21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MAIN LINE: 7 e3 liJd7 8 i..d3 dxc4 197<br />

B<br />

11...0-0 12 e5 'ike7 gives White a<br />

space advantage, but has a strategically<br />

interesting aspect. While most<br />

middlegames are slightly superior for<br />

White, Black will be quite happy if he<br />

reaches an endgame, for then the e­<br />

pawn will show to be more of a weakness.<br />

White's main strategy therefore<br />

fIrst involves dissuading the ... c5 advance:<br />

a) 13 'ike2!? and now:<br />

a1) After 13 ... c5?!, Kamsky suggests<br />

14 l:tad1 cxd4 15 .l:.xd4 with an<br />

edge for White, while he does not like<br />

14 d5! in view of 14 ... ttJxe5 IS ttJxeS<br />

exdS, when 16 ttJxg6 'iVxe2 17 .ixe2<br />

fxg6 18 ttJxdS .ixb2 19 .l:.ab1 .if6!<br />

gives Black a clear advantage, but why<br />

not 16 ttJf3 instead? I can hardly believe<br />

that Black's compensation is suffIcient<br />

after 16 ... 'iVxe2 17 i.xe2.<br />

Hence 14 dS! looks much easier.<br />

a2) 13 ... .l:.d8 14 .l:.fe1 transposes to<br />

'b2' below.<br />

a3) 13 ... b6 14 l:tfe1 and now:<br />

a31) 14 ... a61Si.d3(lSttJe4c5=)<br />

lS ... i.b7 16 i.e4 l:ta7 (16 ... l:tab8!?)<br />

171bc1 bS 18 'ilVe3!? (trying to take<br />

advantage of the relatively strange position<br />

of Black's rook on a7) 18 ... cS<br />

19 dS! ttJxeS 20 ttJxeS i.xe5 21 dxe6!,<br />

Kamsky-Kramnik, Lucerne Wcht 1993,<br />

and now according to Kramnik Black<br />

could equalize with 21...~g7!. In fact<br />

Black certainly looks no worse after<br />

22 i.xb7 i.d4 23 'iVg3 'ikxb7.<br />

a32) 14 ... a5!? IS ttJe4?! (Kamsky's<br />

plan with IS i.d3 is worth considering)<br />

IS ... cS! 16 dxcS bxcS 17 ltJed2<br />

(17 ttJd6? ttJxe5!) 17 ... l:td8 18 l:tad1<br />

i.b7 = Hulak-B.Lalic, Yugoslav Ch<br />

1989.<br />

b) 13 .l:.e1 with the following possibilities:<br />

bl) Kramnik's plan with 13 ... b6 is<br />

here best met by 14 ttJe4, with the<br />

point 14 ... l:td8 IS ttJd6 cS 16 dS ttJxeS<br />

17 ttJxc8 ttJxf3+ 18 'iVxf3 l:taxc8 19<br />

dxe6±.<br />

b2) 13 ... .l:.d8 14 'ilVe2 and then:<br />

b21) 14 ... ttJb6 IS i.b3 cS 16 dxcS<br />

'ilVxcs 17 ttJe4 'ilVb4 18 ttJd6 with an<br />

edge for White, Korchnoi-Anic, Enghien<br />

1997.<br />

b22) 14 ... bS IS i.d3 i.b7 16 i.e4<br />

.l:.ab8 17 .l:.ac1 ;t Van Wely-Magerramov,<br />

Tilburg 1992.<br />

b3) 13 ... bS!? 14 i.b3 (14 i.d3 is<br />

better; White needs his bishop on e4<br />

in the event of Black playing ... cS)<br />

14 ... i.b7 IS l:tc1 l:tfd8 16 'ilVe2 'ilVb4!?<br />

(I do not see anything wrong with the<br />

immediate 16 ... cS!; e.g., 17 ttJxbS<br />

i.xf3 18 'ir'xf3 cxd4 19 ttJxd4 ltJxeS)<br />

17 ttJe4 c5 18 ttJd6 l:tab8 19 ltJxb7<br />

.l:.xb7 20 d5! (it is not an easy position,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!