Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
218 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />
game Novikov-Dreev, Lvov Z 1990;<br />
even after the superior 17 'ir'c1 'ir'xc 1 +<br />
18 l:txc1 liJc6 Dreev believes Black<br />
has the better prospects) 15 ... 'ir'd6 (after<br />
15 ... 'ir'g4 16liJe5! 'ir'xg2 17 l::tgl<br />
'ir'xf2 18 'ir'xa4+ liJd7 19 b4 cxd4 20<br />
l:txg7 White had a winning attack in<br />
Novikov-Strokov, Alicante 1992) 16<br />
'ir'xa4+ ~d7 17 'ir'c2 cxd4 18 c5 is<br />
good for White - Stohl.<br />
8 e4 dxe4 9 liJxe4 (D)<br />
B<br />
9 ... 'ir'f4<br />
This is clearly the most ambitious<br />
move for Black. By attacking the e4-<br />
knight, Black wins a tempo to prepare<br />
... e5. This is strategically very attractive<br />
for Black, since with an open position<br />
Black's bishops will soon excel.<br />
However, the disadvantage is that<br />
Black falls behind in development due<br />
to the many queen moves and the<br />
queen may also feel herself rather exposed<br />
so far forward.<br />
A safe alternative is 9 ... 'ir'f5 10 ~d3<br />
'ir'a5+; my intuition tells me that Black<br />
should be doing fairly OK here. For<br />
example, 11 liJc3 (11 ~f1, as in Rylander-Ziegler,<br />
Swedish Ch (Haninge)<br />
1997, is perhaps worth investigating;<br />
after 1l...~e7 12 l:tel liJf6 13 liJg3<br />
'ii'b6 14 'ir'c2 c5 15 d5 exd5 16 cxd5<br />
liJxd5 17 ~c4, Black came under<br />
pressure but was able to avert the danger<br />
after 17 ... liJb4 18 'ir'e4 liJc6 19<br />
~d5 'ir'c7 20 liJh5 g6 21 liJg3 ~f8)<br />
l1...e5! (11...~b4 12 0-0 ~xc3 13<br />
bxc3 0-0 14 l:tfel 'ir'c7 15 l:tadl b6 16<br />
~bl %:.d8 17 'ir'c2liJf8 18liJe5 ~b7<br />
19 f4!? gave White an edge in Jasnikowski-Roogaard,<br />
Arhus 1996) 120-0<br />
exd4 13 :'fel + ~e7 14 liJxd4liJc5 15<br />
'ir'c2 'ir'd8! with at least equality.<br />
IO~d3<br />
Timman's suggestion, 10 liJfd2!?,<br />
intending to fianchetto the bishop, was<br />
tried in Hillarp-Persson - Cu.Hansen,<br />
Reykjavik 1998, but Black was able to<br />
equalize following 10 ... ~e7 11 g3<br />
'ir'c712~g2e5! 13d5f514liJc3liJc5<br />
15 'ir'c2 e4 160-00-0 17 l:tadl ~f6 18<br />
liJb3 liJxb3 19 'ir'xb3 'ir'b6 20 'ir'a3<br />
~xc3 21 'ir'xc3 cxd5 22 l::txd5 ~e6 23<br />
l::td4 %:.ad8 24 l::tfdl :'xd4 25 l::txd4<br />
'ir'c5 26 b3 a5.<br />
IO ... eS!?<br />
10 ... ~e7 is more solid but slightly<br />
passive; e.g., 11 0-00-0 12 :'fel and<br />
now:<br />
a) 12 ... l:td8 13 :'adl 'ir'c7 14 ~bl<br />
liJf8 15 c5! b5 16 liJg3 ~d7 17 'ir'e3<br />
~e818~c2a519a3l:ta720h4witha<br />
promising position for White, Smyslov-Petrosian,<br />
Moscow 1971.<br />
b) 12 ... c5 13 :'adl cxd4 14liJxd4<br />
liJc5 (14... l::td8!? is probably a more