Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />
but White has to be praised for finding<br />
a way to complicate things) 20 ... c4 21<br />
dxe6 fxe6 22 .tc2 (22 .tdl tiJc5 +)<br />
22 ... 1Wxb2 23 1We4 Ac7, Cebalo-Scekie.<br />
Nova Gorica 1997, and now White<br />
could claim reasonable compensation<br />
with 24 Abl 'i'xa2 25 lhb5 tiJf8 26<br />
:eb 1 - Sceki6.<br />
12 dS tiJb6 13 ~b3<br />
If White wishes to avoid the forthcoming<br />
endgame he should try 13 tiJd2<br />
but Black's chances are not worse:<br />
a) 13 ...'ii'g5 14 'ii'e2 0-0 15 l:tfdl<br />
~h3 16 f3 Aad8 17 ~b3 ~c8 18 tiJc4<br />
tiJxc4 19 ~xc4 with an edge for<br />
White, Piket-Van der Wiel, Dutch Ch<br />
(Rotterdam) 1998.<br />
b) 13 ... 0-0 14 a4 l:td8 15 a5 tiJxc4<br />
16 tiJxc4 'Ii' g5 17 'ii'b3 ~h3 18 tiJe3<br />
':ab8 19 l:tacl ~f8 20 ~hl ~d7 21<br />
tiJe2 cxd5 22 tiJxd5 ~e6 was fine for<br />
Black in Piket -Kramnik, Linares 1997.<br />
13 ... ~g4!<br />
<strong>The</strong> resulting endgame is probably<br />
a tiny bit better for White but Black<br />
should still play this, for after 13 ... 0-0<br />
14 h3! the bishop is deprived of much<br />
of its scope and Black has no convincing<br />
counterplay to contain White's<br />
passed d-pawn; e.g., 14 ...':d8 15 'ii'e2<br />
~d7 16 Afdl ':ac8 (16... c5 17 tiJd2<br />
tiJc8 18 ~a4 Ab8 19 ~xd7 ':xd7 20<br />
a4 ± Anastasian-Pelletier, Pula Echt<br />
1997) 17 a4 cxd5 18 ~xd5 (18 exd5!)<br />
18 ... tiJxd519 tiJxd5 'li'e6 with roughly<br />
equal chances, Shulman-Ippolito, Linares<br />
1997.<br />
14 h3 ~xf3 15 'iixf3 'ii'xf3 16 gxf3<br />
~e717 dxc6 bxc6 (D)<br />
White's chances ought to be slightly<br />
better as the c6-pawn is weaker than<br />
the doubled f-pawns. However, Black<br />
has had few problems defending this<br />
position in practice. Both sides have<br />
little chance of generating an attack,<br />
so here the opposite-coloured bishops<br />
are often only a drawing factor.<br />
w<br />
IS':ac1!?<br />
In the game Khalifman-Akopian,<br />
Erevan 1996, White used the other<br />
rook and immediately began redeploying<br />
the knight: 18 l:.fc1 l:.hd8 19<br />
tiJd 1 l:td6 20 l:tc3 a5!? 21 tiJe3 h5 22<br />
Ibcl a4 23 ~dl ~d7 24 ~f1 ~h6<br />
with a roughly equal position.<br />
IS ..• l:tabS<br />
If Black embarks on the plan chosen<br />
by Akopian, White can here exchange<br />
a rook with l:tfdl. Swapping<br />
one pair of rooks actually increases<br />
the pressure as Black will then often<br />
end up with two weaknesses (c6 and<br />
f7). Take, for example, a position with<br />
a white rook on the c-file and one pair<br />
of rooks and the knights exchanged