Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE MAIN LINE: 7 e3 liJd7 8 i..d3 dxc4 197<br />
B<br />
11...0-0 12 e5 'ike7 gives White a<br />
space advantage, but has a strategically<br />
interesting aspect. While most<br />
middlegames are slightly superior for<br />
White, Black will be quite happy if he<br />
reaches an endgame, for then the e<br />
pawn will show to be more of a weakness.<br />
White's main strategy therefore<br />
fIrst involves dissuading the ... c5 advance:<br />
a) 13 'ike2!? and now:<br />
a1) After 13 ... c5?!, Kamsky suggests<br />
14 l:tad1 cxd4 15 .l:.xd4 with an<br />
edge for White, while he does not like<br />
14 d5! in view of 14 ... ttJxe5 IS ttJxeS<br />
exdS, when 16 ttJxg6 'iVxe2 17 .ixe2<br />
fxg6 18 ttJxdS .ixb2 19 .l:.ab1 .if6!<br />
gives Black a clear advantage, but why<br />
not 16 ttJf3 instead? I can hardly believe<br />
that Black's compensation is suffIcient<br />
after 16 ... 'iVxe2 17 i.xe2.<br />
Hence 14 dS! looks much easier.<br />
a2) 13 ... .l:.d8 14 .l:.fe1 transposes to<br />
'b2' below.<br />
a3) 13 ... b6 14 l:tfe1 and now:<br />
a31) 14 ... a61Si.d3(lSttJe4c5=)<br />
lS ... i.b7 16 i.e4 l:ta7 (16 ... l:tab8!?)<br />
171bc1 bS 18 'ilVe3!? (trying to take<br />
advantage of the relatively strange position<br />
of Black's rook on a7) 18 ... cS<br />
19 dS! ttJxeS 20 ttJxeS i.xe5 21 dxe6!,<br />
Kamsky-Kramnik, Lucerne Wcht 1993,<br />
and now according to Kramnik Black<br />
could equalize with 21...~g7!. In fact<br />
Black certainly looks no worse after<br />
22 i.xb7 i.d4 23 'iVg3 'ikxb7.<br />
a32) 14 ... a5!? IS ttJe4?! (Kamsky's<br />
plan with IS i.d3 is worth considering)<br />
IS ... cS! 16 dxcS bxcS 17 ltJed2<br />
(17 ttJd6? ttJxe5!) 17 ... l:td8 18 l:tad1<br />
i.b7 = Hulak-B.Lalic, Yugoslav Ch<br />
1989.<br />
b) 13 .l:.e1 with the following possibilities:<br />
bl) Kramnik's plan with 13 ... b6 is<br />
here best met by 14 ttJe4, with the<br />
point 14 ... l:td8 IS ttJd6 cS 16 dS ttJxeS<br />
17 ttJxc8 ttJxf3+ 18 'iVxf3 l:taxc8 19<br />
dxe6±.<br />
b2) 13 ... .l:.d8 14 'ilVe2 and then:<br />
b21) 14 ... ttJb6 IS i.b3 cS 16 dxcS<br />
'ilVxcs 17 ttJe4 'ilVb4 18 ttJd6 with an<br />
edge for White, Korchnoi-Anic, Enghien<br />
1997.<br />
b22) 14 ... bS IS i.d3 i.b7 16 i.e4<br />
.l:.ab8 17 .l:.ac1 ;t Van Wely-Magerramov,<br />
Tilburg 1992.<br />
b3) 13 ... bS!? 14 i.b3 (14 i.d3 is<br />
better; White needs his bishop on e4<br />
in the event of Black playing ... cS)<br />
14 ... i.b7 IS l:tc1 l:tfd8 16 'ilVe2 'ilVb4!?<br />
(I do not see anything wrong with the<br />
immediate 16 ... cS!; e.g., 17 ttJxbS<br />
i.xf3 18 'ir'xf3 cxd4 19 ttJxd4 ltJxeS)<br />
17 ttJe4 c5 18 ttJd6 l:tab8 19 ltJxb7<br />
.l:.xb7 20 d5! (it is not an easy position,