21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

game Novikov-Dreev, Lvov Z 1990;<br />

even after the superior 17 'ir'c1 'ir'xc 1 +<br />

18 l:txc1 liJc6 Dreev believes Black<br />

has the better prospects) 15 ... 'ir'd6 (after<br />

15 ... 'ir'g4 16liJe5! 'ir'xg2 17 l::tgl<br />

'ir'xf2 18 'ir'xa4+ liJd7 19 b4 cxd4 20<br />

l:txg7 White had a winning attack in<br />

Novikov-Strokov, Alicante 1992) 16<br />

'ir'xa4+ ~d7 17 'ir'c2 cxd4 18 c5 is<br />

good for White - Stohl.<br />

8 e4 dxe4 9 liJxe4 (D)<br />

B<br />

9 ... 'ir'f4<br />

This is clearly the most ambitious<br />

move for Black. By attacking the e4-<br />

knight, Black wins a tempo to prepare<br />

... e5. This is strategically very attractive<br />

for Black, since with an open position<br />

Black's bishops will soon excel.<br />

However, the disadvantage is that<br />

Black falls behind in development due<br />

to the many queen moves and the<br />

queen may also feel herself rather exposed<br />

so far forward.<br />

A safe alternative is 9 ... 'ir'f5 10 ~d3<br />

'ir'a5+; my intuition tells me that Black<br />

should be doing fairly OK here. For<br />

example, 11 liJc3 (11 ~f1, as in Rylander-Ziegler,<br />

Swedish Ch (Haninge)<br />

1997, is perhaps worth investigating;<br />

after 1l...~e7 12 l:tel liJf6 13 liJg3<br />

'ii'b6 14 'ir'c2 c5 15 d5 exd5 16 cxd5<br />

liJxd5 17 ~c4, Black came under<br />

pressure but was able to avert the danger<br />

after 17 ... liJb4 18 'ir'e4 liJc6 19<br />

~d5 'ir'c7 20 liJh5 g6 21 liJg3 ~f8)<br />

l1...e5! (11...~b4 12 0-0 ~xc3 13<br />

bxc3 0-0 14 l:tfel 'ir'c7 15 l:tadl b6 16<br />

~bl %:.d8 17 'ir'c2liJf8 18liJe5 ~b7<br />

19 f4!? gave White an edge in Jasnikowski-Roogaard,<br />

Arhus 1996) 120-0<br />

exd4 13 :'fel + ~e7 14 liJxd4liJc5 15<br />

'ir'c2 'ir'd8! with at least equality.<br />

IO~d3<br />

Timman's suggestion, 10 liJfd2!?,<br />

intending to fianchetto the bishop, was<br />

tried in Hillarp-Persson - Cu.Hansen,<br />

Reykjavik 1998, but Black was able to<br />

equalize following 10 ... ~e7 11 g3<br />

'ir'c712~g2e5! 13d5f514liJc3liJc5<br />

15 'ir'c2 e4 160-00-0 17 l:tadl ~f6 18<br />

liJb3 liJxb3 19 'ir'xb3 'ir'b6 20 'ir'a3<br />

~xc3 21 'ir'xc3 cxd5 22 l::txd5 ~e6 23<br />

l::td4 %:.ad8 24 l::tfdl :'xd4 25 l::txd4<br />

'ir'c5 26 b3 a5.<br />

IO ... eS!?<br />

10 ... ~e7 is more solid but slightly<br />

passive; e.g., 11 0-00-0 12 :'fel and<br />

now:<br />

a) 12 ... l:td8 13 :'adl 'ir'c7 14 ~bl<br />

liJf8 15 c5! b5 16 liJg3 ~d7 17 'ir'e3<br />

~e818~c2a519a3l:ta720h4witha<br />

promising position for White, Smyslov-Petrosian,<br />

Moscow 1971.<br />

b) 12 ... c5 13 :'adl cxd4 14liJxd4<br />

liJc5 (14... l::td8!? is probably a more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!