviously needs to be further investigated;<br />

e.g., 23 ... cxb2 and now White<br />

must act quickly, else Black consolidates<br />

with ... liJb8:<br />

a21) 24l:ta6? ~b7+ 25 ':'c6+ ~b8<br />

26 i.f4+ liJe5 27 .ltxe5+ (27 l:txe5<br />

i.d6 28l:te7 b1~ -+) 27 ... .ltd6 -+.<br />

a22) 24l:te8? liJb8 -+.<br />

a23) 24l:txd7 l:txd7 25 ~a8+ ~c7<br />

26 i.f4+ .ltd6 -+.<br />

a24) 24 .ltf4 .ltd6 25l:ta6 (25 i.xd6<br />

'iWxd6) 25 ... i.xf4! 26 l:txb6liJxb6 27<br />

'it'a6+ 'iti>c7 28 l:te7+ l:td7 29 ~b5!<br />

i.d6 30 J:hd7+ liJxd7 31 ~xb2liJb6<br />

and again White's chances of defending<br />

are poor.<br />

b) 19 liJxc5!? and then:<br />

b1) 19 ... i.xc5 20 i.xb7+ 'it'xb7?<br />

(20 ... ~xb7 21 bxc5 liJxc5 with compensation;<br />

this might also occur via<br />

note 'a' to White's 20th move) 21 bxc5<br />

liJe5 22 f4 liJd3, Ronneland-S.<strong>Pedersen</strong>,<br />

Gothenburg 1996, and now White<br />

wins with 23 'ii'a4! liJxb2 24 c6! ~b6<br />

25 'it'xa7 ~xa7 26l:txa7.<br />

b2) 19 ... i.xg2 20 'iti>xg2liJxc5 (or<br />

20 ... i.xc5 21 bxc5 ~b7+ 22 'ifi>gl<br />

transposing to 'b1') 21 bxc5 i.xc5 22<br />

~f3 'ifi>b8 is actually far from clear.<br />

White is a pawn up and even has a<br />

seemingly strong attack but if Black<br />

can repel this (which I think he can)<br />

the centre pawns should not be underestimated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!