Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
214 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />
b) 9 ... g6 (D) is the most popular<br />
set-up in the main lines so why not<br />
here? <strong>The</strong> only difference in the structure<br />
is that here White has a c-pawn,<br />
whereas in the main lines he has an e<br />
pawn. White has several options:<br />
bI) 10 i.d3 i.g7 11 0-0 0-0 12<br />
:tfe1 c5 13 d5 ttJb6 14 d6 (a doubleedged<br />
decision as it is far from clear<br />
whether this pawn will be strong or<br />
weak; however, White is virtually<br />
obliged to try it since Black obviously<br />
solves all his problems if he is allowed<br />
to exchange on d5, when the lightsquared<br />
bishop wakes up) 14 ... 'iWd8!<br />
(this is much stronger than 14 ... e5 15<br />
'iWxe5 ir'xe5 16 tDxe5 l:r.d8 17 l:r.ad1<br />
l:r.xd6 18 tDb5, which gave White the<br />
initiative in Yermolinsky-Serper, Chicago<br />
1996) 15 'iWf4 i.d7! 16 :tad1<br />
i.c6 17 i.e4? (17 tDe5 'iWxd6 18 tDxg6<br />
ir'xf4 19 tDxf4 is hardly a problem for<br />
Black but is definitely an improvement<br />
over the game continuation) 17 ... tDxc4<br />
18 i.xc6 tDxb2 19 i.xb7 l:r.b8! and<br />
Black regains his material investment<br />
with interest, Atalik-Bacrot, Wijk aan<br />
Zee 1997.<br />
b2) 10 h4!? is more than just a<br />
hacker's move; since Black will most<br />
likely be thinking of castling kingside<br />
it makes some sense to provoke a<br />
weakness on that side. Now:<br />
b21) 10 ... h5 11 i.d3 i.h6 12 0-0<br />
0-013 :tad1 :td814 c5 l:r.b8 (14 ... 'iWf4?!<br />
15 'iWe2 i.g7 16 tDe4 tDf6 17 tDd6<br />
tDg4 18 g3 'iWf6 19 tDg5 tDh6 20 i.c4<br />
± Kruppa-Mukhametov, Berlin 1997)<br />
15 'iWe2 b6 16 tDe4 'iWe7 17 b4 i.f4 18<br />
g3 i.c7 19 i.c4 a5 20 a3 ;!; Matveeva<br />
Prudnikova, Russian wom Ch (Elista)<br />
1997.<br />
b22) 10 ... i.g7 11 h5 g5 12 i.d3 c5<br />
13 d5.!De5 (13. .. ~d8!?) 14 tDxe5 'iWxe5<br />
150-0-0 'iWxe4 16 tDxe4 exd5 17 cxd5<br />
i.d4 18 tDd6+ (18 :thel ~f8 19 f3<br />
i.d7 is fine for Black) 18 ... ~e7 19<br />
tDb5 i.e5 20 :the 1 ~f6 21 tDc3 i.g4<br />
22 i.e2 i.f5 23 i.d3 i.g4 24 i.e2 i.f5<br />
25 i.d3 i.g4 1/2-1/2 Matveeva-Galliamova,<br />
Russian wom Ch (Elista) 1997.<br />
b3) 10 c5 i.g7 11 'iWe3 0-0 12 tDe4<br />
is one of White's best set-ups but the<br />
move-order is inaccurate because of<br />
12 ... 'iWd8! (the threat of ... 'iWa5+ almost<br />
forces White's next move; otherwise<br />
Black easily undermines the<br />
centre) 13 0-0-0 (13 l:r.dl 'iWa5+ 14<br />
tDc3 e5 favours Black - Lutz) 13 ... b6<br />
14 i.c4 tDf6 15 :td2 tDxe4 16 'iWxe4<br />
bxc5 17 dxc5 'iWa5 18 'iWe3 i.a6 19<br />
i.xa6 'iWxa6 + Bacrot-Nogueiras, Havana<br />
1998.<br />
b4) 10 'iWe3 i.g7 11 tDe4 (this is a<br />
more accurate move-order since now